Diabolical Lies - June 01, 2025


Taking Sex Differences Seriously


Episode Stats


Length

26 minutes

Words per minute

180.53

Word count

4,748

Sentence count

277

Harmful content

Misogyny

14

sentences flagged

Toxicity

29

sentences flagged

Hate speech

19

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.520 Today's episode of Diabolical Lies is brought to you by the University of Virginia, their
00:00:05.120 Division I rowing team, the high school 2K erg test time that got me into that program,
00:00:10.100 the scheduling requirements that only allowed us to select certain classes each semester,
00:00:13.900 and the internalized conservatism that inspired me to think that a class called Taking Sex 0.98
00:00:18.020 Differences Seriously might just be the thing to straighten my ass out. 0.88
00:00:22.460 Before we get into it today, Katie, I would like to serve you with a petition from the
00:00:27.120 people, I have collected over a thousand signatures demanding that you watch Veep
00:00:30.980 as soon as possible. Oh, goddammit. Not again. I know you 0.83
00:00:35.180 have a book coming out soon. I know you have a book coming out. And you're busy or
00:00:39.060 whatever. So I'm going to give you a stay until July, and then I will be enforcing
00:00:43.080 this petition with daily follow-ups until you click on the pilot on
00:00:47.140 HBO Max. So you know how on the new iOS
00:00:51.220 it'll give you AI summaries of
00:00:55.200 messages. Our group text with Megan Day the other day where you guys were badgering me to watch it,
00:01:00.580 the AI summary popped up and it was like, in italics, watch Veep to avoid sanctions.
00:01:08.300 The first and last time AI has summarized something correctly. Speaking of, do you want
00:01:12.880 to plug your fucking book that's coming out? I would love to plug my fucking book that's 1.00
00:01:16.820 coming out. It's called Rich Girl Nation. Rich Girl Nation. Taking charge of our financial 1.00
00:01:21.960 futures. I am metaphorically and spiritually holding it up right now. It is my attempt at
00:01:28.240 writing a personal finance book that combines a systemic critique with actually rigorous financial
00:01:35.400 advice. If you want to be mad about the world we live in, but also be like, okay, but how do I
00:01:40.600 manage money though at the same time? This is the book for you. Please buy it.
00:01:46.760 When does it come out?
00:01:48.180 June 10th.
00:01:48.820 June 10th, and you have a few appearances around the nation, do you not?
00:01:53.160 Did someone at Penguin contact you to be like, please make Katie market this book?
00:01:56.900 Honestly, I wrote the bit about you having a book coming out, and then I was like, 0.97
00:02:00.320 why the fuck is Katie not, like, plugging our fucking podcast to sell her book? 0.97
00:02:04.960 So I'm trying to force you to be a little bit more salesy. 0.99
00:02:07.600 Listen, I want to be on a bestseller list, because, you know, that's where all the cool kids congregate.
00:02:14.700 And by cool kids, I mean James Clear and Atomic Habits.
00:02:19.580 All the things that Mel Robbins won't stop writing about.
00:02:22.720 What was the question?
00:02:23.580 Oh, yeah, events.
00:02:25.060 I'll be in New York the 10th and the 11th.
00:02:28.260 There's a party on the 10th.
00:02:29.660 If you want to come hang out, I have tickets on my website.
00:02:34.060 And then I have a talk at the 92nd Street Y on the 11th.
00:02:37.660 So you have two nights, not one, but two nights to come hang out in New York.
00:02:42.320 Carol, will you be flying back from Europe to spend time with me?
00:02:45.720 I am at this very moment doing a type of scheduling gymnastics that might break my
00:02:51.780 back to see if I can pull it off. So water on my laptop, water on my laptop. We're fine. We're
00:02:57.820 fine. We're fine. We're fine. Okay. That's a bad sign. Sky mommy doesn't want us to meet for the
00:03:03.300 second time in person. Okay. So I will do my best. This is really exciting and everyone should go see
00:03:09.840 you in person. You're much smaller in person than you come off on audio. Everyone should see it to
00:03:15.220 believe it. I got that feedback a lot on Instagram. Like, wow, I thought you were taller. And I'm
00:03:20.280 like, I am going to, I'm going to choose to internalize that as like, I must just have such 1.00
00:03:25.340 a big dick energy, big dick or big girl. I guess that's a good segue to the conversation that we're 0.99
00:03:31.300 having today. Yes, Katie. Thank you for that segue. Because they are different. They are
00:03:36.820 different and it is essential to get that binary clear. So Katie, in an earlier episode this year,
00:03:41.820 I mentioned that I took this class in college called Sex Differences. Do you remember that?
00:03:47.540 Yeah, of course.
00:03:48.660 I took it my senior year of college, so 2014, 2015. I can't remember if it was fall or spring,
00:03:53.080 but like recently in the grand scheme of things, very recently. And after our episode where I
00:04:00.200 mentioned that class, I found myself thinking about it more and more and kind of wondering
00:04:04.460 what the course material would look like if I read it again today, because I remember not
00:04:08.400 having high blood pressure I guess I would say like I was not alarmed by this class it was very
00:04:13.800 chill the professor Stephen Rhodes who wrote this book taking sex differences seriously that you and
00:04:18.880 I both have in front of us he was very nice like he was very nice very cordial I would go to his
00:04:24.260 office hours like I did not think anything of this book Katie I read this book about a month ago and 0.99
00:04:32.300 when I say my spine almost shot through my asshole, I was shocked. And I don't know, 0.98
00:04:40.800 if Professor Rhodes ever listens to this, I still think you're a really nice person,
00:04:44.360 but I can't abide by this. Katie, this book, I think, is basically emblematic of the one book
00:04:53.520 theory that is often referenced on If Books Could Kill. Do you know what I'm talking about?
00:04:57.640 Oh, yeah, of course. It's the idea that every book is really just
00:05:00.780 getting at the same like three ideas yeah so if books could kill if anyone hasn't listened to it
00:05:06.120 on this podcast you should you and i love it it's hosted by michael hobbs and peter shamshiri
00:05:09.860 and it basically picks a different airport book each episode like think let them or you know a
00:05:15.300 malcolm gladwell kind of thing and it deconstructs it from a kind of like leftist humorous perspective
00:05:19.440 and they have this theory that there is basically one type of airport book it's like a manifest your
00:05:25.020 future pull yourself up by your bootstraps you know optimize yourself with these simple tricks
00:05:30.100 kind of thing. And so, when I was reading this book, I realized that this is our one book.
00:05:36.120 This is the one book for Diabolical Lies. And so, I thought it would be like a trip for us to just
00:05:41.640 read this book together. This is like our crossover of Diabolical Lies X, If Books Could Kill.
00:05:46.300 Only, it's going to be a little bit different because I'm really going to embody my professor
00:05:50.140 and I'm going to really try to deliver his arguments like I believe them. And Katie,
00:05:53.940 I want your honest response to some of these arguments. Okay?
00:05:58.120 All right.
00:05:59.780 Okay.
00:06:00.460 I can already tell I'm going to be so angry.
00:06:04.080 You're wearing a sweater right now.
00:06:05.440 It's going to be off in like four minutes.
00:06:06.380 Should I just take it off now?
00:06:07.820 You should take it off now.
00:06:08.940 I will say on a side note, I think this is going to be hilarious.
00:06:11.680 And it's what we all need as we, you know, watch our democracy slowly keen to one side.
00:06:15.660 But I do think it's going to be useful because we often reference certain ideas like gender as a social construct or masculinity or femininity.
00:06:23.120 And we've never really spent time to talk about those things.
00:06:25.840 So I think that's going to be useful today.
00:06:27.040 We haven't?
00:06:28.420 We talk about it as like a foundational assumption,
00:06:31.140 but we haven't spent time like actually comparing those arguments.
00:06:34.840 Okay.
00:06:35.560 What I found in this is that this book is essentially
00:06:38.680 the conservatives' argument for sex differences,
00:06:41.560 which was used as a foundation of like 80s, 90s, 2000s era conservatives
00:06:47.420 for the conservatives we're seeing now.
00:06:49.420 So this like very friendly, kind professor
00:06:52.120 wrote the arguments that someone like J.D. Vance is now using.
00:06:55.860 And so, I think it's going to be very useful in that way.
00:06:58.320 So, okay, Katie, the year this book was published is 2004, okay?
00:07:03.160 During this time period, 2004, the number one song is Yeah by Usher, featuring Lil Jon and Ludacris.
00:07:08.800 It's the year that Ronald Reagan dies.
00:07:11.600 It's also the year that same-sex marriage is legalized. 0.98
00:07:14.560 So, good times.
00:07:16.240 It's the year that we decide as a country that we do want four more years of George Bush.
00:07:20.660 And it is the year that we decide that, no, we do not think Janet Jackson should be given another chance after her nip slip at the Super Bowl.
00:07:27.000 So that's the time period that we're moving through.
00:07:29.080 Okay. You're painting me a picture.
00:07:31.480 I am. In 2004, you were a precocious elementary schooler soliciting donations for the U.S. military.
00:07:38.340 Stephen Rhodes, at that point, was a white college professor with Ivy League bona fides and a professorship at the University of Virginia.
00:07:45.440 And he has just released his seminal book, Taking Sex Differences Seriously.
00:07:50.460 So now, Katie, you have a copy of this book in your hands.
00:07:52.820 Can you tell me what it looks like?
00:07:54.600 Okay.
00:07:55.900 So, there is a kind of like a guy that looks like he was fashioned after Lucky Blue Smith.
00:08:03.460 Big time.
00:08:04.300 Just in profile on the left side of the book and, you know, hair slicked back.
00:08:09.420 And then there's like a wide gap.
00:08:12.140 he's looking at a woman who is in profile coming out of the right side of the book who 0.65
00:08:18.540 kind of looks like june cleaver like blonde 40s hair very snatched jawline obviously they are both 0.97
00:08:26.880 white yeah they look like the parents on leave it to beaver and there's probably like three inches
00:08:31.760 of space between them and they're like staring at each other and then it just says taking sex
00:08:36.140 differences, seriously. Yeah, it's almost like a battlefield. Yeah, there's no subtitle. We out
00:08:43.420 here abundance style. It's just a rockin' title only. Stephen Rhodes was like, I have the cachet
00:08:49.940 for this. I'm gonna put the headline up front, bitch, and let you guys draw your own conclusions. 0.99
00:08:57.660 Okay, can you now flip the book and read the blurb from The New York Sun? 0.99
00:09:02.000 Do I have to? You sure do.
00:09:04.220 Okay, quote, Mr. Rhodes' book is sure to outrage feminists who will most likely, depending on their testosterone levels, throw it across the room with anger or indignation. Yeah, challenge fucking accepted. But he makes an important argument and makes it well. To fight for an androgynous society is to fight human nature. It's a losing battle on all fronts, end quote. 1.00
00:09:32.900 So androgynous is a word that you're going to see a lot in this book today.
00:09:37.280 I'm also going to share my screen,
00:09:39.200 and I would like you to read this review from Goodreads right here. 0.98
00:09:43.340 Oh, fucking hell. 0.97
00:09:45.340 Five stars, really good book. 0.99
00:09:47.500 I wish people would look past their own opinions
00:09:50.180 that have actually been constructed by society.
00:09:53.620 So you do believe in societal constructs?
00:09:58.100 And look at the things that naturally set us apart,
00:10:01.180 things that have put men and women in two separate categories since the beginning of
00:10:05.580 mankind and see that they shouldn't be calling them 1950s gender roles, but rather for all of
00:10:12.240 time sex roles. I'm sorry, hold on. And this book brings those hard hitting facts to life. Okay,
00:10:25.680 From here on out, we are only ever going to describe gender roles as for all time sex roles on this podcast.
00:10:33.400 For all of time, sex roles.
00:10:35.620 Okay.
00:10:36.020 Okay.
00:10:36.380 Cool.
00:10:36.920 Okay.
00:10:37.160 So, Katie, in this book, the central argument is probably obvious at this point, but I'll just state it plainly.
00:10:42.460 The argument is that sex differences are large, they're deeply rooted, they're consequential.
00:10:47.960 Women and men still have different natures and, quote, they, generally speaking, have different preferences, talents, and interests.
00:10:54.180 Do you have any questions about that thesis?
00:10:56.680 My reaction to stuff like this is like, if it were so natural and predetermined, you wouldn't have to spend so much time reinforcing these ideas for people and telling them how they should be behaving, but whatever.
00:11:10.140 Whatever. Today's going to be annoying. I can already tell.
00:11:13.540 Just you wait until you receive all of my arguments.
00:11:16.620 So I should just note at the jump, I won't be referencing or even nodding towards the existence of queerness because Professor Rhodes does not think queer people exist. 1.00
00:11:25.400 Queer people are like mythical fallacies.
00:11:27.880 They're like the fairytale characters in children's books. 1.00
00:11:30.680 It's not addressed.
00:11:31.680 It's not discussed.
00:11:33.000 It's not a part of this conversation.
00:11:34.300 The assumption is that we are working with heterosexual people and how they should engage with their own sexuality.
00:11:41.180 Okay.
00:11:41.840 He just like doesn't even address queerness?
00:11:44.420 or is it okay that's so fucking weird all right sure doesn't address it at all so katie we're 0.76
00:11:48.900 going to start at the bottom of page five if you can read the paragraph that starts with the culture 0.83
00:11:54.000 wars the culture wars are really about the role of women agree but not in the way you think with
00:12:01.040 you so far but women are split between a majority who are traditionally feminine and others who are
00:12:07.420 more like men than their sisters are the latter group which on average has been exposed to higher
00:12:13.200 levels of testosterone, is more interested in the physical side of sex, more independent,
00:12:19.280 assertive, and career-oriented, more competitive in sports, and more conflicted about—so,
00:12:25.140 so far, he's, like, describing basically every woman I've ever met, so that's kind of funny—and
00:12:29.660 more conflicted about children. The tension between the two kinds of women will arise in
00:12:34.480 all parts of this book. Oh, goody. Okay. 1.00
00:12:38.200 So, the book opens by kind of acknowledging how much has changed in the last 50 years,
00:12:42.940 And by discussing how much our mainstream conversation does now account for gender, I think that it's kind of up to debate the extent to which the idea of gender as a social construct has impacted the mainstream.
00:12:54.720 I do think that the way that we talk about women and men, even in relatively conservative circles, has probably changed dramatically since, you know, the 1940s.
00:13:02.560 I'm not necessarily convinced that it's as radical as he thinks it is.
00:13:05.980 But Katie, you are a radical left-wing feminist, so can you offer us a broad characterization of what it means to view gender as a social construct?
00:13:13.860 To me, the idea that gender is a social construct comes down to the way that we are all, in some ways, performing the sex that we have been assigned.
00:13:27.300 So it's more about the idea that these ideas about what women are, or what men are, or what women should be, or what men should be, are fungible.
00:13:37.740 They change over time.
00:13:39.100 The way that we embody them changes over time.
00:13:41.720 and that any argument that like the extent to which you can perform that specific iteration
00:13:47.920 of your gender well, like is subject to change. Like the way that like women performed femininity
00:13:54.260 a hundred years ago is different than the way they would like perform it now. 0.98
00:13:59.200 Well, that's very thoughtful, but you're wrong, obviously. And you're wrong because
00:14:04.060 Steven Rhodes is really uncomfortable with that. When women don't act like women, aka when they 0.99
00:14:08.820 don't stay at home to raise children, when they don't lean into their nurturing feminine sides,
00:14:12.800 and when men don't act like men, aka when they don't go hunt bison or work at their sales job,
00:14:18.620 what you get is what he calls androgynous parenting. So that is a term that we will
00:14:24.400 discuss a lot today. It's this idea that we're all just fucking floating through space, man, 0.95
00:14:28.780 that we both neutered ourselves and everyone's confused. And he opens this book with a chapter 0.73
00:14:34.500 called Androgynous Parenting at the Frontier.
00:14:37.240 And in this chapter, he talks about a small study
00:14:39.680 that he conducted on a few hundred
00:14:42.140 allegedly liberal college professors
00:14:44.180 with children under two.
00:14:45.520 And the idea was,
00:14:46.980 this is a relatively progressive group of people, right?
00:14:50.280 Like the assumption would be
00:14:51.340 that they both have shared ideals around parenting.
00:14:55.280 And he was surprised to see that this was not the case.
00:14:58.260 So if you go to page 12,
00:14:59.760 I would love for you to read a paragraph
00:15:01.480 that starts with despite.
00:15:02.800 Despite what they said about the importance of sharing child-rearing, these male professors, who by all rights should be more egalitarian than most men, were not often taking leave, nor were they doing intensive baby care in the way that the female professors were.
00:15:19.320 Indeed, there is reason to think that our formal results overstate how much of it the male faculty actually do, okay?
00:15:26.300 So you're like, yeah, I've got a bunch of deadbeat dads here, and that must be natural.
00:15:30.440 When we debriefed our phone interviewers, they said that the men often seemed embarrassed when they kept answering that their wives always or usually did the specific child care tasks we enumerated.
00:15:41.860 It's so funny how close he is to, like, making a good argument.
00:15:45.800 I know.
00:15:46.380 Halfway through the list, one guy joked, I don't sound too good here, do I?
00:15:51.000 Another admitted, if I were completely honest, I would look like a bad parent.
00:15:55.620 Some men even interrupted their string of she-does-it-more answers
00:15:59.300 with editorials to the effect that their wives were more emotionally suited to baby care.
00:16:04.260 The interviewers on the survey came to believe that many of the men
00:16:07.100 were also defensive on the questions about enjoying baby care
00:16:10.160 and were saying that they liked it more than they really did
00:16:13.320 because they were embarrassed to tell the truth. 0.99
00:16:16.880 Oh, my fucking God. 1.00
00:16:19.120 Thoughts? 1.00
00:16:19.960 I mean, to me, this is like he's sitting there writing this being like, 1.00
00:16:24.940 got him, bitch. See, men don't like children. Men don't want to do this shit. And that is natural. 1.00
00:16:31.120 Whereas I'm reading this being like, yeah, this is the problem with gender roles.
00:16:34.900 This is exactly the problem that you're saying doesn't exist.
00:16:38.640 The reason why I bring this section up to start is because what we see here is a classic
00:16:43.400 situation of a literal misunderstanding taking place between conservatives and progressives,
00:16:49.220 which is you're looking at a problem and conservatives look at it as, well, we are in
00:16:54.160 the world where feminism has won. Yes. And this is still happening. And progressives are looking 0.93
00:16:59.480 at this, which is, no, we are still much closer to the 1950s, and this is why we need to move
00:17:04.780 forward. And this is proof that it hasn't won. Yes. You will see this kind of dichotomy that
00:17:12.460 these people will never acknowledge because they don't even realize that they're doing this. You
00:17:15.560 will see this in almost every article in the free press. Well, they will nod at something and go,
00:17:19.640 we already fixed this by now, and look at what's happening in the world that we fixed.
00:17:23.600 It's a really good point.
00:17:24.840 I will add, I think a lot of dudes who claim to be liberal or progressive are not as liberal or progressive as they think they are when the rubber hits the road.
00:17:32.040 I have a pet theory that men like to help in the home in fun ways.
00:17:37.860 And so their form of help is often literally taking care of the children because being with kids is fun.
00:17:43.260 You benefit as a father by developing a relationship with your kids.
00:17:46.060 There is like a positive reinforcement mechanism.
00:17:47.940 And so my kind of hot take is that the real mark of a helpful husband is not how involved he is with being a father, but how involved he is with housework. Housework is the thing that is not appreciated. It is unsexy. It can be emasculating. It is thankless. And so in my view, a husband who is on paternity leave in those early weeks or months of newborn care would largely be a housekeeper. That's like my kind of hot take of like the way that you could help the most, but that's kind of neither here nor there.
00:18:15.160 So, the conclusion that Rhodes draws from this that we will see again and again is that this is proof that androgynous parenting works for no one.
00:18:23.220 So, moving on to chapter two, masculinity and femininity.
00:18:26.340 Katie, can you summarize what those two words mean?
00:18:29.040 Am I doing, like, good faith definition?
00:18:31.220 Yeah, yeah.
00:18:31.560 The words masculinity and femininity are how we, like, broadly refer to what I would call universal human traits that we have decided to assign to one sex or the other.
00:18:43.940 So I think the word assertiveness has already come up.
00:18:47.240 That's something that we assign to men and say men are more naturally assertive than women because testosterone or whatever.
00:18:54.460 And then femininity is the word that we have come to use to assign to all the like, oh, sensitive, caring, submissive, passive.
00:19:03.880 If you let power run roughshod over you, you're being nice and feminine. 1.00
00:19:08.700 Yeah, you're being a pussy. 1.00
00:19:09.620 You're being a woman. 1.00
00:19:10.220 So this is basically the core debate of these conversations between gender theorists and sex scientists is where these traits come from. What is masculinity and what is femininity and where are they coming from? Are they completely socially constructed or are they inherent to our nature or are they both? That is kind of the debate that is still raging.
00:19:28.340 Something that I just want to point out is that a lot of the research around negotiation for women is really instructive in this debate because during the kind of girl boss lean in era of the 2010s, there was this real push for women to demand your worth, ask for what you want, directly and aggressively ask for more money, right?
00:19:52.660 you're kind of being told to embody these societally masculine traits and essentially
00:19:58.240 to behave in a gender incongruous way. And what research found was that women who behave that way 0.87
00:20:05.980 are penalized in negotiations for it. That a man and a woman that are both asking for like the same 1.00
00:20:12.020 type of raise in this research, the man was 33% more likely to have success with that approach. 0.70
00:20:18.060 I know that we can debate what are the origins of this, but the reality is that women who behave in masculine ways and seek masculine goods are punished repeatedly in society for doing so.
00:20:30.140 So, to say that none of this has to do with, like, societal reinforcement or penalty is crazy to me. 0.61
00:20:38.580 Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense.
00:20:40.080 So, this actually was a relatively interesting chapter to read.
00:20:43.640 The way that Rhodes gets into this tension is by highlighting something pretty interesting, which I then researched and found to be true externally, which is that there is a really interesting trend with sex difference researchers in that a lot of them go into the landscape of, like, scientific sex research hoping to disprove it and end up coming away with a more complicated picture.
00:21:04.580 So that's not to say that they come away saying gender is not a social construct, but it's that they come away saying this is much more complicated than I originally believed.
00:21:12.580 So, Katie, I'm going to have you read page 18.
00:21:42.580 sex differences. In Eagley's view, they draw on feminist research of the 1970s, which, in order
00:21:49.480 to eliminate stereotypes hindering women from fulfilling their potential, highlighted the idea
00:21:54.620 that sex differences were ephemeral. According to Eagley, however, new research indicates that
00:21:59.820 women and men really do conform to some of these stereotypes. Women, for example, do tend to
00:22:05.180 manifest behaviors that can be described as socially sensitive, friendly, and concerned
00:22:09.740 with others' welfare, whereas men tend to manifest behaviors that can be described as
00:22:13.840 dominant, controlling, and independent. In other words, ordinary people's gender stereotypes are,
00:22:18.820 as Eagly says, fairly accurate. And most people do recognize that men and women occupy
00:22:23.260 partially overlapping groups possessing different average levels of various attributes.
00:22:28.220 Eagly concludes that scientists currently studying men and women have begun to realize
00:22:32.120 that they have shattered not cultural stereotypes, but the scientific consensus forged in the
00:22:37.180 feminist movement of the 1970s. Okay, but, like, I guess we just haven't gotten to this part yet,
00:22:41.420 but I still don't feel like this is going any further to convince me that any of this is natural
00:22:47.020 or innate. And this is where I think the fact that there is no acknowledgement of queerness
00:22:52.160 is so critical, because none of this holds up if you acknowledge that some people don't—you're
00:22:58.900 basically saying, yeah, there are this, what, 10 to 15, maybe 20 percent of the population that
00:23:04.420 completely upends this paradigm. We are just not even going to address the fact that those people
00:23:10.440 exist and we are only going to look at the ones who most closely mirror the things that we are
00:23:16.960 claiming are true. Does he answer this question? Does he actually proffer any research that like
00:23:23.120 goes the distance in justifying the idea that any of this is innate? He does not at any point.
00:23:29.400 It is just not discussed. What's actually amazing to me, there's like a sleight of hand that he does that's really interesting when you read the book from start to finish, or actually, frankly, when you take the class, which is that he does not do what other conservatives similar to him would do, which is that he doesn't reference the 1950s ever.
00:23:48.300 There is never like an explicit reference. Like even the front page of this book that you showed, which is 1950s images, is the closest that we get to ever having like an actual reference. This whole argument that he makes essentially floats in the ether in a way that I think really benefits him. He doesn't ever nod to like, well, things were better X. He basically is just constantly arguing for this is how we are.
00:24:15.060 He's essentially arguing for something that is immutable. It's not about any one time period. That's how we've always been. But I want to get back to Alice Eagley because she's very interesting and he very much mischaracterizes her in this paragraph.
00:24:27.700 So Alice Eagley does think that certain biological factors impact our behaviors, but she believes in
00:24:34.460 biosocial theory, which essentially argues for like a hybrid of both biology and culture to
00:24:39.880 explain our gender differences. I will share some of her studies because biosocial theory is very
00:24:45.780 complicated and they essentially are studying the very intricate relationship between biology and
00:24:51.120 how our culture plays with that over time. And their argument is it's not just nature and it's
00:24:56.420 not just nurture, it is always both. So what are we talking about when we talk about that?
00:25:02.620 Steven Rose will constantly reference testosterone. They will talk about eyesight. Like one of the
00:25:07.760 studies I remember reading when I was in that class was a study that argued that men actually
00:25:12.680 can't see socks when they're on the ground. They're not being lazy. They can't see them.
00:25:18.960 And so they can't pick them up. You just have different eyesight, housewives. Anyways, so 1.00
00:25:25.620 One organ that I do want to talk about is the brain, okay?
00:25:29.300 So we're going to read how Stephen Rhodes talks about this,
00:25:31.660 and then I'm going to talk to you about, like,
00:25:33.200 actually what people are doing with this.
00:25:35.160 So, Katie, I want you to read page 27. 0.99
00:25:38.060 Brain research also reveals inherent sex differences.
00:25:41.800 For example, neuroscientists have determined that men
00:25:45.000 have fewer neurons connecting the left and right hemispheres of the brain. 1.00
00:25:49.940 This difference may help to explain why women are better 1.00
00:25:52.200 at talking about their emotions.
00:25:55.240 Men will write an entire book about sex differences instead of going to therapy. 0.54
00:26:00.620 The left brain controls talking.
00:26:03.000 The right brain controls emotions.
00:26:05.680 That feels oversimplified to me.
00:26:08.720 It's hugely oversimplified.
00:26:10.420 So I'm going to start with the conservative argument for this, and then we're going to complicate it.
00:26:15.500 So I looked into this.
00:26:16.800 The data is pretty fascinating.