Culture Study Podcast - January 14, 2026


Let's Collectively Fantasize About a Family-Friendly Society

Topics
How Did Dating Get THIS Difficult? Is Everyone an Influencer Now?

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per minute

184.57

Word count

12,692

Sentence count

404

Harmful content

Misogyny

8

sentences flagged

Toxicity

17

sentences flagged

Hate speech

15

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.180 Hey everyone, we're getting back into the swing of recording, and as always, we need your questions.
00:00:05.520 So, here's a quick rundown of all of the recordings that are coming up.
00:00:09.280 Money and morality, specifically as related to taxes, who should pay taxes, why we pay taxes, all that sort of thing.
00:00:15.740 Wedding culture, what's weird, what's culty, what's changing about it.
00:00:21.280 The culture of Puerto Rico, take that as expansively as you'd like, but we are pegging it to Bad Bunny's performance at the Super Bowl.
00:00:28.660 chain restaurants what's changed what's the same also thinking about supply chains and how they
00:00:34.360 work with chain restaurants dark academia this one's going to be really good mom fluencers what's
00:00:40.240 different what you've noticed what's changing and then life after cars so you can submit your
00:00:46.880 questions at tinyurl.com slash culture study pod and that's also where you can submit ideas for
00:00:52.760 future episodes, and anything you want for the ask and anything segment. Our guest hosts always
00:00:58.540 comment on how thoughtful and smart your questions are, so we're very excited to see what you come
00:01:03.020 up with. Okay, on with today's show. This is the Culture Study Podcast, and I'm Anne Helen Peterson.
00:01:16.640 Hi, I'm Elliot Haspel. I'm a child and family policy expert and author of the book Raising a
00:01:20.740 nation, 10 Reasons Every American Has a Stake in Child Care for All.
00:01:24.960 You know, we sent out this question that was like, listeners, send us your question about
00:01:31.260 making a family-friendly society, or what would that actually look like?
00:01:35.140 And the most popular answer, by far, was some variation of, why does the school day end
00:01:42.200 at 3.30, but work ends at 5? 0.98
00:01:44.320 This sucks. 0.98
00:01:46.040 Yep. 0.99
00:01:46.280 And all of its different iterations.
00:01:47.760 And also questions about the length of the school year and that sort of thing.
00:01:51.320 And, you know, that question is pointing at so many different things.
00:01:55.340 But I wonder if we can talk just to start about why is this the number one thing that comes to people's mind when we talk about a family friendly society?
00:02:04.160 Yeah, absolutely.
00:02:05.140 It's such a mismatch, right?
00:02:06.420 Like a fundamental time mismatch and it causes so many challenges.
00:02:09.900 And it's interesting because there's like there's the historical answer, the long historical answer.
00:02:15.340 Totally. I like this question because it also, I think, gets us to that fundamental disconnect that we have in America. So the short, like longest road glancer is that this is a vestige of the 19th century compulsory school laws and we had a more agrarian society and these kids need to get back to the farms and that we, you know, and some child development experts at the time didn't think kids should be in school for that long.
00:02:41.260 So there are those reasons. And, you know, what I think is always interesting, though, and I like this question because it gives me the reason to talk about 1971, which is my favorite thing to talk about in child care. So I'm not going to give this sort of super long.
00:02:55.780 You and every other child care historian.
00:02:57.920 Yes.
00:02:58.160 It's such a big year.
00:02:59.400 It's a big year. Can I tell the story real quick?
00:03:02.120 Yes, please.
00:03:02.820 So in 1971, you have this bill called the Comprehensive Child Development Act, and it would have started to create a federally funded, locally run network of child care programs.
00:03:12.080 And importantly, it also would have funded after school and summer care.
00:03:16.400 This is really a time when, you know, we had huge changes going on in the economy.
00:03:22.240 Women and mothers were flooding into the workforce because you couldn't really sustain a one income household anymore.
00:03:28.160 Women were gaining rights.
00:03:29.660 And so big changes in America and across the developed world.
00:03:35.200 And so this bill passes Congress, actually.
00:03:37.200 It passes the House.
00:03:37.960 It passes the Senate by a partisan basis, right?
00:03:39.720 That's the thing. It passes Congress.
00:03:40.800 It passes Congress, yes.
00:03:41.800 It shows up on Richard Nixon's desk.
00:03:43.480 And Richard Nixon at the moment, at that time, actually, was like hemming and hawing
00:03:46.740 because he came into office talking about some family stuff.
00:03:49.200 He's talking about like, you know, and so he shows up on his desk.
00:03:52.560 And the story basically goes, at the time, he's getting a lot of pressure from the right wing
00:03:57.220 because he was engaging with China and there was talk about a conservative primary, you know,
00:04:01.280 in the next election and things like that. And basically, Pat Buchanan gets in his ear, right?
00:04:06.380 Pat Buchanan, you know, convinces him to veto the thing. And he vetoes it in this exceptionally
00:04:12.820 strong language, right? This exceptionally strong language, saying that to do this, in as many words
00:04:18.080 as would be to commit the moral authority of the federal government over that of the family.
00:04:22.500 And this would have created like a network of voluntary child care programs and funded after school and summer care.
00:04:28.480 This isn't forcing anyone to do anything, but it gets in the water, right?
00:04:32.980 This idea, and actually it's interesting.
00:04:35.280 This bill comes up later, you know, in following years and you had this like flyer when the viral version of the 1970s saying that it was going to let kids unionize and sue their parents if their parents made them take out the trash or go to church.
00:04:50.740 Not kidding.
00:04:52.020 Like this is literally what people thought that the federal government was trying to do.
00:04:56.440 And so we basically have this schism, right, where government goes on to one side and the family goes on to the other side.
00:05:04.100 And it's a relatively modern invention.
00:05:06.140 It really came out in the 70s.
00:05:07.500 But as a result, all of the energy around things like creating a child care system, about creating a universal system of after school or before school care or summer care that could go around the school year and the school day, extending school day, that all went out the window.
00:05:24.120 And we're still really, really fighting that legacy today of this idea that the government doesn't have any role to play in child care.
00:05:34.280 Yeah, yeah. And even like the understanding which aligns with some of these like, you know, the government should get out of child care, like the understanding of funding as partisan. Right. When it was not previously. So this I want to tee up our first question first, like actual listener question, because it's going to allow us to talk about, I think, how some of like our understandings of what is actually family friendly are coded.
00:06:02.300 So let's start from this question from Kim.
00:06:05.000 I think the biggest disconnect with creating family-friendly societies is the definition
00:06:09.380 of what a family-friendly society is.
00:06:12.020 For a set of people, usually from an explicit or quasi-religious place, specifically, of
00:06:17.060 course, conservative Christian, this means jobs for men and no options for child care
00:06:21.880 besides mom and maybe grandma or a small co-op of other moms.
00:06:25.980 Whereas for others, it would mean robust parental leave, high-quality, accessible child care, 0.93
00:06:30.460 hybrid work options, generous sick leave policy, etc. How do we even begin to bridge that gap?
00:06:37.100 I see this pop up so much, and I think people who maybe haven't lived in places where this
00:06:43.340 ethos is very prominent might think of it as, I don't know, like satire almost. But there really
00:06:51.500 is a strong strain that any policy that quote-unquote encourages mothers to be outside of
00:06:58.940 the home is not actually family friendly, right? That it's a destructive force for the family. So 0.61
00:07:05.560 I wonder if you can like break down these two understandings of like, what kind of family
00:07:11.080 policy directives are trying to protect or you see where I'm going here?
00:07:17.220 I do see where you're going there. Yeah. It is such a good point. I think what's interesting
00:07:22.880 underneath that, my question is always like, what are the values that are being asserted,
00:07:27.900 And when you kind of unpack it, some of the values, this idea that like family is the cornerstone of society. And so we want to have strong families that are able to pass on values and traditions and stories to the next generation, essentially the socially social reproduction.
00:07:45.540 and that when I have these conversations with people because I've as well and I've heard plenty
00:07:50.780 of there are politicians that will say this unabashedly out loud right like I think that's
00:07:55.320 what's underneath it is this idea that we if we if we do this if we are encouraging you know
00:08:01.340 women outside of the home it's going to break down the family what I think is interesting is that when 0.99
00:08:06.600 you actually assert the idea that a good child care system can strengthen families it can make
00:08:13.820 people really sit up straight because there's a way in which saying, look, if what you're getting
00:08:20.600 at is the idea that every family should have the care that they need to be able to raise their
00:08:26.760 kids the way that they want, like that, and that is a value statement. And I think most people
00:08:33.080 agree with it. It leads you on interesting paths because then you have to ask that same person,
00:08:37.640 right? Okay. Well, if you've got, you know, and I've, I've interviewed and done focus groups,
00:08:41.320 like stay-at-home dads who were like, you know, we had this conversation. My wife and I were like,
00:08:44.620 we really wanted someone home, you know, with the children to be able to, you know, have more
00:08:49.120 touch points with them and to be able to raise them in the way that we thought was best. And
00:08:52.900 I remember one dad told me, my wife looked at me, we were sitting on the porch and he said,
00:08:56.460 it's not going to be me. So, right, this idea that like, okay, like we can have two things can
00:09:01.540 be true. Like, yes, we need strong families. Yes, we need strong relationships. And yes,
00:09:05.380 children need stable parents with good ability to be present. And what that's going to mean is in
00:09:13.480 some cases, we're going to need to support stay-at-home parents. In some cases, that means
00:09:18.180 that it's best for those kids to have both of their parents out doing something that they find
00:09:22.360 meaningfully fulfilling and coming back at the end of the day, like charged up and ready to engage,
00:09:27.100 right? And so where I find is challenging is this sort of question and where I think the argument
00:09:32.480 on the far right kind of falls apart i'm like choice has to cut both ways well okay so the
00:09:38.280 first thing i would say is that i think a lot of people on the far right do not actually believe
00:09:42.640 in the libertarian ethos that everyone should have the right to raise their kids however they want
00:09:46.640 because they think like queer parents should not have the right to yes raise their kids right like 0.98
00:09:52.460 they they pathologize single parenthood especially single parenthood by choice um and you know the 0.95
00:09:59.720 like the whole cloth ethos of like a family is everyone right it's like it's also grandparents
00:10:08.460 and it's also like how do we take care of other people in our extended family like that falls
00:10:14.220 apart it's so focused on the nuclear family that is straight and has two parents and one income
00:10:21.840 and like but then they say like i should have the freedom to raise my kids however i want
00:10:28.400 and not expose them to the propaganda of like say public schooling right yes so like that that's
00:10:34.980 always my frustration like if we if we can get on board that like okay we should like people
00:10:40.260 should be able to raise their kids in a way that they feel is fit so long as it's not breaking any
00:10:46.440 laws um but they like for them like you said like this sword doesn't cut both ways like they
00:10:53.260 for for them and theirs but not for us and ours yes and i think that's absolutely right i think
00:10:59.540 in some ways we said that's an argument that we have to be able to win uh i do think there's this
00:11:04.900 sort of way in which though ideas that they've asserted have gotten into a lot of the mainstream
00:11:12.320 ideas and you know it's interesting i'll say like i have a very conservative like christian
00:11:17.120 conservative family member who i talked about child care a fair amount and like their thing 0.82
00:11:21.340 is like, yes, I think it would be better if all mothers stayed home with their family. My wife 0.97
00:11:26.720 didn't, right? But then they're like, look, if you have a childcare idea or policy that is going to
00:11:33.360 support stay-at-home parents and also offer these other options, I can basically reluctantly get
00:11:38.100 on board with that. That's basically their conclusion. Well, and that's the thing. I think
00:11:41.800 about how so many churches have what they call like mom's day out, where it's like a couple hours
00:11:47.640 up dacre and like that's okay right like that is sanctioned for you to have part-time child care
00:11:53.500 it's just that you can't like have a full-time job and it also just leads me to all of this
00:11:58.640 research about like so many people do want to provide elder care say because this is going to
00:12:04.660 be something that's part of our conversation as we're moving forward about how a family-friendly
00:12:08.160 society is actually one that's also friendly to elder care but they don't want to be the only
00:12:13.440 person doing it yeah right yeah and this applies to i think all kinds of care like if you're caring
00:12:19.540 for a disabled partner if you are caring for kids you just don't want to be the only person doing it
00:12:27.180 all of the time right like what is the escape valve a lot of people want to do that work but
00:12:31.740 they just need help yeah and that's what we don't provide oh that's right it's why you know and i
00:12:36.920 argue a lot we need to assert care as a right like we need to assume rights language and we need to
00:12:42.040 challenge anyone to say why shouldn't that be because if it is just this nice to have thing or
00:12:47.560 this pay-to-play system and if you happen to be wealthy congratulations you can hire to your point
00:12:52.160 right you can hire help totally because you know who we don't look down on is the wealthy people
00:12:57.160 who are all hiring nannies to raise their kids for them right like they don't get any approbation
00:13:01.760 from us um so i think that's which is so funny right like i think that like it's liberals actually
00:13:09.780 there is some like
00:13:11.900 opprobrium from like liberals
00:13:14.340 who are like oh must be nice to have the privilege
00:13:16.220 to have a nanny you know what I mean
00:13:17.960 like that and I
00:13:19.820 understand it but like
00:13:22.080 conservators aren't saying to Donald 0.70
00:13:24.080 Trump like oh did nannies help
00:13:26.140 raise your kids you know 1.00
00:13:28.060 that's right so I think
00:13:29.740 universal rights language is
00:13:32.080 potentially a way
00:13:33.280 out of that and I think it has
00:13:36.200 to be pluralistic right that's the other thing about to your point
00:13:38.260 about other care too, like I think as someone who is avowedly on the left, right, like we get into
00:13:43.300 trouble when we actually sort of say we only want in child care, like licensed, you know, child care
00:13:50.120 centers, we only want pre-K. We don't actually want to support family members or grandparents or
00:13:54.800 stay-at-home parents. Like I think we do have a tendency sometimes to look down on that as opposed
00:13:59.680 to saying, look, it's all, it's all care. It's all happening. It should all be supported. Children
00:14:04.560 can develop healthily in any of those settings, and we need a system that supports it. And it's
00:14:09.500 not going to look exactly the same, because the way you support a grandparent, the way you support
00:14:12.040 a stay-in-law parent, and the way you support a child care center are necessarily going to look
00:14:15.300 different. It's going to cost different amounts of money. But can we have a system where everyone
00:14:19.700 can get the care that they want and need? That would be a huge, you know, advance.
00:14:24.440 Okay, so let's tease up our next question, which I think we'll get to a fundamental problem. This
00:14:28.620 comes from Carrie. We don't have to invent all that many policies or practices in this area if 1.00
00:14:33.820 we don't want to. There are a lot of models we could quickly adapt with a lot of bang for our
00:14:39.020 buck. When you fly into the airport in Lisbon, there are family-only lines so parents don't
00:14:44.500 have to hold their toddlers on their hips for three hours in line for passport control.
00:14:49.520 I'm looking at you, Newark Airport. Restaurants in many cities in Europe have play areas for kids,
00:14:55.080 so there's something for them to do while you wait for the meal. So many places abroad are
00:14:59.200 built with strollers and wheelchairs in mind. Surely planners and policymakers travel too.
00:15:05.020 And yet in the U.S. we just don't do this. It seems deliberate. My question is thus less how
00:15:12.600 we can make our society more family friendly, but why don't we? I have theories about cultural
00:15:18.440 preferences for fairness and plain old misogyny, but I shouldn't answer my own question.
00:15:23.960 i love i love that carrie starts to answer her own question uh you have done so much work
00:15:33.420 closely studying the way that family-friendly policy works in other nations so that's part of
00:15:39.840 why i wanted to to have you answer this question because like you have show like i have read your
00:15:44.380 work on all of these different ways things that we could adopt so why don't we yeah oh it's such 1.00
00:15:51.000 a good question i mean i think some look carrie's obviously there obviously is misogyny there
00:15:55.020 obviously is so some of that that's going on no doubt i think part of it quite honestly is we
00:16:01.060 there's not that much of a constituency for it what i mean by that i don't mean that there
00:16:05.960 aren't constituent parents but like when's the last time that a parent called up a congressperson 0.53
00:16:13.060 or a city council person and said look like the stroller infrastructure in this city sucks
00:16:18.640 or you know we need to have airport like family lanes like it's just not a there's not been a
00:16:24.100 really an organized constituency i actually think it's a really potentially fruitful area and
00:16:28.840 interestingly this is a place where there could be some bipartisanship and i use that word with
00:16:33.040 full awareness of the moment that we are in um you know there's a conservative thinker who i
00:16:39.040 am friendly with the name patrick brown he's written about these ideas of like look there
00:16:43.120 should be playgrounds at every rest stop on every highway in america right like that's like a proper
00:16:48.080 use of public funds. And I think there's actually some sort of strange bedfellows that could be
00:16:52.520 had around that. But you're right. What it comes down to is, and my colleague, I work with Joe
00:16:58.120 Waters, talks a lot about this, is what's the ethic sort of within a culture about where family
00:17:03.940 is placed? So in Italy, it's literally in the Italian constitution that one of the purposes
00:17:12.600 of the italian government is to support healthy family life and so yeah like that like what that
00:17:19.440 says you know that's not a policy but that is a statement of values that you can then go down to
00:17:24.720 yeah we're going to have these things that are family friendly but you're right absolutely why
00:17:28.060 don't i mean there are so many things and we could go down the list of the family line lanes in the
00:17:33.540 airport the lack of stroller infrastructure the the fact that public pools in most places now have
00:17:39.460 incredibly short hours and, you know, short years that they're open. I mean, we could go down the
00:17:44.820 list. There are so many things, and these aren't actually giant P-paws. Like, fixing child care
00:17:51.400 will cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Fixing, like, airport lanes and, you know, stroller
00:17:57.320 infrastructure and splash pads, like, that's not going to break the bank, but it does require
00:18:02.280 becoming a priority. And in public policy, everything is always fighting for, you know,
00:18:06.560 attention and energy and funds within a finite circle and so part of the question is how do we
00:18:13.880 get parents organized around this and you know if they're not even organized right now writ large
00:18:18.360 around bigger things like child care right well and it also it strikes me that so much of this
00:18:26.720 has now been like shunted onto the private sphere or onto like the corporate yes you know like in
00:18:31.860 in airports like the fact that the pumping rooms were like at least until recently i haven't seen
00:18:38.440 them recently but um you know it was like a company that paid to have like pumping rooms
00:18:44.540 that were like little i don't know like a size of a box that you could go into but it was like
00:18:51.660 advertising for this company so of course the airport and like the infrastructure of the
00:18:56.560 airport was not paying to actually construct a place where moms could pump it was like well 0.96
00:19:00.980 let's have the private like private sphere take care of this and we know that that's not 0.99
00:19:06.480 it doesn't go well or even like i'm thinking of regulations too that have just like disincentivized
00:19:13.860 the development of any sort of third spaces or third public spaces where you don't have to buy
00:19:18.740 something in order to be there yeah there's also like this for this proliferation of sort of places
00:19:23.040 also that aren't even culturally aren't even friendly towards kids they don't in the restaurants
00:19:26.600 or the breweries are like no kids allowed like that in a way we were becoming more hostile to
00:19:31.560 the idea of families with young children um or families with children generally and that is i
00:19:36.200 think uh you know that's a real challenge and we could it's a choice in a lot of ways and but some
00:19:43.220 of it comes again from the top down of when lawmakers are making a policy for example like
00:19:49.460 there have been proposals made throughout from both parties across time around there should be
00:19:54.540 a family impact lens to that right a family impact statement you know what is this going to mean for
00:20:00.280 families if we do that and some of that can be weaponized and we have to be really careful about
00:20:03.580 it i mean parents rights has been weaponized against uh you know against lgbtq people i mean
00:20:10.500 they're that language can be dangerous but as an idea of we need to think about policy making with
00:20:18.240 families in the center. And interestingly, we really don't think about families as a unit very
00:20:25.180 much in policymaking. We often think about individuals, that the parent is the worker,
00:20:29.960 the child. As the child, we don't often think of what's best for families. And so the stuff
00:20:35.280 ends up falling from the wayside. I think in some cases it's benign neglect. In some cases,
00:20:39.780 malign neglect. But I don't know that there's necessarily hungress people sitting around being
00:20:44.900 Like, you know what we're going to do is, like, make the airport terrible for families with kids.
00:20:51.960 No, but it's also like, and this gets to, like, you know, Protestant individualist work ethic.
00:20:57.900 Like, if you're going to go on vacation, you better suffer.
00:21:02.360 Or just, like, the idea that something, anything that makes your life easier in some way, especially if the state is doing it, like, that's waste.
00:21:13.300 Does that make sense?
00:21:14.260 Like things are supposed to be hard and we're supposed to struggle to do them. 0.93
00:21:18.320 And if we manage to do them, that makes us better people is really at the heart of like that individualist ethic, which sucks.
00:21:27.200 We just keep making things so hard.
00:21:33.420 The Culture Study podcast is sponsored by Blueland. 0.84
00:21:36.880 One of the things that I try to do every year is just throw away less crap. 0.94
00:21:42.500 Buy less crap and throw away less crap.
00:21:44.940 One way that you can bring less crap into your house and throw less crap away
00:21:48.720 is by reducing the amount of single-use plastics that you use in your everyday life.
00:21:53.860 In the past, every single time that I needed a cleaning product,
00:21:56.580 I would buy a brand new plastic thing of it.
00:21:59.860 And when it got low, I would go and get another one.
00:22:02.520 And this was incredibly wasteful, but at the same time, it was just low on my priorities.
00:22:07.040 I needed something that was going to be really easy to implement if I was going to change that behavior.
00:22:10.520 and then Blueland sent me their products and here's what I love about them. You have a really
00:22:16.440 sturdy meant to last spray bottle and you use that over and over again. It's simple. It's not hideous
00:22:23.980 like you can see what's inside of it and then you have these tablets that come in a nice little tin
00:22:30.080 and then you open up the tablet and you put the tablet in it and you add some water and then
00:22:35.460 that's it i use blueland for my hand soap right now i'm still using the really nice
00:22:40.580 winter themed piney one i also use their tablets for the toilet bowl you don't even have to like
00:22:46.540 use any sort of plastic squeezy thing you just put the tablet in there it's fantastic blueland
00:22:51.700 products are certified by cradle to cradle and meet the highest standard of clean they're effective
00:22:56.500 yet gentle on people and on the planet from cleaning sprays to toilet bowl cleaner to
00:23:01.760 dishwasher and laundry detergent tablets, Blueland's 100% microplastic-free EPA Safer
00:23:07.180 Choice certified formulas are safe to use around your family, your pets, your plants. I love not
00:23:13.720 having to choose between the safe option and what actually gets my house clean. And right now,
00:23:18.280 Blueland has a special offer for listeners. You can get 15% off your first order by going to
00:23:22.740 blueland.com slash culture. You won't want to miss this. blueland.com slash culture for 15% off.
00:23:29.680 That's blueland.com slash culture to get 15% off.
00:23:34.260 Today's episode is brought to you by Blissey.
00:23:36.660 Melody, do you ever wake up and your hair looks like you were a two-year-old who slept for 18 hours and it's just like piled on one side?
00:23:45.380 Yes.
00:23:45.840 One thing that I didn't realize before I got a Blissey pillowcase was that a huge cause of that particular type of bedhead is actually what kind of pillowcase that you're sleeping on.
00:23:56.200 cotton and satin cause frizz and then oh they also cause those like embarrassing sleep creases
00:24:02.660 where like you look like you just smashed your face into a pillow guess what you don't get that
00:24:08.900 with a blissey i was traveling a couple of weeks ago so i was away from my blissey pillowcase
00:24:14.220 and i kid you not one day my sleep creases lasted until like three o'clock in the afternoon
00:24:22.020 every time that I like went to the bathroom to wash my hands or whatever I was like why is this
00:24:27.020 still happening they make me feel like I'm a two-year-old who just got up from a nap and I'm
00:24:31.880 like still cranky you know what I mean like I need a string cheese like force-fed to me that's
00:24:36.700 if I look in the mirror that's what they make me feel like yes again you don't get that if you take
00:24:42.160 a nap with a blissy if you sleep at night with a blissy blissy pillowcases are silk not satin
00:24:48.900 there's a real difference silk is natural cooling gentler on skin and hair and it also helps reduce
00:24:55.320 fine lines wrinkles and sleep creases like what we're talking about and reduces breakouts which
00:25:00.140 somehow even at age 44 i still have why did no one tell me this right now because you're a listener
00:25:05.900 blissy is offering 60 nights risk-free plus an additional 30 off when you shop at blissy.com
00:25:12.140 slash culture pod. That's B-L-I-S-S-Y dot com slash culture pod and use code culture pod
00:25:20.040 to get an additional 30% off. Your skin and hair will thank you.
00:25:29.100 Okay, so I promised so many listeners that we would not just talk about like parents of little
00:25:34.680 kids in this episode. So we have a question that's going to tee us up to be much more expansive here.
00:25:39.620 I just hear from Marissa. How can a truly family-friendly community recognize and make
00:25:45.000 space for single, childless people? Or, better yet, make single, child-free life more possible
00:25:51.120 and even encouraged as a role that adds value to a community? Single people are often entire
00:25:56.140 families in and of ourselves, playing a lot of different roles at once every single day.
00:26:00.720 And while I love being anti-Marissa to the kids in my life, I'm actually anti-Marissa a pretty
00:26:04.820 small percentage of the time it is often too easy to just fill the anti-roll and nothing else to
00:26:10.340 kids friends and family alike are there specific ways a community can make folks who are opting
00:26:15.440 out of traditional families feel visible and valuable as simply themselves so what does this
00:26:22.160 spark in you it's a really good question and it really is something that bothers me about the
00:26:29.180 family formation birth rate discourse right and this idea that i i wrote in an op-ed in opposition
00:26:34.700 to this one so i think tank that was calling these people kinless i'm like they're not kinless like
00:26:39.460 they're not like without yes they're not without families like right like they have for you know
00:26:44.420 they're filling these important roles and then humanity is a great deal of great debt of gratitude
00:26:50.520 to many many many people who who ended up not having being married or or having kids i so i
00:26:56.080 think part of it is like we need to be able to have this conversation which is not going anywhere
00:27:01.640 about the declining birth rate without denigrating people who don't have kids and part of it is
00:27:07.580 literally what we're doing right now i think saying that out loud and saying it loudly and
00:27:11.160 over and over and over again um no and then i think there's a question of like can communities
00:27:15.220 like i don't have like a list of things that the community could do but if you think about the way
00:27:20.460 that we have, you know, grandparents day at school, right? Like, or grand, like grand friends
00:27:25.720 day, right? Can we have like, you know, on uncle day, can we have ways that we are elevating,
00:27:32.060 you know, these individuals, but again, not just because of their, their relationship to kids,
00:27:36.060 but also ways to celebrate them in and of themselves. If we have parents night out,
00:27:41.080 you know, is there a way to do more events that aren't just focused on parents? I think having
00:27:45.220 both and is probably the way forward um and again the more that we can just say that out loud
00:27:52.620 the better so i don't have a magic wand on that one but i'm glad it was asked because i do i am
00:27:57.800 getting concerned that the discourse is is heading in a nasty direction as a person without kids i
00:28:04.660 have so many thoughts on this because like there are so many spaces when like i feel awkward or
00:28:10.540 not particularly welcome one of them goes back to like the point that we made earlier
00:28:15.080 about how a lot of spaces now have become either child-free or conversely only for kids so i think
00:28:22.300 about like i don't know these spaces that are like now you like jump at the walls and there's
00:28:28.540 like like foam all over the place like there's you know what they're like some of it's trampolines
00:28:33.960 and like it is a stimulation overload but if you're there without like children under your 0.89
00:28:40.880 direct supervision you're a freaking weirdo right so like i went with some friends with my friend's
00:28:46.440 kids and it's like but where's your kid and like i played more than any of the other parents 0.96
00:28:51.100 but still it's like this interesting kind of interloper thing one thing that i appreciate
00:28:56.800 that the school does on my island is like oftentimes for things like graduation or
00:29:02.440 plays or that sort of thing they make a very explicit call that everyone on the island is
00:29:08.080 welcome to come and what that does is that anyone who has an investment in the school
00:29:12.720 which is everyone because like it is at the center of our island in so many different ways lots of
00:29:18.440 people have either gone there themselves or had kids who went there or volunteered there or taught
00:29:22.320 there like you have people who are there who are not just parents including me and my partner
00:29:28.620 one other thing before I get into the policy stuff like I uh earlier this year one of my
00:29:35.140 friends kids who I love she had to do a report on an adult in her life for school every other person
00:29:42.280 in the class did a family member but she did her report on me so she interviewed me and like got
00:29:49.800 pictures of me when I was a kid and like all of this stuff it was really special to me but what
00:29:54.720 imagine if the teacher had said you need to do this on an adult in your life who isn't related
00:30:01.180 to you oh you know what i mean like so many adults would be so honored yes to be asked to do that
00:30:08.080 and all it takes is just that one little that one little switch in like the curriculum um so that
00:30:14.620 sort of thing or like bring bring an adult you're not related to school and if that's something that
00:30:20.060 becomes a norm i know that that sounds weird but if that becomes a norm uh like it's something that
00:30:26.640 parents are more conscious about cultivating so that their kid doesn't get to third grade and
00:30:30.760 have no adult in their life who isn't a parent yeah right yeah um and then the policy stuff that
00:30:36.460 i was just mentioning it's just like we just like the way that the suburbs and the and urban centers
00:30:42.820 like how they select for people who do or do not have an additional need for a bedroom right um
00:30:49.820 um or like how difficult it is in an urban area to have kids and to not have a car yeah like
00:30:56.100 these all interlock oh yeah and we could live i think in in closer community with people with
00:31:02.120 different family situations because to not have kids is all you're still a family you're a family
00:31:07.000 unit you're just a family unit of one that would just be so much easier okay our next question
00:31:13.320 about family friendly and who benefits from that this comes from maggie how would a family friendly
00:31:19.760 society also be better for folks outside of the family structure? Workplaces that make space for 0.93
00:31:25.240 care work are needed for parents, but also child-free folks who are caring for aging parents
00:31:30.080 or ill partners. Maybe less obviously, if public spaces were truly accessible to parents,
00:31:36.480 would this allow parents not to retreat into the nuclear family, leading to both parents and
00:31:41.400 child-free folks retaining the friendship slash community that many lose when they or their
00:31:46.680 friends become parents yeah what's your answer here i mean yes so i think look care care has
00:31:54.880 investing in care and family family societies has a strong curb cut effect on curb cut effect is
00:32:00.580 uh this idea right that when you know originally curbs the curb cuts were poured by disability
00:32:06.720 advocates uh because they needed somewhere for people in wheelchairs to be able to get across
00:32:10.140 the street uh they are now used by everyone right like um this is so that's the idea huge effects
00:32:15.860 right cyclists strollers exactly delivering people universal design right millions of people
00:32:21.580 use use curb cuts every day super helpful that was not originally where they were put in so
00:32:26.140 you can think about some of these family friendly uh adjustments that can be made and the way that
00:32:32.820 they could benefit so one example i think is interesting is we think about so the school
00:32:37.120 street movement right this idea of let's make schools our streets around schools and in some
00:32:41.960 cases child care programs uh either car free or like we have like we have to intentionally we're
00:32:47.980 lowering the speed cars can go or we're you know restricting idling of cars in some cases uh places
00:32:55.280 like paris is actually completely pedestrianized like tons of their streets around around schools
00:32:59.980 that's super helpful for parents that's super helpful for non-parents too right making uh wide
00:33:05.540 sidewalks you know cleaning up the air making accessible you know vibrant art installations
00:33:12.420 all of these things can be really good for families they're also going to help people
00:33:17.540 who don't have kids because in a lot of ways um i heard once described i think it was the former
00:33:23.440 mayor of bogota colombia who once described children as an indicator species indicator
00:33:28.520 species being right in biology the idea of like the health of this species is telling you what's
00:33:33.200 going on in the rest of the ecosystem and his point was if things are going well by the children
00:33:38.380 and by the families that means things are going to be going well by everyone else if things aren't
00:33:43.000 going well then right vice versa so i really think actually that's part of the challenge
00:33:47.480 is that when we sort of segment out this is like just something that's about care this is just
00:33:52.960 something that's about kids doesn't have to do with the rest of society actually makes it harder
00:33:56.720 to develop those society that we want the neighborhoods that we want because you're
00:34:01.920 also artificially restricting the constituency in that way. It's saying everyone has an interest in
00:34:06.740 this. And I think the elder care point, which I think we're going to talk about more, is so
00:34:10.800 important too, particularly in our aging society. We have got to put structures in place that are
00:34:17.340 more conducive to that. And it's going to help everyone. And that can look like multi-generational
00:34:22.480 housing. That can look like, I've seen more and more people are co-locating elder care services
00:34:27.420 and childcare services, which is super cute and also like super helpful, right? Like that makes
00:34:31.700 all the sense in the world. Will you explain that for people who aren't familiar? It's really cool.
00:34:36.540 Yeah. So basically like you'll have one building, right? And on one wing of that building is a
00:34:40.480 childcare center. And on the other wing of that building is on a senior center essentially. And
00:34:45.360 so, but they'll mix, right? They'll send the kids, you know, so you'll have the toddlers go over and
00:34:49.900 they'll do like a story time with the elderly people. And it's really adorable and also creates
00:34:56.840 right like these intergenerational connections it's good for the seniors but then it also means
00:35:00.740 that when family members are coming to visit again like they're interacting with with both
00:35:05.580 generations so those sorts of things i think can really um and it's again it's what does it signal
00:35:11.080 as well like it signals that we're not segmenting out kids go over there seniors go over there right
00:35:15.680 like we're bringing everyone together um to sort of restore these ties that bind yeah and this is
00:35:22.820 kind of counter to the the idea of like oh we need more family-friendly places like obviously
00:35:28.400 of course i want more places where i can hang out with my friends in public spaces but also
00:35:32.860 more robust child care would mean that i would get to hang out with my friends without their kids
00:35:37.820 a lot more because right now it's just like it's so unaffordable and inaccessible that those spaces
00:35:44.880 to not hang out with kids are also incredibly difficult to come by and sometimes you do want
00:35:50.620 to hang out without your kids that's the thing like you don't always kids don't always have to
00:35:54.120 be there no that's absolutely right and how do we marshal community resources to that too right like
00:35:58.300 you know if we have i always joke that we have the those you know first friday art walks like a lot
00:36:02.880 of communities have right like what if we did you know third thursday's care night right and
00:36:06.760 everyone's going to come out we're going to provide you know centralized places of care and
00:36:10.900 we're going to all go out and you know everyone's going to have time to to engage like there are
00:36:15.680 lots of creative ways to do this i've read about a few restaurants that have started to basically
00:36:19.640 have like a temporary sort of like child care kind of associated like on next door or above
00:36:26.340 them in like the second floor of the restaurant. And there are lots of ways to do this because
00:36:30.800 you're right. Like part of society is going to need time with the kids. You also need time
00:36:36.140 without the kids, whether or not you have kids. Yeah. The next question is about something that
00:36:42.600 I think about a ton, which is how oftentimes not only is a lot of this discourse focused on like
00:36:47.980 people with two parents who have kids. It's focused specifically on like, how can we make
00:36:53.440 the mom's lives easier? So this next question comes from Kelly, and Melody's going to read it.
00:37:00.080 How can we keep queer parents in the mix of these conversations about family-friendly society,
00:37:05.740 especially baby-friendly society? I'm a heterosexual new mom, and I've become very
00:37:10.600 aware of the support available to me that isn't available to my husband's boss, who is a gay man
00:37:16.240 with an adopted daughter the same age as my son. I'm all for girl power or mom power, but why are
00:37:21.960 parenting classes so femme coded? If it isn't specifically about post-birth recovery, why are 0.82
00:37:27.980 baby-friendly workout classes all for moms? My husband also wants to be an informed, involved
00:37:33.180 parent, but he isn't invited into these spaces the way that I am. I even live in a liberal city
00:37:37.980 and I've been disappointed at how traditional gender rolesy things are. Yeah. Okay. So this 0.99
00:37:44.500 is a chance for you to talk about what it's like to be a man in these spaces like because you are 0.96
00:37:48.720 able to observe it from that place like what have you noticed yeah uh it is not the she's right
00:37:55.260 right these places are not the most welcoming for for men and you know even i remember my kids
00:38:02.140 younger and take them to the playground and like i've always felt like a weird pressure to somehow
00:38:06.380 assert the fact that like they were my kids and i was here with kids right like um i don't think
00:38:12.340 that my general sense of talking to my wife is it's not the sense that most women have. So that's
00:38:18.120 absolutely true. It's also, I think, sometimes harder to find that community as men. The sort
00:38:27.300 of dad chat is not quite as robust, I think, as the mom chat and things like that. What's
00:38:32.880 interesting is I think we're in this transitional moment where we haven't quite gotten there yet.
00:38:37.660 So, for example, at this point, one in five stay-at-home parents is a father, which is way more than it used to be, right?
00:38:45.020 It also means that four in five stay-at-home parents are still women.
00:38:48.260 So that's – but with that number of dads, there's sort of this need.
00:38:53.920 But when you talk to them, like a lot of times there is a sense of isolation, a sense of I don't have these spaces that are welcoming to me.
00:38:59.740 Actually, they look askance at me if I show up in these spaces.
00:39:02.460 So I think we need to continue as we develop these offerings, finding ways to intentionally let men in.
00:39:10.820 And it is, again, possible.
00:39:12.000 I mean, the U.S. is in other countries.
00:39:13.460 I get that.
00:39:14.100 But it's interesting.
00:39:14.980 It is in Denmark, I believe, that is reading about – they have a term for it.
00:39:18.240 It basically translates to latte dads.
00:39:20.680 But it's all the – you know, it's this idea of like the dads will go out and they'll meet up and they'll get – like it's a trope because there are so many of them because – and this is the other thing we haven't talked about yet.
00:39:30.440 paternity leave exactly yes like non-birth parent leave because that i think is a better term here
00:39:38.600 to describe like all of the different roles that because this could be adoptive parents too right
00:39:43.620 like so what does leave look like when you have not given physical birth and i love that you bring
00:39:49.520 up the latte dads because i have such a vivid picture in my mind i was in bergen norway i was
00:39:55.580 like walking past the museum and i saw two dads like you know well-dressed norwegian dads
00:40:03.120 with two strollers with babies in them who were between the ages of one and two which from my
00:40:09.220 understanding in norwegian society and a lot of scandinavian societies usually the man takes the
00:40:13.620 second kind of end of the the parental leave and they were just like hanging out being guys
00:40:19.680 with their babies like they were just you know like they were walking like past the museum with
00:40:25.000 like, I think they had coffees, like, you know, and it was so absolutely normalized. And it's
00:40:31.140 possible because there is not just like, it's use it or lose it paternity leave. And not just
00:40:37.140 it create, there's so many trickle down effects. Just can you spell out why we are so resistant
00:40:41.960 to non-birth parents? Non-birth parents. We're resistant to all kinds of leave. I want you, 0.99
00:40:45.780 unfortunately, in this country. No, it is, right? This is, I really think, a cultural moment that
00:40:51.940 we are in and we actually all have agency and where it goes so do you like i remember every
00:40:56.560 so often this will come with like a professional athlete right like a male professional athlete
00:41:00.040 who will their their spouse will give birth and then they'll get while they're golfing right
00:41:05.720 like they're playing the masters or yeah exactly and they'll take like two days off and they'll get
00:41:10.940 you know all sorts of um you know kind of yelled at and there'll be sports center segments about it
00:41:16.440 because it'll become this big thing but actually it's because i think it's currently contested
00:41:20.180 like that idea of like is paternity leave like is it appropriate like because you still hear all
00:41:26.320 the crap about like oh well what's the dad even doing he's just hanging out right like or what's
00:41:31.420 the non-birthing parent even doing and like obviously i think we are reaching a point where 0.93
00:41:36.360 enough um non-birthing parents are starting to have those experiences um i'm starting to speak
00:41:42.980 up about it that we're but we're in i'm hopeful that if we have this conversation 10 years from
00:41:48.280 now things will um look very different but uh i think it is a legacy very much of this one's
00:41:56.540 misogyny let's put it that way this one is very much like the idea of men don't have a role to
00:42:01.820 play um yeah or number of things don't have a role to play in it and that's we have got to keep
00:42:07.580 fighting it um and we have to fight for better maternity leave too we should say that too like
00:42:11.200 that is it is insane yeah yeah so yeah and the fear i have is once again that this like it becomes
00:42:17.620 the the paragon of like the private sector in terms of like oh well if you work for a quote
00:42:24.980 unquote good company then they have more progressive non-birth parent leave policies
00:42:30.540 but if you and i think actually in in various states too have been like trying to increase
00:42:36.460 leave like leave policies and then it just leaves the rest of the country and the rest of like 0.78
00:42:42.500 workers or especially people who are don't work for places with benefits just like shit out of
00:42:48.500 luck and that's why i feel like the cultural shift doesn't happen because we continue to place the
00:42:53.840 responsibility in this private sphere that's absolutely right and then you get those those
00:42:57.460 inequities too because who it's you know the the more affluent kind of white collar workers who
00:43:01.640 have access to and it's not lower income workers and the disproportionately workers of color and
00:43:06.360 then you get this weird two-tier system which is i mean look i have the private sector is not saving
00:43:12.800 us here like the corporations cannot create a family-friendly society they can be part of it
00:43:18.100 and i think actually thinking about things like flexible and you've written lots about this right
00:43:21.520 like thinking about things like flexible work hours predictable scheduling like these are all
00:43:26.000 things that is at a company level and that they could do but why are we asking companies to provide
00:43:31.380 like paid like to be a national paid leave law we didn't you should have national and state funded
00:43:36.680 you know child care and leave like that is the only thing that makes sense and look again it's
00:43:41.340 it's not news but the united states and papua new guinea are the only two countries in the world
00:43:45.600 with a national maternity leave law like it is in absolutely absurd without one without one the
00:43:50.640 only two ones without yeah yeah so that national maternity leave law uh much less uh you know
00:43:55.940 non-birthing parent leave and that's one where I feel like every time like this issue comes up
00:44:01.200 around like parents and stay home and all that I'm like can we like it's a paid leave conversation
00:44:06.280 when they're infants at least and like I feel like it needs to be brought up I sort of I've
00:44:10.600 made a pledge that every time I talk about child care from here I'm going to at least include like
00:44:14.700 one line about paid leave because we've separated them and it's weird doesn't this just circle back
00:44:19.940 to the question at the top of our conversation which is that there is still this fantasy space
00:44:26.960 held closely by conservative legislators that if the birthing parent is staying at home then why
00:44:34.300 would they need leave right you know what i mean like that like so why would we need policy right
00:44:39.960 if what we actually want is a scenario where this person is not working outside the home
00:44:44.280 It is. It is there. You're absolutely right. And it is absolutely a thread there. I think it is. I am sensing a degree of loosening for, I think, two reasons. One is because, look, across the country, around 70 percent of children under the age of six have all of their available parents in the workforce.
00:45:01.620 And much of the legislators don't like that. That means that in rural Idaho and rural Alabama and, you know, everywhere else, like there are a ton of families that have all of their available parents working. Actually, it's higher in like in rural and lower income areas because from economic necessity. So it really does cut across every line of difference. There's still those curmudgeony old white legislators who male legislators.
00:45:28.560 And I'll say, they're never poor. 0.65
00:45:30.780 They're always upper middle class.
00:45:31.920 Oh, absolutely. 0.99
00:45:32.580 They always, like, own a fucking car dealership and are like, my wife doesn't work and yours shouldn't either, you know? 0.97
00:45:38.980 But look, I will – I'm going to say with the faintest amount of praise I can provide something nice about Katie Britt, the senator from Alabama, which is that at the very least, she is willing to say, like, look, that's not a reality for everyone. 0.97
00:45:56.000 We are going to need to have an external child care system.
00:45:59.220 And I think that's the other change we're seeing is younger legislators, even younger Republican legislators, are coming around or saying, at least, are acknowledging the need for an external child care system, acknowledging the need for better leave.
00:46:13.460 Now, are they willing to pay for it instead of giving giant tax breaks to rich corporate friends?
00:46:19.000 That's a separate question.
00:46:21.740 Yeah. 0.92
00:46:26.000 Support for the Culture Study Podcast comes from Ollie. 0.98
00:46:32.660 You know what?
00:46:33.720 My poor dog, Steve, he's just a sensitive boy.
00:46:36.980 Like he just, some days he's like, oh, I just don't feel like eating today.
00:46:40.920 We've taken him to the vet a couple of different times to make sure that like there's nothing wrong with his blood work.
00:46:46.620 He doesn't have IBS.
00:46:48.120 Like he just, he is just a cranky, sensitive boy.
00:46:51.360 But the thing, whenever we're trying to prompt him to start eating again, the thing that always works is Ollie.
00:46:58.120 We put a little bit of it on his dry food every time, and it's like a magic trick.
00:47:04.080 It is fantastic.
00:47:05.580 The quality of Ollie is just so high that it kind of makes me jealous.
00:47:10.340 I know that's weird to say, but it does.
00:47:11.900 Sometimes I'm like, what if we made this into a stew?
00:47:14.220 So it's human-grade recipes backed by vet nutritionists and crafted by culinary experts.
00:47:21.100 Dogs love the taste. I can absolutely attest to this.
00:47:24.780 Even the pickiest eaters like Steve will show more excitement during mealtime.
00:47:28.660 You can also tailor your meal plan to meet your dog's specific needs.
00:47:32.120 Maybe you want your dog to only have Ollie.
00:47:34.280 Maybe you use it as a topper like I do.
00:47:36.820 It's also perfectly portioned and you get it in this fantastic mess-free packaging,
00:47:40.820 which is so much better than cans.
00:47:43.100 I cannot say this enough.
00:47:45.240 It's great, and it doesn't make you feel like you are shoving dog food in your refrigerator.
00:47:49.540 Your dog's well-being starts with their food, and that's why Ollie delivers fresh, human-grade food that your dog will love.
00:47:55.440 Head to ollie.com slash culture, tell them all about your dog, and use code culture to get 60% off your welcome kit when you subscribe today.
00:48:04.580 Plus, Ollie offers a happiness guarantee on the first box, so if you're not completely satisfied, you'll get your money back.
00:48:11.140 That's O-L-L-I-E dot com slash culture and enter code culture to get 60% off your first box.
00:48:19.540 Today's episode is sponsored by Wild Alaskan Company.
00:48:22.640 So, Melody, we just got a new shipment of Wild Alaskan.
00:48:26.300 There was a bunch of salmon, and I had been really wanting to try this fantastic ginger miso salmon curry with basil.
00:48:35.220 That's from the New York Times.
00:48:36.920 we used the coho salmon and it was so good it was fantastic wild alaskan company is the best
00:48:46.140 way to get wild caught perfectly portioned nutrient-dense seafood delivered directly to
00:48:50.700 your door so that you can also make the ginger miso basil salmon curry tonight it's so good
00:48:56.760 seriously we're talking about 100 wild caught never farmed fish this means there are no
00:49:02.200 antibiotics, GMOs, or additives. Just clean, real fish that support healthy oceans and fishing
00:49:07.800 communities. They're nutrient-rich, full of flavor, and sustainably sourced. They're wild
00:49:13.320 caught from Alaska, and every order supports sustainable harvesting practices. Plus, your
00:49:18.220 membership delivers flexible shipments, expert tips, and truly feel-good seafood. If you're not
00:49:23.960 completely satisfied with your first box, Wild Alaskan Company will give you a full refund.
00:49:27.920 No questions asked, no risk, just high-quality seafood.
00:49:32.260 Not all fish are the same.
00:49:33.640 Get seafood you can trust.
00:49:35.260 Go to wildalaskan.com slash culture for $35 off your first box of premium wild-caught seafood.
00:49:42.180 That's wildalaskan.com slash culture for $35 off your first order.
00:49:47.780 Thanks to Wild Alaskan Company for sponsoring this episode.
00:49:50.720 okay next question is about something that comes up all the time in the culture study comments on
00:50:03.420 so many different issues it just kind of funnels down to this question so i would love your take
00:50:10.180 on it this comes from kate how do we create a family-friendly society that recognizes multiple
00:50:15.660 kinds of family obligations. For example, we are in the throes of RTO where there will be flexible
00:50:21.060 work arrangements made only for parents, like for pickup and drop-off. I obviously want parents to
00:50:26.760 have flexibility. I do not want this benefit taken away. At the same time, those of us who are
00:50:32.020 childless are not eligible for flexible arrangements. Why are policies like this so often focused on the
00:50:37.980 very nuclear family? How do we create a set of additive or expansive policies that recognize
00:50:43.540 the vast number of kinds of family obligations i also want to like as we proceed with this
00:50:50.080 conversation think about obligations to the self yeah like and what i mean by that is like
00:50:56.580 someone who has a disability someone who has chronic migraines um someone who has ibs like
00:51:03.420 all sorts of things as part of like family care and family obligation because i think
00:51:08.880 we have this weird fetishization of like it's okay to go care for one and like for someone else
00:51:15.060 yeah but not for yourself yeah um you should tough it out so have you heard of places that
00:51:23.180 are actually doing this well i paused because i don't know that there's i mean there are i'm sure
00:51:32.780 you know individual corporations and companies that are doing this better yeah it's the challenge
00:51:39.300 i think is this and you may not agree with this and that's totally fine like i think two things
00:51:45.240 can be true at the same time i think one thing is that all workers all you know people in this
00:51:52.000 country should have access to the flexibility and the support they need in order to flourish and in
00:51:59.960 order to make meet their care obligations whether that care obligation is to to an elderly parent
00:52:05.680 to to a dependent to themselves to your point right to a dog sure sometimes you gotta take
00:52:12.260 your dog to the right yeah and i'm going to assert that there is a uniqueness about parents
00:52:20.580 with minor children that goes above and beyond that and part of that is because you have so the
00:52:28.760 child is involved in that situation and so for example there's a dependent and you know and in
00:52:35.080 that case like child development is literally occurring as a result of how stressed or not
00:52:40.280 stressed that parent is right whether they're um what kind of functioning that family has how stable
00:52:45.780 that relationship is um so that's one thing the other thing obviously is that you know in terms of
00:52:51.300 the the broader societal reproduction and it is not fun to talk about in these terms but i think
00:52:56.920 it's fair to talk about them in this conversation in these terms like we do need to have a new
00:53:02.400 generation coming up behind the existing one they they need to be healthy optimally right they need
00:53:08.800 to be able to engage um and i mean ideally both in their sort of moment of having a happy and
00:53:13.760 healthy childhood and also when they will become citizens and they will become you know people who
00:53:19.320 are earlier so there is i think and that logic doesn't necessarily apply to the pet as much
00:53:24.840 right like what i described so there's i think we need to be able to say yes everyone should have
00:53:30.760 what they need and also there's a reason parents with with children and i actually this is one i
00:53:34.640 do extend i do think as we continue to have an aging society thinking about elder care as well
00:53:38.240 because that's a dependent in a way those two sides of things really occupy uh
00:53:44.020 can i say first among equals when it comes to like care needs and so what i don't want to happen
00:53:50.400 though is like this idea of um and then it all just gets dumped that's to me like a sign of like
00:53:55.560 poor management because now we get now you get more to your own man we're talking about
00:53:59.680 if you have companies that are short staffing themselves intentionally right or staffing with
00:54:05.020 as lean as possible just in time right like and then yeah when one person has to leave because
00:54:10.260 their kid got sick and they need to go pick them up from school or child care early who picks up
00:54:15.000 the slack right right if you actually staff with some slack um and you know then it's okay and
00:54:21.640 again we can look at other countries that do this much better that sort of have ethics and norms
00:54:26.160 around this understanding that like look uh you know kids get sick right like and so that's gonna
00:54:32.500 happen we know what's gonna happen so we can plan for it instead we have a you know an economy where
00:54:37.600 many many companies are doing their very best to not have any slack on the line because it would
00:54:41.960 mean less profit. Well, and that such great points. I'm glad you brought in the elder care
00:54:47.300 part because I think that that often is a similar scenario. Or I think caring for someone else who
00:54:54.120 is dependent on you for whatever reason, right? So like a sibling who needs that sort of care.
00:54:59.820 But I would also say that if we create policies that make greater family friendliness, right,
00:55:08.300 then you wouldn't have to leave in the middle of the day to pick up your kids from school at
00:55:11.700 230 because there would be great aftercare opportunities right um but i do think that
00:55:17.260 flex work does facilitate this a little bit but not in perfect ways but as things are now i think
00:55:25.780 that the growing divide or maybe divide is not the right word the the festering animosity
00:55:33.940 between people with kids and without kids which i see very much um all over the internet i think
00:55:41.040 it is exacerbated by situations like this right and as you said like if they would if they would
00:55:47.180 staff appropriately then this would not be an issue but that it's often even worse because of
00:55:53.960 understaffing or just-in-time staffing um the other thing that it makes me think of is similar
00:55:59.140 to the curb cut example like what if workplaces had just like big bucket of leave yeah and you
00:56:08.900 could use it for parental leave you could use it for elder care leave you could use it to
00:56:14.380 take a sabbatical like there's so many things you could use it for
00:56:17.940 and that would i think change some of the dynamics around it but i think that what some people would
00:56:24.440 say is like well then no one's gonna have kids if they could just take a vacation to europe right
00:56:29.540 but that's not the case people still have kids even with all of the other difficulties that we
00:56:34.840 have. Yes, absolutely. The overwhelming majority of people still have and want kids. They all still
00:56:40.880 choose the kids. Yes, that's right. Okay, so last question, I think. Let's do this one about
00:56:48.840 part-time work. This comes from Caroline. Are there any companies or industries that have
00:56:54.000 actually done a good job allowing parents flexibility in the workplace? My mom friends
00:56:58.520 and I are often lamenting the lack of part-time opportunities for white-collar professional
00:57:03.020 workers like ourselves, lawyers, consultants, MBAs, since two-parent full-time employment is
00:57:08.620 so hard to swing with kids. Likely some of the intransigence is a product of client service
00:57:13.320 industries, but I'm wondering whether there are flex time, part time, or job sharing arrangements
00:57:18.540 that have been proven to work in certain companies or industries, or even in other countries. Are
00:57:23.900 there models that could help U.S. employers relinquish their attachment to the default 40
00:57:28.140 or even 50- or 60-hour work week without forcing all of us to become freelance?
00:57:32.740 So when I was researching out of office, I was so surprised by just what a divide there was
00:57:43.880 between the U.S. and so many different countries when it comes to the availability of part-time
00:57:49.080 work. And it's really this almost zero-sum game in the United States. There are so few ways to
00:57:55.820 work part-time, which is in part why a lot of women get involved with MLMs. That's a whole 1.00
00:58:02.840 other place for us to go. But do you have any thoughts? What is your thinking about how the
00:58:11.420 lack of part-time work influences all of this? I think it's a huge problem, actually. And I'm
00:58:15.920 glad you mentioned the examples. And yes, when you have countries that are that's an expectation,
00:58:20.340 there is much more job sharing. It's much, much easier to take extended leaves and someone comes
00:58:24.180 in temporarily and this is much more transient um in that respect i actually so there are two
00:58:28.860 challenges part-time worker one is that there isn't enough of those options the other is what
00:58:32.520 exists often is a trap right because they'll keep you at 29 hours and then they won't let you out
00:58:38.580 right and so that's the other huge problems actually we don't so what part-time work does
00:58:43.140 exist is a often not what families need anyways actually it's interesting when you survey local
00:58:50.580 surveys of particularly working class individuals by and large parents say part-time work is ideal
00:58:55.500 for them right for exactly the reason that they're right like that great that's more flexible you
00:58:58.920 know i can i can work some and do some uh care i don't have to pay for as much child care all of
00:59:04.640 that's good so there have been proposals from time to time um you know yuri bronfenbrenner was this
00:59:09.500 great child development expert back in the 70s and he talks about he talked in the 70s about this
00:59:15.220 idea of a part-time uh kind of worker bill of rights uh basically which has been adopted actually
00:59:20.860 i think uh senator warren introduced a version of it a while back but this idea of you can't
00:59:25.540 keep part-time workers just below uh you know enough hours to give them health insurance like
00:59:30.900 you have to be able to you know offer them opportunities for more hours things like that
00:59:35.320 so i think that's one thing that could help but the other thing is going to be i think this this
00:59:40.440 entire uh ethic of again job sharing would be interesting to see more and more companies
00:59:46.760 go into that so for example you know this in many other countries because of their strong
00:59:52.660 leave policies like there's this idea of like a temporary assignment is very common right like
00:59:57.300 i'm gonna come on for six months to a year and cover this person's job and then i'm going to
01:00:03.060 move along because they're going to come back to work like we just don't have very much of that
01:00:07.680 here so i because the leave isn't that leave isn't that long right yeah no like you see it you see
01:00:13.580 the vestiges of it at the academic level because sabbaticals were built into the model of academia
01:00:20.920 they're going away but um that if you you know every seven years say you get a full year off
01:00:27.300 or every four years you get a half year off and so they instituted a policy of they they hire a
01:00:32.680 visiting professor who comes for a full year and covers that job, right? Or like they'll cover two,
01:00:40.540 if two, one person is taking one semester and another semester, then that professor will take
01:00:44.920 that full year off. But we don't do that with our other jobs because the leave isn't that long.
01:00:49.540 Yes. And I come back honestly to this idea, and we talked about earlier about like,
01:00:53.160 why are we not seeing these changes? I think there needs to be an organized constituency
01:00:58.660 for this idea of a family-friendly agenda.
01:01:00.840 And I actually think, particularly as the Democrats
01:01:02.540 are searching, soul-searching for what's next,
01:01:05.640 this idea of family policy can be really interesting.
01:01:10.260 This idea of we're actually going to move.
01:01:11.820 I will tell you, I've always thought the idea
01:01:14.840 of solve after school and summer care
01:01:16.500 has got to be the lowest hanging fruit for any politician.
01:01:19.780 You would get 125% of the vote of the parents
01:01:23.940 if you said that you were going to fix after school
01:01:26.180 And some are care, but we don't because we have this general sense, and I think it is still a vestige of the great society, where we look to programs instead of to policy and this idea of an overarching sense of how do we organize our society, how do we organize our funding, how do we organize our government in ways that support an overarching goal.
01:01:51.200 And if the overarching goal is the stability and quality of family life in all of its forms, that leads you in very, very different places than if the goal is to maximize the labor force participation rate or maximize the GDP or things like that, right?
01:02:05.840 We go back to Bobby Candy Sr. and his famous speech about how the GDP can tell us everything except about what makes us proud to be Americans.
01:02:18.440 It's philosophical in a sense, but that's the deepest answer to all of these questions.
01:02:22.940 We have to put families at the center and then we have to push our politicians that we don't just want a laundry list of programs useful as they might be.
01:02:32.420 We want all of society push and an agenda that is going to get us from this crap place that we are, where everything is harder than it needs to be, to your point, partially intentionally, to a place where everyone can thrive and can have the family that they want, which may include kids or may not.
01:02:54.520 But, you know, right now, all we're doing is we've sort of turned over our choice set to the raw and uncaring maw of the economy, the free market economy.
01:03:06.860 Well, and this makes me think, too, that part of that policy, and this is why I think it's so difficult to get people on board, like part of that family-friendly policy, and this touches every single thing that we've talked about today, would be universal health care.
01:03:20.120 Yes.
01:03:20.580 Right?
01:03:21.100 Absolutely.
01:03:21.500 If you disarticulate healthcare from your job, it changes so much.
01:03:29.040 If you disarticulate your access to elder care from your ability to afford elder care insurance when you're in a particular job and to buy into that at a specific time, the chance to buy into that in your life.
01:03:45.980 If we just cared for people, how much would change?
01:03:50.100 Yes. This is, as an aside, why I'm so nervous about this push for employer-sponsored child
01:03:55.400 care. I'm like, let's not tie child care to employment, please. There, you're absolutely
01:04:00.020 right. This is this question of, you know, Alyssa Strauss in her books, When You Care,
01:04:05.260 talks about this idea of a care ethics and that it's actually part of the social contract. We
01:04:09.140 just don't talk about it, right? Like, we need to start talking. We need to make care visible
01:04:13.560 because it underlies everything, everything, everything that we are trying to do. And if we
01:04:19.840 don't address it then yeah we end up in this place where uh you're you're in a thicket well and right
01:04:27.140 now i think that most people would say that we are a society that privileges family above all else
01:04:33.020 but does not actually create policy that reflects that idea yes we rhetorically yes yes i agree yes
01:04:40.860 Rhetorically and ideologically, but do not, do not legislate or create policy or not programs policy that, that reflect that prioritization. And it's like, to me, that is the, the discrepancy that is at the heart of like so much sadness and, and difficulty.
01:05:03.940 and also at the heart, I think, of the dropping birth rate
01:05:07.320 because what we see in our society is people saying
01:05:10.160 you are only valuable if you have kids, 1.00
01:05:12.060 but also it fucking sucks and deal with it. 0.99
01:05:15.600 Yeah, no, I think it's right. 0.99
01:05:16.900 I mean, you wrote a health care council add one in.
01:05:18.780 This also goes back to wages, too.
01:05:20.900 If you trap people in low-wage jobs,
01:05:24.340 then yeah, they're also going to be controlled
01:05:26.200 for their own time.
01:05:27.240 I mean, it is.
01:05:27.820 It's really hard to find that sense of hope
01:05:30.500 and forward thinkingness that makes you want to, you know, engage in, in these sorts of
01:05:36.720 future activities. Yeah. Yeah. Well, Elliot, this has been a pleasure and an infuriating pleasure.
01:05:46.540 I'll talk about that on my business card, it's an infuriating pleasure.
01:05:49.940 If anyone wants to, like, if you're interested in, in combining this like larger level policy
01:05:57.840 thinking with a really like you just you know the history you know like you bring it all together
01:06:03.420 you have a fantastic newsletter i also recommend people seek out your books can you tell us about
01:06:08.400 your most recent one yeah my most recent book is called raising a nation 10 reasons every american
01:06:12.520 has a stake in child care for all and it's basically making this values-based argument
01:06:16.820 this rights-based argument that whether or not one has kids we we desperately need a strong and
01:06:22.860 well-funded child care system and we will of course direct people to your newsletter in the
01:06:27.380 show notes. Where else can people find your work on the internet if they want to find more?
01:06:31.400 Yeah. So capita.org, like per capita without the per, is my, it's a think tank that I work for. I
01:06:37.380 write a lot there. I also work with New America's Better Life Lab as well. So, but yeah, I'm all
01:06:44.620 around. And I would say to plug if I can, I'm a board member for an organization called Chamber
01:06:49.760 of Mothers, which really helps bring mothers together, helps them understand these policy
01:06:54.600 issues and work collectively for change. So I would also say for any of your listeners who are
01:06:59.540 interested in taking action, that'd be my first stop and you can find them on the internet real
01:07:04.420 easily. Thank you so much. Yeah, thank you. Thanks for listening to the Culture Study Podcast.
01:07:14.880 Today, paid subscribers got an Ask and Anything segment about what happens when your kids' friends
01:07:20.000 don't like you if you want to support the show and always get that bonus content head to patreon.com
01:07:25.640 slash culture study slash join it's five bucks a month or fifty dollars a year and you'll get ad
01:07:31.080 free episodes an exclusive advice time segment and weekly discussion threads for each episode
01:07:35.920 be sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts because we have so many great episodes
01:07:41.120 in the works and i promise you don't want to miss any of them if you want to suggest a topic ask a
01:07:45.960 question about the culture that surrounds you or submit a question for our subscriber only advice
01:07:50.600 time segment go to our google form at tinyurl.com slash culture study pod or check the show notes
01:07:57.000 for a link the culture study podcast is produced by me ann helen peterson and melody rowell our
01:08:02.640 music is by pottington bear you can find me on instagram at ann helen peterson melody at
01:08:07.840 melodious 47 and the show at culture study pod
01:08:15.960 Thank you.