There Are No Girls on the Internet - January 06, 2024


Harvard’s Real Scandal Was A Black Woman Leader — NEW EPISODE

Topics
Why trad wife content is taking over social media right now — BEST OF TANGOTI The New Weaponization of Plagiarism [PATREON UNLOCKED]

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 7 minutes

Words per minute

176.39

Word count

11,885

Sentence count

588

Harmful content

Misogyny

27

sentences flagged

Toxicity

52

sentences flagged

Hate speech

56

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.940 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:38.460 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:43.680 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:47.300 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:00:51.020 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:54.640 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:58.680 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:10.580 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:18.700 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:21.440 happy new year so we were meant to air a new newscast the first of 2024 but instead we have 0.99
00:01:32.500 to talk about this clotting gay thing at harvard so this is kind of an unplanned emergency episode 0.98
00:01:38.260 we weren't even actually going to do it but then mike you and i started talking and it was clear
00:01:43.000 that i'll just say that it was clear i had a lot to say and i had a lot of opinions and i had a lot
00:01:47.440 big feelings. And eventually you said, you know, if you feel like getting on the mic and yelling
00:01:52.200 at me about it, I'm here. I'm here for you, Bridget. Okay, so let's do it. I generally want
00:01:57.920 to give some broad strokes about how we got here and then give you all my take on it. But I feel
00:02:02.420 like I need to say a few things right off the top. First of all, some of these issues that we're
00:02:06.460 going to talk about are thinky, right? They just they deal with facts and what happened. But some
00:02:12.020 of them are feely. This issue is really personal for me. It felt personal. And it was clear when
00:02:18.360 I was putting together my research and my thoughts that I have a lot of big emotions about it.
00:02:23.040 When Gay resigned, a bunch of the like Black women's group chats that I'm in were all buzzing
00:02:28.500 about what it means and how we should all be feeling in this moment. So I say all of that
00:02:32.840 to say this, which is that it is important to me that I am giving y'all very clear facts and also
00:02:38.660 separating my feelings and my opinions from those facts so that y'all can make sense of
00:02:43.220 what's actually happening and also come up with your own take on it. But this story was, I have
00:02:48.080 to say, pretty complex for me. It's not a terribly complex story, but it has a lot of intersecting
00:02:54.560 feelings and thoughts. And a lot of those feelings and thoughts were really raw and nuanced. And so
00:02:59.340 at times, it was difficult for me to say where my own feelings ended and the facts began.
00:03:05.460 So I just want to say that right off the top, if this seems like a more emotional episode
00:03:10.560 than you're used to getting from me, that is why, because this feels really personal.
00:03:14.760 So let's start with the basics of what's going on.
00:03:18.140 Dr. Claudine Gay was the first Black woman president, first Black president, and only
00:03:23.540 the second woman president of Harvard in the university's almost 400 years.
00:03:27.480 On January 2nd, she announced that she was resigning from that position, making her tenure
00:03:32.540 as Harvard's president, the shortest in the university's history, lasting only six months.
00:03:38.200 And here's how we got here. So after the attack in Israel on October 7th, there was a big
00:03:42.600 conversation about anti-Semitism on college campuses. This is my opinion, so I want to 1.00
00:03:47.240 state it carefully. I think that those conversations were hijacked by people with other agendas and
00:03:53.400 that concern about anti-Semitism was being used as a smokescreen to mount larger attacks on
00:03:59.480 culture war issues on university campuses, and also some just personal grievances unrelated to
00:04:06.500 antisemitism at all. I'll get into that in a moment, but first, here's a timeline.
00:04:11.440 Amid concerns about antisemitism on campuses, there was a congressional hearing with the heads
00:04:16.000 of Harvard, MIT, and University of Pennsylvania being questioned before Congress. When Gay was 0.78
00:04:20.900 questioned by Republican Representative Elise Stefanik on whether calls for genocide of Jews
00:04:26.180 violated Harvard's rules of bullying and harassment, Gay responded, it can be, depending
00:04:31.660 on the context. Gay went on to say, anti-Semitic speech, when it crosses into conduct that
00:04:37.300 amounts to bullying, harassment, and intimidation, that is actionable conduct and we do take
00:04:42.060 action. Now, this moment was a particular moment that became a big flashpoint from the
00:04:47.840 hearings. It got a lot of attention on social media, mostly negative. But the university
00:04:52.480 stood by Gay. Next, in an unexpected ad hominem attack that had nothing to do with anti-Semitism,
00:05:00.260 right-wing activist Christopher Rufo surfaced plagiarism allegations against Gay,
00:05:05.360 calling her academic integrity into question with allegations of plagiarism. Then, a right-wing
00:05:10.220 newspaper based here in D.C. called The Free Beacon wrote about it. From then, the New York
00:05:14.600 Times starts writing about it a ton, multiple times per week, and then it becomes a larger thing.
00:05:20.900 Now, Harvard did an investigation that cleared Gay of any academic misconduct, and they were
00:05:25.800 standing by her. The Harvard Corporation, which is, I guess, the university's overall governing
00:05:31.340 body, conducted a review of her published work, and they found that she had not violated the
00:05:36.520 university standards for, quote, research misconduct, but they did find, quote, a few
00:05:42.880 instances of inadequate citation and stated that as a result, Dr. Gay was, quote, proactively
00:05:49.140 requesting four corrections in two articles to insert citations and quotation marks that were
00:05:54.460 omitted from the original publications. So here's a little bit of a caveat, which is that I am not
00:05:59.560 an academic, so I don't even really want to weigh in too much here beyond what Harvard's governing
00:06:04.440 body has already said. I was once sort of an academic. I dropped out of a PhD program after
00:06:10.600 completing my coursework and really struggling, like struggling, struggling, struggling to finish
00:06:18.600 a dissertation so technically i'm what you call abd like all but dissertation but you know i could
00:06:25.620 not manage to adequately put together a dissertation and i was like nah i'm out so what the hell do i
00:06:33.340 know mike you do you consider yourself an academic you kind of you have a phd but like what do you
00:06:38.080 consider yourself yeah i somehow managed to put together the dissertation get it published and
00:06:44.980 uh you know have been publishing academic papers ever since so yeah i do consider myself an
00:06:52.680 academic i've got several manuscripts that i'm working on with right now with co-authors and
00:06:58.980 you know plagiarism is a super serious uh allegation uh and it sounds like she didn't
00:07:06.900 do it right like there was an investigation by the governing body uh they had independent experts
00:07:13.400 who looked into it and determined that, nah, there wasn't plagiarism there.
00:07:18.740 So here's my thing.
00:07:20.560 I don't even necessarily want to get into a thing of like, well, did she plagiarize or
00:07:25.240 did she not plagiarize?
00:07:26.660 One, because as I said, I'm not an academic.
00:07:28.420 And I think part of the issue is that we are in this situation where people who are also
00:07:33.640 not academics like myself and have never done academic writing like myself are now the ones
00:07:39.280 who are attempting to set the standard for what is or is not plagiarism.
00:07:42.900 and what is and is not acceptable in academic writing.
00:07:46.860 And it's like, well, you know, I'm not the expert.
00:07:49.680 I don't know why these people who don't have any expertise in it,
00:07:52.140 why they have become the expert, but whatever.
00:07:54.620 Like these charges are not coming from her academic colleagues
00:07:57.480 or her peers or like other academics.
00:08:00.160 They're coming from people who have explicitly already said
00:08:03.120 they have a grievance against her.
00:08:04.480 If they wanted to do a survey where we looked at
00:08:07.380 the academic publishing records of every college president
00:08:10.080 in the United States, totally fine.
00:08:12.040 Let's do that.
00:08:12.900 but that is not what they're saying or doing. They are saying we need to zero in on just her
00:08:18.140 for some reason. And that reason is race. Like, that's not me saying that. That is what Chris
00:08:23.740 Rufo, the person who initially surfaced these allegations against her, has said. He explicitly
00:08:29.100 has said that his disdain for DEI, or diversity, equity, and inclusion, is the point of why he is
00:08:36.180 doing this, why he is mounting these allegations. So the focus on if she plagiarized or not
00:08:41.840 totally allows what are explicitly bad faith actors to set the agenda and the terms of the
00:08:48.360 conversation. So they say she plagiarized. And rather than responding with like, well,
00:08:53.560 what kind of standard are you setting with regards to plagiarism accusations? Mainstream
00:08:57.640 media outlets like the New York Times are just scrambling to cover and answer the like, well, 0.98
00:09:02.200 did she plagiarize question in dozens of front page stories without doing any of the examination 0.86
00:09:09.400 of the larger question of why they are presenting this as a question that needs to be answered.
00:09:14.380 And that is what I object to. All of this is at the explicit urging of right-wing education
00:09:20.140 activist Christopher Rufo. If that name sounds familiar to you, it might, because he is the
00:09:26.100 person who brought us the disingenuous moral panic on critical race theory that dominated
00:09:31.140 our national discourse and led to a flurry of state laws against teaching critical race theory
00:09:35.640 or really anything related to, like, Black people, really, this is not me saying this.
00:09:40.980 This is from Christopher Rufo's own words and public tweets. In March 2021, he tweeted,
00:09:47.040 we have successfully frozen their brand, critical race theory, into the public conversation
00:09:51.840 and are steadily driving up negative perceptions. We will eventually turn it toxic as we put all
00:09:58.080 the various cultural insanities under that brand category. So, as he says, it is not about critical
00:10:04.440 race theory, it's about anything that he thinks is a, quote, cultural insanity, putting it under
00:10:10.800 the umbrella of critical race theory and then being like, critical race theory, there it is,
00:10:15.400 let's get it, let's make a law against it. He goes on to say, the goal is to have the public
00:10:20.660 read something crazy in the newspaper and immediately think critical race theory. We
00:10:26.260 have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions
00:10:32.360 that are unpopular with Americans.
00:10:35.220 So by his own admission,
00:10:38.500 anything that he don't like is critical race theory,
00:10:41.280 and that's going to be what he's trying to make toxic.
00:10:44.120 And I got to give it to him because he did it.
00:10:46.700 Mission accomplished.
00:10:47.800 Like people passed laws.
00:10:49.860 There are laws on the books
00:10:51.680 banning critical race theory from being taught.
00:10:53.980 Even though he's saying,
00:10:55.080 I'm not even operating from the actual definition
00:10:57.140 of whatever it is.
00:10:58.780 I'm just saying anything that I don't like,
00:11:00.600 anything I have a grievance against,
00:11:01.640 I'm going to get people to fold that in with critical race theory and be against it.
00:11:06.900 And by the way, I just recently found this out thanks to journalist Kaylee Holloway.
00:11:12.280 Rufo, who has positioned himself as the person who should be reshaping our academic institutions,
00:11:18.220 has been saying that he himself holds a, quote, master's from Harvard, when in reality,
00:11:24.660 dude went to Harvard's extension school.
00:11:27.400 Not a real Harvard.
00:11:29.380 That is a different thing. 0.96
00:11:30.520 I know this might sound like a little bit petty, but it is just too ridiculous to ignore.
00:11:36.200 The Harvard Extension School is not Harvard.
00:11:39.220 Like when I say Harvard, you're thinking of Harvard, the university.
00:11:43.480 The Harvard Extension School is a different entity.
00:11:47.280 Yeah, right.
00:11:47.780 Like one has the question, what does that word extension mean?
00:11:52.100 Who is it being extended to?
00:11:53.620 It is being extended to the public.
00:11:55.320 It is being extended beyond Harvard to general members of the public.
00:12:00.520 Right. This is how bestcolleges.com describes it.
00:12:03.480 Quote, Harvard College, the undergraduate school at Harvard University, can be difficult to get into, to say the least.
00:12:09.520 For the class of 2027, Harvard received almost 57,000 applications and accepted 3.5%.
00:12:16.520 Admissions to the undergrad extension program is dot, dot, dot, less stringent.
00:12:22.860 Anyone can sign up for a course at any time.
00:12:25.140 So the fact that anyone can sign up for a course at any time of the Harvard Extension School should probably be a giveaway that it is not real Harvard, where famously not everyone can just decide to go and then go at any time.
00:12:39.980 Yeah. And to be clear, extensions are great. Lots of universities have them. That's not what this is about. We won't get into it. But just to be clear, we're not dunking on extension schools. What we're pointing out is that he is claiming that he has a degree from Harvard when he does not.
00:12:56.940 So, side note, do you know who else did the very same thing also at Harvard?
00:13:02.300 One of your favorites?
00:13:04.360 Yes, Tyra Banks.
00:13:06.040 she went to the harvard extension business school which is like as far as i can tell it's like 0.99
00:13:12.540 a weekend like a week program or something she did notably have to stay on campus for like a
00:13:18.360 couple of weeks and it was a big deal she's been dining out on being a harvard business school
00:13:24.540 graduate ever since and it's funny i actually was joking about this before i even knew about rufo
00:13:30.520 not having actually gone to harvard i was actually joking a few weeks ago that i think in 2024 i want
00:13:37.940 to go to an ivy league extension program and then start telling people i graduated from harvard
00:13:44.460 because i don't think that people really check and by the time anyone like actually looks into it
00:13:49.600 you've already said you've gone to harvard so many times that like everybody's accepted that i don't
00:13:53.940 think i don't think anybody is like really checking yeah i remember you joking about that
00:13:57.720 like weeks ago. This was going to be your big plan for 2024. So when your next podcast is coming to
00:14:02.840 you from Columbia University master's degree holder, Bridget Todd, y'all will know what's up.
00:14:09.360 Don't blow up my spot. You heard the plan, but let's just see. Well, actually, question.
00:14:15.900 If I actually did an Ivy League extension program and then started publicly, but often
00:14:22.600 like obnoxiously and smugly claiming that I went, that I was like a graduate of Harvard University
00:14:27.320 or whatever how long do you think it would be until somebody called me out publicly it was like
00:14:31.300 you didn't actually go to harvard you didn't actually go to mit it would probably happen i
00:14:35.220 mean you're you're online a bunch a lot of people looking looking into what you say uh you know
00:14:41.740 you're a black woman so might be a little harder to get away with it maybe this will be my pet
00:14:48.620 project in 2024 to see how long it takes i feel like if you did it well you already have a phd so 0.93
00:14:54.680 like what like what are you what are you trying to prove at this point but i feel like it will be
00:14:58.980 i'll be curious to know how long it would take each of us to be called out publicly i feel like
00:15:03.340 you should make a performance art piece out of your own cv and just like see how many of these
00:15:08.600 you can rack up like bridget todd holds degrees from columbia harvard yale ucsd stanford you know
00:15:20.040 just throw in a couple to keep them guessing why not finish at maryland i that's where that's where
00:15:27.080 i actually dropped out of my phd program university of maryland college park my parents almost every
00:15:33.840 time we talk it comes up like are you gonna go back and i'm always like oh maybe no i'm never
00:15:38.220 going back i was a terrible student you could just go back for a weekend and say you got the
00:15:44.120 whole degree they take your money it was a crazy summer what did i do i got a i got a phd crazy
00:15:51.440 summer pass fail yeah pass fail let's take a quick break
00:16:01.560 get bell pure fiber internet with crave netflix and disney plus from 94 a month price guaranteed
00:16:13.340 for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca for details
00:16:18.360 and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and not thinking
00:16:23.720 about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming
00:16:28.740 music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster iheart's twice as large as the next
00:16:34.060 two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear your message plus only iheart
00:16:39.000 can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:16:42.420 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:16:44.360 Think iHeart.
00:16:45.380 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:16:47.600 Let us show you at iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:16:50.160 That's iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:16:52.540 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:16:54.520 are equally important to your personality,
00:16:56.940 welcome home.
00:16:58.460 This is Prose Society,
00:17:00.560 the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:17:02.860 part group chat for thought daughters,
00:17:04.900 pop culture obsessives,
00:17:06.220 and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island
00:17:08.600 to deserve the same level of discourse.
00:17:10.940 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots
00:17:13.480 between books, the internet,
00:17:15.220 and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:17:18.040 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:17:19.940 I'm obsessed, so obsessed.
00:17:21.620 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators
00:17:24.240 to the latest pop culture moments,
00:17:26.480 nothing is off the table.
00:17:27.560 It's like if you can hide some real messages
00:17:30.860 inside compelling characters,
00:17:33.560 then that is a Trojan horse.
00:17:35.420 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives,
00:17:37.340 smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:17:43.000 you're in the right place. Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:17:47.600 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. See you between the pages.
00:17:57.780 And we're back. So the reason why I'm curious, like what, how long it would take for people to
00:18:03.460 call me out is because I do think that once you say it enough times, people just keep repeating
00:18:07.660 it like, oh, they went to Harvard, they went to Harvard. Because even after all this, Rufo is 1.00
00:18:11.720 still claiming that he went to Harvard, Harvard. Rufo, in an email to the New Republic, disagreed
00:18:18.060 that there was any difference between the Harvard Extension School and any other school. He said that
00:18:22.640 he was unaware of any debate over whether Harvard Extension School should be referred to differently
00:18:28.040 than any other graduate degree from Harvard.
00:18:30.940 So we are meant to believe that Rufo is uniquely qualified
00:18:35.000 to be determining how higher education functions
00:18:38.220 in the United States, how it should be run, and all of that.
00:18:41.260 And also, if we take him at his word,
00:18:44.960 he is also too unfamiliar with higher education
00:18:47.800 to know and understand the difference
00:18:49.600 between the Harvard Extension School and actual Harvard,
00:18:52.840 and that he doesn't understand
00:18:55.120 that he did not actually graduate
00:18:56.740 from the real Harvard University after having gone to an institution that he didn't even really
00:19:00.520 have to, like, apply to attend. Either he's lying, he's stupid, or both. A complete mess. 1.00
00:19:08.140 So Rufo was behind this pressure campaign to oust gay. Bad actor number one, the guy who 1.00
00:19:13.740 literally surfaced the plagiarism allegations. And this is what I mean when I say that bad actors
00:19:19.540 with agendas have nothing to do with the stated goal of eradicating anti-Semitism on college
00:19:24.620 campuses or concern about plagiarism, they are the ones who are setting the agenda. And again,
00:19:30.560 this is not, I don't know this because I'm super smart or have done some like super sleuthing.
00:19:36.860 The reason why I know this is because he says it explicitly in his own words. In an interview with
00:19:43.060 Politico, he says this in very clear terms. We will link to this piece in the show notes,
00:19:47.760 but here is a bit. Gay's resignation was the result of a coordinated and highly organized
00:19:52.860 conservative campaign. It shows a successful strategy for the political right, he told
00:19:57.620 Politico, how we have to work the media, how we have to exert pressure, and how we have to
00:20:02.020 sequence our campaign in order to be successful. So basically, he describes it as a three-pronged
00:20:06.980 attack. Political, led by Representative Stefanik, the member of Congress who grilled gay about 0.69
00:20:12.540 anti-Semitism during the congressional hearing, who, by the way, is a graduate of real Harvard,
00:20:17.880 not the Extension School, but who was later removed from a senior advisory committee at
00:20:22.240 Harvard School of Government after she declined to resign voluntarily. Can you guess what happened
00:20:29.200 with her that she was basically forced out of this position? It could be anything with her.
00:20:36.080 Well, it's because she was one of 147 congressional Republicans who opposed certifying President
00:20:42.700 Biden after he won the election fairly and continued to lie about non-existent election
00:20:48.980 irregularities that just like did not exist and were made up. There was a pressure campaign for
00:20:53.620 Harvard to cut ties with her and it worked. So she has unrelated beef with Harvard. Here's what
00:20:59.320 she said after she was pushed out. The decision by Harvard's administration to cower and cave to
00:21:04.300 the woke left will continue to erode diversity of thought, public discourse, and ultimately the
00:21:09.720 student experience. So again, not exactly somebody who has no agenda in all this and is purely
00:21:16.080 worried about rooting out the rot of anti-Semitism in our institutions. And because, like, come on,
00:21:23.060 she supports former President Trump and has said nothing when he had dinner with Nick Fuentes,
00:21:28.920 a literal Nazi. She also found herself in hot water last year when she ran a campaign ad
00:21:34.160 that warned immigrants could overthrow our current electorate, which is pretty much a not-so-subtle
00:21:39.880 nod to the Great Replacement Theory touted by white supremacists like the Buffalo gunmen and 0.98
00:21:44.540 other trolls and bad actors. And so I just do not believe that this is somebody who is purely
00:21:49.960 motivated by sniffing out the rod of anti-Semitism in our universities.
00:21:55.400 Yeah. She's super partisan, insurrectionist, supported Trump on January 6th, supports him
00:22:05.460 today. It's just hard to take it seriously. Exactly. So we have Gay, a woman being
00:22:14.320 pushed out of her job at a private university with the help of an elected official. Again, 0.94
00:22:19.440 this is not me saying this. This is Rufo, who publicly owns this as a win. He says that
00:22:25.060 Representative Stefanik used her position as an agent of the state, and that is what helped push
00:22:30.120 Gay out of her job. So let's talk about how he used the media to help push Gay out of her job.
00:22:36.500 On December 19th, Rufo tweeted that it was his plan to, quote, smuggle the plagiarism story into
00:22:42.080 the media apparatus from the left, which legitimizes the narrative to center left actors
00:22:46.560 who have the power to topple gay. So this is what really pisses me off in a story where there is a 0.88
00:22:53.100 lot to be pissed off about. Here's what Rufo told Politico about the strategy of getting folks on
00:22:57.920 the left and in legacy media like the New York Times to comment on and thus legitimize the story.
00:23:03.120 He said, it's really a textbook example of successful conservative activism. And the
00:23:07.920 strategy is quite simple. Christopher Brunette and I broke the story of Claudine's plagiarism
00:23:12.760 on December 10th. It drove more than 100 million impressions on Twitter. And then it was the top
00:23:17.240 story for a number of weeks in conservative media and right-wing media. But I knew that in order to
00:23:21.700 achieve my objective, we had to get the narrative into left-wing media. But the left-wing media
00:23:26.440 uniformly ignored the story for 10 days and tried to bury it. So I engaged in a kind of a thoughtful
00:23:32.180 and substantive campaign of shaming and bullying my colleagues on the left to take seriously the
00:23:36.880 story of the most significant academic corruption scandal in harvard's history side note there's
00:23:42.300 just no way that can be true right like in 2019 harvard released a report talking about how many
00:23:48.360 of the faculty and staff owned enslaved people during slavery and taught racial eugenics oh no
00:23:54.500 but this this president might have misattributed some citations that is the biggest scandal yeah
00:24:01.320 And again, there was an investigation and independent investigators determined that
00:24:07.220 there was no academic misconduct, right?
00:24:10.400 Like you can't have corruption.
00:24:13.120 It can't be a corruption scandal if there's not misconduct happening.
00:24:17.580 So Ruffo goes on to say, finally, the narrative broke through within 24 hours of my announcement
00:24:22.740 about smuggling the narrative into the left wing media.
00:24:25.520 You see this domino effect.
00:24:27.280 CNN, BBC, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and other publications started to do the
00:24:31.700 actual work of exposing gay's plagiarism. And then you see this beautiful kind of flowering 0.60
00:24:36.120 of op-eds from all those publications calling on gay to resign. Once my position, which began on 0.56
00:24:41.200 the right, became the dominant position across the center-left, I knew it was just a matter of time
00:24:46.420 before we were going to be successful. He goes on to say that this strategy gives permission for
00:24:51.220 center-left political figures and intellectual figures to comment on the story and then
00:24:54.800 editorialize on it. Once we crossed that threshold, we saw this cascade of publications calling on her
00:25:00.320 to resign. And this is why I am really looking at legacy media publications at the New York
00:25:05.820 Times about this. Like, I'm not saying that it shouldn't be written about, but it can't be
00:25:09.940 newsworthy enough to be written about that amount. As Adam Johnson of the Citations Needed podcast
00:25:15.880 put it, articles about Claudine Gay and her various, quote, scandals were top five featured
00:25:21.480 stories on the New York Times homepage, December 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th,
00:25:28.120 17th, 22nd, 25th. And her firing is now their top story. There is simply no way this is
00:25:34.160 proportionate, sober, or reasonable coverage. And I agree. I'm not saying it shouldn't have
00:25:39.760 been written about, but that is not a reasonable amount of coverage. And especially when Christopher
00:25:45.520 Rufo is out here saying, explicitly saying, oh, we're playing the New York Times. We're getting
00:25:50.900 them to legitimize this issue. We're getting them to make this into an issue and write about it and
00:25:55.180 write about it and write about it until it becomes true. Just like me not going to Harvard, if I say
00:26:01.480 it enough times, eventually who's going to really check whether or not I win? Who's going to really
00:26:05.860 check? Well, are these actually plagiarism allegations or is it like a few case of sloppy
00:26:10.020 citations which the governing body says is not plagiarism? And I think when grifters like Rufo,
00:26:16.420 who are explicit and clear about their intentions to use these institutions to launder these
00:26:22.240 disingenuous attacks, you are just letting them set the agenda. And I don't understand why.
00:26:27.480 When he flat out says, I plan to make this plagiarism thing a smokescreen to get this
00:26:32.980 woman fired as a larger attack on DEI, why pretend that that's not what he's saying?
00:26:38.560 Why act as if these are conversations legitimately about just anti-Semitism or legitimately about
00:26:44.640 plagiarism when plain as day in English, he is saying that they are not. Because again,
00:26:50.440 here is what he says in his own words. When asked by Politico, what is your broader objective here
00:26:55.180 beyond forcing the president of Harvard to resign? He said, my primary objective is to eliminate the
00:27:00.220 DEI bureaucracy in every institution in America and to restore truth rather than racialist ideology
00:27:06.100 as the guiding principle of America. There it is. So in all of these articles where you are saying
00:27:13.120 he was the person to surface these plagiarism allegations, why don't you say, why don't you
00:27:19.120 follow the thought that he gives you, dot, dot, dot, because I hate the EI. So I don't understand
00:27:26.120 why legacy media continues to allow themselves to be used in this way over and over again by this
00:27:32.500 one grifter who is so clear about what he is doing. So as revealing as I think his interview
00:27:38.260 with Politico is, here's where they kind of lose me. Because after the question where he says,
00:27:43.440 oh, the entire thing is about how much I don't like DEI, the next question that that interviewer,
00:27:48.460 if I had been interviewing him, I would have asked is, what does Claudine Gay have to do with DEI?
00:27:54.060 Because that's the threat I see here, right? I have said this before on the show, but I really
00:27:59.180 want to underline it. DEI is the new critical race theory. It's already happening. And the same way 0.61
00:28:05.600 that when Rufo's attacks on critical race theory were happening, they weren't really about attacking
00:28:10.500 critical race theory because that would be absurd because as we know, critical race theory wasn't
00:28:14.880 actually being taught to like grade schoolers or preschoolers. And it was barely even a thing that
00:28:20.500 your average person was encountering in their day-to-day life. It was about labeling anything
00:28:25.540 having to do with race or wokeness as critical race theory, and then making that label a toxic
00:28:31.760 brand. In her resignation letter, Gay kind of alludes to that. She says, it is not lost on me
00:28:38.900 that I make an ideal canvas for projecting every anxiety about the generational and demographic
00:28:44.000 changes unfolding on American campuses. A Black woman selected to lead a storied institution,
00:28:49.600 someone who views diversity as a source of institutional strength and dynamism,
00:28:53.740 someone who has advocated a modern curriculum that spans from the frontier of quantum science
00:28:58.100 to the long-neglected history of Asian Americans,
00:29:00.760 someone who believes that a daughter of Haitian immigrants
00:29:02.840 has something to offer to the nation's oldest university. 0.92
00:29:06.200 Gay is the daughter of Haitian immigrants.
00:29:08.500 Also, fun fact, she is the cousin of the writer Roxane Gay.
00:29:12.060 So I think what Chris Rufo and people like him
00:29:15.220 are actually saying is that they are looking
00:29:17.340 at this institution that is Harvard, right?
00:29:20.140 This big, shining school, and saying, 1.00
00:29:23.160 if there is a Black woman who is at the helm 1.00
00:29:25.520 of that institution, it could not possibly be 1.00
00:29:28.040 because she is qualified. It is because she is Black. She has been given this job as a diversity 1.00
00:29:33.460 hire, and that is representative of all that is wrong that needs to be righted in a society that 0.80
00:29:39.220 has gotten too woke and too upset with identity politics. And that she is a Black woman at the 0.99
00:29:43.920 helm of the oldest and most prestigious university in the country is representative of that, 1.00
00:29:48.560 representative of all that is wrong with our current society, our current woke agenda, blah,
00:29:53.320 blah, blah, blah. So Rufo said that Bill Ackman represented the financial plank of getting Gay
00:29:59.560 pushed out of Harvard. So who is he? Well, he is a billionaire hedge fund manager and a donor to
00:30:05.580 Harvard. He has given tens of millions of dollars over the years to Harvard, but that money actually
00:30:11.300 does not rank him even close to the top donors, not even a little bit. He has not given near enough
00:30:17.540 money to rank as a top donor to the school. He said that he was really upset about the way that
00:30:22.480 gay-handled charges of anti-Semitism on campus. I'm like, that is what he has said is his issue
00:30:27.880 with her. But according to a piece in the New York Times, even before the October 7th attack,
00:30:33.400 the relationship between Ackman as a donor and Harvard had already begun to deteriorate.
00:30:38.280 Mr. Ackman has privately steamed at Harvard over at least the past three years, several people who
00:30:43.760 have discussed the subject with him say, in part after the university's administration brushed off
00:30:49.060 his suggestions for how to set up a testing lab to get students and staff back to campus during
00:30:54.220 the pandemic. Two years ago, in an incident not previously reported, Mr. Ackman told members of
00:30:59.920 Harvard's fundraising team he might not give another dime because they hadn't heeded his
00:31:04.680 advice on how to invest an earlier donation, said two people with knowledge of the exchanges.
00:31:10.020 Mr. Ackman sent off a series of fiery letters to Harvard administrators
00:31:13.820 questioning their financial acumen. He wound up donating more money anyway.
00:31:18.940 So it is possible that Ackman was concerned about anti-Semitism. I'm not saying that that's
00:31:25.120 a lie or made up, but it's also clear that this is somebody who felt that because they were giving
00:31:30.860 some money, again, though, not even close to a top donation that Harvard receives,
00:31:35.180 and I guess because he's got business acumen, he's a billionaire or something,
00:31:40.080 that like he should be having more say in how things are run at Harvard. And honestly, like
00:31:46.960 to really keep it a hundred, to extrapolate a little bit from what I've read in the New York
00:31:52.460 Times, again, this is my opinion. I think he probably felt like when Gay got into that position
00:31:59.800 of president at Harvard and then didn't immediately like look to him with the reverence he felt he 1.00
00:32:06.840 deserved i bet that he was like who does this black bitch think she is not capitulating to me 1.00
00:32:11.820 i'll show her like i think i think that that's probably how he felt it sounds like even before 1.00
00:32:16.840 gay was ever at the helm that relationship was deteriorating and now having a black woman 0.95
00:32:23.640 at the helm not listening to his brilliant financial advice i think that probably chapped 0.99
00:32:29.060 his ass like i i have dealt with my fair share of this kind of dynamic and that's what it reads 0.88
00:32:35.980 like to me more after a quick break 0.99
00:32:42.380 get bell pure fiber internet with crave netflix and disney plus from 94 a month price guaranteed
00:32:53.920 for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca for details
00:32:58.960 and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and not thinking
00:33:04.340 about podcasting? Think again. More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming
00:33:09.240 music from Spotify and Pandora. And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next
00:33:14.440 two combined. So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message. Plus, only iHeart
00:33:19.240 can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your
00:33:23.720 business? Think iHeart. Streaming, radio, and podcasting. Call 844-844-iHeart to get started.
00:33:30.400 That's 844-844-IHEART.
00:33:33.180 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:33:35.180 are equally important to your personality,
00:33:37.600 welcome home.
00:33:39.120 This is Prose Society,
00:33:41.360 the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:33:43.760 part group chat for thought daughters,
00:33:45.540 pop culture obsessives,
00:33:46.740 and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:33:48.540 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:33:51.520 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week,
00:33:53.280 we're connecting the dots between books,
00:33:55.280 the internet, and the conversations
00:33:56.700 everyone can't stop having.
00:33:58.460 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:34:00.400 I'm obsessed, I'm obsessed.
00:34:02.280 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators
00:34:04.900 to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:34:08.620 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters,
00:34:14.200 then that is a Trojan horse.
00:34:16.080 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations,
00:34:20.100 or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:34:23.600 you're in the right place.
00:34:25.280 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:34:27.880 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. See you between the pages.
00:34:37.800 Let's get right back into it.
00:34:41.500 So y'all might recall that after the October 7th attack in Israel, the Harvard Undergraduate
00:34:46.760 Palestine Solidarity Committee published an open letter in which they said that they hold,
00:34:51.640 quote, the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence, declaring that
00:34:56.660 millions of Palestinians in Gaza have been forced to live in an open-air prison and called on Harvard
00:35:01.720 to take action to stop the ongoing annihilation of Palestinians. After they published this letter,
00:35:07.740 Ackman called for the publication of the names of all the students involved in signing the letter
00:35:12.120 so that he could ensure that his company and others do not inadvertently hire any of the
00:35:17.100 people who signed the letter. Ackman posted, one should not be able to hide behind a corporate
00:35:21.820 shield when issuing statements supporting the actions of terrorists, and the name should be
00:35:26.220 made public so that their views are publicly known. Keep in mind, we are talking about
00:35:30.940 undergraduate students here. Now, this is my thing. Whether or not you think that these
00:35:36.600 undergrads should have written this letter or not, I'm not saying that's what I think,
00:35:40.980 but let's say for the sake of argument, that's what somebody thought. I can tell you having an
00:35:45.800 aggrieved 60-year-old billionaire donor to the school who has his own unrelated gripe against
00:35:52.120 the university, litigating what should happen to a bunch of undergrads is not good. Issues of
00:35:58.240 campus protest and speech are, I guess they're important in a kind of sense. This is a whole
00:36:03.780 other episode. And this is my opinion. Even if you think that these undergrads should not have
00:36:08.960 written this letter, they are in college. They are undergraduates. Where else are you meant to
00:36:14.420 be working out your political and social opinions as a young person, if not in college? I don't
00:36:20.400 even want to get into some of the stuff I believed and publicly said when I was an undergrad. I was
00:36:26.820 walking around identifying as a libertarian, thinking that that sounded cool and smart.
00:36:33.020 But in reality, I was 19 and I was just like stoned all the time. And I didn't know what I
00:36:36.820 was saying because I was young. So I just don't think a dynamic where a billionaire who thinks
00:36:42.360 everybody should be kowtowing to him, injecting himself into what is happening on a college
00:36:47.340 campus with undergrads is going to be good for anybody. I listen to a lot of the podcast
00:36:52.500 You're Wrong About, and Michael Hobbs, friend of the show, talks about this a lot when he covers
00:36:57.860 issues about campus culture wars, where he says when stuff happens on a college campus,
00:37:04.480 outside forces with an ax to grind, swooping in and pouring gasoline on the fire is not making
00:37:10.960 things any better, especially at a time when you had trucks displaying the names and faces of
00:37:17.300 undergraduates who were supportive of Palestine on campus. Like, this is not a safe or reasonable
00:37:23.260 college campus climate for anyone. So the day after Gay resigned, Ackman published a 4,000-word
00:37:30.840 screed against DEI on Twitter, where he says that DEI is, quote, the root cause of anti-Semitism
00:37:38.620 at Harvard. Which, like, think about that, right? Because Harvard is almost 400 years old. DEI wasn't
00:37:46.080 even a thing until like around the 60s. So he is saying that, say, back in 1922, when Harvard's
00:37:52.780 then president, A. Lawrence Lowell, was doing all kinds of stuff, like proposing a quota on the
00:37:58.540 number of Jewish students that Harvard should allow. Well, it turns out that was actually
00:38:02.240 because of DEI, a school of thought that would not even exist for another 40 years. And it's
00:38:07.420 such a rewriting of history. Like, I do think an honest assessment of anti-Semitism in institutions
00:38:14.400 is a worthwhile practice, but pointing to DEI as your starting point is ridiculous when history
00:38:21.100 exists. But, you know, why look at the rot in our institutions when you can just blame Black people 0.99
00:38:27.040 and blame wokeness and call it a day? Ackman writes, under DEI, one's degree of oppression
00:38:33.040 is determined based upon where one resides on a so-called intersectional pyramid of oppression
00:38:38.460 where whites, Jews, and Asians are deemed oppressors, and a subset of people of color,
00:38:44.260 LGBTQ people, and or women are deemed to be oppressed. DEI is racist because reverse racism 0.83
00:38:50.680 is racism, even if it is against white people, and it is remarkable that I even need to point
00:38:55.520 this out. This country has seen burgeoning resentment and anger grow materially over
00:39:00.100 the last few years, and the DEI movement is an important contributor to our growing divisiveness.
00:39:05.960 Resentment is one of the most important drivers of racism, and it is the lack of equity, i.e.
00:39:10.920 fairness, in how DEI operates that contributes to this resentment, he continued.
00:39:15.060 So what he is actually saying, in my opinion, is that it is not about anti-Semitism, it
00:39:19.360 is not about plagiarism, and they are saying that out loud and in print.
00:39:23.900 It is this attitude that says that Black people and people of color have gotten too much handed
00:39:29.400 to us because we are Black or because we are women or because we are Black women.
00:39:33.060 And honestly, I agree with him that it is about resentment, white resentment and white grievance and white anxiety that people like him are stoking.
00:39:42.400 And this anti-DEI campaign is about stoking those white grievances and resentment and saying, hey, look, those freeloaders get everything and it's gotten out of hand.
00:39:52.480 Let's put a stop to it.
00:39:53.440 To put a point on the argument that I think he's making, Ackman and Rufo see a Black woman at the helm of an elite institution like Harvard and say, she could have only gotten there because she's an affirmative action hire, and she took that job from a more qualified white person, and that needs to end.
00:40:10.400 Vivek Ramaswamy, current Republican presidential candidate, tweeted after Gay's resignation,
00:40:15.740 Here's a radical idea for the future.
00:40:17.900 Select leadership based on merit, who, by the way, for as much as he is hand-wringing
00:40:23.360 about people who might have gotten any support based on their identities, Ramaswami himself
00:40:27.660 got a fellowship from the Soros family intended to support the educational pursuits of students
00:40:33.520 who were raised by immigrants.
00:40:35.040 And to me, that is really what it comes down to.
00:40:38.160 It's different when he does it.
00:40:40.640 When he is successful, it is because of merit.
00:40:43.000 even if he objectively got a fellowship because of his identity. 0.71
00:40:47.280 When Gay is successful, it's because she's a diversity hire 0.98
00:40:50.820 who just didn't work hard and deserve it like he did. 1.00
00:40:53.920 Like, of course, he deserved it,
00:40:55.580 not like her who gets things because of her identity.
00:40:58.540 He doesn't do that.
00:40:59.600 That fellowship was something else.
00:41:01.140 He worked hard and it's merit for him.
00:41:03.760 And that is why you see this infuriating double standard
00:41:07.860 that only Gay is being held to.
00:41:11.100 Like, do people think that Gay is the first and only university president to have omitted
00:41:15.820 a handful of citations over her academic career?
00:41:18.460 Why are we not digging into all of their publishing records if this is such a big deal for university
00:41:23.620 presidents now?
00:41:24.340 Like, if you are affiliated with the university, is the standard that we're going to go through
00:41:28.040 every piece that you've ever published and every citation that you've ever published
00:41:32.140 to make sure that it checks out?
00:41:33.960 If so, fine.
00:41:34.900 But if that's not happening, why are we only talking about it with regards to Gay? 0.67
00:41:39.220 And this is what really pisses me off and where I kind of get into my feelings about the whole thing, because when this happens to qualified Black women, what they are really saying is that none of us deserve to be anywhere or have power over anything. 0.83
00:41:54.740 If you're Vice President Harris, you got power because you slept your way to the top. Or if you're Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, it's because of affirmative action.
00:42:04.380 Like, it doesn't matter if you have a PhD from Harvard, which gay has. 0.97
00:42:08.520 It doesn't matter if you've gone to the best schools and been at the top of your class 1.00
00:42:11.880 forever, as gay has. 1.00
00:42:14.000 Black excellence will not protect you. 1.00
00:42:16.720 Because what the fuck makes these people think that this is a woman who didn't get where 1.00
00:42:22.100 she did on merit? 1.00
00:42:23.800 It is only because she is a Black woman.
00:42:25.820 By virtue of just being a Black woman in these spaces, these people automatically think
00:42:30.000 that we were just handed a position or a fellowship or a job or support.
00:42:33.780 It is automatic to them.
00:42:35.860 The people tweeting about gay, just assume it and don't even give it a second thought.
00:42:39.880 And that wouldn't be so infuriating if it did not also coincide with this reality that 1.00
00:42:45.260 they do not give us a fucking thing. 0.99
00:42:48.620 Like, if Black women had been handed cushy positions at Harvard all this time, why did 1.00
00:42:55.580 it take almost 400 years for one of us to collect?
00:42:58.540 if there is a Black woman working in a space where you do not usually see Black women,
00:43:04.340 trust and believe she is there because she earned it. They do not give us a thing. It takes so much 1.00
00:43:10.460 work. You have to claw for it, fight for it, put up with shit that people could not even imagine 1.00
00:43:15.940 to stay there day after day. It truly reminds me of that episode of Scandal where Kerry 0.99
00:43:22.200 Washington's dad is yelling at her and he's like, we have to be twice as good to get half of what
00:43:27.660 they have. Like that really is the truth of what it is like. And I don't know, just like seeing this
00:43:34.060 unfold, seeing how quickly all of these people so quickly turned to her not being qualified
00:43:42.080 as an automatic given, it just really hurt. And I think that's one of the reasons like why
00:43:48.960 this was so hard for me and why it's so personal for me. After Gay resigned, Jason Kalikinis,
00:43:55.660 who is one of the hosts of the All In Tech podcast, who I feel like I talk about that show
00:44:00.420 a lot on this podcast. And it's probably because it is generally the number one or number two
00:44:06.860 tech podcast in the world. And so I think what they say, they have a huge platform when it comes
00:44:12.020 to shaping opinions and technology. So what they say, I think really matters. He tweeted,
00:44:16.920 we are returning to a colorblind performance-based society where we judge people by their character,
00:44:21.860 effort and achievements identity politics is a road to nowhere and it focuses a society on what
00:44:27.680 divides us as opposed to what binds us as we bend back however we must acknowledge that the world
00:44:32.720 isn't there and everyone has a different starting line in life it is virtuous to support everyone
00:44:37.140 who starts behind us to catch up but we should do this at the source education internships and
00:44:41.740 skills training so this tweet is what really got me yeah i remember you reading it to me and it was
00:44:51.220 you had a big reaction to this tweet yeah I did I don't exactly know why I think part of it is
00:45:02.720 because we're both tech podcasters and so ostensibly we're kind of colleagues and I think
00:45:10.260 it really cut deeply because this is how they really feel about me this is what they really
00:45:18.820 think about me, if we, if, if Jason, I don't know Jason, as far as I know, we've never been
00:45:24.020 in the same room together, but if we were at a tech conference or a podcast meetup or something
00:45:29.780 and he saw me there, this is what he would really think about me, that I didn't get there on my
00:45:36.240 merit, that I couldn't be qualified. And it just really hurts. Like if somebody listening knows
00:45:45.980 Jason or listens to his show
00:45:47.880 or has a connection to him, I honestly
00:45:50.100 hope he hears this and like
00:45:51.680 I don't mean that in like 1.00
00:45:53.480 a badass bitch way, I wish I did 1.00
00:45:56.020 I don't mean that in a like 0.98
00:45:57.940 tell Cersei I want her to know it was
00:46:00.080 me kind of way
00:46:01.000 Nice job with that reference
00:46:03.240 Thank you, I never watched Game of Thrones so I was kind of like
00:46:05.960 ooh, this is the right reference
00:46:06.820 Yeah, I hope
00:46:10.020 that he hears this somehow, I'm sure he's not a listener
00:46:12.000 of the show, but
00:46:13.620 I mean it
00:46:15.980 in the way that like, I really want him to hear this. And I would be happy to talk to him about
00:46:20.960 this. Like if he does hear this and he wants to talk to me off the record or on the record,
00:46:25.320 I want to have a conversation about this. If you were to scroll the Apple tech podcasts where
00:46:31.140 Jason and I both sometimes show up, him all the time, me, if I'm lucky, the top Apple tech
00:46:36.960 podcasts, and you were to tell me how many of those shows were hosted by black women,
00:46:42.020 or even how many of them had Black women behind the scenes? 0.74
00:46:45.500 How many of those shows even had Black women as guests? 1.00
00:46:48.180 Let's say they have white hosts. 1.00
00:46:49.780 How many of them regularly spotlight Black women's voices,
00:46:52.660 even just as guests as commentary?
00:46:54.960 Take a look at those numbers and then tell me, Jason,
00:46:58.140 with a straight face that we are in a performance-based,
00:47:03.020 colorblind society here in the tech space that we're both in.
00:47:06.980 Look how few of us there are in this space
00:47:09.660 and tell me with a straight face that you think that I got here because they are handing out
00:47:15.600 positions and jobs and funding and podcasts and support to Black women because of our identities.
00:47:22.080 I am not saying that I am the only one of us out here. Thank God I am not the only one of us out
00:47:27.160 here. I would not want to be in this space if I was the only Black woman out here doing this.
00:47:31.000 However, if what Jason is saying is true and we're all just getting whatever thrown at us
00:47:37.700 because we're Black women, then where are the rest of us? Why is this space so white and male?
00:47:43.700 Why does this space feel so lonely sometimes? When I look at the All In podcast, why does your 0.83
00:47:51.420 podcast have no Black women? Why do y'all almost never spotlight Black women? Our research,
00:47:57.580 our commentary, our analysis, where is it? If we have just been being forced into these spaces,
00:48:04.300 not because we deserve it, not because of merit, but because they're just giving them away because
00:48:08.580 we're Black women and so we're just getting everything. Where are the rest of us? Where are
00:48:12.820 we? I would love to know. If what he is saying is true and that people are just being given things,
00:48:20.920 when it comes to VC funding, why is it that Black women get less than 1% of all VC funding?
00:48:28.280 Not even like less than one, not even one. One is the smallest amount of a number that something can be and still be a number. And we don't even get that. Why? If what you are saying is true, how can that be possible? 1.00
00:48:40.600 And I think hearing comments like that from people like Jason, against the backdrop where we already get so few of anything, so little of anything, we already get the crumbs, the scraps, the less than one, and to have people say, well, what little you do have, you don't even really deserve that, it was handed to you.
00:49:02.420 It's just such a slap in the face. And what upsets me about this is that it negates the reality that people on the outside don't always see. And I honestly work very hard to not get down on it and not focus on it.
00:49:17.700 But the reality is that we are dealing with so much just to be in these spaces.
00:49:25.680 Like, I had to fight to have shows on the same chart as Jason's, albeit a hundred slots
00:49:33.200 down, but I had to fight to be there.
00:49:35.060 You think they gave me anything?
00:49:36.660 You think anybody knocked on my door and said, here, take this? 1.00
00:49:40.280 I fucking wish. 0.99
00:49:42.600 I would, if that were the case, I would be the first person to be like, oh my God, like, 0.99
00:49:47.700 can you believe I got this? How cushy. And this assumption that it is about merit for him and
00:49:55.000 not about merit for me on the basis of me being a Black woman, it's not just wrong. It's offensive.
00:50:03.880 Like, it's a lie. It is hurtful because these are my colleagues and this is how they really see me.
00:50:10.660 This is what they really actually think about me. And yeah, I do take it personally to have someone say like, oh, well, for him, it's about merit. But for me, I got to be the diversity hire. And so we have to work very hard to fight for what we get. And what we get is not often a lot and not often what we deserve. And we kind of have to like make a meal of that.
00:50:34.200 But then on top of it, to have people like them who set the agenda, set the tone and be like, oh, well, you don't even deserve what you have.
00:50:42.960 Meanwhile, if they knew the stuff that I have to smile through, the amounts of shit I have to eat regularly, the kind of responses that we get from people who don't think that we deserve to be where we are, just to have the opportunity to work and make less, it would shock him. 0.98
00:51:00.340 Y'all remember, they had to have public campaigns to remind white people not to touch Black people's hair in public places. This has happened to me before in a professional context. Jason, has it ever happened to you? Have you ever had to experience that in front of your colleagues and then just smile through it and brush it off and keep going and do your job because that's just how it is? 0.98
00:51:24.060 we just did an ad for the service Delete Me. And when I got the ad, I was like, oh, I know exactly
00:51:29.920 what I'll say, which is that even before the podcast started, when I was just working out
00:51:34.660 what we were going to be talking about, one of the first things I did was sign up for Delete Me
00:51:38.920 because I was afraid that people were going to come after me and come after my family and come
00:51:44.680 after my loved ones because of the things that I was saying on here. And those fears are not
00:51:49.540 unfounded. They are actually very reasonable. People like Jason have no idea what people like
00:51:57.500 me have to go through just to be here and get less. He could not be me for one second.
00:52:05.220 Again, it just upsets me to hear what you always suspect, to hear what you really know deep down.
00:52:13.580 It just really hurts. And yeah, I mean, I'm hurt. Like it's upsetting to me. And I think it goes for women. It goes for black women. It goes for other people of color. It goes for trans folks. It goes for queer folks. Like if people really knew how hard it is to do what we do to have to show up in some of these spaces, how much of ourselves we have to like cut and cut off and cut out to be in these spaces.
00:52:38.580 Like we know, we feel it every day. We deal with that reality every day, but they don't know. And then on top of it, they get to go out in public and say shit like this and not just say it, but have what they say, set the agenda, set the tone, establish the conversation, be accepted as truth.
00:52:56.620 it is just like so wrong and so ignorant and it hurts like it hurts that these are the people that 0.99
00:53:05.600 I'm like in the same space with it it hurts that this is how they this is genuinely how they see
00:53:11.920 us and I know I know this sounds like very well with me right now and I'm I am sorry uh but it
00:53:18.440 it hurts me very personally very deeply and the reality is that it hurts all of us the data is
00:53:25.320 super clear that these kinds of public conversations trickle down to other
00:53:29.840 marginalized people. And it paints us all as unqualified and bad leaders. It was so easy
00:53:36.740 for people to say Claudine Gay is unqualified. She has a PhD from Harvard. Do you know how many
00:53:41.820 people have that? They are so quick to cut her down and tell us that she didn't deserve to get 1.00
00:53:49.180 where she is. And other people see that and it has a real impact. It makes it so easy to look
00:53:56.560 at marginalized people in leadership positions and say, we don't belong there. We shouldn't be
00:54:01.800 there. This stuff has real consequences. It keeps us out of rooms where decisions are being made,
00:54:06.560 which makes us all worse off. It makes us all less safe. It makes technology worse because
00:54:12.080 it's being designed by less people who are in more silos. Everybody suffers when this kind of stuff
00:54:16.840 flourishes as it's flourishing right now. Other marginalized people see this and they think,
00:54:21.720 well, it's not worth it to strive if this is going to be what it is. It prevents us from having a
00:54:28.620 truly representative democracy, the democracy that we deserve, and keeps us from having civic and
00:54:34.360 public spaces that look like the communities that they're supposed to be working for. And I think
00:54:39.500 that that is what people like Rufo are saying, that we shouldn't be able to have any avenues
00:54:45.740 to be in civic and public life and build power in those spaces. We shouldn't have any avenues to
00:54:52.260 power. Black women who we already hold so little institutional power, and they want us to not have 1.00
00:54:58.520 that either. And honestly, the thing about Gay, it's not really about her as an individual, but 1.00
00:55:04.880 I do think I might have a little bit of an unpopular opinion about her, which is that
00:55:08.180 I don't know Gay, but she is unquestionably qualified to be the president of Harvard.
00:55:12.840 The question of whether she got there by merit or not, like, is laughable, does not deserve a response. But I think that maybe part of Gay maybe thought that, like, carrying weight for Harvard's status quo was going to be the answer for her. And that, like, maybe that would save her. Like, if she doesn't mix it up too much, the storm will pass. And in the end, it didn't save her.
00:55:34.900 my friend tim put it really well on twitter her resignation is proof that you can be 0.99
00:55:39.940 middle of the road apolitical and innocuous and your black ass will still get clipped 0.98
00:55:44.660 so you might as well stand for something and fight back sorry i'm like genuinely upset 0.97
00:55:51.820 yeah that was a lot yeah thank you for that it it the emotion really came through so that was a lot
00:56:00.860 What does it all mean?
00:56:02.140 Well, this month in Texas, Texas SB 17 went into effect, which is a law that requires public
00:56:08.420 universities in Texas to no longer have offices dedicated to DEI or employees focused specifically
00:56:14.460 on that purpose.
00:56:15.200 Higher education workers and job applicants can also no longer sign any statements dedicated
00:56:19.620 to upholding any kind of DEI standard or attend trainings that reference race, color, ethnicity,
00:56:25.640 gender identity, or sexual orientation, according to this law.
00:56:28.540 DeSantis signed a similar law in Florida last year, too.
00:56:31.600 So I think the next iteration of this is going to be corporations and brands facing pressure
00:56:37.220 to drop or distance themselves from DEI.
00:56:40.420 I don't know if you saw, but the former CEO of the activewear brand, Lululemon, basically
00:56:46.620 said, like, oh, we have to get away from DEI.
00:56:49.660 You need to make it clear that you don't want certain people buying your clothes, which
00:56:52.360 is like, trust and believe when I say I will never buy another.
00:56:56.120 Mission accomplished. 1.00
00:56:57.080 your stuff is overpriced garbage anyway but trust and believe that my black ass never will 1.00
00:57:02.320 you will never get a dime my money can do don't gotta worry about me will never be buying another 1.00
00:57:08.500 lulu lemon item again in my life what a statement i had not seen that yeah and so i think that's
00:57:16.120 going to be the next push getting brands and corporations to distance themselves and i think
00:57:21.480 the bigger game is to make dei just like with critical race theory into a toxic brand you know
00:57:26.700 where anything that right-wing culture warriors don't like can be labeled DEI and automatically
00:57:33.240 conjure up negative association. So like a Black woman in a leadership position, DEI. A book written 1.00
00:57:39.740 by a Black person on a college syllabus, DEI. A Black woman in an ad campaign, DEI. And I think 0.58
00:57:46.060 the goal really is a society where marginalized people do not hold power in civic and public life
00:57:52.800 And any avenues whereby we might have access to power or support toward power are obliterated.
00:57:58.420 It's the same reason why, after gutting affirmative action, Edward Blum, that right-wing activist, went after funding fellowships that support Black women, like Fearless Fund. 0.53
00:58:07.740 And I think doing this via attacks on DEI as racist, or like reverse racist or whatever, just sets up this fictitious idea that we're living in a society where Black folks are being given everything, all the power. 0.85
00:58:21.880 It is the most callous, disingenuous way of stoking the fears and anxieties of the dominant group while they get to continue enjoy being the dominant group and also pretending to be underserved. 0.71
00:58:34.340 But as always, those attacks always end up hurting everyone, right?
00:58:39.180 Like they end up making us all worse off.
00:58:41.860 Rufo has said that one of his goals is to make DEI work at the professional level obsolete dead end jobs.
00:58:47.340 He said, one goal for 2024, 50% net reduction of DEI jobs in corporate America, put the
00:58:53.240 entire industry into chaos, make it a career path to nowhere.
00:58:56.940 And do you know who has held the majority of DEI jobs in the United States? 1.00
00:59:01.440 White women.
00:59:02.320 The data is very clear. 0.73
00:59:03.960 Over the past 10 years, white women not only hold the majority of executive and consulting
00:59:08.460 DEI roles, but are also the best compensated for this work with the longest tenured.
00:59:13.100 This is according to a write-up by Aparna R. of Data for Inclusive Change, which we'll link to in the show notes. And so I say all of this to say, like, it is not just about Black women. These attacks, if left to fester, hurt all of us. And so women, white women, all women, all of us should be concerned about this.
00:59:31.860 Because it's like Prince said, when you play me, you play yourself. 0.52
00:59:35.640 And if he succeeds at making DEI not tenable as a career, white women are the ones who are holding those jobs. 0.99
00:59:45.140 You could ask the question as to why that is. 0.96
00:59:48.120 That's a whole other issue.
00:59:49.140 But that's who is currently holding power in the DEI space currently.
00:59:54.260 The data is very clear.
00:59:55.180 Yeah. And more broadly, it harms all of us by excluding talented, insightful people with unique and valuable perspectives from conversations, from positions of authority. It hurts all of us.
01:00:12.740 That's exactly right. That diversity and inclusion is what makes our country good. It's what makes our companies good. Not even from the level of it's nice to do, which it is. It makes our products better. It makes our businesses better. It makes people more money. It makes us more creative. It's a good thing.
01:00:33.200 And so I think that we're just in this place where it's like people have to decide whether or not they agree.
01:00:38.820 And Mark Cuban, he made the point that you made.
01:00:41.620 He said, the loss of DEI phobic companies is my gain.
01:00:45.720 Cuban went on to defend the core principles of DEI and saying having a workforce that is diverse and representative of your stakeholders is good for business.
01:00:53.180 Yeah, it's like an obvious thing. Having employees who are representative of the stakeholders who you're trying to serve, who you're trying to sell products or services to is a good, smart thing.
01:01:10.180 And I can't believe that that's not clear. And I guess the question is, like, do these people care more about grievance mongerings than they do about having successful companies and making money? Maybe they do.
01:01:22.260 When we did our miniseries, Internet Hate Machine, last year, we broke down how right-wing grievances are weaponized into these kinds of attacks.
01:01:30.060 Now, it is long past time for institutions like corporations, legacy media, universities, etc., to understand these kinds of attacks and how they work.
01:01:41.560 It has been going on for so long, it is time to figure out the game and figure out what you are going to do.
01:01:47.080 It is past time to figure out the game and figure out what you're going to do.
01:01:50.380 These same disingenuous tactics have been used too many times for these institutions to continue to feign ignorance and powerlessness and not know how to respond when they happen and to not be anticipating them.
01:02:04.400 One of the biggest takeaways that I had from that series is that you cannot capitulate to these people.
01:02:11.380 If you give them an inch, they will smell blood in the water and they will know they can take a mile.
01:02:15.940 Gay announced her resignation like a couple of days ago.
01:02:18.900 Ackman has already called for the entire Board of Harvard to resign right after that, even after he got his way and she resigned.
01:02:26.540 When trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney made that one video for Bud Light, the company apologized, basically threw her to the wolves, never called her, never even sent her an email like, how you doing?
01:02:39.040 Let her have to deal with death threats, have to leave her home, all of that.
01:02:44.680 They parted ways with employees who had been involved, and these people were still not
01:02:49.820 satisfied.
01:02:50.420 They went after Target for Pride merchandise next.
01:02:52.900 There is no pleasing these people because they are bad actors.
01:02:56.740 So if you relent at all, they will know, like, oh, this is a winning strategy.
01:03:02.360 Let's just keep doing it.
01:03:03.940 So it is time to stand by your staff, stand by your people, and say, listen, if you come
01:03:09.980 for them, we will not budge.
01:03:11.900 Go pound sand. 1.00
01:03:12.880 And to legacy media, you do not have to be Chris Rufo's bitch. Like, you can make a different choice. Victor Ray, who wrote the book On Critical Race Theory, put it so beautifully. He said, accepting bad faith framing is a choice to ally oneself with bad faith actors. And that is absolutely the truth. 1.00
01:03:31.700 And, yeah, I guess that's really where we got to leave it. Like, I really hope that we see institutions who do have power really preparing for this and understanding this. And, yeah, I mean, it's not how I wanted to start my 2024 with a whole massive national conversation about how Black women are unqualified.
01:03:52.580 um you know when this was all going down one of my mentors sabrina and i were talking 0.93
01:03:57.220 about like what we should be doing in this moment like should prominent visible black women be like
01:04:03.640 publishing an open letter putting legacy media on blast and being like we see this happening we see
01:04:09.640 you doing it we won't take it and i thought about this for a minute and i was like you know all i
01:04:16.440 really want to do is like exist and do my work and do my job and that's it and just like live
01:04:22.360 live our lot like live my life all I want to do is live my life the same as anyone else
01:04:26.380 without these attacks when we get into leadership positions all I want to do is know that I'm not
01:04:32.480 going to be tossed out like garbage as collateral damage when the attack comes right I just want
01:04:39.540 my humanity recognized and so I don't know the idea of like putting out a letter saying this
01:04:46.100 I just think in 2024, we should be done having to advocate for our humanity in this way, in public.
01:04:54.200 And yet, here we are.
01:04:56.060 So I don't know.
01:05:02.180 If you're looking for ways to support the show, check out our merch store at tangoti.com slash store.
01:05:08.140 Got a story about an interesting thing in tech or just want to say hi?
01:05:11.600 You can reach us at hello at tangoti.com.
01:05:13.560 You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangody.com.
01:05:17.320 There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me, Bridget Todd.
01:05:20.020 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
01:05:22.680 Edited by Joey Pat.
01:05:24.500 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer.
01:05:26.720 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer.
01:05:29.360 Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
01:05:31.360 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
01:05:32.840 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
01:05:36.160 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app,
01:05:39.380 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:05:43.560 if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality
01:05:51.300 welcome home pro society is a weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat for anyone
01:05:57.520 who thinks pride and prejudice and love island deserve the same level of discourse each week
01:06:02.040 we're connecting the dots between books the internet and pop culture with your favorite
01:06:06.080 writers book talk creators and plenty of overthought opinions yeah i'm obsessed i'm
01:06:11.080 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:06:41.080 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:06:51.060 Hey, this is Hayes Davenport.
01:06:53.020 And Sean Clemens.
01:06:54.220 We host the podcast Hollywood Handbook.
01:06:56.380 Every episode, we're trying to help our guests improve their careers by mainly focusing on how they can help us improve our careers.
01:07:02.000 The show is famously super accessible, so you can easily jump into any of our 650 episodes and understand what's going on.
01:07:08.380 We recommend some of our recent episodes with Ben Stiller, Danny McBride, Riz Ahmed, and Mary Steenburgen.
01:07:13.380 Listen to Hollywood Handbook on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:07:19.360 This is an iHeart Podcast.
01:07:22.000 Guaranteed human.