00:00:00.000class is in session hey everybody and welcome to unlearn 16 classes in session guys today today i
00:00:09.440have a fight ready to go i think we have a throw down fight no we don't we actually we actually
00:00:15.200discuss incredibly well um you guys maybe know him as viva fray from twitter he has a pretty
00:00:22.720significant presence there he has a significant podcast that where does that stream all over like
00:00:29.920I rumble YouTube locals. And then I and then I snip and clip and put it to put it to Twitter.
00:00:36.700It's all over the place. Really. It's it's genuinely all over the place. But what we found, I think David and I have found this nice little, I don't know, this nice place of we disagree maybe on a lot more than most, but I like it.
00:00:53.900And I think we do it honestly and we do it intelligently.
00:00:57.840And I think hopefully that's the kind of dialogue people want to hear.
00:01:03.180I was, I was, I was talking about it with my wife where I,
00:25:16.920I know Judaism doesn't speak really about hell,
00:25:19.000so we're really talking about Christianity here.
00:25:20.820Yeah, but it's a character of religion.
00:25:22.720It's like abide by the rules and you'll get...
00:25:26.640you'll go to heaven type thing uh or you're saying i look to religion if i if i don't if
00:25:31.840i can't look to religion i need something external to fulfill something that i'm searching for and i
00:25:37.680think the quest for spirituality you're right i think the quest for spirituality the quest for
00:25:42.400connection because i think those two things are very very different i think is a a fundamental
00:25:48.560human conscious desire i agree with you 100 but i don't think that looking to something external
00:25:57.600to you um is finding the connection that is actually fulfilling maybe for some people
00:26:05.760maybe for some people but i think the inherent connection the thing that we
00:26:09.840really and when you and you'll see this when you find people that are like
00:26:15.840connected to a humanity on the basis of, you can see their struggle, you can see their pain,
00:26:25.860what you're willing to do for that person who you don't even know, that's the connection.
00:26:30.780It has nothing to do with something external or above.
00:26:34.340Well, someone will tell you, all right, well, the lesson of morality and spirituality and
00:26:39.680inter-human connection that you just fleshed out. Well, I can cite the biblical verse where it's
00:26:44.460said in exactly that way but through old you know biblical terms sure i'm not saying there's nothing
00:26:51.100in of course there is something in let's be also honest in every single religious text that i can
00:26:57.260pull out when i teach world religions you want to know what my kids get to after 12 major religions
00:27:03.180they get to the end and they look at me and they say we've just studied 12 of the same religions
00:27:08.620with different outfits and different days off honest to god that's what they say because
00:27:13.660underpinning wise it's very because it's the philosophy not necessarily the god it's not the
00:27:19.820scripture no but absolutely but but right now you're highlighting the fundamental primordial
00:27:24.940human value of religion i agree all 12 you know they have similar principles different practices
00:27:29.900and then even within christianity you'll have oh you know however many subdivisions 30. the fact
00:27:36.940that they are all somewhat derivative of similar core underlying principles shows you that these
00:27:42.540principles albeit materialized in a religious sense are our fundamental human condition principles
00:27:47.820which is why amazing we do not need the pinup poster of a very late comer to the game why don't
00:27:55.420we put up zoroastrianism principles it's the exact same stuff if we're worried if we're truly worried
00:28:03.580hun about people's moral and ethical leanings if we are worried about the directionality of their
00:28:11.180life why are we so concerned that it's a christian methodology on that wall rather than being
00:28:17.160concerned with how do we teach values that you and i both agree with no respect um education um
00:28:25.720empathy um cooperation why why not teach those values why not put those up on a wall does that
00:28:33.360not make more sense than don't covet which by the way who doesn't covet but i i think we're saying
00:28:40.380we are saying the same thing whereas you're objecting to the antiquated formulation via
00:28:46.180the 10 commandments but if you like have that one the rules of a happy household be forgiving0.97
00:28:50.780the indoctrinization is what i'm well yeah and i'm saying like you want to put up another0.96
00:28:56.380iteration that's a non-religious iteration you're talking about the same thing you just want to have
00:29:00.560it your way as opposed to the way it's been done since humans have been philosophizing about
00:29:04.480morality i just want to have it in the way that we're talking about the things that make good
00:29:09.980people. That's what morals and ethics we're talking about. We're talking about what makes us
00:29:14.520good in this time, in this space now. You've got to know 50 years ago being gay, you're not being0.99
00:29:21.620gay. No, absolutely not. You can't be gay under certain religious beliefs, right? And there's0.52
00:29:28.700still lots of places where that's not true. And there's still some states where I'm not going
00:29:32.000anytime soon. Well, that I think is, you might need to stop reading some news outlets, but
00:29:38.500there are certainly some countries where as a practicing gay person you probably don't want to
00:29:42.020go uh is that to say that some of the old religious principles have been outdated you know
00:29:47.400like stoning your neighbor to death for for for infidelity there are there are some uh is that to
00:29:53.580say that there are not some which are timeless and and and will last forever there are there
00:29:58.340are some as well the ten commandments might be more along the lines of ones that are not going
00:30:01.900to age badly versus stoning your neighbor but flip side and now i just forgot my thought it
00:30:07.240had to do with religion oh will there be a day when punching a nazi because you deemed a person
00:30:12.700to be a nazi is going to be a morally laudable thing or is that the product of people who need
00:30:17.000rules who need morality and find it in places that lead them to believe it's moral and justifiable
00:30:22.700to punch a nazi that's there's lots of religions and actually i i don't know if it's all of them
00:30:28.680that believe that sometimes violence is the answer i would need to time and time again with0.95
00:30:35.660different religions in different time periods where in which they thought by saving souls
00:30:41.620they either needed to convert or slaughter and and we don't need to go into that much history
00:30:47.700to understand that that's the principle um and again stepping out of that for a second and we're
00:30:54.600going to talk about what morality really should look like at what point having a good discussion0.94
00:31:00.020a philosophical discussion in a school about at what point is violence justified damn that's a
00:31:06.340great conversation that's a great conversation for older kids and for grade threes just joking
00:31:14.460for kindergarten well i mean even things kids typically understand listen it's so funny we're
00:31:20.800saying not kindergarten kids but watch who resorts to violence real damn quick it's going to be the
00:31:25.440kid who stole the crayons and the other kid who wants them back. The lessons have to start there
00:31:31.140a hundred percent. They just have to happen. And now I also have to be sure not to fall into the
00:31:36.380no true Scotsman fallacy where, okay, there has undoubtedly been violence committed in the name
00:31:42.240of religion for the saviors of the individuals. There has also been inhumane violence committed
00:31:46.940by non-religious or um not even secular but you know godless godless entities so the the constant
00:31:56.520that we might want to just take away from that is there will be violence the only question is um
00:32:01.300does that mean that you you throw the baby out with the bath water because violence carried out
00:32:06.220the name of religion therefore we must you know uh no and that's why i'm never and again i'm going
00:32:11.240to go back to this. I am never talking about throwing out religion in the sense of people's
00:32:16.860internal beliefs, deep rooted connection, and it brings them peace and it brings them joy and it
00:32:23.760brings them a sense of identity and a place in this world. I would never, never, never want to
00:32:28.060take that away from a person. I, however, do not think it has any place, those particular beliefs,
00:32:35.580Those particular ideas and that personal belief that they cannot prove nor I cannot disprove, there is no way that that should be sitting at the head of any table in a secular society, whether it be Jewish, Christian, the 18 denominations of, you know, the 30 denominations of Christianity.
00:32:53.780but then but then this this goes just to the fundamental point is a a what is a secular
00:32:59.220society versus what is a religious society and the question is going to be is is well a secular
00:33:06.360society means we're not going to does it mean we're not going to impose anything on you or does
00:33:09.700it mean that we're going to go scratch off the in god we trust on our pennies and so you know
00:33:14.580there's a difference between a secular society and a godless society yeah so that and that's
00:33:18.760where i would say i i still consider it doesn't even have pennies anymore no that that's that's
00:33:23.560that we'll thank inflation for that soon they're not even going to have toonies it's just going to
00:33:26.960be it'll be central digital banking currency but no that's that's the question is where i don't i
00:33:32.000don't view i don't even view that 10 commandments as a religious non-secular element i think that
00:33:37.400that's our because you have to also understand i don't really care because i am who i am i believe
00:33:44.440what I believe, and I've grown up in a Christian society, right? You're Jewish, you've grown up in0.74
00:33:51.440a Judeo-Christian society. We have the luxury, for the most part, of saying, who cares? It doesn't0.67
00:33:58.140really impress upon me. It doesn't really control me. It doesn't really serve to limit who I am and
00:34:05.180how I walk through this world. Of course it doesn't. Of course it doesn't, because I love a
00:34:09.300Christmas movie because I can't wait to buy a Christmas tree because I like Easter and looking
00:34:14.760for chocolate, even though I have no idea how those two go hand in hand. None of that impacts
00:34:20.120me, but I can be cognizant enough to understand how that ideal, how that power, because we're not
00:34:28.520just talking about faith here. We're talking about religion. And I think you've discerned between the
00:34:32.880to how the power of religion is just as terrifying, just as intrusive, just as domineering, and
00:34:41.640to put it in your words, as the power of too much big government and what they get to tell
00:34:47.520us and what they get to convince, what, a grade one of, a grade two?
00:34:53.860We used to, I don't know if you remember this, there was a teacher in Alberta named James
00:43:49.260A religious text reflects a belief structure of the time
00:43:52.900reflecting the context of when it was created you know i we talk about jewish dietary laws0.71
00:44:00.180those were brilliant they're not brilliant necessarily because god said so they're
00:44:04.380brilliant because you didn't die that's why they were brilliant well but you get sick and die
00:44:10.920and joe i mean they're they're they're still brilliant even today when it comes to certain
00:44:15.380types certain types of food and so again but this is highlighting the value of the religion that
00:44:21.860you could actually somewhat dissociate from the religion itself. It's highlighting the value of
00:44:25.900ideas people come up with and humans come up with, and they codify it as a religion in order to
00:44:33.320promote what they need at that time in that place. Listen, the reason why Texas wants to pass this
00:44:38.260law is no, it's clear as day. Women file, and if I hear this stat one more goddamn time, I'm going1.00
00:44:44.600to lose my mind, what, 75, 80% of divorces. So all divorces, for the most part, are initiated by0.95
00:44:50.880women. Texas wants that to stop. Texas wants divorce to stop. They want people to start1.00
00:44:56.420having more babies. So they ban abortion and they force people to stay married. Once you've made0.97
00:45:02.520that choice, it is no different than fornication under the command of the King. It is the same
00:45:08.940idea, the same mentality. How do we make sure our population, how do we control our population
00:45:16.620in order to elevate how many people are having babies, how they're staying together,
00:45:21.540because that's a better economic unit. We all know this. Divorce sucks economically for both sides,
00:45:27.340right? Divorce is a weight on the economic system. It is a weight on the stability of a1.00
00:45:34.940community. All of that is true. And how do we get back at it? Well, we get back at it by bringing
00:45:41.940back traditional beliefs and using that to manipulate and codify and indoctrinate, whereby
00:45:50.040we really need to be talking about the bigger issues of what marriage is, how it happens,
00:45:56.000how people have kids, what the laws are. Everything of that has been changing for 50 years.
00:46:02.540Well, I have no knowledge of this particular law, and I'm trying to think of not...
00:46:09.380It's not a law yet. I'm just saying it was a legal, right?
00:46:11.600But also, there might be some other very real social reasons for attempting to change that where there might there are certain inequities in the divorce process in the family law process that are fundamentally more unfair and disadvantageous to the male counterpart where you might have divorces for opportunity.
00:46:30.780i say opportunistic i think every time i've seen it it's a it's a like in most places now we're
00:46:37.100talking 50 50 50 50 money 50 50 kids 50 50 everything and that's the go-to even when by
00:46:45.020the way even when we could very easily prove or possibly prove that one parent is and whether
00:46:54.300it's a guy or the girl, I don't care. But one parent is more suitable, more stable, a better
00:47:04.200parent. Even when that's the case, even when you have a better parent, the courts aren't allocating
00:47:09.980that. The courts don't take that into account. Not here, in California, not in Florida, not in a lot
00:47:16.680of these states. I am not convinced that that's accurate in terms of it being 50-50. I think
00:47:22.400there's still massive inequities when it comes to custody uh and other issues in the family law
00:47:27.700and i i'm not the man of sphere i mean there's a lot of people who operate in this sphere
00:47:30.620i would all be civil too so it would be very different i'm assuming every place you go in
00:47:35.200the united states right we'd be talking about a a pretty big overpinning of law i'm i'm just
00:47:41.360trying to think if i had i it's it's i i i'm going to see now i can't remember the name of
00:47:46.060the person who's been on the channel incredibly insightful a woman she's she was big in the in
00:47:51.420the men's rights um in the men's rights sphere once upon a time the name will come to me in a
00:47:56.080few seconds i'm i can't remember it but no but my understanding is that there are massive inequities
00:48:00.300in the family law court system and perhaps this legislation or this proposal was an attempt to
00:48:04.680counter that but no bottom line religion aside everyone should be everyone should be allowed to
00:48:10.120get divorced um yeah i don't understand listen i can get married in a day i should be able to get
00:48:15.160divorced in the same amount of goddamn time i should be able to sign that if i want to and i
00:48:20.960should be able to tear it up you know irrespective of fighting about money and kids and all of that0.94
00:48:25.920that's different that's different but an actual legal divorce I mean I in Canada in Ontario for
00:48:32.840example you have to prove that you've been separated for a full year well true no but
00:48:42.260there's a logical reason for that is that they want to make sure that people don't make rash
00:48:45.360decisions then go and get remarried afterwards the government didn't ask me to make a logical
00:48:49.400the rash decision when I got married. No, but there's value and stability of contracts from
00:48:54.820an entire social perspective. Sure, but when you're breaking a contract and there's clear
00:48:59.200delineation about what the broken contract looks like, there's not a lot of fighting that goes on
00:49:03.460there either. You talk about Finley Law in Ontario and it's real simple. What are your assets?
00:49:09.800What are your debts? Do you have kids? Everything gets divided. You'll have a lawyer that say you
00:49:16.520don't even need a lawyer it it's that clear the only time you need a lawyer is when there's abuse
00:49:22.260or there's any of those horrible things or somebody's doing a really good job about hiding
00:49:26.720assets assets and it's never the women everybody's like oh the poor men hiding look i want to know
00:49:33.680how many women have hidden houses and money i want to know well these are these are stuff where
00:49:40.280i would make sure that i know what i'm talking about before venturing into it for the time being1.00
00:49:45.080No, but the idea of having to live apart for a year before you formalize the divorce,
00:49:50.660you could disagree on policy, but there's a very logical reason for that is that
00:49:54.380people get into fights, they go through two weeks of badness and then they get divorced
00:49:58.540and then, oh, we regret it. Let's get it back together.
00:50:01.040But again, you're asking, I can't believe you of all people are advocating the state
00:50:07.420to be able to tell me when I can be or cannot be.
00:50:10.140They're not telling you when they're just saying.
00:50:11.480yes they are yes they are they're saying no no think about it little girl sit down and have a
00:50:19.340good thought about it because we know better no no well i don't think that's what they're saying
00:50:23.360i think the thing is look if and it's left over from the days where we couldn't get a divorce
00:50:27.740anyway which isn't that long ago or it was really hard anyway yeah but i i don't i don't view it
00:50:33.340that way as the state saying look i'll tell you when the state is saying look we we understand
00:50:37.520the nature of heated fights if you're going to get divorced um make sure make sure that it's a
00:50:44.460definitive decision i i know i have the other thing is agree or disagree with it that's not
00:50:48.560that's not going to be um that's not going to be my make or break uh limit as to what the government
00:50:52.920tells me to do that that pisses me off think about this for a second honestly let's think about
00:50:59.900let's say two people get married and divorced and it's you know it's a disaster and all of a sudden
00:51:04.780get married one day they want to get divorced the next day boom gone stability to the wind but
00:51:12.140let's say those two people never get married but decide to have a kid
00:51:17.340there's the lack of stability there's the rashness and there lies the real social damage
00:51:25.980of erratic choices and and fly by the seat of your pants kind of behavior that brings
00:51:33.820whole other living entities into this world, into that dynamic. Which one should the government
00:51:40.060be talking about? Because I know you're not going to say they should be able to tell people when
00:51:43.600they can have kids, but that one directly, but that one, we can agree, would directly cause
00:51:51.140way more harm to this society than the latter. Yeah, but look, I can play devil's advocate and
00:51:56.560say there's a fundamental difference is that one is the government telling you what you,
00:51:59.880uh is setting certain parameters once you've entered into a contract and the other one is
00:52:04.360the government preemptively telling you what you can and cannot do with your body you want if you
00:52:07.660want to get married and you want to get the government benefits that come along with getting
00:52:11.720married well what are those benefits but tax tax benefits i i think i think earn more money
00:52:18.260obviously to see what benefits big tax benefits i get well no i think there are certain financial
00:52:24.480tax deductions and whatever but the bottom line you can't say look i want to get the government
00:52:28.380benefits so i'm going to get married but then i don't want the government having any say as to
00:52:31.180you know there on in that's just the government benefits only last as long as you're married as
00:52:36.840soon as you're divorced those government benefits cease to exist true but the bottom but the bottom
00:52:42.240line is you're saying look i i want to adhere to a government uh run program okay well then look if
00:52:49.400you once you get into it you'll think you'll make sure that you're certain when you want to get out
00:52:53.600of it again but these are these are not like i don't care about this issue one way or the other
00:52:57.740I think they all matter. Let's steer it back to where we were in the beginning because I think it all matters because I think the most fundamental thing about all of the things we're talking about, whether you're talking about what people search for in this world, whether you're talking about a stable population, whether you're talking about what the government should and should not be allowed to do and how they should be able to sort of set policy or rules for our life, that all starts with education.
00:53:25.580And I'm being real clear and real honest. And I'll talk about Ontario because I really can't speak to curriculum in Florida, even though I have talked about books and stuff like that. I'll be real honest. The curriculum and the money that we spend, if we really were interested in stability, if we were really interested in an intelligent, diverse, powerful base population,
00:53:52.320We would spend boatloads more money on education, and we would not be talking about what a parent gets to decide should or shouldn't be on a reading, possible reading curriculum, because those decisions should be made, and I think this is an interesting conversation, should be made by the people who study it, by the people who have dedicated their lives to it,
00:54:20.440by the people who have become professionals at it.
00:54:23.680Just like I don't want a parent deciding
00:54:25.880what the national policy on medical care should be
01:18:17.280So now we're saying our teenagers experimenting with each other, is that a bad thing?
01:18:24.260And I'm saying I'm not going to make that moral distinction.
01:18:26.880I am going to want them to be two things, very, very importantly.
01:18:31.140I want them to have full control and full consent of their bodies at all time and feel empowered by that. And number two, in a very close second, no matter what you choose to do, how you choose to do it, I want you to be 100% safe so you don't die from it.
01:18:48.460I think those, I am not, I'm not the one imparting morality. The other side is. I am not the one telling somebody what's right or wrong. I'm telling you what just scientifically is.
01:19:00.800Empowerment with one's body sounds like sexualizing versus biology being this is how it works.
01:19:08.240When I say empowerment, I mean every single person, and I believe this should be taught
01:19:13.600from freaking kindergarten, every single person should be told their body is their body. Nobody,
01:19:20.000not a single person has the right to touch you anywhere you don't want to be touched.
01:19:26.320And I think that lesson should, every parent should be like, yes, I'll make the flag for that.
01:19:34.400It's a song, my bodies, my bodies, no one's but mine.
01:19:37.560You touch your own body, let me touch mine.
01:19:40.900But you're taking that away now because they're starting to say, because it can, look, it can extend into like, okay, well, you know, what if, like I have a, my friend's kid is four years old.
01:19:54.000and every time I go over there, some days he likes me, some days he does not. I always want
01:19:58.500to hug him hello. Always, always, always. Right? And Anna, my partner, always goes,
01:20:06.720uh-uh. And I'm like, what? Let him decide. There is something so freaking powerful about that
01:20:14.480lesson. And that's a lesson for me because I would just pick him up and hug him because I'm
01:20:18.520just you know but how powerful is that lesson for me to give him and I say it to him do you want to
01:20:27.320hug me if you do cool if you don't amazing you don't have to but I'm telling you right now you
01:20:35.500very well know that the majority of people aren't going to be on side with that but I'm telling you
01:20:41.480you want to stop people with nefarious goals getting at kids you you we all want to stop that
01:20:51.100right start by giving them power over their own bodies to decide every step of the way yeah
01:21:01.040no but we are we're talking about two different things at this point in time and and and the the
01:21:06.340it goes back to the question as to where the line between parents teacher and
01:21:10.180exists. And then the question is going to be, you teach them biology,
01:41:21.900Or if a kid comes in and says, I'd like to go by they, them.
01:41:26.780Look, I'll even grant you what I think.
01:41:29.840Just saying, where's the outrage about the screaming teacher?
01:41:32.220I think there is, there should be, and the fact that two things are destructive, but one more destructive than the other doesn't mean that the other one's not destructive.
01:41:39.840I'm simply saying I, as well as you, would like some consistency across the board.
01:41:45.680I saw a gym teacher rugby tackle a girl because two girls were fighting and he rugby tackled one of them.