00:00:00.000When we're talking about the romance genre, where romance is the central component, where it is about a happily ever after, happily for now, it's important to also remember that like, we're talking in a lot of ways about marginalized positions.
00:00:20.260So way back in the heyday, when romance really began to be a big part of traditional publishing, there was a slogan, we'll call it a slogan, that was often shared about romance.
00:00:36.560and that is it is for women by women. And women at that particular moment were viewed as like a
00:00:44.220very specific marginalized perspective. Because women to this day in a lot of spaces experience
00:00:52.280systemic oppression through work, through social class, whatever. It centers this marginalized
00:01:01.240joy, it centers their happiness, it centers their experiences. And that's kind of where
00:01:09.500this for women by women began. But we are in the process of going through a social justice
00:01:18.320revolution. Now, we've seen feminism change, we've seen the way that our rhetoric around race has
00:01:27.760changed. And romance continuing to center marginalized perspectives is also changing
00:01:36.340with that. And so it's not so much as a chicken before the egg, like does art imitate life,
00:01:43.540life imitate art. It's more of a like romance is having a conversation
00:01:47.480with what's happening right now in our world.
00:01:50.720this is the culture study podcast and i'm ann helen peterson and i am nisha sharma a young
00:02:01.920adult and contemporary romance writer so for this episode we are talking about trends that
00:02:07.720we're seeing in romance novels within the reading and writing community and one of those trends
00:02:12.440is just like more right there's just more romance and there's a lot more willingness for people to
00:02:20.100talk more about it and talk more about reading romance. So even though romance as a genre is
00:02:25.620not new by any means, it definitely seems to be having a moment, a visibility moment.
00:02:31.800So Nisha, what do you see as the reason behind this current boom?
00:02:34.840That is a great question. And I think it's not like one specific thing. There is, of course,
00:02:43.280awareness through TikTok, um, that has made a few titles very popular and then has kind of like
00:02:51.700expanded people's horizons when it comes to the romance genre. Um, because people just wanted
00:02:58.980more. I think the pandemic did, um, quite a bit of work when it comes to people coming back to
00:03:07.440reading in a specific way. And I think in general, like after the pandemic, even though we're,
00:03:13.500you know, we're still feeling the effects of it, specifically in communities that have
00:03:19.560disabilities and, you know, are still like, isolating and quarantining, but people are
00:03:25.300looking for community again, and books are providing that for them. You know, kind of
00:03:30.900alongside that, I think that different fascination with different types of reading, like part of it
00:03:37.320the pandemic, because of the stress, because of all sorts of anxiety and doom scrolling and all
00:03:43.940sorts of things that made it difficult to read in a way that you might have read before. Like I was
00:03:50.200included in this bucket of people who felt like I couldn't read for many months. And then I think
00:03:56.860for a lot of people, romance provided a way back in. It was like, I'm reading again, and it feels
00:04:03.120good and it feels transportative, which feels good for other reasons. But I do think that it
00:04:07.620was kind of a hook that was very effective for a lot of people. Absolutely. And I mean,
00:04:13.520I don't exactly know how that feels just because I've been a romance reader, like a dedicated
00:04:18.960romance reader since like the summer after seventh grade. So when people were coming to me that like
00:04:25.620I had never like thought would be interested in a romance, like in my in like my real life.
00:04:33.120And they were like, do you have more romance titles? I was, I was genuinely surprised,
00:04:38.360but also really elated at the same time.
00:04:40.980Totally. It's such an interesting point in conversation right now. And I think,
00:04:45.000you know, in another episode where we're focusing on romance and talking with someone who studies
00:04:49.220like the romance community, she was talking about how so much of it has to do with the expansion of
00:04:55.220self-publishing and how that has broken down and expanded both audiences and authors and all of
00:05:03.060these interesting ways. But okay, we got to get to the listener questions because we've got so many.
00:05:09.160So we're doing multiple episodes on romance. Another one that we're really excited about is
00:05:14.480we're going to have a bookseller of a romance specific bookstore on to talk about like the
00:05:20.480business of selling romance, which I'm so excited about.
00:05:23.560Which is amazing. I'm also excited about that.
00:05:26.240And I love too that there's like many options. Like we have reached out to some people and we're
00:05:32.840like, oh, if they say no, we have so many other options. It's incredible. And that was not the
00:05:37.840case even, you know, 10 years ago. But for now, we're going to talk with you about some bigger
00:05:44.000philosophical, big picture questions. We have some really fun questions about specific tropes
00:05:50.200that I cannot wait to hear your thoughts on. And also for paid subscribers, we have a whole
00:05:55.080segment on recommendations, all that sort of thing. So if you already know you need that in
00:05:59.920your life you can head to culturestudypod.substack.com to sign up but let's start with a big
00:06:05.240picture question from Nina. Why do so many people with otherwise feminist values still hold such
00:06:11.760negative assumptions about romance novels? There's this classic idea that they're nothing but sex
00:06:16.860and therefore that makes them somehow not serious reading but I'm more interested in how these
00:06:21.980novels are seen as representing readers expectations of their real love lives. Of course there's the
00:06:28.140internalized misogyny. But it feels like more than that. I've never thought that someone that
00:06:33.480loves fantasy is interested in actually fighting dragons, or someone that loves detective novels
00:06:39.180is ready to start hunting down serial killers. But with romance, it's often assumed that adult
00:06:44.480women think a real-life human man will be a Prince Charming. But I think we all know the world's not
00:06:50.620that perfect, and I have about as much a chance at meeting that dragon tomorrow as I do one of
00:06:56.600these book men. If anything, it seems that straight women typically don't set very high
00:07:01.700expectations of the men they date. Yet I've seen a lot of straight men scared that they can't live
00:07:07.240up to those expectations when the expectation doesn't even exist. It's all escapism, so why
00:07:14.180isn't it seen that way? This is such a naughty question. Naughty as in K-N-O-T-T-Y. She starts
00:07:22.340by talking about people who are otherwise feminists have these negative assumptions which
00:07:27.060is a question in and of itself but then she talks about how like this is just fantasy if it's fantasy
00:07:32.580and not real life then like why are people scared of them but i i mean i think those two are very
00:07:38.760intertwined right if people are scared of fantasy and people have cultural hierarchies to do with
00:07:46.200all of those genres that she listed right fantasy detective romance any sort of fantastical space
00:07:54.300and i think even though superhero stuff has been legitimated in some ways through like
00:08:00.140mainstream culture like the mainstreaming of nerd culture in part because it's masculinized
00:08:05.280i where where does this question take you okay so i feel like we have to take this in parts
00:08:13.300Yes. The first question is like, why do so many people with otherwise like feminist values hold these like assumptions about romance novels? And we should define feminism. Like feminism is like, at the broadest of definitions. Again, remember, I'm an average academic. And if you can get a grad degree in this, like this is just an invitation to explore more.
00:08:36.420Yeah, no. Okay. Yeah. So our broad understanding of feminism is not that women should like whatever
00:08:42.680they like. That's not feminism. No. Feminism is like a sociopolitical movement. It's an ideology
00:08:51.500and it's based on the premise of equality. And there are waves of feminism. There are different
00:08:58.520types of feminists and different types of feminism and not all feminism is created equal. That is
00:09:04.600very important to know i think my pat answer to kind of address this feminists having negative
00:09:11.360assumptions is that like it can boil down to education um yes like yes this demographic of
00:09:18.300feminists who are anti-romance and i'm using quotes for that are probably not like romance
00:09:23.900readers who read widely within the romance genre they may see like hit pieces that are out about
00:09:29.880the genre that capitalize off of stereotypes. And they're building assumptions based on what
00:09:35.480society has made as well, like assumptions that society has as well. But it's not coming from
00:09:40.120this place of knowledge. But it's important to like dive a little bit deeper because I don't
00:09:44.820want to be dismissive and say that, oh, they just don't know. Yeah, no, I think oftentimes it's this
00:09:50.160interesting place where people who have done some of the work in dismantling crappy hierarchies in
00:09:57.860their lives, like, we're always doing more work. So like, there's stuff that I have internalized
00:10:03.460from other adult women in my life saying things about romance novels. Yeah. When I was a kid,
00:10:10.460right? Like, where I saw them was Harlequin Romance at the grocery store. Or my mom being like,
00:10:17.200don't read that Daniel Steele, that's trash, right? So those things, even if you have a feminist
00:10:23.280praxis like you can still collide with those internalized hierarchies so yeah and and so
00:10:31.020Maya Rodale I think is like a really good name to kind of mention right now and like she's an
00:10:36.840author she's a social commentator and she talks a little bit about this um no actually she talks
00:10:43.020a lot about this um in her book uh I think it's called Dangerous Books for Girls and she traces
00:10:50.360the rhetoric around romance in this book. And she basically theorizes or, you know, she talks about
00:10:57.760how like, when women began to really read as a form of pleasure, and it became more accessible,
00:11:03.860like books became more accessible to women, books that were being published specifically to kind of
00:11:09.600attract women would center their happiness. And to be completely honest, like, men were scared.
00:11:17.900they were like they were concerned that women were reading they were getting ideas right and
00:11:24.940these ideas were challenging like power and authority over women um and these books like
00:11:32.280they talked about the right to be happy the right to say no the right to have opinions
00:11:36.580and readers can kind of like ask themselves like why is the right to control what happens to me
00:11:42.200like something that's fictional when like when in actuality i feel like it should happen to me
00:11:47.500In an effort to like suppress these beliefs, men who controlled the narrative, like they controlled like the newspapers, they controlled the review sites, they controlled everything, right? Like I'm saying sites like websites existed back then, but like they controlled like the circulation.
00:12:04.060And they positioned these books as silly, anti-religious, harmful, against like family values. And because of that, because that language that originated in like a patriarchal structure, that is something that we inherited. And, and I don't know if you remember the canon wars. Do you remember the canon wars?
00:12:29.320Yes. So like, in the 80s, this conversation came up again. And like, specifically, this was about academia, right? So it was, do we teach diverse stories in schools? Or do we continue to teach straight white men in schools? And this particular lecture is so it like imprinted on me. It was the Toni Morrison lecture.
00:12:53.060And Toni Morrison, she wrote this keynote. And in the keynote, she says, canon building is empire building. Canon defense is empire defense. And she's basically talking about how like people who control the narrative have, you know, the right to basically talk about like, who gets to have these lived experiences.
00:13:17.520That's kind of what had happened originally when like, you know, this conversation around romance began and how it is still existing today.
00:13:25.400But now it's not just like white women, which is originally what it was about specifically, because those are the ones who had access to a lot of these romance novels.
00:13:33.640But it is about marginalized groups through an intersectional lens.
00:13:37.980Like we're seeing like black and brown stories.
00:25:03.920I remember Lois Duncan books that that's like a throwback.
00:25:09.060Like, I my first like, I feel like, you know, regardless of what can be considered like a really thoughtful way to introduce younger audiences to sex like there.
00:25:21.020this is like again complicated because not all romances are created equal not all romances
00:25:26.260like do the same thing and not all romances may be appropriate right like you're talking about like
00:25:31.900frontal lobe is underdeveloped right so like that is also a piece of it but again like
00:25:37.120i i want to like focus on the capitalism piece of it and how like they do not care they do not care
00:25:43.980They're expecting parents to be involved in like, the screening process. And like, they want to attract as many individuals as possible. So that's part of it. But I will kind of add like this, this additional element to it, because I personally have cartoon covers.
00:26:01.700cartoon covers have given me the ability to access a wider skin tone yeah and wider representation
00:26:13.600ability yeah for my books there are not enough stock photos and images that exist out there
00:26:21.180and there's not enough budget in a lot of marketing departments to do an original photo
00:26:26.140shoot for all of these books to have people on the cover so like not only is and by the way like
00:26:32.880one I will also add that like my publisher has made it very clear and has shared it like widely
00:26:37.760in town halls um I'm with like Harper Collins I've been with Penguin Random House I've been
00:26:43.320with Skyscape like all of these publishers they kind of speak to the same thing that
00:26:46.360cartoon covers sell more and like for me I have access to South Asian artists who can
00:26:54.580authentically depict individuals who look like South Asian characters that are in my book. And
00:27:02.740they understand when I say things like Jumka, they understand things when I say like Lenga,
00:27:07.260like they know they picture it right away. And I feel like I'm working within my community to be
00:27:12.560able to get an authentic depiction on the cover of my book. I also feel like the thing about
00:27:18.280cartoon covers is they make the world more imaginable does that make sense like more it's
00:27:25.160more um amenable to other people's imagination because when you're imagining what's happening
00:27:31.100in the book in the plot you're not imagining a cartoon like that's not how it's playing out
00:27:37.100right like you're imagining a real person but that person gets to take on the characteristics
00:27:41.000that you ascribe to them in your mind instead of i i always like reading a book before the movie
00:27:46.080comes out because I don't want to be thinking about like, oh, Bella in Twilight looks like
00:27:50.660Kristen Stewart. Like I want to think of that image myself. I want to have ownership over and
00:27:55.820control based on what the author says, right? But it's just more fun that way. I also want to say
00:28:01.280that most, in my experience, most authors have some input on cover. They do. But not a lot.
00:28:10.780yeah like we are not the final say when i have conversations with other marginalized authors
00:28:17.300they generally have really supportive publishers who are like let me let me work with you because
00:28:22.940you are the expert here and um i think that's where cartoon covers can really be helpful and
00:28:30.500like almost an experience that is like a safe experience to have in a publishing industry that
00:28:37.140is like fraught with different like microaggressions I love that framing of it and it's so much I think
00:28:44.880more useful to think about than just sometimes I think there there's this tendency to think like
00:28:50.100oh they're so hyper feminized or that they look like they're for younger people but having these
00:28:55.480perspectives I think is going to be really useful okay so oh one thing from Melody I feel like this
00:29:02.340is like a melody secret question that she put in here that she wants to ask are there any secret
00:29:08.400tips for discerning the spice level when looking at a cover I don't think so like I think if you
00:29:14.840look at the meta tags and if you look at the like I personally always like to hear directly from the
00:29:20.060author like how they describe their story because the author themselves will often tell you like
00:29:25.740spice level so if I read a book or if I read about a book like I will immediately go to their social
00:29:31.920media and I'll be like what are they saying about their own book because that will really
00:29:36.000generally tell me what I'm looking for. Melody do you have any hints? Do you have a way that
00:29:40.900you interpret it? No that's why I was genuinely asking. Because what if there was like oh if
00:29:47.400there's like ears on the dog then it's like oh. I mean like again this is like just because it's
00:29:55.040supportive of like my experiences as a marginalized author does not mean like all cartoon covers are
00:29:59.880created equal. And like, they're great. Like, there are some cartoon covers that are very
00:30:04.140misleading. And again, you know, it's, it's also like capitalizing off of like the ability to kind
00:30:09.420of like cast a wider net to people by almost misrepresenting in a way. But yeah, but this is
00:30:15.640a very nuanced question. And it's oftentimes like very specific to publishing house to authors. So
00:30:22.420so there are good things and bad things about cartoon covers and the bad thing is this inability
00:30:30.000to distinguish between the two but the good thing is like yes there are more stock images that exist
00:30:35.820now but like south asians are not monolithic right so like okay fine there's more south asians
00:30:42.540out there but like are there more punjabi south asians like right what is going on right right
00:30:47.260or like really filtered through like the shitty um stock image whiteness lens which is oftentimes
00:30:53.820like oh yeah exotic right like in various ways like if no is it like sometimes i just want people
00:31:00.460to browse what is available on getty on various stock image sites to understand just how pervasive
00:31:07.480these tropes remain okay wait can i just type in on one more thing uh yes please i think what you
00:31:13.860said about casting a wider net to readers is absolutely spot on because that is what happened
00:31:18.880to me and I think there's still a lot of stigma around reading the more traditional like photo
00:31:24.840covers where somebody is like wearing a dress and clutching somebody else and my first romance
00:31:30.120novel ever was The Proposal by Jasmine Guillory because it had a cartoon cover with a baseball
00:31:34.740on the front and then when I got to the sexies I was like oh my gosh like you can do this
00:31:40.300like oh so and then melody was like you guys it's like rom-coms but in books like did you know
00:31:48.620that romance novels can be funny yeah but then like do you see how we're deconstructing patriarchy
00:31:56.300here like this exactly but so now like i needed i needed that like safe entry with the cartoon
00:32:02.220cover where nobody could know the contents of what i was reading whereas like now i'll read
00:32:07.280whatever and like sarah mcclain is one of my favorite authors and she has those more traditional
00:32:11.480like um mass market paperback covers and if i post them on instagram people are like oh my god
00:32:17.540like what are you reading and you're like good shit yeah good shit because now i am like educated
00:32:25.020enough by the cartoon covers to appreciate the stories inside the more traditional covers yeah
00:32:30.500Okay, next question is from someone who is new to the genre and has a lot of questions for you.