There Are No Girls on the Internet - March 05, 2024


Will we ever see a woman president?

Topics
Willy Wonka AI fiasco; Google’s “woke” AI fiasco; Tumblr CEO transphobia fiasco; Wendy’s pricing fiasco – NEWS ROUNDUP TikTok wants you to call congress; Black people love Trump in AI deep fakes; Disable this new Twitter feature — NEWS ROUNDUP

Episode Stats


Length

47 minutes

Words per minute

185.53

Word count

8,754

Sentence count

363

Harmful content

Misogyny

74

sentences flagged

Hate speech

18

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.940 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:38.460 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:43.680 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:47.300 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:00:51.020 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:54.640 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:58.680 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:10.340 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:18.460 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:21.200 Friday, March 8th is International Women's Day.
00:01:26.640 And here at There Are No Girls on the Internet, we're celebrating by taking part in iHeartRadio's Women Take the Mic initiative.
00:01:33.960 International Women's Day has always kind of meant a lot to me.
00:01:36.920 It is so important to me to be honoring and lifting up women all over the world.
00:01:41.880 And I think this year I'm doing that while also really wrestling with the fact that women, both here in the United States, but especially globally, are facing a lot right now.
00:01:50.800 you know, in times of war, in conflict, we know that it is always women that really bear the
00:01:56.540 brunt. And I guess that's just sort of weighing very heavy on my mind as I reflect on what
00:02:01.520 International Women's Day means to me this year. I do also just want to take a moment to honor the
00:02:06.660 women who have supported me and helped me to get where I am today. You know, I know that I would
00:02:11.240 not be doing any of what I am doing if not for the women that came before me. You'll hear a bit 0.85
00:02:16.200 more about that later in this episode, but the woman that I kind of modeled my career after was 0.96
00:02:21.660 the late, great Gwen Ifill, a journalist and correspondent on PBS. Gwen Ifill was the first 0.77
00:02:28.040 woman to host a nationally televised U.S. public affairs program with Washington Week in Review.
00:02:34.000 I actually have a picture of her hanging on my fridge right now. My parents always watched her
00:02:39.080 on PBS, and when I was a kid, it was the first time that I saw a Black woman have this big career
00:02:45.060 on television. And I always wondered, wow, I wonder if I could do that too someday. You know,
00:02:50.320 she really had the quintessential big career that I always wanted for myself. Like, she did it all.
00:02:56.580 She moderated presidential debates. In fact, in February of 2016, Gwen Ifill, alongside Judy
00:03:02.760 Woodruff, became the first team of women to moderate a Democratic presidential debate, 0.57
00:03:07.740 moderating the debate between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders. You know, some little girls 0.99
00:03:12.460 dream of being president. Well, I did not dream of being president. I dreamt of being the woman
00:03:17.300 who asks the person who wants to be president hard questions on television. And I might not
00:03:23.060 ever have a big career like Gwen Ifill's, but she really inspired me to want to ask questions
00:03:29.060 and challenge myself and others. As women, we should be seeing ourselves reflected in government,
00:03:34.840 politics, media, journalism, culture, art, and every other place where decisions are being made, 0.97
00:03:40.440 including the White House. NBC's Ali Vitale has been covering elections from the campaign trail
00:03:47.280 for years. Her book, Electable, Why America Hasn't Put a Woman in the White House, dot dot dot, yet, 0.91
00:03:55.000 takes a sweeping look at one of the lingering questions of American elections at a time when
00:03:59.980 more women have run for president of the United States than ever before in our history. Will we
00:04:04.360 ever see a woman president? Ali and I have been friends for years, and I hope that you'll enjoy
00:04:09.880 our conversation about women and our White House ambitions throughout history as much as I did.
00:04:20.960 So Allie, you have been covering the campaign trail pretty much like since I've known you.
00:04:26.560 So for years, what has that been like for you?
00:04:30.060 It has been like, I don't know, six or seven years now straight of just traveling from Iowa
00:04:36.020 Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, Florida, everywhere in between, constantly just following candidates,
00:04:41.920 Republicans, Democrats, midterms, presidentials, we do it all.
00:04:47.700 Yeah, I mean, one of the big questions I have for you is, having done this for so long,
00:04:53.040 what changes have you seen in the way that we talk about candidates, especially women,
00:04:56.900 people from marginalized backgrounds? Have you seen a change since the beginning of your time
00:05:01.880 doing this to now? Gosh, I hope it's changing for the better. I think it's changing for the better
00:05:08.260 in large part because I think that media is more comfortable calling out sexism and racism.
00:05:15.140 There's not necessarily any more of this knee-jerk reaction to both sides, things that just
00:05:20.460 shouldn't be both sides. So I look at it, especially through the lens of someone like
00:05:25.080 Hillary Clinton, right? In 2008, the media ecosystem didn't necessarily know how to deal 0.98
00:05:31.700 with a moment about like, are you likable enough Hillary, right? Remember that moment on the debate
00:05:36.740 stage with Barack Obama and her in New Hampshire? Everyone remembers the Obama piece of that moment,
00:05:42.040 and he got a little bit of criticism for that. But few people remember the fact that it was a
00:05:48.000 media moderator who teed that moment up by asking Hillary Clinton, voters say that you are qualified,
00:05:55.480 but they say that you're not likable. How would you reassure them? I think likability is something
00:06:00.680 that you need to be president. It's nice to have, but like, I don't think you need to be president
00:06:05.320 if you're only if you're a likable person. So people forget that. I think that we have come
00:06:10.960 further, thankfully, in the decade since that moment, or less than a decade since that moment,
00:06:16.920 At least not asking those questions anymore. But the thing about sexism, and you know this, is it's persistent. If it's not likability, it becomes something else. And I would argue that in 2020, likability became electability. And that's sort of the whole premise of my book. And that's really where I start out.
00:06:37.100 the whole thesis is that it's fair to want a candidate who's electable, who can win because
00:06:42.560 everyone wants to pick a winner. And certainly in 2020, every single Democratic voter that I
00:06:47.140 talked to just so badly wanted to pick the person who could beat Trump. But the thing about
00:06:53.060 electability is no one knows who can actually win until voters vote. And so it's really where
00:06:59.260 are you assigning your benefit of the doubt? And I think the upshot of the book is in a whole bunch
00:07:04.360 of different ways, we give male candidates much more benefit of the doubt than we do female
00:07:09.640 candidates. It's fascinating. The book is fascinating. Can you talk us through some of
00:07:13.940 the ways that you see this playing out for women, that women are not given the benefit of the doubt
00:07:18.600 the way that men are? Because, yeah, I can think of some recent male presidents who I might say
00:07:24.580 were not the most likable, and yet that didn't stop them from getting to the White House.
00:07:29.140 I mean, the first person that I thought of was Donald Trump, because I would go out on the campaign trail.
00:07:35.100 I covered him in the 2016 election and his first year and a half in the White House.
00:07:39.040 And what voters would say to me all the time was, I don't like him.
00:07:42.440 I don't like the way he talks. I don't like the way he acts towards people.
00:07:45.940 But I also like that he says what is on his mind.
00:07:48.980 And I also like that he tells it how it is.
00:07:51.260 But I like the policies. I like the judges.
00:07:53.320 They found ways to rationalize the fact that they didn't like him, but he was strong.
00:07:58.080 and they wanted him to be president. And with women, what a study that I point to in my book
00:08:03.040 has found is that it's not just, oh, nice to be liked, everyone wants to be liked. It impacts
00:08:08.780 the way that people won't vote for female candidates. Because in the case of someone 1.00
00:08:12.860 like Trump, voters will vote for a man that they don't like, but they are less likely to vote for
00:08:17.600 a woman who they don't like. And so it's not just nice to have, you have to have it. You have to be
00:08:23.140 likable, but then you also have to be strong. And the moment that I come back to a lot from 2020
00:08:27.960 was this seminal moment on the debate stage
00:08:31.180 in January of 2020 in Iowa.
00:08:33.980 We're like two weeks from caucus.
00:08:35.920 All of us are exhausted,
00:08:37.280 heavily caffeinated room of reporters.
00:08:39.680 Everyone on stage is very on edge,
00:08:42.480 all of the candidates,
00:08:43.460 because there's just been this leaked meeting
00:08:45.520 that happened between Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.
00:08:47.840 I'm sure you remember this,
00:08:49.040 where Bernie allegedly said to Elizabeth Warren,
00:08:51.500 I don't think a woman can win the presidency
00:08:53.340 or I don't think a woman can win the presidency against Trump.
00:08:56.060 and Elizabeth Warren, surprise, surprise, disagreed with that premise as a woman who 0.99
00:09:00.840 was going to try to be a woman who took on Trump. And they get on this debate stage and I'm covering
00:09:05.280 the Warren campaign and they feel like she's on the record telling her side of the story
00:09:10.900 and no one is believing her. And so she goes forward and tries to take this moment and make
00:09:16.680 it into one that's like a big electability argument. Here's why Elizabeth Warren can win. 0.98
00:09:21.200 And she says, of all the people that are on this stage right now, and she's next to Joe Biden and
00:09:25.600 Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar is the only other woman up there.
00:09:29.360 She says, of all the people on this stage right now, only two of us have won all of our elections,
00:09:34.320 me and Amy Klobuchar. Yes. And that's the reaction that Klobuchar had. She's like laughing,
00:09:40.120 chuckling at her podium because she knows it's right. And everyone else is just up there stoically
00:09:44.880 nodding. And it's a proof point. That's a way that you can prove the unprovable, which is like,
00:09:49.940 I know you don't know who's going to win come Iowa caucus day in 2020. But I can tell you that
00:09:54.680 every other time I've been on a ballot, everyone's voted for me enough to the point that I've won.
00:09:59.840 Same with Amy Klobuchar. The men, they don't get to say that. Joe Biden, he ran for president twice
00:10:05.220 before he ran in 2020. He didn't win any states outright then. They were failed presidential
00:10:10.820 campaigns. And yet he was the guy who had the air of electability around him in 2020, in large part
00:10:17.540 because he was a moderately positioned white male of a certain age. And so that's a moment that I
00:10:24.180 look at it. And I'm like, this is the seminal moment where you look at electability as both
00:10:28.720 an important metric, and also a very heavily gendered one. And part of the reason I wanted 0.90
00:10:34.220 to tackle it in this book is because in the media environment, especially in cable,
00:10:39.400 we are moving forward so quickly doing live shots every hour and the hour. And you don't always get
00:10:44.980 the chance to unpack things through a gender lens, a race lens, you are solely looking at it 0.51
00:10:50.480 sometimes through a horse race lens. And I really wanted to be able to go back over this campaign,
00:10:56.220 especially because all of us were stopped in 2020, right after Warren dropped out because
00:11:01.480 of the pandemic. I wanted to be able to go back over it with a heavy gender lens and try to
00:11:06.520 explain what's unquantifiable, which is that gender really plays a role here. You can't put
00:11:11.500 a percentage on it, but that doesn't mean that it's not there. Yeah, I so first of all, I just
00:11:17.760 you probably get this a lot or maybe you don't i don't know i get so fed up with the kind of
00:11:23.920 reporting that only frames things as a horse race like who's going to come out ahead because i i do
00:11:31.280 think that can be important but it doesn't really tell us a lot about where we are as a people what
00:11:36.060 we care about what we're thinking about when we're just thinking about it as like who's gonna win
00:11:39.780 i think so much of the nuance about things like identity gender race gets lost but we know these
00:11:45.940 things are so salient in our in our world and in our society so thank you like from the bottom of
00:11:50.800 my heart for from for like actually doing the work of trying to shade in some of that nuance
00:11:55.980 it is so easily lost when we talk about politics but I also think that that's what people are
00:12:01.140 hungry for right like people are very tuned in right now that is one of the biggest outbrokes
00:12:06.860 I think of the Trump era is the fact that a lot of people who might have been casual or non-political
00:12:12.540 people have started to tune in in a little bit more of a consistent way. And I recognize that
00:12:17.680 there's a ton of fatigue out there right now. But I think that's also why it's important to put
00:12:22.100 things in context for people and to explain like, okay, this one thing happened over here,
00:12:27.540 but it's connected to these 10 things that happened over here. And oh, by the way, the thing
00:12:31.920 that runs under the lens of all of them is gender or is race or is something else. And I think that
00:12:38.520 that's really important, right? If you're going to get to be an expert in something, you should
00:12:42.160 be able to talk about all the different prongs of it. And so I think it's a real privilege to be
00:12:46.560 able to explain politics through all of those lenses, not just who's going to win, even though
00:12:51.580 you and I both know elections have consequences. Sure. But like, I do think one of the positive
00:12:56.040 things about 2020 was you had candidates who were running, who were putting policy at the forefront.
00:13:02.760 The fact that Elizabeth Warren's tagline was, I have a plan for that, wasn't necessarily just
00:13:08.260 about policy though she loves policy like these people love policy let me tell you they love the
00:13:14.440 policy and also like as someone who's read many of those policy memos they know their stuff i mean
00:13:19.940 many of the policy priorities that she put forward ended up being the nuts and bolts of like the
00:13:25.040 larger democratic platform once the primary was over but it was also a way for her to like show
00:13:30.440 expertise and that's really important for women when they are running as well so like you had 1.00
00:13:35.140 candidates who were trying to lean in, not just to the horse race, but who were trying to steer 1.00
00:13:39.700 the conversation to a policy place as well. And that helps too. Yeah, I want to talk a bit about
00:13:46.120 that because you talked about the amazing moment of Warren being like, oh, well, we've won all of
00:13:50.800 our races, the women on the stage. Do you think, like, when I think about all the different
00:13:56.260 stereotypes and negative misconceptions about women as leaders, I think that's, and you and I
00:14:03.700 it'll probably rattle off a bunch of them but i think that one that we used to see a lot of is
00:14:09.080 like oh women are not competent and part of me feels like it has probably gotten to a place where
00:14:14.400 it's like women are competent but like she has to be competent but also nice about it like i almost 0.89
00:14:20.640 wonder if like the it's like the the stereotype has kind of evolved to continue to oppress women
00:14:26.740 and not not allow us to be the lead the effective leaders that you and i know that we can be but
00:14:31.080 also it's like oh yeah you can't just be a woman who has a plan for everything you also have to be
00:14:35.280 like demure about it you have to be nice about it it's like i have a plan for everything but no
00:14:39.340 worries if not you know but but i do think so first of all the good news is that any like polling
00:14:47.200 or bias research that's out there shows that thankfully public opinion has shifted on this
00:14:53.280 idea of female competency like there is now and i point to this in my book like people think that
00:14:59.260 men and women are as competent as each other. So yay for very obvious progress that should have 1.00
00:15:05.480 never had to be progressed to. But I also talk in the book about this idea. And I'm actually sure
00:15:11.140 that you feel this too. Like, the idea of being called a smart girl is something that I dig into
00:15:18.060 in my book, because it's something that I've been called, but it's an example of like,
00:15:22.200 words that are coded that like, if you are female, you know what it's like to have something
00:15:28.760 said to you that kind of sounds like a compliment, but like, isn't actually a compliment. And it's 0.96
00:15:35.200 one of the things that I dive into in the book in relation to how we talk about female candidates,
00:15:39.500 because you're right, there's almost an apology that has to come after you assert yourself or
00:15:44.720 after you show how smart you are or after you actively pursue the goal that you're trying to
00:15:50.900 go towards. And there's a great op ed that came up during the 2020 race that said something to
00:15:56.520 the effect of you know she's the most beautiful woman in the world but also she's very ugly she's 0.95
00:16:00.960 you know she holds she knows how to shoot a gun but also she's never held a gun like all of these
00:16:06.440 random examples that the author gave and the final one i thought really was a gut punch because
00:16:13.180 it was she wants to be president but she'd never run for it and that's almost what we demand in 0.94
00:16:19.320 women is like we want you to assert yourself we want you to try we want you to be the best you 0.94
00:16:23.580 should strive to be the best, but also don't make anyone feel uncomfortable that you're in your 0.99
00:16:27.960 pursuit of doing those things. And that's, you know, I think that's something that women who 1.00
00:16:34.180 are listening to this and who have been in these spaces that are still so male dominated. I think
00:16:39.600 that's something that a lot of people resonate with. And it's part of why I think that the more
00:16:44.620 diverse your newsroom gets, the better you'll be at calling out the narratives when they start
00:16:49.760 against female candidates and also you won't fall into those traps in the first place at least i
00:16:55.260 hope not yeah oh that is a gut punch and i i feel like i really saw it with vice president harris
00:17:01.960 i i remember reading someone saying like oh she's like the insult that they gave them i mean they
00:17:07.900 didn't they didn't come out and say that it was an insult but we can read between the lines it's
00:17:12.040 like oh she's ambitious she really wants to be president and it's like do you think that the men
00:17:17.440 on stage like accidentally filled out their paperwork to run for president and they don't
00:17:21.600 actually want it it was just some big mistake and now they're on stage just showed up here one day
00:17:25.840 yeah it's like of course she wants to be president that's the point everybody on that stage wants to 0.96
00:17:31.060 be president that's the point the fact that it is lobbed at women coded as an insult or coded as 1.00
00:17:38.380 like this is why you shouldn't trust them because they have high they have high ambitions for 1.00
00:17:43.680 themselves and they want power and they want visibility and they're making themselves big
00:17:48.240 and that's something that is to be distrustful of if you are a woman or a person or like a woman or
00:17:53.720 a woman of color in particular like yeah i don't see that same thing lobbed at men even though
00:17:59.500 of course they want to be president of course they're ambitious yep exactly and that was the 0.84
00:18:06.660 word of the vice presidential deep stakes if you remember right biden says he's gonna pick a woman 1.00
00:18:12.060 a bunch of really amazingly qualified women get put on both the public list that the media likes 1.00
00:18:18.640 to make, but also the campaigns list. And it's everyone from Stacey Abrams to Kamala Harris to 1.00
00:18:24.300 Elizabeth Warren to Amy Klobuchar to Val Deming, Tammy Duckworth, Gretchen Whitmer, all of these
00:18:30.140 really amazing women that showcase just how much work Democrats have put into filling the pipeline
00:18:36.860 with really good talent and diverse talent and all of them going forward and voicing the fact 1.00
00:18:44.820 that they want to be vice president, raising their hand and saying, yeah, I would do that job
00:18:49.300 and I would be good at it and here's why. That got turned into, oh, well, they're ambitious.
00:18:55.340 And now we're back to those words that sound like they should be compliments, but really
00:18:58.800 they're not. And that was, I think, one of the things that felt particularly gendered about
00:19:06.440 a process that shouldn't have had gender percolating behind it at all, was the vice 0.68
00:19:12.340 presidential lead stakes. And that word ambition just reared its head in such a negative way. But 0.98
00:19:17.460 I think the silver lining to it was that what we saw happen was Democratic groups formed this
00:19:24.880 whole group of strategists and operatives and Emily's List and other groups that have been
00:19:33.080 working to elevate women across politics, they formed We Have Her Back. And you watched it
00:19:39.780 happen. When they would do live shots, they would be asked, okay, you know, who's better suited to
00:19:45.160 be vice president, Karen Bass or Kamala Harris? And instead of comparing, contrasting, tearing one
00:19:50.700 down to elevate the other, I watched Valerie Jarrett do this time and again on MSNBC. She would 1.00
00:19:55.640 say, well, Karen Bass would be a great choice for XYZ reason. Kamala Harris would be a great choice 1.00
00:20:01.120 for ABC reason. And they would both be amazing vice president, period. They did not say anything 1.00
00:20:06.220 negative and they did not pit these women against each other. That's not to say that it didn't
00:20:10.060 happen because politics is still politics. But when it came down to it, you watch Democratic
00:20:16.020 women, especially try not to make this seem like a catfight. And I think that was a really big 1.00
00:20:23.480 silver lining that makes it better going forward. But yeah, Kamala Harris has been a really
00:20:28.620 fascinating person rising to the role of vice president because her ambition and having run
00:20:34.660 for president beforehand, which, by the way, Joe Biden did right before he got to be vice president,
00:20:39.560 that's somehow being held against Trump. Let's take a quick break.
00:20:51.060 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix and Disney Plus from $94 a month. Price
00:20:56.300 guaranteed for two years on internet with a two-year term and auto pay credit visit bell.ca
00:21:01.100 for details and to check availability bell connection is everything run a business and
00:21:06.560 not thinking about podcasting think again more americans listen to podcasts than ad supported
00:21:11.640 streaming music from spotify and pandora and as the number one podcaster iheart's twice as large
00:21:16.760 as the next two combined so whatever your customers listen to they'll hear your message
00:21:20.860 plus only iheart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio think podcasting
00:21:26.060 can help your business? Think iHeart. Streaming, radio, and podcasting. Call 844-844-iHeart to get
00:21:32.860 started. That's 844-844-iHeart. If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to
00:21:38.980 your personality, welcome home. This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club,
00:21:46.520 part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride
00:21:50.760 and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse. I'm Eli Rallo, and every week
00:21:55.940 we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't
00:22:00.420 stop having. I'm gonna have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed. From best-selling
00:22:05.740 authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off
00:22:10.540 the table. It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that
00:22:17.200 is a Trojan horse. Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations,
00:22:22.480 or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:22:26.400 you're in the right place.
00:22:28.060 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app,
00:22:31.020 Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:22:34.120 See you between the pages.
00:22:41.080 And we're back.
00:22:43.520 For women, both in politics or government 0.89
00:22:46.520 or just professional women in general,
00:22:48.320 I'm sure that you get this as a journalist. 1.00
00:22:49.720 like I think that we have this this cultural attitude that effort is bad like if people can
00:22:57.040 see the effort that's no good it's supposed to look effort you're supposed to look like you don't
00:23:01.280 really want it and that you know if you're good at something it's just happenstance it's just
00:23:06.080 natural like I've never shot a gun before but I'm great at shooting a gun like yeah I think that
00:23:10.120 we're told as women that you have to hide all of the inner machinations that make you ambitious
00:23:17.360 that make you show up as a professional person
00:23:19.280 who wants to achieve things
00:23:20.880 and, you know, have a big flashy career
00:23:23.660 or a big flashy life or something.
00:23:25.480 I think it goes back to this like cultural attitude 1.00
00:23:28.640 that we are not supposed to see that from women.
00:23:30.900 And when we do, we don't like it 1.00
00:23:32.320 and we have to like ding it down.
00:23:34.480 Yeah. And so, you know what?
00:23:35.980 Like to the extent that we can as individuals,
00:23:38.660 like we have to lift up the work, right?
00:23:42.580 Like I do feel like we're in a period
00:23:45.220 where I think it's like all of us,
00:23:48.020 like I look at my girlfriends who are hard workers.
00:23:51.760 They strive for their goals.
00:23:53.500 They reach for them.
00:23:54.720 Like I am definitely someone who tries hard.
00:23:57.900 I will say that openly.
00:23:59.640 I do my research when a story is breaking.
00:24:01.700 For example, when I knew that Speaker Pelosi
00:24:03.860 was going to be making an announcement
00:24:05.600 about her future plans,
00:24:08.060 the first thing I did was pick up a book
00:24:09.940 that I had read about Pelosi six months ago
00:24:12.020 that I didn't remember every detail of,
00:24:13.920 But I was like, okay, how can I scan for the fine points that I had marked off the pages on? Like, it's okay to do your research. Like, to anyone who's listening, like, I would never be able to show up on television every day and know random facts about the legislative push that Nancy Pelosi made in 2008, just off the top of my head.
00:24:35.120 And you have to work at it. And I actually think the more that we normalize that for other women, the harder it becomes to ding people for working hard and for showing up and being smart. And, you know, we can kind of take that back. Like, I do want to believe that that power is within us. So I'm not willing to cede the space to the patriarchy on that one for me or for anyone else, like who's running for president or who's just like, you know, going about their day trying to be the best version of themselves.
00:25:01.300 yeah and it goes back to what you were saying about the we have our back coalition you know
00:25:06.600 I do think that I mean on the one hand I hate that it's kind of on us as individuals to combat this
00:25:13.400 this stigma that I think is like highly institutional and like systemic but I do
00:25:18.740 think like modeling how you can talk about other women who are ambitious and like not not give 0.69
00:25:25.400 not give people fodder to be like 0.98
00:25:27.700 ooh catfied or like ooh like
00:25:29.480 you know I work for a gender
00:25:31.720 justice organization ultraviolet and we have 1.00
00:25:33.680 a norm where even 0.92
00:25:35.640 if we're talking about a woman that we
00:25:37.560 don't like or that we don't agree with her
00:25:39.500 our values don't align we think she's
00:25:41.660 like not good for the country or whatever as a 1.00
00:25:43.520 lawmaker we don't call her unqualified 1.00
00:25:45.800 we don't there are certain things
00:25:47.660 that we don't call her or that we will never
00:25:49.600 like even imply because
00:25:51.360 it adds to this
00:25:53.380 it adds to this
00:25:55.400 for this this stigma that i think holds us all down as women and so even even if we're saying
00:26:01.300 like oh this woman we don't like her if we say that she's unqualified or this or that or this
00:26:05.740 that can come back to get us because we're all women and all of our all of our oppression is 0.70
00:26:10.380 really linked in that way we're just we're just adding fuel to that fire to have somebody be able
00:26:14.440 to lob that another woman and keep her down yeah look so much of this is systemic too like i always
00:26:21.180 think about the idea of a lot of my friends, I feel this way a lot, the idea of imposter syndrome.
00:26:27.600 And really, that almost puts the onus on us. Like it's our fault that we don't feel like we are
00:26:32.580 qualified enough or that we are taking up space in the right way. And really, like the onus should
00:26:38.420 be on the systems in which we are operating, because I can guarantee that every single one
00:26:42.960 of my friends who has the feeling of being an imposter in the spaces that they're in,
00:26:47.700 that's not the case. They are more than qualified to be there. Their voice should be valued there.
00:26:52.940 It's the systems that we need to push back on and the systems that need to stop making us feel like
00:26:59.000 we are outsiders to them. So I think that that's really important. It's not fair that we have to
00:27:03.860 reshape these structures, but that's sort of the onus that we have right now, whether it's fair
00:27:09.940 or not. Yeah. I mean, it's like, that's the trip of living in a patriarchal society, I guess. It's
00:27:15.500 like, it shouldn't be on us, but it is. And like, it's like part of the work part of part of showing
00:27:20.500 up part of the and what a trip it is. And what a trip it is. But you know what, you bring up
00:27:27.340 something that's so interesting, too, because there is in the book, I do explore a lot about
00:27:32.840 Democrats, in large part, because six of them ran for president in 2020. But I also talk about
00:27:40.020 Republicanism and gender and identity. And there's a really fascinating thing happening on the
00:27:44.720 Republican side right now where they are electing more women, but the groups that exist on the
00:27:51.000 Republican side to try to get more women in their pipeline. Thankfully, now there's a recognition 0.90
00:27:57.340 among Republicans that women can run in really tight races. They're a large part of the reason 1.00
00:28:02.760 they flipped so many seats in 2020. A lot of the competitive seats this cycle had women running in 1.00
00:28:08.380 them on the Republican side, especially. So all of those things are true, but they're having a 0.99
00:28:14.960 kind of debate about, can we call other women unqualified or unviable? And they're having it
00:28:21.640 because of people like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert, who have embraced non-reality
00:28:27.560 and who have embraced conspiracy theories and election denialism. And it's a thing that the
00:28:34.100 whole Republican Party is dealing with right now, like the role of Trump, the role of election
00:28:39.840 denialism, the role of the fringe of the party. They're all figuring it out right now. But when
00:28:44.760 it comes to women, I've watched these women's groups try to draw the line by using words like 0.99
00:28:50.740 we only endorse viable female candidates or we only endorse qualified female candidates. 1.00
00:28:56.780 They're trying to make that delineation because they think that some of the women who have risen
00:29:02.040 to popularism in recent years and months are not qualified and should not be indicative of the kind
00:29:08.600 of Republican women serving. So it's fascinating that those are one of the words that you guys
00:29:12.540 think about actively, because in watching it on the Republican side, that's one of the words that
00:29:18.120 they use as sort of like a line of demarcation. Like we only support serious candidates, which
00:29:23.580 is to say they don't support the conspiracy theorists. And like, that's a line that needs
00:29:28.660 to be drawn in republican politics right now but it's fascinating the way that they're drawing it
00:29:33.160 that's so interesting and it's like i mean especially coming out of midterms where people
00:29:38.060 were like oh there's gonna be a red wave and i would say that like people kind of rejected
00:29:42.900 that like election denialism vibe but i think people kind of the voters kind of were like no
00:29:48.960 thank you and i do think like figuring like it's interesting how they're they're using these i
00:29:54.680 don't know if euphemisms is the right word but using these ways to draw a line in the sand and
00:29:59.660 to sort of like explain like oh these are the kind of candidates that we're looking to support and
00:30:05.680 uplift not these other ones they're not gonna they're not gonna come out and say we don't want
00:30:09.560 to you know get in bed with an election denial denial candidate or a conspiracy theory candidate
00:30:14.940 but like the way that they're using language to sort of like but you know what we're trying to
00:30:18.820 say you know yeah yeah well well and some of them will say that i mean some of the women that i
00:30:23.740 talked to and quote in the book will say that is not the kind of female candidate that we want 1.00
00:30:30.120 to put our money behind, to put our resources behind, to help out of primaries. And I specifically 0.99
00:30:35.200 say to help out of primaries because a large part of the reason that groups are so important in
00:30:41.040 elevating female candidates and people of color, basically anyone who's non-white and non-male,
00:30:46.940 the reason it's important is because they're operating in structures that are just tilted 0.99
00:30:50.480 against them. Like this is a system at the end of the day that was built by men, built by white men 0.59
00:30:55.520 for white men to keep power for white men. So anyone who's not that is already kind of going
00:31:01.400 against the system as it was built. But in primaries is really where we see gender and race
00:31:07.800 play a role that can be counterproductive to the candidate. And that's why it's so important to
00:31:14.900 focus on primaries, because when people get to general elections, they're tribal. If you're a
00:31:18.920 Democrat, you'd probably vote in Democrat. If you're a Republican, you're probably voting
00:31:21.740 Republican. I love independent voters, but increasingly it's a smaller and smaller slice
00:31:26.540 of the pie. And so that's why the focus is so important on primaries just generally, because
00:31:31.260 that's really where the dynamics are. It's not as tribal there because you're picking among
00:31:35.760 multiple people in your own party. Yeah, this is going to be, I'm not even really sure how to ask
00:31:40.940 this, but it fits so nicely in the intersection of your work. There are so many women candidates 1.00
00:31:46.180 who do embrace things like election denialism and conspiracy theory there are men there are a lot of
00:31:51.220 men who do it too but plenty of women become like rising stars and have big platforms and big
00:31:55.880 profiles on the basis of their embracing conspiracy theory and election denialism do you think there's
00:32:01.640 something about women where when they have embraced this this ideology it like helps them
00:32:08.580 more like what do you what do you think is going on well on the republican side definitely i mean
00:32:13.640 But again, it's not just women on the Republican side who are being forced to grapple with what I would call like Republicanism in the age of Trump, because the more I'm out, the more I hear voters who say that like the word Republican doesn't mean conservative anymore to them.
00:32:30.420 The word Republican means Trump. So the party itself is going through a reckoning. The fact that there are women at the forefront of that movement, but there are also men at the forefront of that movement.
00:32:41.920 You know, like, I don't know if that's necessarily a gender question, but I do think that it speaks to something that Secretary Hillary Clinton said to me when I was talking with her for this project, which is the entire idea of electability has changed, right?
00:32:57.020 Like the idea and she brought up an example, not using a specific candidate, but she pointed to the Republican side where she thought at one point that a woman holding a gun prominently in a campaign ad might not have been viewed as electable several years ago, but certainly helps a woman's electability now in the Republican Party.
00:33:18.220 So look, the upside of that is that we are starting to see more kinds of women as electable. The downside is that right now in Republican politics, it is also popular to deny results of legitimate elections, proffer lies to an electorate about those elections.
00:33:39.500 um that that's problematic from a small d democracy standpoint and that's just like a
00:33:45.960 republican thing that they're dealing with right now gender aside yeah that is so so interesting
00:33:51.580 and it's like even even though that's not necessarily you know particular to gender 0.96
00:33:57.020 i do see it as just like another way that it can become a trap for women right like another way
00:34:02.400 that like it can be this tightrope that women are expected to walk that men just are not
00:34:09.500 Yes. Yeah. Well, there's also something interesting on the Republican side of this, too, where I found a study in my book where if you are female or a person of color, and I think the study was was around demographic biases that may exist within conservative voters. 0.81
00:34:27.640 One of the ways that candidates of color and female candidates can overcome any demographic biases that exist is by being more hyper conservative.
00:34:37.080 So if you're Carly Fiorina or if you're Ben Carson, and those were some of the names that were tested by in this one study, their hyper-conservatism showing that ideologically they ascribe to all aspects of republicanism, that can overcome any bias that might exist because they are black or because they are female.
00:34:58.160 And I thought that was a really interesting study that sort of explains why you have the rise of certain very hyper conservative women on the right.
00:35:08.140 It kind of explains Sarah Palin and Marsha Blackburn and Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert.
00:35:16.380 Like there at least is some explanation for it, because on the Republican side, otherwise, they do not want to talk about gender and identity politics.
00:35:23.980 That is like a bad word. Don't get into it. Don't talk as a woman. Don't talk. You know, they don't want to hear that. It's just, are you, you know, their metrics for assessing candidate viability are just different.
00:35:35.600 that is so fascinating so i have to ask though the book is called electable by america hasn't
00:35:43.240 put a woman in the white house dot dot dot yet and that title makes me think that you are so
00:35:49.620 so like what are you what are your thoughts do you think we're gonna see a woman president in
00:35:53.120 your lifetime our lifetime like are you hopeful what do you think i need to see it we have to
00:36:00.120 see it we're gonna see it i mean i was so like i thought i thought we had our time and then then
00:36:09.520 you know i mean look i i say yet because a i i need to be optimistic about this i do think that
00:36:19.920 you have people even liz cheney right now who have made the point in recent months that men
00:36:25.180 have been running things for a while and it hasn't always gone so great, I do think that it's time to
00:36:30.700 maybe try something else. At the same time, though, too, there have been just systemic issues with
00:36:38.660 why a woman has not been able to ascend to the White House. And in large part, it's because
00:36:43.480 we haven't seen a ton of women serving an elected office until like the last 40 or 50 years. And I
00:36:50.360 know, that sounds like a long time, but it's actually not that long. And women are filling 1.00
00:36:55.800 the ranks of both parties so much right now, that finally, there are long lists of women who we can 1.00
00:37:02.300 say, okay, they can run for president on the Republican side, they can run for president on
00:37:05.800 the Democratic side, to the point where I think in 2024, and 2024 is tough, because two men still
00:37:14.880 govern this process. And so at a certain point, it becomes a numbers game. And I think that gone
00:37:19.960 are the days where you're just going to have only fields of dudes running for president. 1.00
00:37:24.160 There are going to be women who are running. I also think that what Biden did by electing,
00:37:29.340 by choosing Kamala Harris and then Kamala Harris and Joe Biden being elected in 2020,
00:37:34.680 the fact that we have our first female vice president is huge. Women of both parties that
00:37:39.880 I talked to for this book agree that she makes it easier for those who come after her simply 0.99
00:37:45.120 because she goes to work being who she is every single day. And it allows the American mindset
00:37:50.560 to see female leadership at its highest rungs, quite frankly. And that's also something that 1.00
00:37:56.320 Speaker Pelosi has done for this country, because she was elevated first. But I also think that
00:38:03.420 especially if it's Biden and Harris again in 2024, it's gonna be really hard for Republicans to just
00:38:09.340 nominate another ticket that looks like Trump and Pence that just looks like two older white men
00:38:14.640 again. I do think that we're now in a place where gender and diversity is an asset. And I look at it
00:38:23.020 in 2020 when Biden chose Harris. I mean, the fact that he had just consolidated his power,
00:38:30.100 he had just won the primary, and he comes out and he says, I'm going to choose a woman. 0.94
00:38:35.260 To me, it was a sign that times had changed. Because if you look at the last few times that 0.99
00:38:42.840 men had selected women as their running mates. We're talking about Walter Mondale in 1984 when
00:38:48.060 he chose Geraldine Carraro. And his campaign was in the tank. He was not doing well. He did
00:38:53.900 something that could excite his base. They thought, hey, we'll do a woman. And it was sort of a throw 0.96
00:38:59.260 spaghetti at the wall kind of moment, see if it sticks. It didn't. But it was also the mindset
00:39:04.380 the next time we saw that happen, which was on the Republican side, 2008, John McCain picking
00:39:09.020 Sarah Palin, shocking everybody. But the mindset was the same. He was falling behind Obama in the
00:39:14.200 polls. He needed something to excite the base. He chose someone who was female, who used phrases
00:39:21.340 like she wanted to finish the work that Hillary Clinton had started because Clinton ran in 08 0.99
00:39:25.700 and fell short to Obama. I mean, it was very throw spaghetti at the wall, see what sticks.
00:39:31.180 Now in 2020, you have Biden purposefully choosing a woman saying that her gender, her lived experience
00:39:39.020 The different things that she brings to the table are assets.
00:39:43.060 It's not just, we'll see what happens. 1.00
00:39:45.000 We'll pick a woman.
00:39:46.100 It's, no, we want to pick a woman. 1.00
00:39:48.100 We want to pick a woman of color. 0.99
00:39:50.080 She provides us strengths that we would not otherwise have.
00:39:54.000 That is a really big moment of progress and one that it's hard for me to see not sticking.
00:39:59.380 And so I do think we're going to have a female president.
00:40:02.080 And I do think we're going to see more female vice presidents. 1.00
00:40:04.460 I would love to see both happen at once. 1.00
00:40:06.420 That would be really cool.
00:40:08.160 But progress is slow, but it's coming.
00:40:10.540 I have to believe it.
00:40:11.900 I'm happy that you're doing this work of like modeling the progress that we have made and signaling to the progress that is yet to be made in the future.
00:40:19.860 You know, I do think this book came about at a dark time for everybody because the pandemic happened.
00:40:26.960 I was asked to do this book in March of 2020.
00:40:30.680 And a week later, I flew home from being on the road with Biden in Ohio and Elizabeth Warren had just dropped out.
00:40:37.180 And all of us never left our houses again for the next few months.
00:40:40.560 So it was a dark time.
00:40:42.020 And I remember the only thing that I said to my editor was, I don't want to do this book
00:40:46.660 if I can't come out in a place where I feel optimistic.
00:40:49.200 I can't not find the silver lining.
00:40:51.860 So I remember some of the early calls that I made to some of the smartest sources that
00:40:55.660 I have, where I just said, make me feel good about this.
00:40:58.880 Like, it's going to happen, right?
00:41:00.460 Like, I feel like it's going to happen.
00:41:02.060 Point me to some examples that make you feel like it's going to happen.
00:41:05.360 And I came out with a lot of examples. And yes, it's important to show why it hasn't happened yet and to shine a spotlight on moments where, unfortunately, the isms, sexism, racism, all of the others won out. But I think once you show people that those moments have happened, once you see it, you can't stop seeing it. And that's part of helping this road to progress, too. 0.58
00:41:29.960 that's so powerful and ali i have to say not to get too like
00:41:34.040 sappy or whatever but you and i like we kind of came up in the in the sort of political media
00:41:42.300 space together and i remember when we were working together at msnbc i you just i could
00:41:48.380 just tell that like you were going to be a real mover and shaker in the space and so
00:41:54.700 watching you like you were on the campaign trail you were like i i follow you on instagram and i
00:41:59.360 see these images of you like you know setting up producing like shots and setting up shots like
00:42:05.480 talking like you are in it and watching this trajectory has been really incredible and
00:42:11.240 powerful it's like I can't help but wonder how many little girls like when I was a kid I used
00:42:16.340 to watch Gwen Ifill on tv and be like I could be her someday and I wonder like are you the Gwen
00:42:21.380 Ifill for a new generation of women finding their voice in political media I say yes
00:42:26.660 first of all you just gave me chills second of all my god immeasurable immeasurable goal for me 0.83
00:42:34.720 to put up i mean my god but i i think about it too as like there's just more of us now right
00:42:41.240 like there are just more women who are out there who are empowered to be experts who are empowered
00:42:47.920 to ask good tough questions um i think that's good for everybody i mean i love looking around
00:42:55.660 and seeing in a scrum or in a gaggle when I'm with a candidate like a bunch of other women around me
00:43:03.860 I think that that is just such an amazing thing and I love it even more when it's a female candidate
00:43:09.460 it's the center of it um but I I mean yeah you you and I both I think have have really
00:43:16.020 climbed through our industries and and I think about the way that we first met too I mean right
00:43:22.340 We were doing a shoot for Liz Plank, right?
00:43:27.300 Liz Plank brought us all together, the queen, to talk about hate online and like the nasty things that people said to us.
00:43:37.620 And it sort of brings us full circle a little bit too, right?
00:43:40.960 Because we were there trying to reclaim some of the nasty words that people were throwing at us just simply for being smart and female and online, right?
00:43:53.280 Thankfully, there are girls on the Internet now, right, who can have each other's backs and, like, you know, not let that stuff just go unchecked.
00:44:02.100 But, like, that's how we met. 0.99
00:44:03.240 We met by calling out sexism online.
00:44:07.480 And now you get to be a proof point that, like, it's not just dudes in a toxic environment.
00:44:13.640 Like, it's women are here and making it better, which I would argue is happening all over. 0.99
00:44:20.900 I mentioned it at the start of the show, but the team here at There Are No Girls on the
00:44:24.860 Internet is celebrating International Women's Day this week.
00:44:27.320 For more programming honoring the incredible women of the network and worldwide, head to
00:44:31.860 iHeart Podcast's
00:44:33.120 International Women's Day feed
00:44:34.440 by searching 0.99
00:44:35.200 Women Take the Mic 1.00
00:44:36.100 wherever you look 1.00
00:44:36.720 for your podcasts.
00:44:38.040 We're featured along shows
00:44:39.380 that I love
00:44:40.220 like Therapy for Black Girls
00:44:41.760 and others. 1.00
00:44:43.020 That's Women Take the Mic 1.00
00:44:44.080 on the iHeart Radio app 1.00
00:44:45.260 or wherever you get
00:44:45.840 your podcasts.
00:44:50.840 Got a story about
00:44:51.820 an interesting thing in tech
00:44:52.920 or just want to say hi?
00:44:54.380 You can reach us
00:44:54.900 at hello at tangody.com.
00:44:56.640 You can also find transcripts
00:44:57.800 for today's episode
00:44:58.480 at tangody.com. 1.00
00:45:00.060 There Are No Girls on the Internet
00:45:00.980 was created by me
00:45:01.800 Bridget Todd. It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative. Jonathan Strickland is
00:45:06.320 our executive producer. Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer. Michael Amato is
00:45:10.940 our contributing producer. I'm your host, Bridget Todd. If you want to help us grow,
00:45:15.560 rate and review us on Apple Podcasts. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,
00:45:19.520 check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:45:31.800 if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality
00:45:39.560 welcome home pro society is a weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat for anyone
00:45:45.780 who thinks pride and prejudice and love island deserve the same level of discourse each week
00:45:50.300 we're connecting the dots between books the internet and pop culture with your favorite
00:45:54.340 writers book talk creators and plenty of overthought opinions yeah i'm obsessed i'm
00:45:59.340 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:46:29.340 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:46:39.340 Hey, this is Hayes Davenport.
00:46:41.280 And Sean Clemens.
00:46:42.460 We host the podcast Hollywood Handbook.
00:46:44.640 Every episode, we're trying to help our guests improve their careers by mainly focusing on how they can help us improve our careers.
00:46:50.260 The show is famously super accessible, so you can easily jump into any of our 650 episodes and understand what's going on.
00:46:56.640 We recommend some of our recent episodes with Ben Stiller, Danny McBride, Riz Ahmed, and Mary Steenburgen.
00:47:01.640 Listen to Hollywood Handbook on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:47:07.620 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:47:10.260 Guaranteed human.