There Are No Girls on the Internet - December 29, 2023


From George Santos to Anna Delvy, do we reward scammers for their cons? — BEST OF TANGOTI

Topics
Ruby Freeman and Shay Moss are American heroes — BEST OF TANGOTI Why trad wife content is taking over social media right now — BEST OF TANGOTI

Episode Stats


Length

57 minutes

Words per minute

173.49

Word count

9,978

Sentence count

390

Harmful content

Misogyny

15

sentences flagged

Toxicity

2

sentences flagged

Hate speech

5

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.940 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:38.460 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:43.680 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:47.300 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:00:51.020 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:54.640 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:58.720 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:06.600 George Santos, disgraced former congressional representative and professional scammer, was voted out of Congress.
00:01:13.880 And rather than slinking into the shadows, he's doing sit-down interviews and allegedly making bank on Cameo.
00:01:20.580 Now, if you believe him, he says that he's already made more money since being kicked out of Congress than he ever would have as an elected official.
00:01:28.660 When asked during an interview by Z-Way what it would take for him to just go away, he said,
00:01:33.160 stop inviting me to events, but you'll never do that because you want the content.
00:01:37.760 And honestly, he's kind of right.
00:01:40.820 So does crime pay?
00:01:42.860 That's the question that Rachel Deloish-Williams asked when we sat down together last year. 1.00
00:01:46.780 Rachel was scammed out of thousands of dollars by notorious fake German heiress Anna Delvey.
00:01:51.980 And she asks, are we incentivizing scamming as a culture?
00:01:55.920 Listen to our episode from 2022 and find out. 1.00
00:01:59.800 She definitely committed so many offenses that harmed real life people.
00:02:05.820 So I think to flatten something like that into this like very frivolous, like fun, glossy slog of a TV show,
00:02:13.540 we'll stop, I don't know, dot, dot, dot.
00:02:16.780 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unblossed Creative.
00:02:28.480 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:02:33.660 We spend a lot of time on this show talking about lies and the Internet.
00:02:38.020 And I have to say that part of the reason why I personally work on disinformation issues
00:02:41.920 is because of my intense fascination in things that are not true.
00:02:46.360 How do lies function?
00:02:48.120 Why do we believe them?
00:02:49.740 Who profits off of them?
00:02:51.480 And how do they shape our world?
00:02:53.600 So in 2018, when the story first broke about the fake German heiress Anna Delvey,
00:02:58.440 I was, of course, fascinated.
00:03:01.240 Anna, real name Anna Sorokin, had been scamming investors, hotels, even her own friends, 0.65
00:03:07.600 in pursuit of opening an art foundation and private club called the Anna Delvey Foundation.
00:03:13.540 The club, like the millions of dollars of family money that Anna said that she was supposedly worth, never materialized.
00:03:21.200 Anna's former friend, Rachel Deloach Williams, first introduced the world to Anna after she wrote about their disastrous trip to Marrakesh.
00:03:29.640 Anna initially agreed to pay for the trip, but never managed to put down a working credit card at the pricey villa where they were staying.
00:03:36.820 When hotel staff insisted that somebody put down a functioning credit card,
00:03:40.760 Rachel was pressured into putting the cost of the entire trip,
00:03:44.660 $62,000, more than a year of her salary, on her work and personal credit cards.
00:03:51.220 Now, Anna assured her that she would wire her the money to pay her back, but she never did.
00:03:56.220 In the end, Rachel helped lead police to Anna's whereabouts,
00:04:00.660 which led to Anna's arrest and conviction for one count of attempted grand larceny,
00:04:05.180 three counts of grand larceny, and four counts of theft of services related to her various scams.
00:04:12.180 But she was found not guilty of the $62,000 Rachel was out for the trip.
00:04:18.940 Last month, Netflix released Inventing Anna, a fictionalized, very sympathetic retelling of her con,
00:04:26.000 based on the reporting of Jessica Pressler at New York Magazine.
00:04:29.820 Anna's crimes were so flashy and outlandish, it was hard not to pay attention.
00:04:34.220 And that, Rachel says, is kind of part of the scam.
00:04:39.400 In her book, My Friend Anna, Rachel writes,
00:04:43.280 I have come to understand that your attention is an investment.
00:04:46.780 Giving someone your attention is the act of being influenced,
00:04:49.800 whether or not you're aware of it in the moment.
00:04:52.080 And especially in this age of constant simulation,
00:04:55.060 with endless people and stories competing for your clicks, likes, follows, and time,
00:05:00.280 your attention has value.
00:05:02.080 It has power.
00:05:03.700 It's worth something.
00:05:05.780 It can even put money in someone's pocket.
00:05:08.660 Be careful where you spend it and understand the cost.
00:05:12.180 I spoke to Rachel about why our current digital media landscape is presenting a golden age for scammers and what that means for all of us.
00:05:19.960 And just one quick note, we were recording on a noisy day in Brooklyn.
00:05:23.740 So the audio quality might not be what you're used to from this podcast.
00:05:27.500 Why do you think this is?
00:05:29.100 Why do you think we're in this era where people cannot get enough of people who lie and scam
00:05:34.160 and steal and cheat others?
00:05:36.080 Yeah, it's a good question.
00:05:38.460 And I've certainly asked myself the same one.
00:05:41.580 But I think I have a kind of unique vantage point in that I lived through like a con firsthand.
00:05:47.860 And I know that's sort of how it works.
00:05:50.140 It's sort of this larger than life flashy illusion, like a magic trick that is meant to grab your attention so that while you're busy sort of puzzling over it, you know, whatever sort of business is going on behind the scenes can can happen without too much focus or analysis, I suppose.
00:06:09.360 So I think there's a fascination with, you know, tricksters and with like it is in many ways like like watching a magician at work and so that people want to want to watch as like a voyeur to understand where this light of hand occurred, how someone fell for it.
00:06:26.340 And, you know, especially in this age where it is kind of hard with the Internet and with all of these different media forms coming at us to discern between fact and fiction, to get to watch something in an arena that seems pretty low stakes because it's billed as entertainment.
00:06:44.420 I think people enjoy, maybe like they don't think about it that hard, but they enjoy getting to see something that straddles that divide on purpose.
00:06:53.840 In talking about the Netflix show Inventing Anna, you write really compellingly about this, that one of the reasons why the show is kind of dangerous is that it does sort of aim to straddle that line.
00:07:06.980 Each episode starts with, this is a completely true story, except for the things that are fictionalized.
00:07:12.360 And I think as a viewer, you might not really know that you're acting like it can be used as a way to heavily, deeply fictionalize something that actually people actually experience.
00:07:25.200 And I think that the purposeful straddling of that line of facts and fiction and kind of blending them can be a little bit dangerous because the stakes do feel low.
00:07:33.760 It just feels like entertainment.
00:07:35.220 Exactly.
00:07:36.060 I mean, you've said it in some ways better than I could say it myself, but that's exactly right.
00:07:41.080 And it's kind of disheartening. I mean, I appreciate that you're speaking up about this, too. And other people are certainly paying attention now. But I think part of the reason I chose to continue talking about this, which, you know, this story, which is well and truly behind me and I would love to move on from and not be discussing today.
00:08:00.900 But the reason I'm speaking up is because I see something happening that sets a precedent that I do think is troubling and that I do think is dangerous.
00:08:08.040 And I do think it requires viewers to ask questions probably more so than we can expect a media company who profits from it to do.
00:08:17.260 But the Netflix show Inventing Anna does do this thing where it like sticks that label up as a as a disclaimer, but it blends, you know, factual information with things that are completely made up, as it says it does.
00:08:32.380 But it makes viewers go online, look things up, see that some things are true.
00:08:36.320 And then that creates this like foundation of credibility that allows them to think, well, if this is true, I believe the narrative that they've woven with, you know, this big, big budget production and all this like whistles and bells.
00:08:49.360 And like, how compelling is that? You know, storytelling is really powerful.
00:08:53.080 And I think that's why it requires a level of responsibility.
00:08:56.320 I think people are apt to believe things that they watch in stories or that they connect to in terms of a narrative more than sometimes dry facts that they hear on the news.
00:09:06.460 Yeah. You know, you describe this in your book in talking about the way that Anna's crimes have been glamorized, in part by places like Netflix, that you see it as a big picture problem.
00:09:17.080 Is that sort of what you are referring to, like that sort of the big picture problem that you're describing?
00:09:22.060 Yeah, that I think specifically, I have become very mindful of the ways that our attention can be commodified. So when Anna was released from prison, the first time before she was detained by ICE, I was asked to do a bunch of media appearances commenting on her release.
00:09:42.200 and I declined because I was like, why, you know, why would I do that? I've already written the
00:09:46.860 book. It's out. I've moved on. I have no interest in sort of coming out and speaking or hypothesizing
00:09:52.760 about what somebody may or may not do after jail. Like she's did, she did her time. Like all we can
00:09:57.780 do is like hope that, you know, Godspeed, like I hope this doesn't happen again. But while I was
00:10:03.080 declining things, I saw that she was being given various media platforms and that would be fine
00:10:09.360 if she had something productive to say, but it felt as though these different outlets were just
00:10:15.480 giving her space to rationalize her behavior, to continue peddling belief in this, you know,
00:10:22.500 fictional, in my mind, like this fictional intention, you know, like I was really going
00:10:28.260 to do it. I didn't mean to never pay someone back. Like all of these things that I believed
00:10:33.040 for far too long and that she's now getting to sell to a broader audience. So as I was watching
00:10:38.460 that, what I realized is our attention to her, our attention to people like this, our attention to
00:10:45.380 things is what gives them influence and power. So when I say it's a big picture problem, I think
00:10:51.960 what I'm really referring to is the attention economy and the way that we think we're watching
00:10:57.200 something just without stakes, but our viewership in itself is actually something that does have a
00:11:04.240 monetary value and also a value in terms of our our own behavior our beliefs um and and how
00:11:11.780 how we move through the world you write about how anna will be given these like
00:11:18.660 very convivial interviews where it's clearly the interviewer was like wow this anna this anna
00:11:24.520 delvey like can you can you can you believe it and they would have these buzzy headlines and
00:11:29.280 I guess part of me is like, how can you print the words of somebody who lies? If you're a journalist
00:11:37.580 or a reporter, somebody asked, oh, are you going to try to talk to Anna for this interview? And I
00:11:41.720 was like, why would I? Why would I want to talk to somebody who lies? Yeah. I mean, I think there's
00:11:47.260 a way to do it. There's actually a 60 Minutes Australia interview. I thought it was, I mean,
00:11:52.240 it's of course still kind of sensationalized around the edges, but at least the viewer had
00:11:56.880 a very firm uh like framing device in which he you know it's it's the same way i think the most
00:12:04.120 successful interviews with someone like donald trump were conducted where you have a baseline
00:12:08.160 foundation of truth fiction you know some some degree of commonly shared right wrong when it
00:12:15.580 comes to like ethics or reality and you you actually try to hold someone to account that's
00:12:20.080 interesting and and then i think it's actually like journalism um but i think what i do find
00:12:26.480 puzzling or i understand it but i think i find it you know problematic is is the way that so much of
00:12:33.400 our media and our news sources today are driven by not by quality but traffic so so so places are
00:12:40.280 incentivized to come up with these clickbait headlines with these really sensationalized
00:12:45.300 recaps of you know you know events that in real life were were interesting but you know are so
00:12:51.900 much more interesting if you embellish these details it and it was troubling for me because
00:12:57.380 watching like even during the trial the way people were reporting on what she was wearing or like
00:13:01.940 you know oh she's so audacious can you believe like like yeah she is that's what you know that's
00:13:07.180 what drew me into the friendship friendship too here's this person you can't quite figure out like
00:13:12.080 She's, she's wacky. She's really confident. She's doing these, these things that kind of break your brain and make you sit there and stare and kind of ask questions. But that's how it works. Like, while we're doing that, like, no one's asking, where's the money coming from? Like, who's, what are the, what's the impact of this person's behavior and why does it matter?
00:13:32.580 According to BBC News, which filed a Freedom of Information Act request,
00:13:36.900 Netflix reportedly started paying Anna before she had ever even gone to trial.
00:13:41.420 They paid $30,000, which went toward paying her lawyer.
00:13:45.520 Then, Netflix paid for the rights to adapt Anna's story into the show Inventing Anna.
00:13:50.300 In total, Netflix reportedly paid Anna $320,000.
00:13:56.380 Now, that money was initially frozen to give her victims a chance to sue.
00:14:01.300 And even though some of her victims did file claims for a portion of those funds,
00:14:05.340 whatever is left over that didn't go to paying the lawyers just goes right to Anna.
00:14:09.760 And what did Anna spend that money on? 1.00
00:14:12.680 Designer clothing. 1.00
00:14:14.140 You've written about the fact that Netflix paid Anna. 1.00
00:14:18.180 You know, it's a little bit of one of those things where she used the money to pay legal fees.
00:14:24.000 However, I would argue that it's not like, it's not like, I mean, they're her legal fees.
00:14:28.760 And so if somebody gives me money and I'm like, oh, I use that money to pay my bills, I feel like it's a bit of a stretch to say that I'm not benefiting from that.
00:14:36.060 But whatever. Do you feel that Netflix is contributing to an ecosystem where lying and scamming can be financially rewarding and financially lucrative?
00:14:46.020 Yeah, I mean, unfortunately, this is like very cut and dry evidence of that because they moved so quickly to to option the story that they ended up paying Anna before her case even went to trial, before she even went to trial.
00:15:02.500 And that that's the money that was used initially to pay her criminal, the criminal defense lawyer whom she chose to pay his his like initial fees.
00:15:12.580 And then beyond that, they started their writer's room the day that the trial began. There were Netflix writers in the courtroom. Her lawyer was representing her in her entertainment dealings at the same time he was representing her in a criminal trial.
00:15:27.620 and I knew that at the time which is part of why I think I went into it feeling I mean of course I
00:15:33.720 was also so raw and I was all so fresh and I was so emotional way more you know I wish I had I had
00:15:40.080 had like a little more distance from everything or a little more composure but I just felt
00:15:44.020 frankly so gaslighted by the fact that I was being accused of using my testimony as content for
00:15:50.040 entertainment quote unquote because I was writing a book um while at the same time I knew that
00:15:56.060 everybody there was doing that. And I actually wasn't like, you know, I was left $60,000 in
00:16:01.720 debt. Like I was just finding a way to like heal, to understand, to move forward. So yeah,
00:16:09.080 it was really topsy-turvy. And I do think Netflix certainly not only influenced the criminal justice
00:16:14.040 proceedings, but also gave this person who, you know, we can all think what we want to think,
00:16:19.740 But looking on paper at her past actions, she is a convicted criminal and they have created for her a glamorized version of her crimes, given her a platform, given her an audience and set her up with a viewership that she can now continue to monopolize.
00:16:39.140 Like she will continue to make money on the notoriety that she achieved through committing criminal acts.
00:16:48.140 Let's take a quick break. 1.00
00:16:49.740 get bell pure fiber internet with crave netflix and disney plus from 94 a month price guaranteed
00:17:01.040 for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca for details
00:17:06.060 and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and not thinking
00:17:11.460 about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming
00:17:16.360 music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster iheart's twice as large as the next
00:17:21.540 two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear your message plus only iheart can
00:17:26.560 extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio think podcasting can help your business
00:17:31.220 think iheart streaming radio and podcasting call 844-844-iheart to get started that's 844-844-iheart
00:17:40.040 if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality welcome home
00:17:46.220 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:17:58.680 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:18:05.800 I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. So obsessed.
00:18:08.940 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:18:15.340 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:18:23.240 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:18:32.420 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:18:38.420 See you between the pages.
00:18:45.240 And we're back.
00:18:47.880 Scammers are not a new phenomena.
00:18:50.320 They've always existed.
00:18:51.700 But in the age of streaming services and social media,
00:18:54.780 it seems like we're living in a golden age for scammers,
00:18:58.380 where if your scam is flashy enough
00:19:00.300 and captures our attention in just the right kind of way,
00:19:03.920 what might have started as a scam
00:19:05.560 can be laundered into a more legitimate platform.
00:19:08.940 For instance, Netflix's The Tinder Swindler,
00:19:11.800 a documentary that chronicles Simon Levev,
00:19:15.100 who posed as a wealthy jet-set playboy
00:19:17.300 by duping women that he met on the dating app Tinder
00:19:20.640 out of thousands of dollars.
00:19:23.360 Levev's con involved convincing women
00:19:25.140 to loan him money through outlandish lies.
00:19:29.760 And since the documentary,
00:19:31.300 Levev is clearly trying to parlay the attention
00:19:33.800 and notoriety from his con
00:19:35.400 into a pathway of a more legitimate, not to mention lucrative, platform.
00:19:40.880 So as Anna once intimated to a BBC reporter,
00:19:44.440 it's kind of hard to say that crime doesn't pay
00:19:46.580 because it seems like in our current media landscape, it kind of does.
00:19:51.420 Do you think that we live in a climate where people who scam and lie,
00:19:56.840 people like, like she was, as you said, she was convicted of this.
00:19:59.460 It's not like it's some big secret.
00:20:00.540 It's not like it's you saying this.
00:20:02.160 These are just the facts of what happened.
00:20:04.900 And I feel like we are allowing pathways to legitimize these people.
00:20:10.960 And like, you know, maybe it started as a con and it started as a scam.
00:20:14.060 But by the end of it, you'll have money and an audience and people who are interested to see what happens next.
00:20:19.580 And that you can sort of legitimize that.
00:20:21.340 Like, for instance, if you watch the Netflix documentary, The Tinder Swindler, the scammer in that case, Simone, Simon.
00:20:29.120 Simon LeVav, I think.
00:20:30.700 Something like that. Yeah.
00:20:31.680 But, you know, he got this big bump in social media followers and also is making pretty good money on Cameo right now.
00:20:40.580 He's charging $300 for a personal shout out and $1,400 for a business shout out.
00:20:45.820 He has a manager.
00:20:46.640 He's talked about wanting to do a podcast.
00:20:48.020 You know, are we creating, is the media creating pathways for folks to legitimize what started out as a scam or a con or a lie?
00:21:00.680 Absolutely. And I think, you know, looking back, it's actually a really interesting book about this called The Attention Merchants by this man called Tim Wu, with the rise of reality television and this model of normal person to celebrity as like a model for business.
00:21:19.140 And then it evolved into social media where people not, you know, they could, it wasn't like winning the lottery. Everybody too could do this if they found a way to brand themselves to market themselves that was compelling enough to attract attention. But as we've just realized, unless you have some kind of outlandish, loud shtick or personality, like no one is really paying attention.
00:21:41.700 And I think this is like now evolved into curation, not just through digital media, but here are these people and these people have always existed, mind you, but we live in an age where that kind of behavior is really rewarded.
00:21:55.320 You know, it's not an age where it's about, you know, morality or like, which sounds so like Pollyanna-ish and hokey, but it's very much about the sort of the cult of personality and who attracts our attention.
00:22:09.160 And like, obviously who we, you know, voted our president is a testament to that.
00:22:14.460 What you just articulated is one of my biggest issues in making in the show is the way that we have our entire digital ecosystem and media ecosystem is biased toward outrageousness and lies and scams.
00:22:32.660 It's been a documented thing that on social media, incorrect information travels much faster and much farther than accurate information.
00:22:40.740 There's that saying like a lie can travel around the world while the truth is still
00:22:44.400 putting on its shoes or some variation of that, but it's very true.
00:22:48.520 Absolutely true.
00:22:49.480 And so, you know, we talk a lot on this podcast about the ways that our landscapes have become
00:22:54.920 this like marketplace for extremism and who's really losing is us, the general public.
00:23:00.860 You know, there's a problem when the weather channel is sensationalized, like for the weather
00:23:05.580 channel to be like whoa like you know and giving these like hokey names to things and like making
00:23:11.260 everything seem like a doomsday event and it's like it's like sprinkling outside like there's
00:23:16.320 no news here they rely on viewership the same way as any other channel does so like
00:23:21.640 for our entire economy to run based on like clicks or attention like that is scary there
00:23:30.060 there are certain things that I think probably would, we, we all might be a little better off
00:23:35.780 if there were other motivators. We all deserve timely, thoughtful, accurate information. And so
00:23:42.660 even, you know, your example of the weather channel, if I need to know whether or not to
00:23:45.980 bring an umbrella and I turn on the weather and it's like, you know, monsoons and hurricanes and
00:23:51.700 oh my God. And it's like, well, I'm being underserved because I don't know if I need
00:23:56.260 to bring an umbrella when I'm going down the street, you know? And so we all, we all lose
00:24:00.080 out. We all lose when we don't, when we have any kind of media ecosystem that is biased towards
00:24:06.040 sensationalism or lies or scams or clicks and outrageousness rather than thoughtful, accurate,
00:24:12.860 nuanced content. And it pushes us to the extremes of either total belief or complete disbelief
00:24:19.920 because either you buy into whatever, you know, Kool-Aid you're looking for, like whether that's
00:24:24.840 Fox News or, you know, some like extreme version of like CNN, like, you know, they all have their
00:24:30.600 their biased reporting techniques. Right. But like, I think you either sort of hop on a bandwagon or
00:24:37.060 you say none of it's objective. I don't believe anything. And then that's not great either,
00:24:42.020 because there are still things that should be believed. So I do agree that it is a disservice
00:24:46.840 to everybody because it creates a system in which it's really hard to tell truth from fiction.
00:24:51.460 In my day job, I do a lot of work combating conspiracy theories and things like that and trying to understand why people fall prey to them. And a big part of it is just complete lack of trust in media institutions. And I think that's a big reason why. It's like, I can understand why somebody would just lose all trust in media when that is the thing that fuels it.
00:25:13.100 Yeah, absolutely. And there is a lot of similarity. Obviously, I mean, stakes are just sort of it's apples and oranges when it comes to like someone like Anna and like masculine conspiracy theories.
00:25:23.820 But there is similarity in the way that both, I guess, like lie structures or manipulation techniques rely on framing arguments in a way that makes them almost irrefutable because they speak to these sort of like cryptic abstracts or things that you literally just can't disprove, even though they are false.
00:25:47.440 It's like a flawed framing device.
00:25:50.940 And I think it's really hard for people, especially if you're isolated, to keep your feet on the ground and understand what's happening if you're not familiar with that type of behavioral pattern.
00:26:04.480 After the disastrous trip to Marrakesh, Rachel was left with a $62,000 credit card bill that her credit card company eventually forgave.
00:26:12.440 But before that, Rachel struggled to pay rent and took loans from loved ones to cover bills to get by.
00:26:18.840 She eventually published her book about what she learned from her relationship with Anna, called My Friend Anna,
00:26:23.700 and sold the rights to develop her story for television to Lena Dunham at HBO.
00:26:28.800 Rachel takes a lot of criticism for, quote, profiting off of her relationship to Anna.
00:26:34.160 So I wanted to go back to something that you mentioned, which is that you sometimes take criticism for the fact that you, you know,
00:26:40.140 published a book about your experiences. You've written about your experiences.
00:26:43.800 I interviewed Amanda Knox, the exoneree. You probably know who she is. And something that 1.00
00:26:48.780 she said in that interview that I will never forget is that, you know, she's often criticized
00:26:53.300 for making money, you know, writing books about what happened to her. And, you know, however,
00:26:58.920 producers, filmmakers, writers, they make a lot of money retelling sometimes like a really harmful,
00:27:05.800 deeply fictionalized account of something that like sort of happened around her but like it's
00:27:12.360 always like deeply deeply fictionalized and something that she said was that it's apparently
00:27:16.860 everyone else is allowed to profit off of something that happened to me except for me everybody else
00:27:22.900 can make money off of my story but me and I guess you know why do you think this is you know I I
00:27:29.760 guess i should say a side note which is that if i lost a lot of money anybody who wanted to pay me
00:27:36.300 to tell the story of what happened to me to recoup my expenses i would absolutely say yes and i think
00:27:41.580 that most people would but i feel that we have this expectation where victims are kind of expected
00:27:46.700 to be kind of holier than now meanwhile the people who harmed them it's like they can do whatever
00:27:52.780 they can make money however and so i think like why do you think that is where do you think that
00:27:56.400 comes from um I mean first of all I do completely agree with you it often feels like the victims are
00:28:02.500 on trial more so than the criminals uh and also like there's this odd thing that I realized the
00:28:09.800 word victim is has so much uh like packed into the connotations around the word the word it's
00:28:17.620 like people think as soon as you're no longer in debt or as soon as you've been made hold no matter
00:28:22.760 how hard you had to work to actually become okay you're not a victim anymore like you're now you
00:28:28.460 know and someone who's exploiting a situation if you you know keep moving forward or if you're
00:28:33.800 seen to succeed and it's like what is a victim like does a victim what does a victim look like
00:28:39.060 I've had so many people reach out to me on social media to say you don't look like a victim and I
00:28:44.120 think that is such a loaded odd thing to say to somebody like saying that you were the victim of
00:28:49.560 a crime is not a request for pity. It's a request for acknowledgement of a wrong that was committed.
00:28:56.260 It is not like I'm still stuck in this stalled state in perpetuity. It's like this happened and
00:29:03.720 that's a fact. It doesn't matter what you do afterwards to be okay, to repair the damage,
00:29:10.360 to find a way out of it. That is really not relevant. But I think there are a lot of things
00:29:18.700 that are distracting, especially when these stories get retold through the lens of media
00:29:22.540 or entertainment, people tend to fixate on the whistles and bells and the flashy trips and the
00:29:27.520 money. And they hold that. I think the jury did the same thing. They sort of hold that lens up
00:29:35.120 and say, well, you know, looking at the net gain, you were doing this before, Anna. Now you're
00:29:41.720 doing this. You came out OK. Therefore, nope, the crime didn't happen. It's like, wait, so you're
00:29:47.900 saying I was too good at, you know, finding like fighting tooth and nail to find a way forward.
00:29:54.000 Like, therefore, it didn't happen. Like, what? Why do I think it happens? I think it's really
00:30:00.820 easy for people to hold on to really simplified recaps of something that was actually very
00:30:06.440 complex and nuanced. And of course, looking back, red flags look like this, like very tidy pattern.
00:30:12.480 But when you're living through something where you're dealing with a master manipulator,
00:30:16.160 You know, there's time between these these things that might have tipped you off to trouble ahead. There's there's a there's an actual relationship between real life people and everything is much grayer than it appears in hindsight.
00:30:31.300 Right. Yeah. It's so funny because I feel like a lot of people I've seen and I saw like, I guess this idea of, you know, well, while that was happening, she definitely wanted to go to Morocco or she definitely wanted this.
00:30:45.080 And it's like, who gives a shit? Like, it just it just seems so like picking apart. It feels very victim blaming. 0.98
00:30:51.200 it's very convenient and and i think people want to look for a reason to explain why something bad
00:30:57.740 has happened to somebody you know especially if if it is not like you know death like you know
00:31:04.240 when it seems like someone's come out okay then it's like okay we all have like carte blanche to
00:31:09.660 just sit here and and talk about why you deserved it and you know at the end of the day like it's
00:31:15.560 everybody wants to be understood like it stinks to be misunderstood and it seems to have
00:31:20.540 things framed in a way that's not true especially when they're so personal and so many people are
00:31:26.940 forming opinions about you from so little information and flawed information um but at
00:31:33.360 the end of the day like everybody looks at a story like this which you know is not a new story it's
00:31:39.560 like a tale as old as time it's just been in a modern uh iteration of it but you people look at
00:31:45.940 and they project, they come away with an understanding of it based on their own life
00:31:50.920 experiences. And if it's important for people to think, if it looks too good to be true,
00:31:56.260 it probably is. Or, you know, don't get sucked into materialism or like, you know, everybody
00:32:01.580 looks at it and thinks these things. But I think that's actually more telling of
00:32:05.940 their own life experiences than it is necessarily of mine. Like, have I asked myself those questions?
00:32:11.560 Of course I have. If I hadn't, I think it's really important to look at. That's why I wrote, I guess, to start. I wrote what turned into the book, but it was so that I could piece together this narrative of experience that I lived through, look at it, try to dig into it, understand what happened, what to make of it, why it happened, and how to learn, heal, and move forward.
00:32:34.460 something that you said you said people want an explanation for why this happened to you
00:32:39.040 I think what they're actually looking for is an explanation for why this would never happen to
00:32:43.820 them I think it's about them right and I mean absolutely as they don't even know me and and
00:32:49.840 like they're even if even if someone did meet me through this experience this is something that
00:32:54.760 happened it was a friendship I knew her for a year we were close friends for about three months
00:32:58.880 three brief months. Like she never bought me clothes. She never bought me shoes. She never
00:33:04.700 bought, like, did I work out with her? Yes. Did she pay for some dinners? Yes. Did she invite me
00:33:09.660 on this crazy vacation? A hundred percent. But to say that anybody understands someone else's
00:33:16.740 entire values, like value system and personality and character through like a few months of what
00:33:26.000 is a you know 30 some odd year life with so many more important like and like I don't know telling
00:33:33.940 things but any it's just life is weird huh it's weird I I gotta say I love this is kind of a side
00:33:40.880 note I love your perspective on this I feel like if this happened to me I guess I guess you know
00:33:47.360 you were saying earlier how people don't really see the work involved in getting you to a place
00:33:51.680 where you're like, oh, this is behind me.
00:33:53.220 I'm speaking about it now,
00:33:54.920 not because I want to relitigate what happened,
00:33:56.980 like the minutiae of our relationship,
00:33:58.480 but because I want to ask these like thoughtful questions
00:34:01.040 about what it says about our culture and all of that.
00:34:04.160 You really turned me as someone who was like,
00:34:06.400 you know, I know we don't see that work,
00:34:08.020 but where you are today,
00:34:09.460 it just seems like you're,
00:34:10.440 I really appreciate your perspective
00:34:11.880 of where you're at right now.
00:34:13.080 I really appreciate you like acknowledging
00:34:15.560 or understanding that because it's very hard,
00:34:18.380 you know, like even,
00:34:19.320 I guess being a photo producer is much the same way.
00:34:21.400 It's like if you're doing it well, nobody pays attention to how it happened or why it's happening in this way.
00:34:27.000 But like, I mean, it's irritating, except that like there's nothing I can do.
00:34:32.040 People who are want to be wrong or it's going to be wrong.
00:34:35.000 But like when people are like, oh, you just want the spotlight or oh, you just want attention.
00:34:38.980 It's like I have turned down so many more things than I have said yes to.
00:34:44.060 Like this is a spotlight that I did not want.
00:34:46.320 You know, I have done the best I could with with something that was very negative.
00:34:50.680 and I've done the best I could to make it into something positive, not just for myself,
00:34:55.320 but ideally for others who may have gone through the same thing or to prevent others from going
00:35:00.280 through the same thing. But you're like, thank you. You're completely right. My very specific
00:35:07.140 and clear objective as to why I'm still talking today, it really is about the spotlight that I
00:35:14.680 didn't want. And I thought very hard about whether or not to just sort of like lie low,
00:35:20.180 not comment when the Netflix thing came out, just like not say anything at all. But I recognize the
00:35:26.720 value of attention. And I recognize the fact that whether or not I choose to engage with it,
00:35:32.920 there would be this attention coming my way. And it felt like there are so many really important
00:35:37.700 causes in the world that need attention. There are so many important issues, even relating to
00:35:42.840 this specifically that can't get people to pay attention to them. So I really wanted to like
00:35:48.420 yield the time towards asking questions. And then ideally, I mean, like finding people like you or
00:35:53.840 finding a way to sort of redirect the spotlight towards activation partners who can speak to
00:36:01.360 these issues in a thoughtful way and make people think a little harder or differently about
00:36:07.100 something that on the surface just seems so sort of frivolous. Our attention has value. And it's
00:36:13.520 also, we only have so much of it. And so when lies and outrageousness are amplified to get our
00:36:20.960 attention, what's not getting our attention? What important issues are just going overlooked because
00:36:26.000 of that? Exactly. And that's, I think that's, that's so right. It's like, you know, do I watch
00:36:32.300 bad TV? Of course I do. Do I eat junk food? Of course I do. Like, it's not to say don't do it.
00:36:37.980 It's just to be mindful that if that's all you do, like that really will inform the health of
00:36:45.100 your life. Like, like, you know, when you are paying attention to these things that are designed
00:36:51.220 to suck up your attention, that are designed to make you want more of them, they're addicting.
00:36:56.200 You are not paying attention to something else. You are not, you know, necessarily
00:37:00.820 having the autonomy you may think you have
00:37:05.580 over the direction of your purpose.
00:37:10.680 I definitely know what you mean.
00:37:13.280 More after a quick break.
00:37:20.780 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet
00:37:22.600 with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:37:24.520 from $94 a month.
00:37:25.940 Price guaranteed for two years on internet
00:37:27.840 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:37:29.860 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:37:33.000 Bell, connection is everything.
00:37:35.360 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:37:38.160 Think again.
00:37:39.180 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:37:43.860 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:37:48.180 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:37:51.260 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:37:55.580 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:37:57.140 Think iHeart.
00:37:58.200 streaming radio and podcasting let us show you at iheartadvertising.com that's iheartadvertising.com
00:38:05.340 when i was 14 years old i was kidnapped and held captive for nine months i survived and i've spent
00:38:13.160 my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them i'm elizabeth smart
00:38:19.260 and these are the survivor files i just remember this low taunting voice next to my ear saying
00:38:26.840 shut up don't say anything every week i'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable
00:38:33.500 i knew if he woke up without a doubt he was going to hurt me i started feeling that there was 0.90
00:38:41.340 someone at the end of my bed and i just started screaming they are abducted stalked controlled
00:38:48.820 and nearly silenced but these aren't stories about what's taken from them they're stories
00:38:54.420 about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:38:57.400 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart
00:39:00.160 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
00:39:03.320 or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:39:11.160 Let's get right back into it.
00:39:13.060 So you can probably tell that I did not really enjoy
00:39:16.020 the Netflix show Inventing Anna.
00:39:18.160 And one of my biggest issues with it
00:39:20.100 is the way that it frames Anna's crimes
00:39:21.800 with a kind of girl-boss-hustle mentality.
00:39:25.200 That she came to this country as an immigrant with nothing, 1.00
00:39:27.980 and that if she did maybe do a little lying and scamming here or there, 0.88
00:39:31.920 it was only in pursuit of building something that she truly believed in.
00:39:36.100 After all, isn't that the American dream?
00:39:39.580 Over on another scammer story, Hulu's The Dropout,
00:39:43.160 which chronicles the story of Elizabeth Holmes,
00:39:45.880 former CEO of Theranos, a blood-testing company that turned out to be a total scam,
00:39:50.300 actually does a pretty good job of showing how empty, not to mention dangerous,
00:39:55.280 it can be when scamming and lying is rebranded as vision or leadership.
00:40:00.800 One of the questions I did have for you is that the Inventing Anna show does this,
00:40:05.900 but I've also seen it kind of glimmers of it in other scammers and just sort of in media in general.
00:40:11.940 This idea of like scamming and lying kind of being rebranded as hustling
00:40:17.280 or trying to achieve the American dream 0.77
00:40:19.480 or worse, girl bossing. 1.00
00:40:21.300 I get, I completely logistically understand
00:40:25.720 why that's how it's framed
00:40:27.560 or why it's how it's reframed.
00:40:29.220 But it's such an easy narrative.
00:40:30.740 But I think it's kind of harmful
00:40:33.160 to reframe stealing from people
00:40:35.880 and lying from people
00:40:36.800 as hustling and girl bossing and leadership.
00:40:40.140 And I guess my question is like,
00:40:41.140 what are your thoughts about that?
00:40:41.960 Have you seen this?
00:40:42.620 And what do you think about it?
00:40:43.640 Yeah, I think it's lazy.
00:40:45.460 I just, I think it's lazy.
00:40:46.900 And I do think it does. It does do damage to the reality. You know, it's so backwards to to attempt to make something about like classism, racism, sexism, and then to frame it in a way that is promoting someone who couldn't care less about those issues unless they're serving their own agenda.
00:41:10.040 Like, that is such a disservice to people who are actually working to, you know, to explore and explore these issues and create positive change in ways that are actually meaningful and substantive, especially in the past, I don't even know how many years, I guess, like 10 years or so, maybe less.
00:41:30.860 like these these sort of catch all buzzwords like like feminism or like um good grief there's a
00:41:40.620 performative activism that that features words that have become trendy and and and like missions
00:41:47.960 that have become trendy and i think shows like this have kind of glommed on to that i told you
00:41:53.720 i uh watched the uh finale of the show on hulu the dropout about elizabeth holmes you know the 0.99
00:41:59.680 serenos scam lady there was a time in feminism where like a woman like a woman like making money 0.99
00:42:07.180 that was feminism i do think there's a kind of it's sort of a it's a sort of like 1.00
00:42:12.180 era of feminism i'm not proud of where yeah if you were just a woman who was make like out for 0.99
00:42:19.880 herself and making money yeah that was seen as like a feminist win and we didn't really ask a 1.00
00:42:24.540 lot of questions about are you harming people are you you know like like we didn't really ask a lot
00:42:29.400 of questions and i think that i i kind of see this era kind of maybe coming to a close i hope but
00:42:35.620 i think that that era really allowed for women to be lauded as feminist icons for doing things that
00:42:44.280 actually hurt other people at their own expense i don't think the answer to chauvinism is a form 0.98
00:42:50.500 of feminism that mirrors the same thing like that reverses that that negative uh way of being like 1.00
00:42:58.820 I do think sometimes pendulums swing too far before they kind of find their their middle and
00:43:04.500 it seems like that's what happened it's like well you did this for so long therefore like
00:43:08.780 it's my time to do it and we should celebrate the fact that I'm doing it um
00:43:13.680 it's I think it's it's hard sometimes to see that when you're in it and when it's a reaction
00:43:20.260 rather than like uh like it's it's reactive rather than proactive right so it's it's like
00:43:27.220 finding a way to exist as a woman in reaction to to what men have done wrong rather than just
00:43:31.860 finding a way to exist as a woman um I don't have solutions but I see the trend as well and yeah I
00:43:39.660 guess one thing related to the Hulu show but I think that show actually strikes me as I mean
00:43:46.380 obviously what she did does not strike me as something that was done well but the show I I
00:43:50.840 thought did a a good job actually of of dramatizing real life events because they
00:43:57.360 framed her in a way that felt very true to the actual sequencing of what happens like I read
00:44:04.840 Bad Blood by John Kerry and it it felt like it you know it followed a fact pattern and it framed
00:44:12.140 her not as someone that everybody was I mean you saw how she was celebrated but that was true to
00:44:17.880 the way that it happened in real life it was very true to the to the mixed reactions she received
00:44:23.180 and I thought Amanda Seyfried did an amazing job of not of like gleefully sort of relishing the
00:44:30.060 like the shtick of the con but just in framing this sort of very misguided probably like
00:44:36.520 psychologically unhealthy person who like just kind of uh lacked a certain like human ship that
00:44:44.980 allowed her to understand the importance of her decision making on real lives uh I it just was
00:44:52.600 such a foil for me when I watched that versus what I had seen in Inventing Anna which really just
00:44:58.960 looked like something that had been made by people who really bought into what Anna was selling
00:45:04.940 oh my gosh I so I am happy to hear you say this I felt the exact first of all Inventing Anna
00:45:11.240 all of the issues that you brought up with it yes but also just like was a slog to watch like
00:45:17.760 I wanted to watch it before I talked to you and literally my partner was like I feel like you've
00:45:22.040 been watching this show for a decade and I was like you and me both but just like wasn't an
00:45:26.560 entertaining show and I guess having that having like I felt the dropout was different because it
00:45:32.820 had empathy for the people who were harmed right like you saw these people who were you know had
00:45:37.660 cancer and were involved in these blood, these blood trials, you know, it had empathy for the
00:45:42.520 whistleblowers who risked so much of their, of their selves to come forward. I felt like it was
00:45:48.100 a show that managed to demonstrate the kind of seductive, you know, cult of personality around
00:45:58.060 a scammer without falling prey to it. And inventing Anna was exactly the opposite.
00:46:02.760 it it was done yeah it was done so thoughtfully it had such depth to it because yeah of course
00:46:08.380 there were people who like hopped on the bandwagon and celebrated her like it was just the full range
00:46:14.200 of of people who were made to to read like real life people you know I think inventing Anna
00:46:21.580 flattened everybody and there's a way that can be done in like a show like Gossip Girl or a show
00:46:27.200 that is meant to be and in some ways i guess this is but meant to be about uh materialism and
00:46:32.840 superficiality but but to reduce something like this where real real crimes were committed real
00:46:38.500 people's lives were impacted it wasn't just these like faceless things they're people who lose jobs
00:46:42.860 they're people who obviously or not obviously if it were obvious that would wouldn't be a problem
00:46:47.120 but there are people who weren't included in the court you know the court case she definitely
00:46:51.120 committed so many offenses that that harmed real life people so i think to flatten something like
00:46:57.980 that into this like very frivolous like fun glossy slog of a tv show full stop i don't know dot dot
00:47:05.260 dot yeah i mean it's there were times where i was like are you meant to be rooting for anna in the
00:47:10.340 show and then i the i think the richest part is at the end where the biggest crime the show seems
00:47:17.260 to suggest has been committed is the character that shares your same name she's like like neph
00:47:23.840 is like you're a bad friend and it's like well anna went to jail like come on like i know i get
00:47:31.700 i mean and people really believe all that is fact like you were like she bankrolled you for two
00:47:37.560 years and like i know better than to feed the trolls on the internet like it's not my job to
00:47:43.360 to like educate people about like what I like the truth is out there if anybody wants to look for it
00:47:50.120 but like I didn't even know her that long and she did not think like uh but yeah so to have
00:47:56.080 have it framed as though like where's the loyalty it's like this is someone I you know we were not
00:48:01.500 best friends I knew her for and also look what she did look look at the pattern of her behavior
00:48:06.100 at what point what why are you suggesting people who are in these like manipulative relationships
00:48:13.000 be they friendships or whatever like that that they are doing something wrong by choosing to
00:48:18.440 leave something that is so harmful like that's bizarre that's like that's a very bizarre thing
00:48:24.780 to say also the show rearranged it as though I had been reimbursed before the trial and then I
00:48:30.040 like kept the secret of my involvement with her arrest like like or kept that a secret like
00:48:35.320 didn't happen I was protected two years after Marrakesh after the trial concluded I didn't
00:48:41.920 keep my involvement in the sting some kind of like grand secret i wasn't ashamed of it but
00:48:47.680 i wasn't that close with like naff or casey i you know i like them i don't i have nothing
00:48:52.620 negative to say it's like fine everybody can look back and and see things through their lenses and
00:48:58.480 that's you know it is what it is but we weren't in touch it's not like i owed people explanations
00:49:05.280 i was out more than i made any they were not left in any kind of like debt or like there was no
00:49:10.740 ongoing relationship there so to suggest that by not reaching out to say hello like this is what
00:49:17.540 i have done and like it's like that's just weird it doesn't it doesn't make any sense yeah and i
00:49:22.920 think people people understand the way these relationships and acquaintanceships work in
00:49:28.360 their own lives and it's like of course that would be that you wouldn't owe these people anything or
00:49:32.960 you wouldn't owe like you know but when it's someone else and that that those the minutiae
00:49:39.020 of those relationships are like projected for everyone to pick apart suddenly it's like oh well
00:49:44.300 why would she do this doesn't she have loyalty and it's like well calm down think about how this
00:49:48.480 would actually go down if it was you like we all understand that in our own lives but when it's
00:49:52.640 somebody else I think it's like different yeah evidently and I I understand people don't tune
00:49:58.640 into shows like this to really think very analytically it's mostly about just getting
00:50:02.840 a good laugh at other people's expense and like I you know I do too it's fine like it's I'm not
00:50:07.540 But I certainly can't hate on people for being human.
00:50:11.500 That's how this works.
00:50:13.920 I think that the frivolity of it does conceal something that is a bigger picture problem,
00:50:20.340 as I have said, which is why I figure if I'm stuck in this dumpster fire anyway, I might
00:50:27.500 as well try and send up a smoke signal about red flags that I know a little too well from
00:50:34.520 first-hand experience.
00:50:36.640 Yeah.
00:50:36.820 Speaking of your firsthand experience, one of the last questions I have is like, what has it just been like for you, Rachel, the person going through this, getting the social media trolls, getting people who have maybe been misled about what happened from the television show?
00:50:52.560 What has it been like to deal with that on online?
00:50:55.500 Yeah. I mean, it's it's definitely not easy, but I'm mindful of the like I'm mindful of my my my privilege and my luck just to have like such supportive family and friends to have an awareness of exactly what it is that is happening.
00:51:17.860 You know, part of it, I learned the hard way just through gaslighting with Anna to begin with. And now through what I've learned in looking back at what happened, looking at, like, I guess, I mean, writing the book helped me a lot just in terms of sort of looking at the pattern of behavior as a pattern rather than like this.
00:51:36.860 when you're in a relationship like that, it's really hard to see anything as black and white
00:51:40.340 because it's not. Life is gray. But looking back, things seem so much clearer to me. So I'm grateful
00:51:45.200 to have had people who believe me, like a platform to speak from, the opportunity to speak,
00:51:52.960 which all that is to say, it's hard. But part of the reason I'm speaking up about it is because I
00:51:59.420 think that the structure of the Netflix show or this broader pattern that's happening,
00:52:03.960 it it does a disservice to people who don't have that ability to understand what's happening to
00:52:09.580 them who might not get to hear stories like this because people are ashamed or they're scared of
00:52:14.040 the the victim blaming which is completely fair it's not it's I mean it's it's wild um and it
00:52:20.680 you know I can have my feet on the ground and my head on my shoulders and if I sit there and read
00:52:26.200 that for longer than maybe like 10 minutes like it even if you know that it you know it's it's
00:52:32.640 actually not about you it doesn't feel good to have that kind of energy coming like I mean that
00:52:37.300 sounds so woo woo but like that kind of hostility coming at you like it's like death by paper cuts
00:52:42.240 like you can be the strongest rock in the water but like if it keeps running like you're gonna
00:52:46.760 get worn down um so it's hard but I recognize that it's harder so much harder for so many other
00:52:53.960 people. And yeah, then I can be pretty nasty. We've talked a lot about how the dangers that
00:53:03.160 come when we willingly give our attention away to liars and scammers and people who are outrageous
00:53:10.280 and extreme. Do you ever see a situation where things like nuance, thoughtfulness, honest,
00:53:18.880 accurate content will be amplified over that kind of extremism and and lies do you think that we're
00:53:25.900 this is just it forever or do you see do you see a change coming um i mean as evidenced by past
00:53:35.340 behavior i'm kind of a willful optimist through and through and that is just who i am so i always
00:53:42.660 hope for that. I do think the damage done by what you just said, the pattern, what I'm trying
00:53:54.180 to say is the truth will out. And it's one thing to think the pattern of celebrating these
00:54:02.660 individuals does do harm that is and will be visible until there is a movement in the opposite
00:54:11.060 direction. So I think we've already seen that like from like Me Too forward, where people are
00:54:18.100 starting to pay attention to things in a different way and actually attempt to hold outlets and
00:54:23.900 individuals to account. I just think it's in very specific arenas thus far that that seems to be
00:54:30.620 happening. And I think people like to sort of pretend that things they do for entertainment
00:54:37.780 don't touch on the same subjects
00:54:39.980 or don't have the same
00:54:42.120 impact or seriousness
00:54:43.860 and that
00:54:45.880 to me is
00:54:46.780 that's the slippery slope
00:54:49.260 I hope that people will recognize
00:54:52.300 these things
00:54:54.000 are not separate, they're inextricably
00:54:56.080 linked to the way that we as a
00:54:58.060 culture
00:54:58.480 celebrate people
00:55:01.860 and form our
00:55:03.980 beliefs. That's really smart
00:55:06.000 Got a story about an interesting thing in tech
00:55:12.600 Or just want to say hi
00:55:13.600 You can reach us at hello at tangody.com
00:55:16.040 You can also find transcripts for today's episode
00:55:18.180 At tangody.com
00:55:19.180 There are no girls on the internet was created by me, Bridget Todd
00:55:22.040 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative
00:55:24.620 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer
00:55:26.820 Tari Harrison is our producer
00:55:28.380 And sound engineer
00:55:29.320 Michael Amato is our contributing producer
00:55:31.460 I'm your host, Bridget Todd
00:55:33.000 If you want to help us grow
00:55:34.960 rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,
00:55:39.200 check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:55:55.560 I survived nine months in captivity, and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive
00:56:02.200 what should have destroyed them.
00:56:04.280 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:56:07.880 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:56:11.580 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:56:15.420 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:56:19.240 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart
00:56:22.020 on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
00:56:25.040 or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:56:26.880 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:56:29.160 are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:56:32.200 Pro Society is a weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:56:40.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and pop culture with your favorite writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:56:49.500 Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:56:51.280 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:56:59.100 Hey, this is Hayes Davenport.
00:57:00.960 And Sean Clements.
00:57:02.040 We host the podcast Hollywood Handbook.
00:57:04.360 Every episode, we're trying to help our guests improve their careers by mainly focusing on how they can help us improve our careers.
00:57:10.260 The show is famously super accessible, so you can easily jump into any of our 650 episodes and understand what's going on.
00:57:16.400 We recommend some of our recent episodes with Ben Stiller, Danny McBride, Riz Ahmed, and Mary Steenburgen.
00:57:21.360 Listen to Hollywood Handbook on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:57:27.340 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:57:29.960 Guaranteed human.