There Are No Girls on the Internet - December 09, 2023


New Taylor Swift conspiracy drops online; IRL violence from misinformation in Dublin; TikTok makes you 17% more antisemetic? Not quite, Nikki Haley – NEWS ROUNDUP

Topics
Devternity! Did this tech conference create fake women to look more diverse? Elon Musk welcomes BFF Alex Jones back to Twitter

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour

Words per minute

174.53

Word count

10,617

Sentence count

365

Harmful content

Misogyny

17

sentences flagged

Toxicity

22

sentences flagged

Hate speech

24

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:00:36.860 are equally important to your personality,
00:00:39.100 welcome home.
00:00:40.700 Pro Society is a weekly podcast
00:00:42.560 that's part book club, part group chat
00:00:44.480 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:00:46.180 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:00:48.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:00:50.360 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:00:52.460 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:00:54.980 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:00:57.080 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:05.220 Hi, Bridget here.
00:01:06.480 The other podcast that I make with Mozilla about AI called IRL was nominated for an Anthem Award.
00:01:13.420 It would mean so much to me if you could take just a few seconds and vote for IRL to win.
00:01:18.480 Just go to tangody.com slash IRL or use the link in our show notes.
00:01:23.140 You can vote until December 21st.
00:01:24.900 Thank you so much.
00:01:26.320 It means a lot.
00:01:27.080 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:39.560 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:44.760 I am here with my producer, Joey.
00:01:46.700 Joey, it's nice to see you back.
00:01:47.940 We missed you.
00:01:48.880 Hi, it's nice to see you too.
00:01:51.060 So as y'all know, we are trying to start every episode with a little bit of light banter
00:01:56.000 to sort of ease us into the episode.
00:01:58.120 I tried my hardest to do it last week.
00:02:01.660 We bantered.
00:02:03.780 Yeah, banter was had.
00:02:06.020 Listener Susan actually emailed us
00:02:08.120 with a great banter suggestion
00:02:09.680 of using the time to sort of get to know our producers
00:02:13.320 because we hear from Joey, we hear from Mike.
00:02:15.840 Listeners don't necessarily know who these folks are,
00:02:17.880 even though I feel like, you know,
00:02:19.020 I'm talking to them all the time.
00:02:21.880 So to do that,
00:02:23.080 let's play a little bit of my favorite game,
00:02:25.100 would you rather would you rather is one of my favorite games i play it endlessly on car trips
00:02:29.820 i've annoyed all my friends i'll text would you rathers okay would you rather be able to use the
00:02:35.260 internet only for 20 minutes every day or you can use it like normal but your boss gets a detailed
00:02:42.100 report of everything you did online every day oh my god i gotta think about that now i'm like what
00:02:51.320 do i do on the internet what do i like i feel like i need to go through um oh okay that's rough
00:02:58.140 like this is my problem i get way too strong like i i love these things but also then i spend too
00:03:05.540 much time being like but what would i do like really what if this was real um i don't know i
00:03:12.040 uh but i think my boss is pretty chill that's the i so i'm thinking of like my boss currently
00:03:19.820 hi maya if you're listening to this um but like i wouldn't like i feel like that would be fine
00:03:28.040 like i wouldn't like there's nothing i read yeah like she would just sort of be like all right
00:03:31.980 whatever like maya wouldn't even look i do spend like an embarrassing amount of time on like
00:03:36.180 twitter so like i don't like i don't really know if i want that like out into the world
00:03:41.280 um i'm gonna say tentatively i think my boss gets a detailed report on what
00:03:47.600 just because I can't like the idea of only having 20 minutes on the internet like I'm like that is
00:03:54.400 not I don't beyond even just like the normal stuff I like need to look up like I don't know
00:04:01.340 how to like function like I don't think I've ever cooked a meal without ever having to like look up
00:04:05.500 something like really stupid like I don't know but yeah yeah that's my answer what about you 0.95
00:04:12.780 Bridget what about you well I'm my own boss really it's like I will say to your point about 0.99
00:04:19.640 like the things that I have to google when I'm cooking like a tablespoon is you know how many
00:04:26.700 cups in a table like things I feel like I should have learned in grammar school like I if I if
00:04:31.060 people if another human got to see the level of inane things that I have to check via google
00:04:36.940 I will be very embarrassed oh the other one recently I've been working on a project currently
00:04:42.560 that's making me go through some like j-store articles and some like really academic stuff
00:04:46.960 uh which is super fun i love doing that stuff like honestly like that's kind of shit i like
00:04:51.380 i'll nerd out over um however it's been a minute since i've read like academic articles and i
00:04:57.180 don't there's a lot of words that i've had to google just like that are like weird words like
00:05:03.080 like but yeah like i feel like by my my recently it's either that or like if i'm writing something 0.82
00:05:09.160 and i'll be like i keep spelling this word wrong those are usually like stupid ones like that's
00:05:13.060 usually like i can't remember how to spell like schedule or something like i don't um that might
00:05:19.620 be a little embarrassing but you know what yeah i can't i can't i don't know what words mean i think
00:05:25.360 okay so here at there are no girls on the internet we have been watching the republican debate so
00:05:32.500 it. Y'all don't have to. It has been interesting and frustrating. I would say like 80% of what 0.78
00:05:39.820 comes up on the Republican debate so far has been like stunts or scams or grandstanding or
00:05:45.600 conspiracy theories. And then maybe like 20% is actual policy discussions. Genuinely, when I
00:05:51.740 watched it this week, I had to turn it off for a little while and collect myself and then return
00:05:56.360 to it. So technology has come up in most of these debates, specifically whether or not TikTok should
00:06:02.480 be banned. Former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley has been all in on banning TikTok. And in
00:06:07.580 this week's debate, she dropped a startling statistic that just 30 minutes spent on TikTok
00:06:12.840 makes people 17% more anti-Semitic. We really do need to ban TikTok once and for all. And let me
00:06:21.280 tell you why. For every 30 minutes that someone watches TikTok, every day they become 17% more
00:06:31.060 anti-Semitic, more pro-Hamas based on doing that. Which is like a pretty big claim. So whenever I
00:06:39.060 hear a candidate make like a clear, specific claim like that, you got to dig into it to find more,
00:06:44.260 right? Because it should be pretty cut and dry, right? Like find the stat, confirm whether it's
00:06:48.240 accurate or not. So I thought this was going to be a straightforward fact check for y'all.
00:06:52.440 When I tell you this was so much more complicated. So that 17% figure that Haley cited actually came
00:06:58.560 from a data analysis shared on Twitter on November 30th by Anthony Goldblum. Goldblum is the former
00:07:04.780 CEO of a data science platform called Kaggle. I looked into Goldblum. He is like a macro economist
00:07:10.560 from Australia. So first, Haley misstated what Goldblum's analysis found. Goldblum's analysis
00:07:17.760 suggests that people who spend 30 minutes a day or more on TikTok are 17% more likely than others
00:07:23.460 to hold anti-Semitic or anti-Israel views. We'll come back to that point in just a moment.
00:07:27.580 For comparison, according to this analysis, the use of Instagram for 30 minutes a day was associated with a 6% increase in the likelihood of anti-Semitic views, and the use of Twitter for 30 minutes a day was associated with a 2% increase in likelihood.
00:07:40.860 Side note, when Goldblum tweeted this, you know Elon Musk was in the thread being like, interesting, this says that actually Twitter is not a big driver of anti-Semitism, you don't say, that's great for me, unsurprisingly.
00:07:54.540 So Haley has definitely misstated the conclusions of this analysis.
00:08:00.280 She said during the debate, for every 30 minutes that somebody watched TikTok, and that's simply not what this analysis suggests.
00:08:07.320 The stated conclusions of the analysis are that people who spend 30 minutes or more on TikTok every day are 17% more likely to hold anti-Semitic attitudes.
00:08:17.260 What it does not suggest is that spending 30 minutes on TikTok will bolster someone's anti-Semitic views.
00:08:22.980 By 17%.
00:08:23.540 which is just by 17% which is like oh like that's like a real like how does one get 17 I want I want
00:08:31.220 to like I would love for an interviewer to ask Nikki Haley how exactly somebody gets seven like
00:08:38.820 what is the metric to measure that what is 17 more anti-semitic 17% more anti-semitic than what you
00:08:44.600 previously were that's yeah so I think that's why what you said I think that's exactly why people
00:08:50.800 are really responding to this on Twitter. People are like, what is the metric that you're using?
00:08:57.000 How are you quantifying this? Had I been the moderator of that debate, I would have definitely
00:09:00.900 pressed her because it's like, you can't drop a stat like that. And then you just like, oh, well,
00:09:05.640 17%, my, my. Anyway, moving on. That's really a stat that she clearly got it from somewhere.
00:09:11.000 And so I do think the moderators, it would have behooved them to ask a little bit more about
00:09:15.460 where that stat came from. So she is just flat out misstating what that analysis actually said.
00:09:21.540 But then there's the issue of the analysis itself that is a bit more complicated. So I want to be
00:09:26.600 super clear that I am like no researcher. I don't have an educational background in this at all.
00:09:31.660 But our producer, Mike, has a PhD and does survey research for a living. I had Mike take a look at
00:09:36.860 the analysis and he raised a few questions. First, Goldblum does not describe his methods in the
00:09:42.580 survey. So we don't know a ton about how he came to these conclusions around that 17% figure.
00:09:48.140 It's entirely possible that these methods are perfectly sound, but because when he shared his
00:09:51.960 analysis, he did not also share his methods, we have no idea and we can't even look into it to
00:09:56.860 say. This was not a study published in a scientific journal. It is just an analysis that somebody
00:10:02.140 posted on Twitter and GitHub. So definitely keep that in mind when thinking about this stat.
00:10:07.680 Second is the way that Goldblum framed the survey questions to determine how often the
00:10:12.260 people responding to the survey use TikTok. According to his data, 90% of all respondents
00:10:17.760 use TikTok at least once a day, which is certainly not representative of the larger United States
00:10:23.220 population. He also did not control for age. You know, we know that folks who use TikTok tend to
00:10:28.480 skew younger. And we also know that younger people tend to be more sympathetic to Palestinians. So
00:10:33.500 in his correlational study, in which he didn't control for age at all, it is possible that the
00:10:38.800 entire effect is driven by the fact that the people who use TikTok tend to be younger than
00:10:42.760 the people who don't. We just don't know. So another point that I wanted to make, which
00:10:47.300 this is coming from noted non-researcher me, Bridget, and not researcher Mike, is the way
00:10:53.420 that Goldblum correlates anti-Israel views with anti-Semitic views. On Twitter, Goldblum
00:10:59.100 fleshed this out, saying TikTok users are more likely to believe Jewish people are dishonest
00:11:04.000 business, are disloyal to America, and have too much power in media. They're also more likely to
00:11:09.420 disagree that Israel has a right to defend itself against those who want to destroy it. And I guess
00:11:13.760 I just have questions about this framing that puts very clear anti-Semitic tropes like Jewish
00:11:19.360 people have too much power alongside specific policy opinions about the state of Israel to
00:11:25.020 make the overall claim about TikTok users being anti-Semitic. I just have questions about how he,
00:11:30.580 how how those survey questions are being understood in this in this analysis yeah
00:11:36.040 that's definitely like the biggest red flag for me um i get also not i'm i'm also not a you know
00:11:45.240 professional researcher um i did however good in journalism school and they teach us a lot about
00:11:52.000 you know not asking leading questions or not how framing questions in a specific way like kind of
00:11:59.520 determines how like I don't know I learned that in like AP stats too like that's a pretty basic
00:12:05.080 concept and this is like hey what it what it does whenever you have something that's talking about
00:12:11.240 anti-semitism and you are also roping in the most basic questions about Israel and the Israeli
00:12:19.480 military and like yeah like this said specific policy uh questions like that's that is so much
00:12:28.380 more complicated than just simply asking about anti-semitism um and also then what it ends up
00:12:35.740 doing is falsely equivocating any sort of criticism of israel with anti-semitism which is not true
00:12:42.120 um it is not like look like i we're in the middle i mean and i think now especially now we're seeing
00:12:49.280 this like there's a lot of like people that are jewish that are very critical of israel or zionism
00:12:54.640 or like the Israeli state um there are people I know that like I mean I don't know I have family
00:13:00.500 members that aren't even like super that are definitely like Zionists that are definitely
00:13:04.920 more pro-Israel but like they're very critical of the Israeli state because the state is currently
00:13:10.460 like has a super far-right government um in charge but yeah no that's that is a weird like
00:13:17.700 I think that that to me just hearing that he put those two things together and and use that as one
00:13:24.080 sort of set of data and to make like one assumption about whether or not people are
00:13:29.060 antisemitic and hold antisemitic views that to me disqualifies the entire results of the survey
00:13:35.980 because if you're if you're not making that distinction you're not going to get accurate
00:13:40.460 results yeah and i want to be clear like i am fully fully ready to believe that it's possible
00:13:48.300 that tiktok drives harmful attitudes like antisemitism we already know that tiktok like
00:13:54.080 This is something that happens on social media platforms. This is not like a surprise. Media Matters did an analysis that found that TikTok recommends users content that is misogynistic and deeply transphobic and uses that kind of uses transphobia and misogyny as a entry point to lead them down far right rabbit holes.
00:14:13.280 And so that is a thing, right? But I wanted to bring this up because I do think it says something about our current political and media climate right now. It is very weird to me that someone running for office, running for president, could clearly and specifically state something as a clear fact based on just an analysis that somebody put out there on Twitter.
00:14:36.160 And that that claim would be this difficult and complicated to verify. You know, I've seen people like dismissing Haley's claims, which I also like kind of understand because it does like I was when I was like looking into this, I was ready to be like, what did Nikki Haley completely misunderstand? Or like, where did she pull this completely ridiculous stat from? I thought that I thought it was going to be like a made up stat that she just like fabricated. And I'm realizing now that like, that isn't necessarily the case.
00:15:04.320 And I actually do think it matters how platforms are shaping and stoking social attitudes. But I wish that we could have that conversation in a way that doesn't misstate findings, or that doesn't spotlight, you know, analysis that's just murky, murky in the sense of like, it's not clear how it was how it was gathered, right? So like, I don't think that this is actually helping us to get there. And I actually would be curious to have that conversation.
00:15:32.620 yeah no definitely I think this is a weird one because I also yeah I think my immediate I'd seen
00:15:38.100 that like I saw that clip on Twitter and my immediate response was just like oh my god like
00:15:41.820 of course Nikki Haley's saying some weird stuff um but yeah no it definitely is indicative of
00:15:48.620 something and I think it also like the way the fact that like something like TikTok that's just
00:15:56.180 a platform has been politicized so much like that makes it so hard to actually analyze like what
00:16:02.840 we're talking about and analyze the way that yeah like what there is a conversation to be had about
00:16:07.320 these sites like stoking hate and like not just anti-semitism but like yeah like racism transphobia
00:16:12.160 homophobia misogyny there is a there's a conversation to be had there um it is important
00:16:18.580 that we like figure out ways to address that problem but like there's so many intersecting
00:16:24.500 issues here a it's the fact that tiktok's been politicized and it's so hard to actually do that
00:16:28.900 research when it's been politicized in this way and then on the other hand like i think this is
00:16:33.100 why it is so important to distinguish between what is actually anti-semitic and what is
00:16:38.900 simply criticism of israel um that's not necessarily anti-semitic because it's so
00:16:45.880 like i feel like i'm having this this has been a frustrating thing lately when trying to find
00:16:49.940 just like statistics and info about anti-semitism in particular is it so much of it is so hard to
00:16:54.900 like really get real clear answers just because yeah so many people whether just sort of by
00:17:03.480 assumption or like for with a specific agenda have included criticism of israel or have included
00:17:11.340 criticism of zionism within their analysis of anti-semitism um and i'm not saying like again
00:17:18.120 And not saying that there aren't criticisms out of Israel and Zionism out there that turn into anti-Semitic talking points. 0.69
00:17:24.980 Obviously, that is a thing, too. And that is bad.
00:17:27.380 But like those you should be addressing those as anti-Semitism and because of the anti-Semitism they got,
00:17:31.540 not because they're just criticizing a government that is separate from just a group of people that share an identity.
00:17:39.940 But yeah, that is it's weird. It is a weird like sort of I feel like this is another one of those things where like the Republican,
00:17:47.220 somebody had the Republican Party said something really weird and it's like a meme for a bit and
00:17:51.160 then you like we all think about it like a week later and are like oh oh no this is bad like these
00:17:56.980 are and again like this is somebody running for president of the United States. Yeah also I'm
00:18:02.540 sorry I don't like this is the like the Republican Party this is y'all are the like Jewish space 0.95
00:18:08.420 lasers party like you can't be out here being like it's TikTok that's making people anti-semitic 0.71
00:18:13.920 Like, I don't know, that's, the call's coming from inside the house.
00:18:17.480 Like, yeah, it's weird.
00:18:19.360 I was literally just thinking that when you were saying that, I was thinking the same
00:18:23.180 line, like, that call might be coming from inside some of the houses on that one.
00:18:32.040 Let's take a quick break.
00:18:33.020 We'll be right back.
00:19:03.020 number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined. So whatever your customers
00:19:07.740 listen to, they'll hear your message. Plus only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across
00:19:12.960 broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your business? Think iHeart. Streaming, radio, and
00:19:18.520 podcasting. Let us show you at iHeartAdvertising.com. That's iHeartAdvertising.com. If your bookshelf
00:19:25.320 and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home. This is Prose
00:19:31.540 Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters,
00:19:36.760 pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the
00:19:41.080 same level of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books,
00:19:46.500 the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having. I'm going to have to look up
00:19:50.780 this story. I'm obsessed. So obsessed. From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk
00:19:55.720 creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table. It's like if you can
00:20:00.660 hide some real messages inside compelling characters and that is a trojan horse whether
00:20:07.480 you're looking for literary deep dives smart pop culture conversations or a community of readers
00:20:12.620 who love to think a little too much you're in the right place listen to pro society on the
00:20:18.100 iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts see you between the pages
00:20:23.920 and we're back
00:20:30.700 so we got to talk about this amazon lawsuit quick heads up that this conversation does involve
00:20:38.680 the sexual exploitation of a minor so two years ago a brazilian teenager was participating in a
00:20:44.880 foreign exchange student program so she was living with a host family in west virginia
00:20:49.220 And while she was there, she discovered that her host family or someone in the host family had put a spy camera purchased from Amazon in her bathroom to obtain intimate footage of her in the bathroom.
00:21:01.580 So now she is suing Amazon for selling a product that was advertised for potentially illicit uses and was allegedly flagged to Amazon's product safety team, which her suit says inspected the sale of that camera on their platform three times and still failed to prevent the severe foreseeable harms that still affect her today.
00:21:21.880 I'm sure I'm sure those harms do affect her today.
00:21:23.900 that is horrible. So Amazon filed a motion to dismiss the case back in March, but this week,
00:21:29.820 the judge hearing the case did not buy most of Amazon's arguments. So the case will proceed to
00:21:35.440 discovery and maybe even a trial. The judge let four claims stand, negligence, product viability,
00:21:41.700 torts of outrage, which is the intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil
00:21:46.220 conspiracy. But the judge did dismiss a racketeering claim against Amazon. So this case is
00:21:52.400 super disturbing to me. And it also highlights that Amazon's marketplace does knowingly sell
00:21:57.820 things that are pretty obviously not just used for illegal, harmful behavior, but basically
00:22:03.440 like advertised that they can be used for that illegal, harmful behavior. The camera that her
00:22:08.960 host family have bought on Amazon is called Hidden Clothes Hook Camera. It's a camera that is meant
00:22:14.980 to look like a hook that you would hang a towel on in a bathroom. And in fact, images that appear
00:22:21.020 in the marketing on Amazon's website advertising the camera show a bunch of bath towels and they
00:22:26.240 have a copy that says, quote, it won't attract any attention, underline, and a very ordinary hook.
00:22:33.660 Yuck. So it's pretty clear what they are advertising, right? Side note on this,
00:22:40.120 I have seen products for sale on Amazon that could be used for other kinds of illicit purposes,
00:22:45.560 but they actually are not super explicit about this like when you buy a scale on amazon that
00:22:52.100 could be used to weigh drugs for instance on amazon they'll show like a tiny piece of green
00:22:58.440 lettuce being late being weighed on that scale not like a piece of marijuana because they don't
00:23:03.960 they don't want to advertise it can be used for weighing marijuana so they it's like a roundabout
00:23:08.660 way of them not advertising that this can be used for illicit behavior i'm not gonna lie i totally
00:23:14.740 forgot that it's still technically illegal to buy weed in most states so did i what i was like oh
00:23:21.620 yeah yeah right uh every time i leave like one of the handful of cities that i spend a lot of time
00:23:29.100 in like dc new york city brooklyn virginia i'm like oh yeah i don't find myself in those places
00:23:36.720 often but when i am i'm like oh yeah y'all don't do that down here yeah no it's so it is like
00:23:42.340 I don't know, a whole other tangent. Yeah, I had a friend visiting recently from a state where it
00:23:48.160 is not legal. And they were just like, what? There's just a store across the street we can
00:23:54.280 go to? Yeah, I know. Anyways. So I do think that marketing is a pretty good argument for the fact
00:24:00.320 that Amazon was well aware what this product was being used for and what use case it was being
00:24:07.760 advertised to be used for, which is exactly what the lawsuit argues too. The lawsuit says that
00:24:13.540 Amazon's product safety team was aware that the close hook camera was intended for unlawful
00:24:17.520 purposes, citing exactly what I just read, the marketing that says that the hidden camera will
00:24:21.620 not attract attention from the victim, who would presumably hang a towel to be used in drying her
00:24:26.800 undressed body. The complaint reads, the intended use of this spy camera as explicitly portrayed on
00:24:32.100 Amazon's online retail store, e.g. as a towel hook in the bathroom to secretly record undressed
00:24:37.640 individuals without their consent is a federal felony and also a crime under West Virginia law.
00:24:43.540 So the judge didn't outright dismiss the case against Amazon because the judge said,
00:24:47.720 quote, Amazon approved product description suggesting consumer use of the spy cam
00:24:51.900 to record private moments in the bathroom. Amazon cannot claim shock when a consumer does
00:24:57.000 just that. So there are plenty of like non-creepy reasons that somebody might put a camera in their
00:25:03.360 home. I have a lot of issues with it, but my mom has cameras all over her house because my dad is
00:25:09.040 disabled and like might be in another room and need help. But those cameras are not disguised
00:25:13.900 as bathroom hooks. Professor Eric Goldman, who runs the tech and marketing law blog,
00:25:19.740 said that this ruling could potentially change the way that spy cams are sold through online
00:25:23.720 retailers like Amazon. He writes, the court's analysis could indicate that all surreptitious
00:25:28.720 hook cameras are categorically illegal to sell, even when buyers plan to use them completely
00:25:33.860 legally. That makes this a dangerous ruling for the spy cam industry and for Amazon. At the same
00:25:39.120 time, I'm curious to hear more about what Amazon's product safety team thought when it evaluated this
00:25:44.320 item. Because according to the suit, they evaluated it three times and still allowed it
00:25:48.160 on their platform. And I do think it kind of goes back to what we were talking about when we talked
00:25:53.340 about TikTok shop. Like, I don't think that platforms should just be off the hook. Like,
00:25:58.720 I don't think that they should be able to knowingly profit from the sale of items that
00:26:04.280 make clear that what their intended use is for is something that is illegal and super
00:26:08.860 harmful.
00:26:09.780 Yeah.
00:26:10.440 Yeah.
00:26:11.040 And like, honestly, the whole idea of having a camera that you can disguise as like a clothing
00:26:17.720 hook, like, I don't know.
00:26:19.620 I can't think of any situation where you would need that, where it seems justifiable.
00:26:26.360 I don't know.
00:26:26.720 like honestly like I feel like that is something that you only use to like get footage of people
00:26:31.100 without their permission and like this is usually the outcome of that like I don't know I feel like
00:26:37.600 specifically just designing it as like a hook like I can't I don't see any argument for why
00:26:41.820 that's something that somebody would need the whole idea of like hidden camera which comes up
00:26:46.680 on the show like surveillance and like hidden cameras like we're all way too comfortable with
00:26:52.020 this idea of hidden cameras i like i seriously like it seems really strange to me and it seems
00:26:57.140 like this is just we're gonna see more and more of this happening and more like of these kind of
00:27:02.720 stories joey don't even get me started you know it's holiday season i'm sure people are gonna be
00:27:08.100 buying all kinds of cameras and devices with cameras and recording devices to be given to
00:27:15.360 their loved ones to like put in their home so that amazon can misuse as as they have done they
00:27:23.040 settled a lawsuit about their staff using cameras to like peep at consumers or so that police can
00:27:30.380 get your information like don't do it take it from me like like love your loved your loved ones more
00:27:36.880 than giving them the gift of surveillance give them the gift of privacy instead
00:27:40.560 So we talk a lot about the IRL consequences of misinformation online on the show, and that means that we really have to take a look at what's happening in Ireland.
00:27:50.900 So last week in Dublin, social media-fueled disinformation turned into a situation with very real-world consequences.
00:27:58.520 Three young children and a woman were injured in a knife attack near a school in Dublin last week.
00:28:03.640 The suspect was apprehended.
00:28:05.280 I think it was like a situation where like people walking by, people nearby just all helped to apprehend the suspect and help the victims.
00:28:13.560 The motive was, according to police, entirely unclear.
00:28:17.680 However, according to The New York Times, the police said that the attack was followed by destructive riots that they blamed on the far right weaponizing misinformation about the ninth attack.
00:28:27.580 So the evening after the attack, chaotic scenes broke out in the city after a group of rioters attacked police vehicles and set fires.
00:28:35.280 Videos from that scene showed stores being broken into, police cars and buses being set on fire, people clashing with police officers, all of that.
00:28:43.900 In the wake of that attack, far-right figures were using social media to spread rumors about the nationality of the attacker. 0.99
00:28:52.120 And one protester said that, quote, Irish people are being attacked by these scum. 0.96
00:28:56.180 Drew Harris of the Dublin police suggested that they were being driven by misinformation online about the knife attack being spread for what he called malevolent purposes. 0.89
00:29:06.200 Ireland's president, Michael D. Higgins, said that the idea that the attack would be used or abused by groups with an agenda attacks the principle of social inclusion and is reprehensible, referring to these far-right protesters, and that it deserves condemnation by all who believe in the rule of law and democracy.
00:29:22.600 So that happened last week.
00:29:24.260 Now, this week, social media platforms were being taken to task for what happened.
00:29:28.420 The Independent, which is where I get most of my news about what's happening in Ireland,
00:29:32.300 had a really comprehensive breakdown of what happened, which we'll throw in the show notes.
00:29:36.540 Irish politician Tanasta Michael Martin said he was concerned about the rapid mobilization
00:29:41.580 of so many people via social media platforms.
00:29:43.680 So Facebook, TikTok, and Google, which all have Dublin headquarters, appeared before
00:29:49.660 the Irites Media Company to discuss disinformation, media literacy, and the response to the chaos in
00:29:55.380 Dublin. So guess who didn't even bother to show up to that committee to talk about what happened?
00:30:03.220 Can you guess? I have a sneaking suspicion. It might be one formerly known as Twitter.
00:30:15.540 Am I right?
00:30:16.160 You are right.
00:30:16.960 So that's what Elon Musk has not done now, which is that he didn't even show up to this
00:30:20.900 committee.
00:30:21.540 And the politicians who were running this thing were not having it.
00:30:25.000 Yeah, he doesn't have to answer the American government.
00:30:28.560 Why would he have to answer the Irish government?
00:30:31.200 Fine Gail TD, Kieran Cannon, encouraged Twitter employees to drop an email to the owner of
00:30:37.300 Twitter, Elon Musk, suggesting that he desist from commenting on affairs within Ireland,
00:30:42.740 which he patently knows nothing about.
00:30:44.860 He also added that Elon Musk personally served to stoke up hatred and conflict in recent times
00:30:50.860 here in Ireland, and that he should be deeply ashamed of those actions. Let him know, Cannon.
00:30:56.480 Yeah, I would not. I would not fuck with the Irish like with this sort of thing to like Elon 1.00
00:31:05.780 Musk. I feel like that would also be very poetic justice if this was what led to the Elon Musk 1.00
00:31:11.860 downfall and I think that would be really funny but um probably won't unfortunately yeah you don't 0.99
00:31:16.780 want this you don't you don't want that you don't want smoke with the Irish right now Elon Musk 0.98
00:31:22.960 this is not a fight you want to pick they've gone through so much so the platforms who did 0.99
00:31:28.420 actually show up kind of gave the usual song and dance I gotta say like I I was sort of heartened
00:31:35.460 to hear what TikTok said that they had done in light of this incident so Susan Moss the head of
00:31:41.220 Public Policy for TikTok Ireland said that TikTok had activated its crisis management protocols to
00:31:46.340 remove violating content and to prevent the spread of misinformation. She said, we activated our
00:31:51.640 emergency fact-checking procedure in collaboration with those fact-checkers. We have a fact-checking
00:31:55.640 organization here in Ireland. And what they did is that they were flagging content, not just on
00:31:59.460 TikTok, but horizon scanning across the internet and flagging to us these individual claims that
00:32:04.180 they were seeing. That helped us to stop the content spreading on TikTok. She said that there
00:32:08.140 were 25 individual claims or type of stories that she saw moving across the platform. And she did
00:32:14.980 say that she felt that TikTok's response had been very fast moving and that she was very confident
00:32:19.920 in it. But then contrast that with Facebook. So Facebook said that they removed a thousand pieces
00:32:25.940 of misinformation from the platform in the first half of this year, which I'm sorry, that is not a
00:32:31.320 lot. Like a thousand pieces of misinformation is just not a lot. And also it just doesn't work
00:32:36.980 like that. Like, trust me, this was my flagging individual pieces of misinformation for removal
00:32:42.800 was my job at one point in my life. And I can tell you that job was the equivalent of playing
00:32:47.580 whack-a-mole. Like, even if it's removed, which is better than nothing, it just pops back, it pops
00:32:53.180 right back up. And so Facebook saying like, oh, this piecemeal strategy that we already know is
00:32:59.020 not really that effective. That was our main line of defense. That is shocking to me and like almost
00:33:04.720 laughable. They also said that they use debunking labels on false content, which we also know isn't
00:33:11.020 always that effective. Again, it's better than nothing, but they're using these tactics that
00:33:15.600 we have known for a while are not necessarily the most effective. Lawmakers also asked specifically
00:33:21.060 about the issue of a voice note that was being shared on the Facebook-owned messaging app WhatsApp
00:33:26.260 calling for immigrants to be killed and asked if there was a failure to curb it from spreading
00:33:30.780 like wildfire. I will say that WhatsApp being a closed platform where the messages are encrypted 0.96
00:33:36.660 means that tackling harmful or inaccurate information there is a specific, unique
00:33:43.500 challenge. That is true. But I was really surprised by just how not robust what Facebook
00:33:51.100 was offering was in comparison to what TikTok was saying that they were doing. They're very
00:33:56.280 different platforms but i just can't believe that like this is what facebook brought to these
00:34:01.780 lawmakers in ireland after such a such chaos that that these folks say was was sparked by social
00:34:09.280 media platforms well you know tiktok's too busy making everybody 17 more anti-semitic for every
00:34:16.380 30 minutes you spend on tiktok not to go back to that but now i'm wondering is it you get
00:34:22.080 progressively more anti-semitic like the more like the more 30 minute chunks go by but yeah
00:34:26.840 see their tiktok's too busy they can't they can't be spreading misinformation in ireland
00:34:32.400 so if you use an hour if you use a tiktok for an hour a day are you like 34 percent more anti-semit
00:34:40.000 like how does it work is there like i'm i want a graph i want a chart i want the full again i took
00:34:47.980 AP stats I know how this is supposed to work yeah I know but there definitely is something I mean
00:34:55.880 like and not not to give TikTok too much credit because again they're a big social media company
00:35:02.120 that you know deserves much of the criticism it gets but like it really is says something I feel
00:35:10.620 like that TikTok is under fire so much like in the news cycle and it's like and yet they seem to
00:35:17.840 be the only platform that's like responding to these kind of things um you know I guess everybody
00:35:23.600 makes fun of the fact you can't say like there are certain words you can't say on TikTok like
00:35:26.860 people started saying like unalived instead of killed and stuff like that but like it's I don't
00:35:30.980 know it's something to be said about the fact that I'm like TikTok at least has that in place
00:35:34.640 but like no other social media company apparently has any interest in doing anything to moderate
00:35:40.180 its content I guess. I agree and I think it really demonstrates how it really isn't about
00:35:45.800 one specific platform. And so conversations like the one that happened on the GOP debate stage this
00:35:52.200 week that make it about one singular platform are just deeply missing the point, right? It is about
00:35:59.240 having a safer, robust digital landscape. And that is a conversation that involves lots of
00:36:07.660 platforms and a lot more, but just making it about one, making one singular platform the boogeyman
00:36:13.720 It's just like not how we get to a safer media landscape where the kind of thing that happened in Dublin does not happen anywhere else, which should be the goal.
00:36:21.800 Exactly. Yeah.
00:36:28.000 More after a quick break.
00:36:29.200 We'll be right back.
00:36:59.200 a one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined. So whatever your customers
00:37:03.780 listen to, they'll hear your message. Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across
00:37:09.000 broadcast radio. Think podcasting can help your business? Think iHeart. Streaming, radio, and
00:37:14.560 podcasting. Let us show you at iHeartAdvertising.com. That's iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:37:20.500 When I was 14 years old, I was kidnapped and held captive for nine months. I survived and I've
00:37:27.660 Spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:37:32.820 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor Files. 0.59
00:37:36.460 I just remember this low, taunting voice next to my ear saying, shut up, don't say anything.
00:37:44.540 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable.
00:37:48.800 I knew if he woke up, without a doubt, he was going to hurt me.
00:37:53.540 I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed, and I just started screaming.
00:38:01.140 They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:38:05.040 But these aren't stories about what's taken from them.
00:38:08.480 They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:38:12.120 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app,
00:38:16.880 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:38:23.540 let's get right back into it
00:38:27.220 so as you probably know time magazine released their person of the year and it's taylor swift
00:38:34.600 i've seen a lot of conversation about whether she deserved it or not i will say people forget that
00:38:39.860 it's it's i think it's not supposed to be like the best person of the year it's like the most
00:38:44.500 impactful or important or like meaningful person of the year yeah a lot of folks have said like
00:38:49.480 oh it should be like Palestinian journalists or activists someone else I really respect said that
00:38:54.240 it should be the concept of like disruptors or like resistors so people who are you know
00:39:00.200 challenging power structures and technology challenging state power structures which I
00:39:05.320 thought was cool remember that year when it was just like you so it was you Joey it was me Bridget
00:39:11.260 it was every listener listening it was all of us was that that was like in the middle of like
00:39:15.480 lockdown right like wasn't it when was that oh mike just chimed in did you hear that
00:39:23.320 it was 2006 okay that i don't remember it because i was five years old but um
00:39:32.540 or six years old sorry i was six years old i was six years old at six years old you were
00:39:37.560 time magazine's person of the year well successful yeah me and taylor swift um yeah no there's always
00:39:44.300 weird discourse about it like i people love to bring up one of the people always bring up is
00:39:52.280 that like in the 1930s they made like hitler person of the year one time and they were like
00:39:56.820 see guy like people always use that as like the see they're they're bad and they they keep picking
00:40:01.440 and it's like no like that was the person in current events at that time that was causing
00:40:06.340 the most right weird shit going on um so like yeah i guess in that sense like it makes you know
00:40:12.880 taylor swift has a lot of power it has a lot of cultural power has done a lot um but yeah i don't 0.73
00:40:20.580 know i definitely agree i i think like i'm not surprised that the time is that magazine didn't
00:40:28.160 do this but like it would have like there definitely are like palestinian journalists
00:40:31.760 that i think have really like changed just so much of like how we've been talking about palestine
00:40:38.400 I don't know like it definitely I think it would have been a much more deserved to maybe give it
00:40:45.000 to one of them no disrespect to Taylor Swift um but yeah it definitely it feels like there've been
00:40:52.220 a lot of big things that have happened this year maybe maybe some other people should have been
00:40:56.740 considered but yeah yeah that's kind of what people are saying so because she was named Time
00:41:03.000 Magazine's Person of the Year she did this wide-ranging interview in the magazine and
00:41:06.960 posed on the cover with her cat. So I have not actually read this interview, but I do know that
00:41:11.080 Taylor has had, you know, a pretty big year with her heirs tour, which I did not know this, the
00:41:15.680 highest grossing tour ever by a woman and the second highest grossing overall tour. You know,
00:41:21.920 she's got this high profile romantic relationship with an NFL player. People obviously had a lot
00:41:27.220 of opinions about whether or not Taylor deserved or should have been the person of the year. And
00:41:32.300 if folks listening have opinions, I want to hear them. Please let me know. However, it also seems
00:41:37.940 like there is a new conspiracy theory emerging from right-wing pockets of the internet. Some of
00:41:44.640 the biggest names on the far right are suggesting that Taylor Swift is being promoted right now as
00:41:49.020 some kind of, like, psy-op campaign to get people to vote for Democrats, question mark. Conspiracy
00:41:55.840 theorist Laura Loomer, who I was going to say, like, who she is, and I was like, oh, she's not,
00:42:00.300 like a very important person. But I actually did not know this, that just last year, Laura Loomer
00:42:05.840 narrowly lost a bid to represent Florida's 11th congressional district. Well, she tweeted,
00:42:12.140 Taylor Swift has been named Times 2023 Person of the Year. This isn't shocking since she's who the
00:42:17.600 Democrats are counting on to interfere in the 2024 election. What would Democrats do without 0.98
00:42:22.240 their idol who runs through men like water and spews anti-Trump drivel every chance she gets? 1.00
00:42:27.660 her entire world tour has become a Democrat Party voter registration drive. You might be asking, 0.72
00:42:34.240 why would Taylor Swift architect a global tour across Latin America, Australia, Asia, and Europe
00:42:40.240 specifically to register voters in the United States presidential election? Unclear how that
00:42:46.120 would work, but that is what Laura Loomer says is going on. I think it is really funny that everybody
00:42:52.240 like listen i'm a taylor swift fan i will say like i love her music i did go to the airs tour
00:42:58.860 um i've been following her for a while like people really from all sides like try to attach
00:43:06.800 some sort of like political bookie man thing to her i think which is weird because she's like
00:43:15.860 when i say apolitical not in the like oh i don't want to like like oh she just like
00:43:22.240 doesn't want to talk about like she just doesn't I don't think I've ever seen her say anything
00:43:26.780 that's like remotely like political like the I don't know the most she's spoken up a little bit
00:43:33.800 about like feminism and stuff like that but it's never like super in depth like I've never seen
00:43:37.780 her like comment on like a specific sort of issue that's happening which I think is interesting I
00:43:42.560 think it like mostly is just the fact that she has such a big platform and she has such a big 0.98
00:43:46.960 platform that's like mostly young women um but then yeah the other side is crazy because if she 0.99
00:43:54.020 wanted she has so much power like she could i like literally i remember seeing something about 0.98
00:43:59.720 it was after the whole like ticket master thing uh like somebody was like somebody like needs to
00:44:05.240 get her to just like say something offhandedly about like student loans or something so that
00:44:09.720 people like start paying like their needs to like like whatever their gains the sort of political 0.88
00:44:14.960 momentum from the swifties that we need to but yeah no exactly that is kind of crazy that she 1.00
00:44:21.320 would have this whole global tour when like all yeah again all she would need to do is make an 1.00
00:44:25.300 instagram post being like i think you should vote for this person and people i mean i think she could
00:44:30.620 do it i think if she wanted to but like she's not going to what she's never has yeah and like she
00:44:37.720 she did post on instagram for national voter registration day and like that single instagram
00:44:43.300 post did drive like i think it was 35 000 new people to register to vote but registering voters
00:44:50.060 is not the same thing as like taking a stand like on an issue taking a stand or like it's not like
00:44:57.940 she said register and vote for biden or like vote for a specific person so it's like just just
00:45:03.520 driving registrations is non-partisan or it certainly should be non-partisan right and so
00:45:09.080 So, like, this idea that, like, she's a shill for the Democratic Party is so curious to me.
00:45:14.860 It makes me think, like, if you feel that Taylor Swift driving people to register to vote in general is automatically her being in the can for the Democratic Party,
00:45:24.280 it really tells me a lot about what you think that, you know, people who are not Democrats have to offer young women voters, which is maybe not a lot.
00:45:33.040 So former Trump White House advisor Stephen Miller tweeted, what's happening with Taylor Swift is not organic, which is like the weirdest sentence I've ever seen someone tweet.
00:45:43.780 Yeah. First of all, weird thing to say to begin with. Weird way to phrase that.
00:45:47.800 Real weird.
00:45:48.500 Also, it's like Taylor Swift has been a huge pop star for a while. And like, yeah, that is so, that is so weird. That is the, yeah, it's the kids these days. It's their fault.
00:46:02.720 rock and roll and taylor swift that's exactly it um jack prosbiak tweeted the taylor swift
00:46:10.180 girl boss psyop has been fully activated from her hand-selected vaccine shill boyfriend to her
00:46:16.360 dink lifestyle if you don't know what dink is it's dual income no kids uh to her upcoming 2024 0.65
00:46:23.220 voter operation for democrats on abortion rights it's all coming i do find it interesting that 0.91
00:46:28.900 they're calling her out for being like having a dink lifestyle as if just like not having children 0.99
00:46:36.460 is some sort of like morally deviant way to live yeah that's so weird like she's not she's she's 0.71
00:46:44.340 like what like 33 34 like she's not i don't know i guess that's like 33 yeah which i guess yeah i
00:46:53.260 guess like that's a normal age to whatever and i'll like get married and have kids but like i
00:46:58.180 don't know i know plenty of people that are like in that age range who aren't and that's such a
00:47:02.080 weird like no dink i've never heard that phrase before but that is that's weird her vaccine chill
00:47:08.880 boyfriend too honestly i think travis kelsey you know this is my controversial opinion travis
00:47:14.680 kelsey should have been time person of the year his tweets so funny like his tweets have been like
00:47:21.180 the light in my news feed lately so Joey coming in with a hot take
00:47:28.360 boyfriend that's so insane though they really like it is again this is why I like I think it
00:47:35.600 is so weird that they found her to be a target of all of this because again she is like the most
00:47:40.580 mild like on like doesn't really has not said anything particularly controversial
00:47:47.940 that is so weird yeah and i i we i talked about this in an episode years ago but
00:47:55.160 only recently has she been somebody who publicly identifies as a feminist like she was on record
00:48:00.700 in her the early days of her fame being like i'm not a feminist i don't believe in men versus women
00:48:06.000 yada yada yada and it wasn't until kind of later in the game that she was like oh no i'm a totally
00:48:10.400 a feminist and so it's curious to me that these people are are criticizing for her for it and i
00:48:18.260 also think like the whole thing is really like gendered and racialized like i think i don't think 0.81
00:48:23.200 any of these people would ever say that part out loud but like they're giving her crap for not
00:48:30.180 having children being somebody who is in a relationship with another person who earns 0.99
00:48:35.400 income outside of the home and not having kids, a dink. And, you know, certainly they would not 0.97
00:48:40.880 be clamoring for me, a Black woman, to have kids, or I'd be a welfare queen. And they wouldn't be
00:48:45.720 clamoring for people who aren't cis women to have kids because they might be like threats to 0.96
00:48:49.540 children, right? And so like, it's very interesting who gets kind of smeared as doing something wrong
00:48:57.140 just by virtue of them not having a child. And I guess I feel like you can't really talk about
00:49:02.560 the kind of hate that she is receiving from these people without talking about like race and gender
00:49:07.560 and sexuality i did see this one kind of like men's rights influence her tweet quote it's shameful and
00:49:14.080 sad that a hyper promiscuous childless woman aging and alone with a cat has become the heroine of a
00:49:20.140 feminist age and part of me is like side note this person runs an organization for what they're
00:49:25.280 calling hard men like masculine manly men i mean because what is what is harder for a man to do 0.97
00:49:33.220 than obsess over the dating life of a pop star on twitter right like it's like they can't even keep 0.72
00:49:37.920 their own ridiculous gender binary nonsense straight like if you were like i don't i don't
00:49:45.340 think like that is a paragon of traditional masculinity caring who tailors with this 0.97
00:49:49.780 dating yet here you are making a big stink about it on twitter you know right also first of all
00:49:54.640 hard hard men if you're gonna call yourself hard men the peak of heterosexuality okay um 0.97
00:50:04.280 also okay hyper promiscuous like i'm sorry i remember like when she brought up sex for like 0.93
00:50:12.700 the first time on one of her albums and it was like i think it was reputation like it was like
00:50:17.000 way down the line like she was like again very much the face of like respectable nice
00:50:24.460 white girl with her guitar you know for the longest time and it's it's weird because again 1.00
00:50:29.780 she really with the feminism thing she's done like the bare minimum to you know stand up for 1.00
00:50:36.440 human rights or whatever and that apparently is too much but um yeah no I it's just that's just
00:50:44.060 it's just such a weird quote I it's such a weird quote but like not surprised I also like remember
00:50:49.900 wasn't there because I was getting back to about like I feel like people turn her and her image
00:50:54.080 to like a lot like the symbol of a lot of political stuff without it really really doing
00:50:57.720 anything and i don't think this one i don't think was necessarily wrong but i remember like a couple
00:51:01.360 of years ago there was a lot of stuff that was coming out about people talking about her music
00:51:05.000 and her sort of persona that she's created and how that relates to like white supremacy
00:51:08.540 and how like she kind of inadvertently has become this symbol of white supremacy and um like there
00:51:16.600 i again it's been a minute since i but i like it's really interesting to see that that switch
00:51:22.120 within a couple of years because she's dating somebody who's vaccinated i guess i don't know
00:51:26.340 yeah i remember this very clearly there was a time where in white supremacist corners of the
00:51:34.200 internet she was sort of the poster girl for like nazism essentially and at the time this was like
00:51:42.720 going back like several years now at the time she i remember doing an episode of stuff mom never told
00:51:50.760 to talk about like blast in the past back when I was the host of the co-host of that show with my
00:51:55.060 friend Emily and at the time I did not you could probably go back to the old cementy archives and 0.93
00:52:01.180 find it I did not feel that she had done enough to like denounce that and be like no sorry Nazis
00:52:07.680 I'm not your poster girl but I do think it speaks to what you're talking about that she is someone
00:52:12.500 that I think people project a lot of stuff onto and around and I think that all of this like all
00:52:18.500 of these weird tweets about her being on the cover of Time, I really think is an anxiety about
00:52:23.860 the rise of single women voters, because like a lot of her listenership and fan base is younger
00:52:30.760 women. And I think that it's about anxiety around how government has failed single women voters and
00:52:38.680 what that means for the 2024 election. So we know that a lot of white women voted for Trump, but
00:52:45.480 it's a little more complicated than that because it's really married white women specifically.
00:52:50.100 Married white women are more likely to vote conservative than their single white counterparts. 0.75
00:52:55.020 So I think after the last few years with like big Supreme Court decisions on things like abortion, 0.93
00:52:59.320 I think that folks are rightfully starting to worry about single women as a voting bloc and 0.99
00:53:05.420 what this means. But here's my thing. It really kind of goes back to the episode that we did with 0.95
00:53:09.860 Julia Mazur, who was like shamed by Tucker Carlson for just existing on the internet as a woman who
00:53:16.400 is not married. I think that all that these people have to offer younger single women is shame and 0.56
00:53:24.080 making fun of us and like the most tired jokes about cats and being alone and this and that.
00:53:30.200 And like trying to scare us into marriage or invalidating our choices. Like not everybody
00:53:35.580 wants to be married or partnered. And there are so many ways to have a full life that doesn't
00:53:39.560 include being married. And I just think that they don't have anything to really offer younger
00:53:45.300 single women. So the best they can do is try to scare them into heterosexual marriages and then 1.00
00:53:50.800 hope that that proximity to men will make them vote more conservatively. I don't think they
00:53:57.040 have anything real to offer. It's just like, all they can do is shame you and hopefully effectively
00:54:01.860 scare you into marriage, which hopefully will make you vote more conservatively. And I think
00:54:06.340 taylor swift the particularly how popular she's been this year i think reiterates that anxiety
00:54:14.720 that like oh no we really don't have anything to offer a pretty big section of the voting public 0.95
00:54:21.660 this might come back to bite us in the ass yeah which is so funny because it's like 0.93
00:54:26.980 you just sat like clearly you don't understand how swifties work because you didn't even again 0.98
00:54:35.600 she gave you she were in the clear she wasn't telling anybody to go vote for biden or do
00:54:40.740 anything like she was doing the bare minimum telling people to go vote maybe not even doing
00:54:45.420 that again this year i think she like literally did it one time um but like she would have been
00:54:50.220 fine but it's like no now you've attacked taylor swift the swifties like they don't care who you
00:54:54.380 are they're gonna learn who you are now and like they're gonna start targeting you and um the 1.00
00:55:00.760 Swifties are fucking terrifying so I would not like I I do think it would be really funny if 0.57
00:55:07.180 like this was what led to like the downfall of like some one of at least one of these people 1.00
00:55:12.980 if the Swifties could do that I think that would be really beautiful and really uh poetic justice
00:55:19.100 but yeah no that's that's so weird why you gotta go after the cats like she has I know I have I
00:55:27.300 love cats they're great great like who doesn't enjoy a cat exactly joey thank you so much for
00:55:35.940 wading through all of this ridiculous tech news you know at the top of the episode we got to know
00:55:41.260 you a little bit better what else are you working on what have you got going on these days i'm so
00:55:46.020 glad you asked i um recently have a show that is in the middle of coming out we just had episode
00:55:55.600 four uh released it's called afterlives the layleen flanco story uh i worked with uh raquel
00:56:01.980 willis who i think will be on the show soon yes little teaser there um but uh it was based on her
00:56:10.700 incredible reporting on transphobic violence and um the epidemic of violence against trans women
00:56:17.460 of color in particular um in this season we are talking about layleen flanco who was a woman who
00:56:22.920 died at rikers uh rikers island prison a couple years back uh but yeah you should definitely
00:56:28.600 check out that show uh i think it's a super important conversation to be having i'm biased
00:56:35.240 i worked on it but also yes you should definitely check that out um episode four just came out
00:56:40.880 episode five is coming out next week and it's called afterlives the laylee and flanco story
00:56:44.680 and of course as always if you want to follow me on social media you can find me at pat not pratt
00:56:50.060 that's p-a-t-t-n-o-t-p-r-a-t-t um twitter instagram so yeah you should definitely check
00:56:57.880 out the show find me on social media and we'll throw a link to afterlives in the show notes
00:57:03.080 uh folks should definitely listen it's it is such an important conversation and thank you for
00:57:08.480 bringing bringing it to us because it's it's really special um and i actually have a little
00:57:14.060 bit of news, which is that the other podcast that I host, IRL, Online Life is Real Life,
00:57:20.080 which is an original podcast from Mozilla. Yep. The Mozilla that makes the browser that we all
00:57:25.740 love, Firefox. Well, we have been nominated for an Anthem Award for Responsible Technology,
00:57:31.200 and it would mean so much if folks could vote for us. If you could help celebrate this nomination
00:57:36.680 by voting for IRL to win.
00:57:38.860 You can go to tangoti.com slash IRL.
00:57:42.160 That's T-A-N-G-O-T-I dot com slash IRL.
00:57:46.120 That link will be in the show notes.
00:57:47.860 Please vote for us.
00:57:49.660 I don't want to get into it,
00:57:51.340 but it would be really cool to win
00:57:53.180 and then maybe Mozilla will have me back
00:57:54.780 to host it again.
00:57:55.560 Who knows?
00:57:56.080 Would love that.
00:57:57.100 So please, please, please vote for us.
00:57:59.180 It means the world to me to spotlight
00:58:00.660 the voices and the stories
00:58:01.940 of folks who are making technology like AI
00:58:04.060 more trustworthy.
00:58:05.080 And it's really also important to me to see those voices celebrated through winning an
00:58:09.440 award like this.
00:58:10.120 So please vote for us.
00:58:11.920 Again, tangody.com slash IRL.
00:58:15.760 Thank you so much.
00:58:16.820 And thank you, Joy, for being here.
00:58:18.920 Thank you, listeners, for listening.
00:58:21.380 Yeah, be well, and I will talk to you soon.
00:58:29.100 If you're looking for ways to support the show, check out our merch store at tangody.com
00:58:33.360 slash store.
00:58:35.080 Got a story about an interesting thing in tech or just want to say hi?
00:58:38.560 You can reach us at hello at tangody.com.
00:58:40.940 You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangody.com.
00:58:44.280 There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me, Bridget Todd.
00:58:46.980 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:58:49.620 Edited by Joey Pat.
00:58:51.480 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer.
00:58:53.680 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer.
00:58:56.300 Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
00:58:58.320 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
00:58:59.800 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
00:59:02.640 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app,
00:59:06.320 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:59:08.140 if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality
00:59:18.240 welcome home pro society is a weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat for anyone
00:59:24.460 who thinks pride and prejudice and love island deserve the same level of discourse each week
00:59:28.980 we're connecting the dots between books the internet and pop culture with your favorite
00:59:33.020 writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions. Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm
00:59:38.020 obsessed. Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
00:59:43.400 podcasts. I survived nine months in captivity, and I've spent my life exploring how other people
00:59:50.760 survive what should have destroyed them. I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor
00:59:56.040 Files. Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable, abducted, stalked,
01:00:02.060 controlled, and nearly silenced. These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
01:00:08.340 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
01:00:14.100 or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Hoda Kotb, host of the podcast Joy 101 with Hoda Kotb.
01:00:20.780 You know, I'm always searching for inspiration and useful tools to maximize joy. Like when my
01:00:26.660 friend Henry Winkler offered advice to aspiring actors and really anybody hoping to stand out.
01:00:33.140 You're not hired just to fill time and space. You're hired to fill the space with you.
01:00:38.800 Listen to Joy 101 with Hoda Kotb on the iHeartRadio app,
01:00:43.340 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:00:46.600 This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed human.