There Are No Girls on the Internet - January 13, 2024


Substack has a Nazi problem; Dating apps are flopping; Ebay execs harass critics; Elon does race science, AI George Carlin – NEWS ROUNDUP

Topics
The New Weaponization of Plagiarism [PATREON UNLOCKED] What we’re leaving behind in the new year - STUFF MOM NEVER TOLD YOU

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per minute

184.68

Word count

12,862

Sentence count

468

Harmful content

Misogyny

4

sentences flagged

Toxicity

24

sentences flagged

Hate speech

25

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.920 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:00:36.860 are equally important to your personality,
00:00:39.100 welcome home.
00:00:40.700 Pro Society is a weekly podcast
00:00:42.560 that's part book club, part group chat
00:00:44.480 for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:00:46.180 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:00:48.920 Each week, we're connecting the dots
00:00:50.360 between books, the internet, and pop culture
00:00:52.460 with your favorite writers, book talk creators,
00:00:54.980 and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:00:57.080 Yeah, I'm obsessed.
00:00:58.220 I'm obsessed.
00:00:59.020 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:09.100 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:17.220 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:22.560 Joey, thank you for being here.
00:01:24.280 happy new year first newscast of 2024. Hey Bridget, happy new year. So it being the new year,
00:01:31.860 I have to start with a question. Do you have any kind of online new year's resolutions or maybe not
00:01:37.000 even resolutions, things that you are like, I am leaving this in 2023. This is not, I'm not bringing
00:01:42.680 this with me to 2024. Ooh, um, one thing I definitely at the end of the year when it comes
00:01:49.120 to like internet stuff um I'm I you know I was on all the social medias and everything and I was
00:01:55.800 like sort of trying to like downsize a little bit I was like I wanted to get rid of so like I don't
00:02:00.060 know I had a snapchat account that I made in like high school that I was like I don't use this
00:02:04.000 anymore I'm deleting it I deleted be real I know that that's been making a comeback like the last
00:02:09.360 month but I was like I don't use this I'm so yeah I think I'm one of my things is I was like I'm
00:02:15.700 going to be online, but it's going to be with like intention. Like I'm not just going to have
00:02:19.700 my like miscellaneous accounts that I don't use. We'll see how long that actually lasts. I will
00:02:24.680 probably end up making some new account to something and forgetting about it. But yeah,
00:02:30.760 that's the goal. What a good thing, a good way to start the new year. Like, you know how we have
00:02:36.820 like spring cleaning or I'm going to, there's like a tradition where you start the year with
00:02:41.580 like cleaning out your physical space. I like applying this to the digital, just starting the
00:02:46.080 year fresh, those accounts that have just been lurking on your phone that you're not really
00:02:50.260 using actively or with intention, getting rid of them and really kind of paring down and being
00:02:54.800 intentional about our digital use. I love this. Exactly. Yeah. I'm also like, I'm one of those
00:03:00.600 people that my phone is just like constantly telling me that my iCloud is full and I don't
00:03:05.860 have any space for anything so I'm trying to make sure I'm not just taking up space on my phone and
00:03:11.560 all that but yeah definitely oh my god I'm so bad about that I actually pay for extra iCloud storage
00:03:17.240 on one of those people so I'm like I would rather just pay a dollar a month or whatever to not have
00:03:22.700 to think about this problem and not have to get those because there's nothing more annoying than
00:03:26.020 getting those those warnings like oh iCloud storage is low I never get it too because like
00:03:31.280 and then I can keep taking pictures like it never actually cuts me off and I know it just keeps
00:03:35.380 don't fully under this is embarrassing i don't fully understand how it works i'm like oh well
00:03:40.600 i was like it's never stopped me from doing anything but i i they do send those alerts all
00:03:45.740 the time one of my in the new year one of my digital behaviors that i'm gonna try to leave
00:03:51.580 in 2023 is kind of getting worked up about small things on social media i will say making a podcast
00:04:01.420 about the internet like you really got to be tapped in and it can't you i i do find myself
00:04:07.560 getting annoyed at behavior that is like ultimately if i take a step back i'm like is this really
00:04:12.100 do i really need to be getting annoyed by this um my the last thing i had a big b in my bonnet
00:04:17.560 about was how annoying the ads on twitter have gotten have you have you seen this like oh my god
00:04:22.860 they're out of control there's this one that i was getting where it's like an ad for a bra and i don't
00:04:28.480 even wear bras and so it's like this ad where it's like a woman cutting a bra with scissors
00:04:35.180 and it just was like an autoplay video of a bra being cut with scissors and i was seeing it every
00:04:40.980 freaking day and if i saw it one more time i thought i was going to scream and then oftentimes
00:04:45.860 the accounts that are posting it are like they have a bored ape or like an nft avi and so i was 0.74
00:04:52.760 like, I don't want this Bored Ape telling me what kind of bra to buy. I just didn't like it. 1.00
00:04:59.500 Oh my God. Yeah. That does. I don't. Yeah. I feel like that's a pretty good generalization
00:05:04.520 is I'm not going to take my bra advice from somebody with a Bored Ape profile picture. 1.00
00:05:11.020 Yeah. I feel like I wouldn't take any kind of life advice from somebody. 1.00
00:05:14.060 Oh yeah. Oh yeah.
00:05:15.080 If you've got a Bored Ape Abby on Twitter, there's nothing you can tell me that I need to know. I 1.00
00:05:18.460 feel literally there was some tweet I don't even remember what the tweet was but I like thought it
00:05:22.900 was funny and I liked it and then I realized that the person had like a blue check mark I
00:05:26.840 immediately unliked it because I was like no I feel this feels wrong like it feels like you
00:05:30.560 shouldn't be funny like I feel like you stole this from somebody you shouldn't have a blue
00:05:34.800 check mark and be funny like something's wrong there yeah you don't get my laugh if you're also
00:05:39.040 giving Elon Musk $8. I love it. Okay. Well, I want to start our first newscast of the year
00:05:47.880 talking about this really interesting new piece from Kate Lindsay in Bustle that I've seen a lot
00:05:52.520 of people sharing online called Dating Apps Are In Their Flop Era. The piece posits that if you
00:05:58.080 met your partner or had a good experience on a dating app like Hinge or Tinder, as the piece
00:06:03.700 said you basically caught the last chopper out of numb because apparently the dating apps are a hot
00:06:10.220 mess now is this do you have any experience with dating apps that's fascinating this is the first
00:06:15.340 that i've heard of this story but yeah i i i'm single i use dating apps uh i am like staunchly
00:06:23.400 beginning of gen z i guess but um that is really interesting i definitely have some weird dating
00:06:29.060 app stories um but uh you know i think especially as like the ways people date has kind of been
00:06:37.260 changing but uh yeah no this is the first time here i get this that's interesting okay so she
00:06:42.600 writes talk to your friends scroll social media or even just sit in a bar and listen and you'll
00:06:47.120 encounter a similar sentiment millennials are tired of dating apps and gen z singles might not
00:06:52.240 bother with them a 2023 survey of college and grad students found that 79 do not use dating apps
00:06:58.180 even once a month, the peace finds. So it sounds like the companies that run these dating apps are
00:07:03.300 also feeling this shift. Match Group, which owns a bunch of them, Tinder, Hinge, Match.com, and
00:07:08.560 OkCupid, saw its stock price drop 40% in the past year. Bumble, whose CEO Whitney Wolf-Hurd stepped
00:07:15.300 down in November after 10 years at the app. And also Field is struggling through a disastrous
00:07:20.780 rebrand. I actually, the only dating app I have ever used with any kind of regularity is Field.
00:07:26.780 It's an app that's, like, for queer people and, like, non-monogamous people and, like, I guess, like, kinky people. 0.79
00:07:33.980 Field just had a really, I guess the only way I can describe it is, like, disastrous rebrand. 0.89
00:07:40.600 That sounds like a good bit to get into on the Patreon because, like, I have a lot to say about it.
00:07:45.600 But all of these apps, Field, Hinge, Bumble, Tinder, are really feeling this change.
00:07:51.080 Match Group said that they saw their paying users decline for the fourth straight quarter,
00:07:56.320 and a 2023 Pew Research study found that while 41% of online dating users age 30 or older have
00:08:03.260 paid for the apps, just 22% of users under 30, which is the demographic they are really looking
00:08:08.580 to court, have done the same. And yeah, I just think it sounds like younger folks are just like,
00:08:13.840 I'm good on these apps. What do you think? I definitely actually thought I agree with. I
00:08:18.500 don't know anybody that um I'm in my mid-20s I don't know anybody that pays for a dating app
00:08:23.920 um uh yeah I definitely it's interesting too like hearing that those stats because I I do
00:08:31.220 think like of me and my peers people that I know that use dating apps I don't know a lot of people
00:08:35.700 that use them like thinking yes this is how I'm gonna find like a long-term relationship like to
00:08:40.660 be fully honest most people you know I don't know like I use hinge a lot but that's like there's
00:08:46.080 like a thing where you can put like what you're looking for I don't think I've seen a single
00:08:49.120 person put like long just long-term relationship or whatever it's all like just see what happens
00:08:54.240 sort your relate like which is that I don't know I feel like that maybe it's also just like a that's
00:08:58.160 how my we're seeing dating now um that's interesting about field too because I was
00:09:03.360 gonna say the thing that I keep seeing about dating apps is like and also like I mean whatever
00:09:08.080 like I'm queer I'm only I only date other queer people um there's so many people that are like
00:09:15.460 non-monogamous i had to ask my little brother what enm meant over winter break
00:09:22.380 how did that conversation go um it was really funny because he was really like he's like 19
00:09:28.640 he was just like it's ethical non-monogamy and i was like oh okay what like they already put
00:09:33.400 non-monogamous why don't we need to put that i also think this is really funny because i'm like
00:09:36.800 does that mean like can somebody call themselves like unethically
00:09:40.180 i know exactly like i was like do they really need to clarify ethical um and then of course
00:09:47.520 my dad overheard this conversation and we had to explain the concept of open relationships to him
00:09:51.640 but yeah um anyways so it's definitely there's you know some generational that i don't know i'm all
00:10:00.840 for people doing the non-monogamy thing you know there's different ways of dating different ways
00:10:05.540 But yeah, that's definitely, I think, the majority of what I've been seeing on there, which I don't, again, I don't think that's a really bad thing, but I can see like from a, you know, the corporation's perspective, not having people paying for the app or whatever is probably not great for them.
00:10:23.800 Yeah. First of all, I have to say, I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in the Pat household during this conversation.
00:10:30.940 Yeah, so it does sound like exactly what you're saying is happening, that younger people just aren't feeling the idea of paying for this experience. And basically, you know, I guess I consider myself a millennial, like a generation older than you. And for my generation, dating apps and hookup apps were kind of considered the norm of the millennial experience, right? Like, they were part of what it meant to be a young millennial when I was coming up.
00:10:58.660 And I think I kind of came up in the heyday of those apps. I didn't really use them myself, but a lot of my friends did. That was the thing. And I think that for the younger generation, it's just fatigue. I think people are experiencing fatigue around these apps and just not using them the way that they used to.
00:11:16.100 I also think the experience of just swiping after swiping after swiping and then having to go on the date and be like, oh, do you have any siblings? Oh, what do you do? I think there might be a lot of feelings of exhaustion associated with the experience and what it feels like to be on these apps.
00:11:34.580 And part of it does just sound like the experience of showing up there kind of sucks now.
00:11:40.640 The most popular apps are free, but they really encourage you to pay to interact with people.
00:11:46.120 And basically, it sounds like they are paywalling all the good profiles.
00:11:49.680 On Hinge, you might know this because you use it, you can only interact with profiles of
00:11:55.020 people who are getting lots of attention or who the algorithm thinks that you might be
00:11:59.000 a good match for, thinks that you might like, if you send them a rose.
00:12:02.180 users get one free rose per week to send and in order to regularly engage with those standout
00:12:08.460 profiles you would need to buy more roses starting at $3.99 each or limit your options to Hinge's
00:12:14.940 general algorithm where it sounds like they keep all the duds all the people that they know you're
00:12:20.180 not gonna like they'll show you those people for free but if you want to see any of the like good
00:12:24.400 ones you gotta pay oh my god yeah I it's interesting too because again like I said like I
00:12:30.540 I'm on the queer side of Hinge but like I'll talk to my little sister about this and like she
00:12:36.020 she's straight and like she is only like and I it's a totally different experience like Hinge is
00:12:41.360 completely different for her um I guess the one other thing I think for the I don't know if this
00:12:46.600 is part of the generational thing because I definitely do think like people still use it
00:12:49.600 but I think with the especially people looking at it more casually like it's like playing a game
00:12:54.140 like it's like you're playing swipes you're like it's which um yeah I don't know I feel like
00:13:00.180 sometimes like a lot more people that i'll talk to that are younger will look at it almost like a
00:13:04.920 video game that you're playing where it's just like or like you're you're getting like points
00:13:09.720 your likes are to i don't know i was talking to okay now i'm terrified that somebody i match with
00:13:14.580 on hinge is gonna listen to this um if you are this i'm obviously not talking about they're not
00:13:18.240 talking about you but um uh like i was like it's almost like a like it's like the serotonin boost
00:13:24.600 is like the appeal of it like i'm like i'm not even really looking for like any more than i
00:13:30.100 am in like any other space for like dating it's more just like the like oh like you're getting
00:13:33.880 points that show you you're attractive or you're whatever because people are liking your profile
00:13:38.140 um but yeah i and i could definitely and again straight women i'm so sorry for y'all like i'm
00:13:45.700 sure you haven't but just i spent from talking to my sister and like my my handful of straight
00:13:51.480 friends um i it's it sounds rough it sounds rough it does i i have heard i i mean i should say like
00:13:58.240 I have been off the market for a very long time, so I don't really know what it's like out there.
00:14:03.740 But I have heard horror stories about the kinds of things that men will say and do to women on first dates.
00:14:11.820 I also feel for people who are single dating, it doesn't sound like it's always very fun.
00:14:19.060 And it doesn't sound like the addition of these apps, which at one time I do think came with the promise of like,
00:14:25.200 oh, you'll get to swipe through lots of people and you'll get to go on lots of dates and it will
00:14:28.360 feel really good and you'll get to have your pick. I don't know that it feels that way anymore. So
00:14:33.680 yeah, I just, I feel for everybody. Yeah, definitely. And also I will say that the rose
00:14:40.600 thing, I just think the vibes might feel weird. Like if I knew that somebody paid $4 just to talk
00:14:49.780 to me that our initial conversation I just it doesn't feel like the kind of vibe that I would
00:14:57.040 want to start a potential relationship with and so I just feel like that system might already be
00:15:03.540 setting folks up for an experience that just maybe feels a little bit weird yeah I because it's I
00:15:10.420 think on hinge you get like a free rose every day but like I honestly I don't think I've ever used
00:15:15.120 them and like i've seen i don't know like that's people who sent me roses but you know
00:15:20.760 but it's always like i never know what the like i don't know i mean the thing about dating apps
00:15:26.480 is you're not meeting in person so it's hard to pick up like the social cues or whatever but i'm
00:15:29.560 always like i don't even really know what that means like did you just like really like my
00:15:32.800 profile or were like were you like i guess i'm gonna use my one rose today whatever like yeah
00:15:37.100 um and it is a little weird like it is i yeah i never thought about it that way too of like oh
00:15:41.880 if you you're paying like four dollars to see me i don't know that's a lot of that feels like a lot
00:15:49.080 of pressure yeah pressure the very vibe that starts out every good relationship every good
00:15:55.460 romantic pairing absolutely and so in the wake of people sort of not feeling the vibes on these apps
00:16:01.700 the companies themselves are trying to pivot like tinder used to be considered the hookup app like
00:16:07.280 the app that was just for people who wanted a booty call, right? But since Gen Z statistically
00:16:13.640 is doing the casual hookup thing a lot less, Tinder is sort of pivoting to service folks who
00:16:19.880 say they are looking for love and letting people pick and describe the kind of relationships or
00:16:24.880 interactions that they're looking for on the app. So they're trying to pivot away from being solely
00:16:29.560 like a hookup app. I found this really funny. Tinder has also become more kind of politically
00:16:35.240 and socially aware, trying to appeal to that Gen Z market that they're really going for.
00:16:40.880 They know that Gen Z really cares about social and political causes. And Melissa Hobley,
00:16:45.940 the chief marketing officer at Tinder, says the LGBTQIA plus community is the fastest growing
00:16:51.120 demo on the app. And during Pride Month, Tinder helped connect eligible users with information
00:16:56.040 about a study that hopes to combat the FDA's blood ban against gay donors. Tinder also launched
00:17:01.500 an election center for app users to access voter registration tools and locate their polling
00:17:05.860 stations and allowed users to include a pro-choice interest on their profile. So all of that is meant
00:17:12.440 to really appeal to like younger folks who they're trying to get to use these apps with more
00:17:17.180 regularity. Yeah, that makes sense. I remember when I, because also I, when, I don't know,
00:17:25.140 I got back on dating apps like a couple months ago probably um and I remember seeing that on
00:17:32.880 tinder I do have a tinder somewhere I don't think I've used it since I downloaded it um
00:17:37.020 but I remember seeing there were like things you could like that you were interested in pro
00:17:41.400 choice was one of them and I was like that's sort of a weird like interest to put but I guess like
00:17:46.360 okay like I don't know um I know hinge also does the like you can put your although it only gives
00:17:52.160 you like liberal and like conservative which i think is interesting nothing else yeah it's a
00:17:59.120 radical progressive liberal and conservative that's it and i i honestly think what is happening
00:18:07.280 with these dating apps is like what always seems to happen with social platforms online right like
00:18:12.740 part of it is that i think that hinge was this big standout mainstream dating app for a while
00:18:17.740 that made a big song and dance about how they genuinely were interested in and invested in
00:18:22.580 people meeting their matches. Like their slogan was, oh, this is an app that is meant to be
00:18:26.320 deleted because we want you to find your person and then delete the app. However, like most
00:18:31.280 platforms, dating platforms, they want your data. They are interested in making money from your
00:18:36.000 data. And once they have gotten all they can from the data of the like maximum amount of users who
00:18:41.100 are going to sign up, then they are pivoting to wanting your money too. So they're not designed
00:18:45.360 to be deleted, they are designed to make money off of people who use them. That's why these apps
00:18:51.260 exist. And so if that means paywalling anybody that you might potentially be interested in,
00:18:57.340 they are going to do that. I read recently that Tinder has launched this super luxe premium
00:19:02.260 package for $500 a month, where they were like, oh, we'll have super special algorithmic matching,
00:19:09.040 and even humans will help match people. Listen, if I'm paying $500 a month for a dating site,
00:19:14.840 the person I meet there better also be like a valet and a personal chef and all the things
00:19:19.980 but I just think that they're just trying to like throw stuff at the wall to see what sticks to set
00:19:25.660 themselves apart because people like I don't think they're offering people an experience it always
00:19:29.800 feels good yeah absolutely I mean I think the other I mean the other thing too I don't know if
00:19:35.740 anybody who lives in New York remembers the big advertisements that were all over the Union Square
00:19:42.260 subway station for um i'm blanking on what it was called but it was some dating app that was
00:19:47.100 supposed to be like people that were like elite and like had nice jobs the league what had a four
00:19:53.020 year the league that's what it was yeah oh my god like i was i remember seeing that i was like
00:19:58.300 what like i was like what like i don't know that because that kind of i feel like reminds me of
00:20:03.500 this or it's like it's there's so many like hyper specific ones that i'm always like is there really
00:20:08.900 like enough people for this to work who like wanted to I don't know I had a friend that signed
00:20:12.960 up for the league though and it sounded like a very interesting experience um yeah no that's
00:20:19.860 that's weird I yeah at that point like five hundred dollars like just go back to finding
00:20:27.080 a matchmaker or something like the old I don't know go old school exactly I mean I again I'm I'm
00:20:33.120 I didn't really get to experience the heyday of the apps, but everybody that I've ever had a
00:20:39.120 meaningful relationship with has been through, I've met through the original OG Hinge, which
00:20:45.180 is just like having pushy friends who like to set people up, who won't take no for an answer.
00:20:51.360 Oh my God. And I guess like, I don't know. I don't think anybody should be spending $500 a
00:20:57.440 month on a dating app. Absolutely not. That money could be better spent for sure. But I just really
00:21:02.420 feel for people trying to meet people romantically these days like it feels like what these apps are
00:21:07.720 offering you like there was a time where it felt like they were offering an endless supply of
00:21:11.800 potential matches it was going to be really fun but it seems like now it's like hey do you want
00:21:15.880 this dud or do you want to give us ten dollars a month or whatever right and like i don't know
00:21:20.000 dating should be fun and it should be pleasurable and i hope that people who are looking to be
00:21:26.720 romantically involved or partnered or and having any kind of whatever interaction they're seeking
00:21:31.640 I hope that they are finding ways to do that
00:21:33.580 that feel fulfilling and fun and gratifying
00:21:35.620 whether they're online or off
00:21:36.860 because yeah, it shouldn't just be a slog
00:21:39.260 that mirrors the annoyances and exhaustion
00:21:42.060 of showing up on social media platforms.
00:21:44.460 Like that's not what romantic partnership is about
00:21:47.220 and like you deserve better than something 0.99
00:21:49.180 that feels like a fucking slog. 0.99
00:21:50.840 It's supposed to be fun. 0.99
00:21:56.700 Let's take a quick break.
00:22:00.920 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:22:07.420 from $94 a month, price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:22:10.720 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:22:13.080 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:22:15.860 Bell, connection is everything.
00:22:18.280 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:22:21.040 Think again.
00:22:22.040 More Americans listen to podcasts than ad-supported streaming music
00:22:25.180 from Spotify and Pandora.
00:22:26.480 And as the number one podcaster,
00:22:28.580 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:22:30.920 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:22:34.180 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:22:38.500 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:22:40.440 Think iHeart.
00:22:41.480 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:22:43.660 Let us show you at iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:22:46.240 That's iHeartAdvertising.com.
00:22:48.600 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:22:54.540 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:22:58.920 part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives,
00:23:02.300 and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:23:07.000 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books,
00:23:10.700 the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:23:13.980 I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. So obsessed.
00:23:17.700 From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments,
00:23:22.560 nothing is off the table.
00:23:23.640 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:23:31.580 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:23:40.740 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:23:46.760 See you between the pages.
00:23:53.640 at our back. Speaking of unfulfilling online experiences full of things that are bad,
00:24:05.440 it was a clunky transition, but you know where I'm going with this. Let's talk about Substack.
00:24:10.260 The newsletter platform Substack has a bit of a Nazi problem. This week, Substack agreed to remove
00:24:17.460 five newsletters featuring Nazi content that incited violence. This comes after almost 200
00:24:24.100 writers, including Casey Newton, who runs Platformer, which I love, a prominent tech
00:24:28.800 publication on Substack, signed on to an open letter threatening to quit the platform if
00:24:33.660 Substack took no action. So this has been an ongoing problem. The Atlantic reported that
00:24:38.600 prominent white supremacists were using the platform Substack not just to spread their
00:24:43.340 message but also to earn money the atlantic reported that richard spencer who you might
00:24:47.680 remember getting punched in the face the last time he was here in my hometown of washington dc
00:24:52.720 which by the way anybody like like ask somebody who was in kind of or at least at that time sort
00:24:59.700 of like more sort of like lefty radical protest circles everybody that i knew knew somebody who
00:25:06.580 was claiming to be the guy who punched richard spencer because he was wearing he was like a
00:25:10.740 A black blacker, like, wearing all black, so, like, nobody knows who that person was.
00:25:15.380 It was actually me.
00:25:16.780 It was actually me.
00:25:19.860 We are all the person that punched Richard Spencer.
00:25:23.280 We are all the puncher.
00:25:24.700 But Richard Spencer now is making, like, after being deplatformed from most other social media platforms, he is making at least $9,000 a year and potentially many times that from his Substack newsletter.
00:25:37.380 And he is not alone.
00:25:38.380 Because Substack the company takes 10% of a cut of any money earned on the platform from subscription fees, Substack is essentially profiting from white supremacists who are also breaking their terms of service that explicitly bans attempts to publish content or fun initiatives that incite violence based on protected classes.
00:25:57.760 So in the letter that these prominent writers on Substack published, they said, from our perspective as Substack publishers, it is unfathomable that someone with a swastika avatar who writes about, quote, the Jewish question, who promotes the Great Replacement Theory, could be given the tools to succeed on your platform.
00:26:15.400 And yet you've been unable to adequately explain your position, the letters reads.
00:26:20.680 Substack has always kind of had this public positioning where they were going to treat
00:26:24.920 content moderation with a really light touch.
00:26:29.840 However, as the letter accurately points out, that is not true.
00:26:33.780 They do choose to moderate some content, including spam sites and newsletters written by sex
00:26:39.900 workers.
00:26:40.360 And so they can't really be like, oh, well, we just allow everybody to express themselves.
00:26:44.940 We don't want to pick and choose. Anybody can show up here. Why do they not allow content
00:26:50.180 written by sex workers on their platform? Hamish McKenzie, a Substack co-founder,
00:26:54.600 defended the company's position back in December, saying, I just want to make it clear that we don't
00:26:58.700 like Nazis either. We wish no one held those views, but some people do hold those and other
00:27:03.440 extreme views, he wrote. So basically being like, oh, well, we're just publishing the views people
00:27:07.280 have. But again, you might not agree that with the profession of sex work, but sex workers exist
00:27:13.380 in society so if that if that is your argument that we're just you know platforming the views
00:27:18.400 that people have and we're not making any kind of like statement about those views why is that
00:27:22.760 clearly you are picking and choosing the views that you that you choose to platform yeah no i'm
00:27:28.060 gonna like honestly and what this is coming from my again 20 something like just sort of
00:27:35.520 whatever experience i have i think like this whole issue is something i've kind of gone back
00:27:39.740 and forth about a lot because yeah it is like one of those things where i'm like yeah free speech
00:27:43.140 want but like also obviously like i don't want neo-nazis i don't want like explicit
00:27:49.880 you know super right-wing racist whatever xenophobic people um but yeah and i but i feel
00:27:56.760 like oh that aside that aside whatever your beliefs are if you are as a company censoring 0.69
00:28:02.420 people that yeah are sex workers are doing stuff that you know maybe not even like leftists and
00:28:09.400 like a political sense but sort of on the opposite like sort of side of like whose voices are being
00:28:15.440 heard that you're censoring them but you're not censoring like that's not an issue of we're
00:28:21.100 censoring versus we're not censoring that's just an issue of favoring the neo-nazis over you know
00:28:26.800 anybody just trying to talk about their life experience well exactly that like that's what
00:28:31.100 these writers have said that it is not just that these like neo-nazi white supremacist folks are
00:28:37.040 being allowed to write on the platform, at times, the platform has actually promoted that content.
00:28:43.720 According to The Atlantic, Patrick Casey, a leader of a now-defunct neo-Nazi group who has a
00:28:49.140 Substack newsletter, uses a Substack recommendation feature to promote seven other extremist
00:28:54.000 newsletters. And so they also describe how, you know, Substack, if you make a certain amount of
00:28:59.320 money, they give you a badge and like things like that. They are using those things to, I would
00:29:05.460 argue promote as a company these beliefs and make money off of these beliefs that they then say like
00:29:10.540 oh well we don't support it if you don't support it why are you taking a 10% cut like that's but
00:29:14.760 the very literal definition of supporting it yeah absolutely and that's not you know it's not like
00:29:20.340 oh we just have this platform and people are writing on it and we have no say on what they're
00:29:24.000 writing like at that point you're complicit you're literally you're essentially what like on the on
00:29:29.520 the board of the, like, neo-Nazi publication, you know? Exactly. So after this outcry from
00:29:36.740 these writers who submitted this letter, Substack this week did announce that they were removing
00:29:42.120 five existing publications that they said were breaking the platform's rules with what they were
00:29:46.980 posting. They said, if and when we become aware of other content that violates our guidelines,
00:29:51.640 we will take appropriate action. They added, we are actively working on more reporting tools that
00:29:57.060 can be used to flag content that potentially violates our guidelines, and we will continue
00:30:00.800 working on tools for user moderation so Substack users can set and refine the terms of their own
00:30:06.120 experience on the platform. And yeah, I just got to say, there is an old adage in content moderation
00:30:13.300 of online spaces, which is if you don't explicitly and specifically and loudly say that you are not 0.71
00:30:19.800 a place for Nazis to gather online, that is how you get Nazis. And if you don't want Nazis, you
00:30:24.820 have to say, no Nazis. And I think this really proves it. Casey Newton, a platformer, one of 0.79
00:30:30.600 the big tech outlets that was behind this letter, said, the Nazis did not commit the only atrocity
00:30:37.120 in history, but a platform that declines to remove their supporters is telling you something
00:30:41.100 important about itself. And I completely agree. And honestly, I am usually somebody who will
00:30:48.160 take any excuse to frame something as a win, even if it's a small win. Something about this
00:30:54.320 doesn't smell right to me, right? Like removing five newsletters and then being like, oh, well,
00:30:59.320 you know what? Years later and after outcry and being pushed by these writers who spoke up,
00:31:05.280 we're finally going to do the bare minimum of enforcing our existing terms of service and
00:31:11.060 removing five newsletters. They don't even say which newsletters were removed. And so
00:31:14.820 it just feels so low effort to me that it's almost hard for me to call it a win. Like I'm glad that
00:31:21.520 these writers spoke up and i'm grateful for their organizing work to push them in the right direction
00:31:26.260 but like that said substack like get it together this is such a low it feels so low effort that
00:31:32.980 it feels barely worth applauding yeah also i don't know the whole idea of users setting in their own
00:31:39.500 terms for what they're like users have the option to change what they want to see it's like okay but
00:31:43.880 then you're not really solving the problem because you're putting it on the individual to like put
00:31:49.260 what i don't want to see nazis which i feel like that should be a given yeah and also i mean going
00:31:54.860 back to my statement before like when i say like whatever prestige obviously like nazis are bad
00:31:59.400 um that's a pretty like easy statement it's really weird i know it's crazy um my
00:32:08.040 gay jewish self is coming out against the nazis i guess um like i don't know it's been so weird
00:32:15.020 the last couple years saying that has just become like it's like like that should be the bare minimum
00:32:19.140 statement and you can't be like Nazis are bad it's like whoa that's I don't know anyways um
00:32:24.740 yeah like that that it just it just it seems like it's not really gonna fix the problem if 0.76
00:32:31.660 you're putting it on the users because you know one thing that the OG Nazis were really good at
00:32:37.820 was propaganda and you know sort of sanitizing their beliefs or packaging their beliefs in a
00:32:44.020 way that like the average person would agree with it and you know this is just giving them
00:32:48.760 another avenue to do that. Yes. And I don't think that, you know, your average person who just wants
00:32:54.300 to read stuff on Substack or write on Substack about their life or whatever should be tasked
00:32:59.300 with that. Like that is an organizational and a structural problem. And I don't think, as you
00:33:06.120 said, I don't think it should be left up to people to have to filter out that level of extremist
00:33:12.180 content, right? Obviously, if there's like stuff that you don't want to see, it's good for platforms
00:33:16.200 to allow you customization,
00:33:18.200 but this is so far beyond
00:33:19.780 a typical customization problem.
00:33:21.760 Like clearly it is a organizational structural problem
00:33:24.680 that the powers that be at Substack
00:33:27.360 have to sort out.
00:33:28.880 And like, if you are not being paid by Substack,
00:33:31.920 it should not be your responsibility
00:33:33.480 to figure out how to keep Nazi content
00:33:36.280 off of the platform.
00:33:37.580 Like that burden should not be on us as the user.
00:33:41.200 Like that should not be on the user end.
00:33:43.280 And speaking of hate speech on these platforms,
00:33:46.200 So one of my New Year's resolutions was to stop using Twitter so much.
00:33:51.400 TBD on how it is going, so far not well.
00:33:54.600 But that will probably mean spending more time on alternatives like Threads.
00:33:59.460 When we first checked in on Threads when it launched, it felt like very brand safe to
00:34:04.240 me and just like didn't feel like a cool platform.
00:34:06.200 I haven't spent a lot of time there yet, so like maybe that has changed.
00:34:09.040 But one thing that has changed on Threads is that people are reporting the platform
00:34:13.680 is flooded with more transphobic pro-life anti-porn and islamophobic posts so hearing this
00:34:21.060 i logged in for the first time in ages and it didn't take long for me to see this this post
00:34:25.500 from a user that i did not follow and certainly like don't follow any accounts that would have
00:34:30.120 like recommended this to me it was a tweet that just said it's okay to be white it's okay to be
00:34:35.800 white like i saw that a bunch did you see that oh my god yeah i did so just a really weird post
00:34:42.280 right yeah no this is i've been having the same experience of like i the only time because i also
00:34:48.140 like i feel like i have the same sort of thing with threads where like i made it when i made
00:34:51.680 a threads account when it came out it's connected to my instagram and everything but i am not the
00:34:56.080 only times i've opened it is when i get in the instagram feed i'll get like baited into clicking
00:35:00.780 like hate clicking on stuff because yeah i'll get like all the there's that thing now where it shows
00:35:05.780 you like recommended threads and they're always like the most like inflammatory like there's been
00:35:10.980 a lot of islamophobic stuff or like very racist stuff that i've seen them in like that can't be
00:35:15.640 real and then i'll click on it to like see the whole thing and whatever it's very like rage
00:35:20.460 baby kind of stuff but yeah no that's i the only times i've opened thrides have been to
00:35:25.420 see those see those tweets in full and be like is this really something joey oh my god i will
00:35:32.320 this will be the rest of the episode but when i told what i said up top that one of my plans for
00:35:38.960 the new year was to spend less time getting bent out of shape about content like this it is it was
00:35:45.640 inspired in part by that that i know exactly what you're talking about on instagram where you're
00:35:50.040 like who is saying what now then you click in and if you're me then you spend your whole day being
00:35:55.720 like well this can't possibly like i need to research this like what's going on here before
00:35:59.440 you know it you're knee deep in some weird ass profile being like like what is this what is this 0.75
00:36:04.520 ridiculousness that i'm looking at on winter break when we were off i spent an entire half a day i
00:36:10.360 lost a whole half a day to that process and i was like they got me it's it's total engagement
00:36:17.000 rage bait they want you to click maybe they want you to click by accident and yeah i just it just
00:36:21.760 it doesn't feel good like it's like a crappy it feels crappy to have that experience online and
00:36:28.820 it feels like more and more like that's what platforms have to offer you is engagement farming
00:36:35.460 and rage baiting and then like exploiting your accidental click into something with shocking
00:36:41.420 inflammatory content. It is infuriating. But I will say that Facebook meta, they are aware of
00:36:50.040 this problem. So in a statement to Mashable, Facebook acknowledged that some users are being
00:36:54.840 shown this type of repetitive, low-quality content, saying, we want people to have a
00:36:59.000 positive experience on threads, and we're continually making improvements to what people
00:37:02.780 see on the app. In addition to removing content that violates our community guidelines, we're
00:37:06.920 aware that some people are seeing this repetitive, low-quality content they may not be interested
00:37:10.340 in. We're taking steps to address it. So I've read a few responses on this from Adam
00:37:15.420 Mosseri, who some listeners might remember is one of my personal enemies. But all of
00:37:21.580 his comments about it are like so general they're kind of like oh we're doing our best to get it off
00:37:25.300 the platform yada yada yada but it is clear that you need to have very clear rules very clear
00:37:32.720 enforcement of those rules and a way to find it when those pieces of content are breaking the
00:37:40.120 rules when users are doing it in a repetitive way like it is not easy to run a text-based social
00:37:45.280 media platform i'll be the first person to admit it like it is a pay grade far above me however
00:37:51.140 it just yeah they've got to get it together because nobody wants to have social platforms
00:37:56.940 where it just feels scammy or baity and I just think that most people have had their fill of
00:38:03.980 experiences that feel that way online right now yeah no absolutely because like especially looking
00:38:09.680 at like yeah the threads that would pop up on my feed that would get recommended to me there were
00:38:13.220 always things that I was like if you're taking my data and you're like understanding the type
00:38:19.520 of person that I am and things I'm interested in and what my political beliefs are like this is very
00:38:23.720 clearly the opposite of that like is the point of these just to get me to like click on it because
00:38:28.840 I'm yeah like rage bait or like confused bait me into clicking on something I look which you know
00:38:36.580 as a marketing strategy to get people to use your app works uh that being said it's not very ethical
00:38:43.260 yeah I definitely like I every time like that happens I'll take a second and like scroll start
00:38:49.080 scrolling through threads and be like when it's never I don't know it is like the same where I'm
00:38:52.820 like I still feel like it's like the social media platform itself hasn't really like there's no real
00:38:58.660 reason for me to go on it otherwise so it's weird it's a weird situation yeah I've come to see
00:39:06.800 myself as someone who has gotten more susceptible to the kind of rage confusion engagement bait that
00:39:16.780 you just described i know like i know it when i see it and i almost feel like the more learned i
00:39:24.320 am about that kind of content somehow the more it gets me on twitter like if you are a black person
00:39:31.020 a young black person who was on twitter you probably are familiar with a certain kind of
00:39:35.300 post that you know is just like i can't i can't describe it but you know it when you see it where
00:39:41.320 it'll be like there's there was a video recently of a of three black women knocking on a door at
00:39:48.240 like knocking on a door of an apartment and the caption on twitter was like this girl was out
00:39:53.380 until 5 a.m and her man changed the locks on her what do you all think about this and everybody is
00:40:00.100 like oh like why is it bad to go out at 5 a.m and then people are being like yeah like she deserves
00:40:04.980 it and something about those kinds of posts where it's oh it's always something like very inflammatory
00:40:10.540 It might not even be true. It might be like a skit that people are doing. That's a whole other episode about how people are making skits, putting them online as if they have been filmed, and then raking in that sweet, sweet engagement when people react to it.
00:40:25.360 I could I mean we should do a whole episode on it because it's a it's a common thing but for
00:40:29.940 whatever reason I am I am susceptible to that like I am not above that I find myself like scrolling
00:40:34.780 the comments and I'm like why am I getting angry about this probably fake scenario that has
00:40:40.980 nothing to do with me like there's enough stuff in the world for me to be reacting to in my own
00:40:44.880 life like why am I exposing myself and getting myself bent out of shape about things that are
00:40:49.460 being presented to me specifically to react to I don't know it just I'm going off on a tangent here
00:40:54.640 But it's a problem and it doesn't feel good.
00:40:57.220 And I agree with you.
00:41:03.220 More after a quick break.
00:41:10.400 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix and Disney Plus from $94 a month.
00:41:15.380 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet with a two year term and auto pay credit.
00:41:19.620 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:41:21.980 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:41:24.640 run a business and not thinking about podcasting think again more Americans listen to podcasts
00:41:30.100 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora and as the number one podcaster
00:41:34.800 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear
00:41:39.660 your message plus only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio
00:41:44.620 think podcasting can help your business think iHeart streaming radio and podcasting let us show
00:41:50.740 you at iHeartAdvertising.com. That's iHeartAdvertising.com. When I was 14 years old,
00:41:57.480 I was kidnapped and held captive for nine months. I survived and I've spent my life exploring how
00:42:04.000 other people survive what should have destroyed them. I'm Elizabeth Smart and these are the
00:42:09.820 Survivor Files. I just remember this low taunting voice next to my ear saying, shut up, don't say 0.96
00:42:18.020 anything. Every week I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable. I knew if he woke up
00:42:25.500 without a doubt he was going to hurt me. I started feeling that there was someone at the end of my
00:42:32.380 bed and I just started screaming. They are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:42:39.740 But these aren't stories about what's taken from them. They're stories about what it takes to make
00:42:45.460 it out alive. Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app,
00:42:51.580 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:42:59.780 Let's get right back into it.
00:43:04.000 So speaking of scams and bait on social media and on Twitter, no, the SEC did not register
00:43:13.100 Bitcoin on securities exchanges. Thank you to listener Trisha Friedman for flagging this for
00:43:18.360 us to talk about. And if folks have stories that they want us to talk about, you can always flag
00:43:22.940 them to us. So the official Twitter account of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
00:43:28.260 SECGov, was compromised this week and sent out an unauthorized tweet. This is a pretty big deal.
00:43:34.640 Twitter officially says that they investigated and determined that it was not a breach of their
00:43:38.780 systems, but that somebody got a hold of somebody from the SEC's phone, which did not have two-factor
00:43:44.920 authentication enabled, and that's how they posted the fake tweet. The tweet said, it does look like
00:43:50.400 a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tweet. The tweet says, today the SEC grants approval for
00:43:56.620 Bitcoin ETFs for listing on all registered national securities exchanges. The approved Bitcoin ETFs
00:44:03.480 will be subject to ongoing surveillance and compliance measures to ensure continued investor
00:44:07.680 protection. So this would be a big deal had it been true, which it's not. But that fake tweet
00:44:13.220 did cause a brief spike in Bitcoin's value of around 2.5% to nearly $47,870 before crashing
00:44:21.100 around 3.2% from its original price. So Twitter, you know, they denied any responsibility for this
00:44:27.920 incident. So they say, I don't know. But what is clear is that since Musk took over at Twitter,
00:44:33.240 Twitter has gotten a lot less secure. This piece in Wired puts it really well. They say,
00:44:38.800 Elon Musk's aggressive slashing of the company's staff over the past year raised fears that the
00:44:43.480 cuts would leave Twitter unable to secure a platform depended on by users that include
00:44:47.900 high-profile figures and government agencies worldwide. One former Twitter information
00:44:52.520 official sued Musk and others for alleged wrongful termination after he was fired for,
00:44:57.640 he claims in the lawsuit, arguing that the staff cuts would interfere with Twitter's ability
00:45:01.880 to comply with a 2011 consent decree with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to protect users'
00:45:07.320 personal information. And yeah, I got to say, one of the reasons I want to use Twitter less is that
00:45:14.180 I don't trust that somebody like Elon Musk would keep my personal information secure and safe. And
00:45:19.820 it makes sense considering how he is, how he acts, how he shows up. Wired spoke to Allison Nixon,
00:45:25.960 the chief research officer for cybersecurity firm Unit 221B, which frequently deals with
00:45:32.200 hackers' accounts takeovers, she puts it really well. She says, people put a lot of trust into
00:45:37.520 an entity that has stopped being a serious company. If a government wants to be able to
00:45:41.620 make statements that people can rely on, they can't do that on a platform that has a targeted
00:45:46.120 account takeover problem. And yeah, even if Musk is denying any kind of responsibility for this,
00:45:53.520 which he is. He certainly is not signaling that he is taking it very seriously. Right after the
00:45:58.560 news of the SEC's Twitter account being compromised broke, Musk was joking around about it on Twitter,
00:46:05.140 responding to a post jokingly being like, oh, what's the SEC's password? Wrong answers only.
00:46:10.820 Musk responds, LFG, Doge to the moon, which is like, let's fucking go, a joke about Dogecoin.
00:46:17.980 the jokes i mean like side note the jokes aren't even ever funny with him it's oh it's always some 0.97
00:46:23.860 like stupid little meme that was like cool five years ago he gets on everything very late that's 0.90
00:46:29.240 another thing about elon musk i can't stand it's the whole doge coin thing like doge is such an 0.98
00:46:33.780 old meme it's so old like oh my god i'm sure there's like teenagers that have like no idea 0.98
00:46:42.900 without even fucking me. 0.96
00:46:44.100 Like, it's so old. 1.00
00:46:45.100 That is so ridiculous. 0.99
00:46:46.640 Oh, my God. 0.98
00:46:47.180 Update your references.
00:46:49.040 And Trisha, the listener who flagged this story for us,
00:46:52.220 really made a good point,
00:46:53.440 which is that for all the hand-wringing
00:46:55.260 that elected officials do about TikTok,
00:46:57.620 it's such a good reminder that TikTok
00:46:59.060 is not the only platform out there
00:47:00.940 that folks need to be thinking about
00:47:02.360 when it comes to our digital security.
00:47:04.760 You know, there was a time where elected officials,
00:47:07.580 campaigns, governments, et cetera,
00:47:09.320 when they needed to communicate quickly with us, the public,
00:47:11.740 Like, it was Twitter that they used, right?
00:47:13.680 And so I don't know if that's going to be the case going forward with Musk at the helm.
00:47:16.680 But yeah, so it really does matter that it is a secure platform.
00:47:21.600 And speaking of Elon Musk, Joey, is there anything that you want to ask me about Elon Musk?
00:47:27.400 Ooh, let's see.
00:47:28.700 We're, what, like, on the second week into 2024.
00:47:34.200 But still, so excited to hear.
00:47:37.800 What has Elon done now?
00:47:39.420 Well, Elon Musk is on Twitter dipping into straight race science.
00:47:45.460 Oh, no.
00:47:46.420 I know.
00:47:46.920 It's bad.
00:47:47.960 It's one of those things that I almost didn't want to talk about because I'm like, oh, I
00:47:51.400 can't stand this guy.
00:47:52.320 But it does connect to a lot of the conversation that's going on right now.
00:47:56.740 You know, we've done a few episodes on Bill Ackman and Christopher Rufo and their attempts
00:48:01.160 to really create a moral panic around DEI, diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives
00:48:06.120 and have had success in getting Dr. Claudine Gay
00:48:10.460 ousted from her position at Harvard.
00:48:12.780 Well, as y'all know, if it is despicable people 0.96
00:48:15.800 doing despicable stuff,
00:48:17.820 you already know Elon Musk is gonna be involved in it
00:48:21.020 in the mix somehow.
00:48:22.620 So yesterday he was engaging with a tweet
00:48:25.120 suggesting that historically black college graduates
00:48:28.520 have quote, borderline intellectual impairment.
00:48:32.700 So this pretty big account on Twitter, Eyelash Ho, 0.90
00:48:35.640 which is an account that really spreads a lot of junk race science. This account was talking about
00:48:42.460 this program from United Airlines that gives HBCU, Historically Black College, students
00:48:47.660 opportunities to interview with the company's career development program to be pilots.
00:48:51.840 Eyelash Ho says, the mean IQ of grads from two of those United Airlines HBCU partners is about
00:48:57.720 85 to 90 based on the average SATs at those schools. Side note, that's just not true. That's
00:49:03.480 made up. He says, the SAT correlates reasonably well with IQ. The HBCU IQ averages are within
00:49:10.160 10 points of the threshold for what's considered borderline intellectual impairment. I'll add that
00:49:15.520 IQ is a well-studied and well-known predictor of job performance, especially for quick processing
00:49:20.000 and mentally demanding occupations like major airline pilots. So none of that is correct.
00:49:24.600 All of it is wrong. Yeah, that is not true. Yeah, first of all, IQ is a totally like
00:49:30.160 arbitrary system and measuring intelligence like we've known this for a while people still latch
00:49:37.380 onto it it's like this is how you know brain smart but you know i yeah no i so even for as
00:49:47.040 wrong and incorrect and silly and junky and bad science and all the other things that that tweet 0.80
00:49:53.460 is elon musk basically co-signed that tweet he replied saying it will take an airplane crashing 0.99
00:50:00.020 and killing hundreds of people
00:50:01.400 for them to change this crazy policy of D-I-E. 0.53
00:50:05.260 Did you catch what he did there?
00:50:06.600 The policy is D-E-I.
00:50:08.520 But he mixed the letters around
00:50:10.440 so it spells D-I-E.
00:50:11.780 Die.
00:50:12.600 I don't know.
00:50:13.480 Also, I'm sorry.
00:50:14.780 Elad, like, don't throw stones in glass houses
00:50:18.480 or whatever. 1.00
00:50:19.320 Like, that is...
00:50:20.440 You should not be the one talking about
00:50:22.960 people crashing and dying with their...
00:50:25.400 Oh, I mean, yes!
00:50:26.780 Thank you!
00:50:27.760 Yeah. 1.00
00:50:28.200 We're talking about crashing and dying, homie. 0.99
00:50:30.500 Let's look at your own cars. 1.00
00:50:32.300 That is such a good point.
00:50:34.380 Also, it's wild to me that they would be like, we broke it.
00:50:38.740 Like, here's the pithy slogan.
00:50:41.760 If you mix the letters around, it smells die.
00:50:44.180 Like, get it on a billboard.
00:50:45.660 Like, it's the most.
00:50:47.780 It's like in Harry Potter when, like, Voldemort's name, like, they turn it around.
00:50:53.740 It actually says die.
00:50:57.680 oh my god and i just like this whole idea is just so silly right like this idea that because
00:51:05.000 you have dei initiatives side note like i feel like i have been in a position of defending
00:51:12.840 dei the last few weeks because of what's going on but like dei initiatives are basically toothless
00:51:18.580 they're basically like meaningless they're basically like they they don't really they
00:51:22.880 have not really accomplished a lot i was listening to the podcast if books could kill they don't do
00:51:27.600 much i was listening to the podcast if books could kill and one of the points that they made which is
00:51:32.320 a really good one which is that if you were a racist in 2024 and you really wanted your spaces
00:51:39.000 to be all mostly white men and have like white straight cis men in power you would you should
00:51:45.380 like the ei initiatives because they have been so ineffective at actually making things more
00:51:51.580 diverse and inclusive that you should be like wow this is going great like i'm gonna keep endorsing 0.88
00:51:55.520 yeah right but however this idea that like dei initiatives mean that you have armies of black
00:52:03.520 folks and brown folks and other represented identities working in these places it's just a
00:52:09.220 fiction but that's what they're so they're basically creating a fiction and then turning 0.57
00:52:13.080 that fiction into a boogeyman and then being like oh i'm scared i watched this fox news report about
00:52:18.840 the alaska airlines flight where the door came off did you see that i did terrifying but in
00:52:25.320 the report on fox news they were like oh well diversity in pilots is to blame for this like 0.97
00:52:32.460 it's dei that's that's what the problem is here and it's like damn y'all will really blame us for 0.67
00:52:37.360 anything now we're now we're causing plane problems like you will blame us for anything 0.73
00:52:42.040 hi okay future bridget here popping in solo without joey because we just got an update on
00:52:50.040 a story that I was obsessed with even before I ever started doing these News Roundup episodes,
00:52:55.280 so I had to talk about it with y'all. I don't think we ever actually talked about this story
00:52:59.220 on the newscast, but it's one of the more bizarre, not to mention gruesome tech stories that I have
00:53:04.540 heard in a long, long time. Today, the online auction site eBay has been ordered by a Massachusetts 0.63
00:53:10.480 court to pay $3 million in damages after their employees and contractors waged what I can only
00:53:17.300 describe as all-out psychological warfare on a Boston couple. That $3 million is the statutory
00:53:23.880 maximum fine for eBay's charges. And in my book, the couple they harassed deserves every penny of
00:53:29.560 it. So back in 2019, eBay senior executives were annoyed that this couple, the Steiners, 0.94
00:53:35.520 were running a newsletter called Ecommerce Bites about eBay that was meant to give people who sell
00:53:40.360 stuff on eBay and auction sites information about the site, happenings with it, news,
00:53:44.800 all of that kind of stuff. According to Yahoo, this harassment campaign began after Ina Steiner 0.99
00:53:50.520 wrote a story in her newsletter about a lawsuit brought by eBay that accused Amazon of poaching 0.96
00:53:55.960 its sellers according to court records. About a half an hour after Ina Steiner published this
00:54:00.860 article, eBay's then-CEO, Devin Wenning, sent another top executive a message saying, quote,
00:54:07.840 if you are ever going to take her down, now is the time. That executive then sent his message to
00:54:13.840 James Baugh, who was eBay's senior director of safety and security. And he called Ina Steiner
00:54:19.280 a, quote, biased troll who needs to get burned down. After that, I guess Baugh was like, I am 0.97
00:54:26.100 on it because he became the ringleader of this harassment and intimidation campaign against the 0.98
00:54:31.280 Steiners. Side note, also don't put stuff like this in an email. Like if you're ever going to
00:54:36.180 do something like this, hopefully you're never waging a crazy campaign of harassment and
00:54:41.580 intimidation against anybody. But if you're ever doing something where you're like, oh, it might be
00:54:45.440 bad if someone were to read these emails, discuss it in person. Your next email should be like,
00:54:50.200 let's talk about it in person. So eBay's head of security basically had other staffers send
00:54:56.220 disturbing packages to this couple's home, including a bloody pig mask, an actual fetal pig,
00:55:02.280 a box of live spiders, a box of live cockroaches, pornography, and a funeral wreath, along with a
00:55:09.540 book called How to Grieve the Death of a Spouse. So like pretty obviously meant to be a threat or
00:55:16.020 a way to intimidate them. Horrifying. The staffers also traveled to their home. They apparently had
00:55:22.140 a plan when they found that their home was locked. They had a plan and tools to break into their home
00:55:27.280 to install a GPS tracking device on their car. They posted the couple's home address on Craigslist,
00:55:33.440 inviting randos to come to their house for sex parties.
00:55:37.480 These were senior-level executives at eBay.
00:55:40.840 Jim Baugh, eBay's senior director of safety and security,
00:55:43.660 was the ringleader, and he was sentenced to 57 months in prison
00:55:46.580 back in September of 2022 for his role in all of this.
00:55:50.080 Six other employees also faced felony convictions for their involvement in this,
00:55:53.900 which include charges of stalking, witness tampering, and obstruction of justice.
00:55:58.600 Acting U.S. attorney from Massachusetts, Joseph S. Levy, said
00:56:02.040 eBay engaged in absolutely horrific criminal conduct and that the company's employees and
00:56:07.240 contractors put victims through pure hell in a petrifying campaign aimed at silencing their
00:56:13.140 reporting and protecting the eBay brand. Imagine doing serious federal jail time because you wanted
00:56:19.640 to protect the brand eBay. So get this, eBay's then CEO, Devin Wenning, the one who was sending
00:56:26.540 those emails about this couple who was harassed, was not criminally charged with anything related
00:56:31.080 to this, but he did step down from eBay in 2019 after it all came to light. But James Baugh,
00:56:36.500 the ringleader, his lawyers have said that he faced relentless pressure from Wenning and other
00:56:41.800 top executives to do something about this couple. He alleged that he was then pushed out by the
00:56:46.700 company when, quote, an army of outside lawyers descended to conduct an internal investigation
00:56:51.820 aimed at saving the company and its top executives from prosecution. It really does sound like this
00:56:57.820 started at the very tippy top, like the former CEO Wenning was on those emails. So it does sound
00:57:04.120 like this started at the very, very tippy top and that this behavior was not just tolerated,
00:57:09.600 but expected, but invited, but like all but asked to happen. And guess what? That former
00:57:17.640 eBay executive Wenning, even though he has not been charged with a crime, it is not like he is
00:57:23.280 laying low after overseeing a company where this kind of criminal behavior happened. Today, he is
00:57:28.520 the CEO of Symbolically AI, a company that he co-founded that is supposed to use AI to help
00:57:33.780 writers and publishers. On his website, he lists all the great accomplishments that he oversaw when
00:57:40.020 he was at eBay, but conveniently does not list overseeing a criminal harassment campaign.
00:57:47.680 Okay, so we got to talk about this new SAG agreement. This summer, actors and screenwriters
00:57:52.620 were in a big standoff with studios in part over AI in what folks like me called hot labor summer.
00:57:59.020 Basically, the question was, could studios use the likeness of actors without their consent to
00:58:04.160 make AI versions of them that they could use forever and ever and ever without paying up?
00:58:09.540 Well, this week, SAG-AFTRA, the union representing more than 150,000 film and TV performers,
00:58:15.280 announced a deal that sets terms for the use of AI voices in video games. So the deal is with
00:58:20.860 Replica Studios, an AI voice technology company, and it establishes protections around the licensing
00:58:25.840 of digitally replicated voices. Duncan Crabtree Ireland, who is SAG-AFTRA's national executive
00:58:31.280 director, told NBC News, I think what's really important about this agreement is the fact that
00:58:35.920 it provides protection for all performers at all levels in the industry. And the fact is,
00:58:39.980 a lot of times performers who may not be famous names really need that protection even more
00:58:44.360 because their bargaining leverage to negotiate those kinds of things individually is not as
00:58:48.340 great. So one of the big pieces of how performers are thinking about the use of AI is whether or not
00:58:54.200 their voices and likenesses can be used after they die, which is like pretty creepy.
00:58:59.700 Crabtree Ireland said that posthumous deals are possible with the consent of whoever the estate
00:59:04.140 has designated to act on the deceased performer's behalf. So I was sort of like set to be like,
00:59:10.140 oh, that's great. That's good. Like, I'm so happy they have a deal in place. However,
00:59:13.860 However, after doing a little more research, I came to find that a lot of performers are either A, angry about this deal, or B, skeptical of this deal and still have more questions.
00:59:24.720 Like, I went to the social media posts that were announcing this agreement, and several people were expressing frustration with this agreement and the announcement,
00:59:31.660 saying that they did not feel like the union had done a good enough job of representing their interests as it pertains to AI, or even just, like, educating them on what they need to know about this agreement.
00:59:40.780 And I don't know, I think it's one of those stories where we'll definitely keep an eye on it and give updates where there are updates. But yeah, it sounds like maybe the folks who are being represented here and the folks who are doing the negotiating, there might be a little bit of daylight in between what both of those parties see as their best interest and whether or not they're being represented.
01:00:03.720 did definitely yeah um I have a lot of friends who are actors in my life so I this is something
01:00:11.100 I've been like hearing about from them um people are not happy with this agreement um and like I
01:00:17.320 totally understand it and it's interesting because I so like I as an iHeart employee like I'm part of
01:00:23.560 the Writers Guild um and we weren't on strike it was just the film and television division we were
01:00:28.720 in a different division but um it was interesting because I feel like with the Writers Strike there
01:00:33.040 was a lot more like transparency about what was happening obviously it's not perfect but like you
01:00:38.360 know i felt like at least like even as somebody who is not in the division that was on strike like
01:00:42.500 i had kind of an idea what was happening and like what the deal was and like what the like kind of
01:00:47.540 negotiation how that was going and i feel like there has there was a lot of like muddiness about
01:00:53.720 around the sag uh the negotiations and and yeah again like just from from my friends that are
01:01:01.880 dealing with this because it's their careers they don't seem to be happy and i also remember like
01:01:07.400 looking at the sag instagram posts like look at opening the comments take a bunch of people that
01:01:11.300 are like i like especially even when like the the contract was announced there were a bunch of
01:01:16.840 videos that were going around from like really prominent actors being like oh yes on this like
01:01:21.140 and it was like why do you have to advertise to people to vote yes like it should be a thing where
01:01:26.000 It's just like, yeah, look, we have a good deal.
01:01:30.460 Do you support it or not?
01:01:31.860 I don't know.
01:01:32.320 Yeah, so this whole thing, I wish the best to SAG and all of the actors everywhere that
01:01:41.620 have to deal with all of this solidarity.
01:01:45.360 Again, it's rough out here.
01:01:47.600 Yeah, I'm with you.
01:01:49.480 And honestly, these performers who are worried about things like their likeness being used
01:01:55.720 via AI after they're dead.
01:01:58.440 That sounds very creepy and futuristic,
01:02:00.280 but that's not an out there concern
01:02:03.100 because just this week, comedy icon,
01:02:06.140 standup legend, George Carlin,
01:02:07.780 released a new comedy special,
01:02:09.440 which is very impressive
01:02:10.460 considering he's been dead since 2008.
01:02:12.560 And the special is called I'm Glad I'm Dead. 0.96
01:02:15.640 It is from Doodsy.
01:02:17.420 I'm getting this from Variety.
01:02:19.060 I'm about to say this,
01:02:20.560 but I'm not totally sure what it means.
01:02:22.600 dude see comma a comedy ai that hosts a podcast and youtube show with mad tv alum will sasso and
01:02:31.420 podcaster chad coltkin i don't know what that means so like is dude see ai like like who like
01:02:39.960 what is what is the ai entity in this it sounds like a like an onion article like that i don't
01:02:45.960 know that george carlin specifically like i cannot think of somebody who would probably be
01:02:51.740 like more angry at the fact that his image is being used for like an ai totally like this is
01:02:58.660 how you get haunted by like a spirit that anytime you're trying to concentrate like whispers pithy
01:03:05.340 little observations about society in your ear like you want to be haunted by the ghost of george
01:03:09.760 carlin like this is how you get haunted by the george a ghost of george carlin which i would
01:03:14.200 love to be haunted by the ghost of george carlin but like in a fun way like it's like like in a
01:03:18.640 Like, my little buddy has just given me life advice, not in whatever's going to come to these guys.
01:03:23.480 Like, that's going to be something different.
01:03:25.860 Okay, so I'm so confused about what this entity, Doodsy, is.
01:03:30.260 This is from their website.
01:03:31.720 Will Sasso and Chad Coltkin have been selected by a state-of-the-art entertainment AI to host this first-of-its-kind comedy podcast.
01:03:39.640 Wait, so they were selected by the AI.
01:03:41.660 I don't know if that's a joke or not.
01:03:43.240 I don't know what I'm reading.
01:03:45.360 It goes on to say, our hosts have been convinced to grant the Dudesy AI access to all of their personal emails, text messages, social media accounts, purchases, and browsing histories so that it can tailor the show to their specific personalities and entertain you at the highest level possible.
01:04:01.140 I don't, like, I don't understand what I'm reading. 0.68
01:04:03.880 This whole thing, like, this sounds like it's a George Carlin.
01:04:07.580 Yes, it sure does.
01:04:08.360 Like, it's like, they've been granted permission by, like, the AI.
01:04:11.880 I don't know.
01:04:12.300 Like, that's how.
01:04:13.540 I am confused. So I'll go on. So Dootsie starts off the comedy special with this. I want to let you know very clearly that what you're about to hear is not George Carlin. And it's my impersonation of George Carlin that I developed in the same way that a human impressionist would. I listened to all of George Carlin's material and did my best to imitate his voice, cadence and attitude as well as subject matter, I think that would have interested him today.
01:04:40.120 So think of it like Andy Kaufman impersonating Elvis or like Will Ferrell impersonating George W. Bush.
01:04:46.080 So I see what Doodsy is doing there, but like he's trying to make us be like, oh, well, this is a more common thing for comedians than you think.
01:04:53.900 But he's naming comedians who impersonate non-comedians.
01:04:58.260 Like it's not like Will Ferrell impersonating George W. Bush.
01:05:01.940 It's more like Dave Chappelle impersonating Richard Pryor.
01:05:04.740 Like it's like a comedian impersonating another comedian.
01:05:06.860 This just sounds like the most annoying dude at the party.
01:05:09.420 Oh, my God.
01:05:10.160 He's like, do you want to hear my George Carlin impression?
01:05:12.940 Like, yeah.
01:05:14.800 Oh, my God.
01:05:15.900 Yes.
01:05:16.200 And I'm not even sure if that dude is a dude or AI.
01:05:19.480 Like, again, I'm not sure, like, what they're trying to tell me here.
01:05:22.900 But I can confirm to you, per variety, that it is an AI-generated impression of Carlin.
01:05:29.980 I don't know in what way this traditionally counts as an impersonation, but there you have it.
01:05:33.540 So this special has Carlin commenting on things in tech that he never got to see because he died in 2008, like Elon Musk buying Twitter and Jeff Bezos' rocket launch into space in 2022.
01:05:46.520 You know what they did forget to do, though, is get any kind of permission from George Carlin's very much still alive family member.
01:05:55.020 His daughter, Kelly Carlin, posted on Twitter saying,
01:05:58.920 My dad spent a lifetime perfecting his craft from his very human life, brain, and imagination.
01:06:04.300 No machine will ever replace his genius.
01:06:06.440 These AI-generated products are clever attempts at trying to recreate a mind that will never exist again.
01:06:11.880 Let the artist's work speak for itself.
01:06:14.080 Humans are so afraid of the void that we can't let what has fallen into it stay there.
01:06:18.620 Here's an idea.
01:06:19.740 How about we give some actual living human comedians a listen to?
01:06:22.700 But if you want to listen to the genuine George Carlin, he has 14 specials that you can find anywhere.
01:06:28.500 So I hate that she has to make that statement, but I really appreciated it.
01:06:33.320 And yeah, like you were saying, of all the comedians that I feel like would not have rocked with this, I feel like George Carlin especially would not have rocked with this.
01:06:45.600 Yeah, yeah.
01:06:46.740 And I love George Carlin. There is a bit like I actually just finished edits on an op ed that opens with a George Carlin bit. I reference it on the show like all the time. You'll probably are sick of me saying it, but I have gotten more wisdom and use out of this one George Carlin bit than I have gotten from anything I've ever encountered in a philosophy book or a college course.
01:07:08.260 and that is his shit versus stuff bit you ever notice how your stuff is stuff and everybody 0.96
01:07:15.480 else's stuff is shit this is not me trying to do an impersonation of him I literally quote it all 0.98
01:07:19.980 the time but that one there I feel like there is more insight into the human condition and how 0.98
01:07:24.940 we all live in a society together in that bit than anything else I've ever read and it bummed
01:07:29.720 me out like the idea of comedians or podcasters trying to recreate that using AI it's like yeah
01:07:39.720 let the work stand for itself not everything needs to be a AI generated copy of something
01:07:46.620 that was good that copy probably wouldn't even be good and his daughter's not into it so don't do
01:07:51.860 this I just really hate this thanks so much for being here Joey where can folks keep up with all
01:07:57.060 your awesome work you can find me on social media at pot not pratt that's p-a-t-t-n-o-t-p-r-a-t-t
01:08:05.280 um and if you want to listen to my other work you can check out afterlives the lili and flanco
01:08:11.800 story um we just finished up the kind of main arc we're posting some sort of bonus content
01:08:19.720 longer interviews at the moment but you should definitely check that out uh super important
01:08:24.880 story but yeah thanks so much for being here thanks so much for all your great work and thanks
01:08:30.000 to all of you for listening you can find me on social media you can hit me up on email at
01:08:33.860 hello at tangody.com and you can check out more ad free content at our patreon at tangody.com
01:08:39.280 slash patreon
01:08:40.260 if you're looking for ways to support the show check out our merch store at tangody.com
01:08:50.780 slash store. Got a story about an interesting thing in tech or just want to say hi? You can
01:08:56.280 reach us at hello at tangody.com. You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangody.com.
01:09:01.700 There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me, Bridget Todd. It's a production of iHeart
01:09:05.400 Radio and Unbossed Creative. Edited by Joey Pat. Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer.
01:09:11.100 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer. Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
01:09:15.740 I'm your host, Bridget Todd. If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
01:09:20.780 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app,
01:09:23.740 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:09:35.100 This is an iHeart Podcast.
01:09:38.000 Guaranteed human.