For The Wild - February 22, 2023


MALCOLM HARRIS on The Globalization of Forgetfulness ⧸324

Topics
FRANCESA LIA BLOCK on Finding Rhythm Through Word ⧸323 ROSEMARY GLADSTAR on Thriving Where Planted ⧸325

Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

140.79

Word count

7,758

Sentence count

273

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Toxicity

6

sentences flagged

Hate speech

6

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today, I'm speaking with
00:00:07.460 Malcolm Harris.
00:00:08.940 Well, just like any workplace is, right? I mean, any place where you're going to have
00:00:12.660 to put people to work under capitalism, any exercise of power includes the possibility
00:00:19.980 for resistance. 1.00
00:00:22.360 Malcolm Harris is a freelance writer and the author of Kids These Days, Shit is Fucked 1.00
00:00:27.360 Up and Bullshit, and the new book, Palo Alto, A History of California, Capitalism, and the 1.00
00:00:32.680 World.
00:00:37.580 Well, Malcolm, thank you so much for joining us today on For the Wild.
00:00:41.680 I am really looking forward to this conversation.
00:00:45.740 Doing the research for this interview definitely energized me, and I felt quite passionate about
00:00:53.040 much of what you talk about and write about.
00:00:56.780 so thanks so much. I'm so excited to hear. Thanks so much for having me. Oh, good. Good,
00:01:04.380 good, good. Well, I'm thinking we could just jump right into talking about California as
00:01:11.000 place and metaphor and the haunting history. There's so much history that's going into this
00:01:19.740 large strip of land along the Pacific, and I was born and raised there, so I definitely have
00:01:26.780 a lot of skin in the game, so to speak, but opening your new book, Palo Alto, A History
00:01:32.680 of California Capitalism and the World, you write, quote, if, as I have been convinced,
00:01:39.480 the point of life and the meaning of freedom is to make something with what the world makes
00:01:44.240 of you, then it's necessary to locate those places where history reaches through yourself
00:01:49.520 and sticks you to the board, end quote. So to begin, I'm just thinking of the ways that history
00:01:58.320 seems really alive in your work with Palo Alto, and I'm wondering how the concept of haunting
00:02:05.220 comes into play, especially in a history so focused on place. Yeah, it's a kind of strange
00:02:13.300 metaphor for someone like me who's such a materialist to use, I think. But I think it's
00:02:19.340 worth thinking about how it works, right? Because haunting implies the persistence of something
00:02:27.340 being where it's not, right? The dead are in the world or there's something caught between realms
00:02:33.540 and there's an impersonal sort of tension produced by hauntings. That's what hauntings are,
00:02:41.360 It's an impersonal tension of things not being in the right place.
00:02:46.420 And I think that feeling on an effective register really describes so much of Palo Alto and what's going on there.
00:02:55.460 And at the same time, it is the premise for an investigative agenda, right?
00:03:00.480 Like what is in the wrong place and why?
00:03:03.800 How did it get there?
00:03:04.740 and the history I'm dealing with is on a cosmic scale you know so short right it's uh less than
00:03:12.840 200 years and we can really go back and see what is haunting where so I think for me it was that
00:03:20.880 kind of possibility that made me want to use the term as opposed to any particular spiritual
00:03:27.540 connection to the to the idea yeah this makes me think about the ways California is often used as
00:03:38.820 a metaphor or an idea of something to which the whole world should aspire or you know on the other
00:03:45.320 hand as a fear-mongering tactic for what California might become or what we might become and you know
00:03:54.660 just even considering from what I had heard last that California was the sixth biggest economy in
00:04:01.040 the world. And it's just the state of California, let alone the entertainment industry, the tech
00:04:08.840 industry, songs written about California, media. I mean, it really does have such a huge presence
00:04:17.260 globally. So I'm wondering, how did you comb through the various representations and
00:04:23.340 characteristics of California in this writing process in order to focus on the history and
00:04:28.620 material reality of the place itself? Well, having a smaller focus in Palo Alto made that so much
00:04:36.700 easier. While at the same time, it's been a heavily documented place. I think I may try to
00:04:42.940 make the case that it's an important historical place. And there is a certain amount of history
00:04:47.160 written about it, but it's not as densely historicized as, say, San Francisco or Los
00:04:53.240 Angeles. And so it sort of gave me a smaller part to deal with. But the premise of my method that
00:04:59.600 the elements of the whole are contained within their parts, right? So by looking at the part
00:05:05.820 of Palo Alto, which I think ends up being a pretty important part, I can sort of derive
00:05:10.120 the structure of the larger system itself and why California achieves that special place that
00:05:17.320 you're talking about in the world despite and or because of its particular place as the last
00:05:26.620 link in this chain of the establishment of a global capitalist system. I was noticing that
00:05:34.540 throughout Palo Alto, you mentioned many influential and complicated connected individuals
00:05:40.460 whose paths marked and were marked by Palo Alto. For instance, you discuss Bill Shockley saying,
00:05:47.780 Shockley became a brilliant engineer, an athlete, a war hero, without seeing battle,
00:05:53.240 a celebrated inventor, a Stanford professor, a Nobel Prize winner, and the man who put
00:05:58.800 Silicon and Silicon Valley. William Shockley Jr. was also the most infamous American bigots in the
00:06:04.880 20th century, end quote. So I'm wondering, how do people come to reinforce and represent the
00:06:11.820 systems from which they come? And how do we complicate narratives that focus only on personal
00:06:17.940 autonomy when considering wealth and power? Yeah, I mean, that's really one of the messages I hope
00:06:25.380 of the book. And one of the things that really focused my attention was a real attention on
00:06:31.300 forces rather than people and people as instantiations or characterizations of those
00:06:37.720 forces. And so Bill Shockley Jr. is a really interesting person, not just because he himself,
00:06:45.540 you know, because of his wacky personality and his undeniable facility technically
00:06:53.520 and his terrible ideas combined to make an interesting biography, but because those are
00:07:00.980 all products of particular historical forces. And so I trace back his connections to this place.
00:07:08.320 You know, how does he come to live here and more importantly, to work here and talk about his
00:07:13.240 mother enrolling in Stanford as a mining engineer and his father becoming a professor at Stanford
00:07:18.820 as mining engineer? And what was the character of mining engineering in the world economy at the
00:07:24.680 time when Stanford was focused on producing mining engineers? And how was Shockley tested
00:07:30.560 and evaluated by Stanford psychologists as a child, as a potential tool of U.S. empire,
00:07:37.660 just like mining engineers had been in the previous epoch? And so trying to embed individuals
00:07:44.060 in these transpersonal narratives,
00:07:47.500 these historical stories that go so much bigger than them,
00:07:51.120 while at the same time acknowledging that
00:07:53.560 if it hadn't been for them any particular individual,
00:07:57.180 there would be a different particular individual
00:07:59.700 to characterize those same or similar social forces.
00:08:05.980 Speaking of Stanford,
00:08:08.100 like so many of the other large Ivy League institutions
00:08:13.980 I think of Stanford as kind of an Ivy League of the West Coast.
00:08:17.940 So do the Stanfords.
00:08:19.260 Yeah, I'm sure.
00:08:21.840 And it's interesting because, of course, it's this nonprofit inflated as this public entity.
00:08:31.780 And really, so many of these institutions are just clubhouses for organized capital, which part of these ideas I'm taking right from your book and things that I've thought about before as well.
00:08:43.400 And I think it's interesting to understand how this institution has shaped place.
00:08:55.300 And I guess I'd just love to hear more about the planned and unplanned ways Stanford was created as an institution of power and wealth accrual.
00:09:05.120 yeah well if you think about stanford i mean stanford leland stanford junior university
00:09:11.900 comes to be we talk about characterizing social forces right it comes to substitute for leland
00:09:19.880 stanford junior who is the heir to the stanford robber baron fortune who dies unexpectedly as a
00:09:26.600 young teenager and his parents decide that their children are going to be the children of california
00:09:32.560 they say. And they had a pretty specific idea of what that meant, but they are sort of transferring
00:09:39.300 this curse, right? It's the activities that they've done, what they've done, and been part
00:09:46.960 of the colonization of the West in order to transfer that wealth to this institution that 0.77
00:09:54.720 then is going to spread it to the children of not California per se, but the Anglo-American
00:10:00.780 settlers of California. That's the premise of Stanford University. That's what happens. And
00:10:06.220 quickly, that spins out of the founding family's control as Jane Lathrop Stanford dies and or is
00:10:14.080 murdered possibly by the president of the university. And it becomes an institution
00:10:19.900 that's really obsessed with the eugenic perfection of man in the service of America.
00:10:27.140 What do we make of the reality that universities like Stanford are often simultaneously hotbeds
00:10:33.500 of student resistance and the beginnings of technologies of war, surveillance, and control?
00:10:39.720 Well, just like any workplace is, right? I mean, any place where you're going to have to put people
00:10:44.240 to work under capitalism, any exercise of power includes the possibility for resistance.
00:10:51.680 So I think wherever you have people working, you see resistance to that work, to capital, and you can find it wherever you look. The key question for me, I guess, is what the importance of the particular resistance that you see in Palo Alto and its character over time.
00:11:06.600 yeah there's so much to say about universities and academia and in your other book kids these
00:11:17.780 days you write higher education is just one industry and it follows sometimes leads the
00:11:22.560 same trends as the rest of the labor market end quote and it's an interesting quote i guess it
00:11:29.200 makes me think about there's so much critique of academia in ways i don't think there were before
00:11:36.200 because of the state of the world and the future opportunities for people who do graduate.
00:11:42.840 I think at one time, if you graduated from Stanford, for instance, your opportunities
00:11:48.740 were probably more abundant, where now these institutions are churning out, I don't want
00:11:56.140 to say robots because people are people, but it's almost like they're just churning out
00:12:00.260 more people. And not to say there's not more jobs, but I don't think that there is the same
00:12:06.980 amount of opportunities. And we see that with housing and maybe before a PhD would have held
00:12:14.100 more weight than it does now because of the way the world is growing and resource extraction and
00:12:22.240 materialism, capitalism, disposability, culture, so on and so forth. And so I guess I think about
00:12:29.620 these young adults like myself who might have these dreams of going into these institutions
00:12:37.580 thinking that it will open up worlds and for many it does now maybe the worlds that it opens up
00:12:43.280 are sinister or are not actually the dream of what young excited people have in mind
00:12:51.920 And so I guess there's a, maybe even like a dream shattering effect of what these institutions can actually provide for us anymore. And, you know, of course, like we can tack that onto some of the boomers, some boomer ideologies of like, oh, kids don't work anymore.
00:13:12.100 you know there was so much more dignity when I was young and we we really you know we really
00:13:17.900 showed up and I'm like well it's not the same world and I have compassion for people who don't
00:13:24.620 want to show up in that way what are they fighting for what are they working for what are they looking
00:13:29.080 forward to and we can get more into that in terms of how social media plays into that and the making
00:13:35.480 of millennials which I and I maybe I'm skipping ahead too far because that's a whole other topic
00:13:40.760 that I really want to get into with you, but maybe we just stick right now before we jump
00:13:46.700 into the millennial and Gen Z world about how these institutions actually fail young
00:13:53.080 people and shatter the dreams that they may come into these institutions with.
00:13:59.560 Well, I mean, that's not really their job, right?
00:14:02.600 It's like, yeah, if they sell themselves as ways to help you achieve your dreams, then
00:14:09.780 I don't know people you can use them that way you can there are resources at every university even
00:14:16.920 outside of universities that people can use to educate themselves so I don't think there's like
00:14:21.880 nothing there but no people shouldn't go into college expecting that especially an elite
00:14:27.880 college like Stanford thinking that the institution itself is going to give them purpose I think
00:14:33.080 mostly what they think it's going to give them is a strong working credential and they're mostly
00:14:38.580 right about that. Or, you know, connections to the kind of people they want to know in their
00:14:43.400 future job, which again is probably the case. So I think that the value of a Stanford degree is
00:14:49.100 probably only increased. So I don't think it's their, the disillusion is necessarily coming from
00:14:55.020 their individual lack of options. I think it's probably coming from their reasoned analysis of
00:15:03.260 the national global situation, right? They see what's happening in the world from a capitalist
00:15:10.120 system. Whether they personally can benefit or not, you still have to be pretty willfully ignorant 0.97
00:15:18.500 not to see what's going on, as well as, for that matter, the participation of our leading and elite
00:15:25.500 institutions with what's going on right so the historically student activists have been really
00:15:33.820 intellectual and really like strong researchers about the complicity of their institutions
00:15:39.860 in american imperialism in uh capitalist violence and tried to hold those institutions to account
00:15:49.860 maybe they have less room to do that now i think that's possible because the job market is so
00:15:55.060 competitive and they have individually may want to feel insecure and might want to hold on to
00:16:02.720 their options. But no, I don't see it as people getting disillusioned because they're personally
00:16:09.900 insecure per se, at least not at Stanford. Yeah. Part of me just thinks intellectualism,
00:16:20.180 um which really maybe has a home in higher academia um is failing us to an extent and
00:16:30.940 and young people specifically because think we are delusioned to think that it's critical
00:16:36.360 thinking or at least that's what we're we're taking part in or i think it's actually quite
00:16:42.360 narrow and i think it really is serving a type of capitalist uh dystopian um dream that i i just
00:16:56.280 tend to think you know maybe there are of course every there's all different types of people
00:17:01.040 different types of dreams and desires but i guess what i see is most people want to be good people
00:17:11.980 They want to, quote, change the world for the better. And they put a lot of time and energy, go into debt, and then come out the other side, actually just being potentially more indoctrinated or less hopeful.
00:17:27.600 And with these institutions having so much money and power, one would hope that they were trying to evolve into something that is more mutually beneficial. I don't know. I mean, I'm definitely in an idealistic thought right now.
00:17:49.320 But and maybe this kind of plays into the plight of millennials. And there's just been so much rapid change in this generation, as I'm sure generations before us would feel as well. But there's, you know, it's like, what does it mean to witness late stage capitalism from childhood? And how does that affect millennials or Gen Zers?
00:18:15.040 And I guess, you know, of course, that plays into like what it means to even go to college and what that even means to enter the job market when we're entering knowing that we are in the throes of late stage capitalism and an extinction crisis, climate change, so on and so forth.
00:18:31.640 It doesn't I would imagine it doesn't have the same meaning of what it was even 20, 30 years ago.
00:18:38.580 in some ways i think that's true but i think also past there are past generations that lived under
00:18:44.380 the shadow of world war that lived under the shadow of nuclear annihilation right like constant
00:18:50.900 threat of nuclear annihilation um and they weren't wrong to like assess that the the anti-nuke
00:18:58.460 movement for example which i think we can draw a lot of inspiration from should draw a lot of
00:19:03.300 from in today's climate movement probably wasn't wrong to see that as like an existential threat
00:19:09.780 to humanity right just like we shouldn't be wrong we're not wrong to see one today but it's not a
00:19:16.080 it's not a unique experience i guess um in that way but we do have to like historicize the
00:19:22.180 particular coordinates of what's going on right now right and what does it mean to struggle over
00:19:27.820 the environment and what possibilities does that open for future kinds of struggle right and so
00:19:35.860 it's like the acceleration of the indigenous movement in North America opens up whole new 0.69
00:19:43.580 vistas of future struggle and that's a product of the current environmental crisis like directly
00:19:49.640 right and this book is partly inspired by that situation and so that's a that's arising from
00:19:56.840 conflicts uh out of our particular circumstance that isn't just about the
00:20:02.340 like the magnitude per se but about the the actual coordinates
00:20:06.480 oh the world is no longer what it was
00:20:24.760 Sky is burning, trees are turning to dust
00:20:30.620 But the moon is rising, can't you see her face is shining?
00:20:38.400 She is smiling to see you dancing in her light
00:20:43.080 Oh, dancing in her light
00:20:49.220 Oh, dancing in her light
00:20:55.300 Oh, dancing in her light
00:21:08.840 Oh, the world is no longer what it seems
00:21:13.840 We fear the worst while we take the very best
00:21:20.420 This paradise is our unrest 1.00
00:21:26.480 She is waiting for us to take our last race 1.00
00:21:38.420 Yeah, those are good points to mull over for a bit for me.
00:21:43.840 And to move into another topic that I find really fascinating that you speak about is
00:21:50.760 the internet as institution.
00:21:53.120 And I'm wondering, how does it change the way we see the internet when we look at it
00:21:57.260 as your most recent book does, as a product of specific capital investments, placements,
00:22:02.980 and longstanding progressions, rather than just a singular and almost like totalizing
00:22:09.140 invention?
00:22:11.680 Yeah, I think that's a great question.
00:22:13.080 The classic internet booster story about the internet is that hippies translated their ideas about the world and oneness and such into this new electronic medium and produced a new space of freedom with the internet and cyberspace.
00:22:36.460 And that's still a very popular historiography of the early internet.
00:22:44.700 And some people view it in a critical way.
00:22:48.200 They're like, and that was bad.
00:22:49.520 Those hippies were bad and the internet they made was bad, but still concede that that's
00:22:54.320 what happened. 0.77
00:22:55.460 But the research that I was doing, which I was mostly concerned with the Cold War, the
00:23:01.920 global struggle over the mode of production, which is the most important thing that was
00:23:06.040 happening at that time in the 70s and 80s not like some guys writing grateful dead lyrics
00:23:12.000 and their computers played and connecting computers the inner networking of computers
00:23:18.120 played a very very specific role which is that it allowed the united states and like unaccountable
00:23:25.160 wings of the united states security apparatus to coordinate clandestine operations really awful
00:23:31.820 violent uh massacres basically as well as the the financing and the weapons moving needed for them
00:23:39.900 um across distances without being held accountable and without people spying on them so like that's
00:23:46.040 what the first laptops were used for you know was doing this kind of cold war network and that to
00:23:53.760 me is a much much more important history to understand in terms of understanding the internet
00:23:59.360 and the role it plays in our lives and our world and society, then the idealistic sort of the
00:24:06.340 internet is a product of our concepts about our relations to each other. Yeah. There's a couple
00:24:15.000 quotes from your article, Are We Living Under Technofeudalism, that I want to unravel with
00:24:22.320 you a bit. One of them is, quote, we do technically spend less time working for our bosses than we do
00:24:29.020 informing on ourselves to tech companies no matter whom we work for or whether we're employed at all
00:24:34.560 we're generating value for bezos and zuck end quote yeah i just would love to hear your you
00:24:41.940 expand on that a bit uh that was a concession that i'm then spending most of the article
00:24:47.000 contrasting with so i don't want to put too much emphasis on it right uh that it sometimes seems
00:24:52.960 like these days that uh our main relation to capitalism is through these apps that we spend
00:25:01.640 a bunch of time on but that's not true our main relation to capitalism for almost all of us is
00:25:08.200 being exploited through our labor and so despite you know our consciousness maybe a disproportionate
00:25:16.240 out of our consciousness being occupied with these apps or ads, that doesn't mean that that's
00:25:23.420 what constitutes our material relation to the mode of production. Just because you can't stop
00:25:28.820 looking at your phone doesn't mean you work for Mark Zuckerberg. But we are giving the tech
00:25:37.520 companies our information they're learning about what we want to buy where we are
00:25:44.080 you know what is the benefit for them of i mean i think i know but like i guess i would imagine
00:25:52.260 spending so much time on these devices on these apps giving data is doing something like it's not
00:25:58.440 we are selling ourselves on some level but i don't know what we're receiving in return
00:26:04.920 Well, it's more or less the same as when you watch television. And I think the industry itself, and there's a phrase I like called critic hype, where you hype up a technology in the way that you criticize it.
00:26:20.120 And it's pretty common, especially around these sort of surveillance technologies, where people exaggerate how effective they are, just as the tech companies themselves exaggerate how effective they are.
00:26:30.620 Whether you're doing it critically or to hype it, it's still exaggerating how effective they are. And I think that we know that Facebook and other of these companies misrepresent how useful this data is all the time.
00:26:44.820 The infamous case is Facebook told everyone that videos were doing super great and so they should all switch to videos. And it turned out that they had sort of made up that data and everyone had changed their business plan based on what Facebook had said about itself.
00:27:00.620 So I take all those claims with a certain amount of a grain of salt, how the security services have used the like back doors that these companies have offered to surveil individuals and like get information on targets is a totally different thing.
00:27:17.620 Because they're actually focused on individuals and they're targeting people for these purposes and they're able to do this through the same pseudo impersonal tracking regime that the social media companies have installed.
00:27:35.420 But in terms of like have social media ads revolutionized society and capitalist production, I do not think so.
00:27:47.020 Interesting.
00:27:47.620 Well, there's another quote where you say, if everything the would be cryptocurrency sovereigns and metaverse real estate developers said was true, we might well be ruled by cyber barons. So it's a good thing that they're totally full of shit. 1.00
00:28:02.580 The internet's true landlords aren't even tech companies, as researcher Daniel Green notes in a newspaper. They are the real estate investment trusts that own the vast majority of data centers and the links between them. When you get behind the scenes and down to the cables, Google and Amazon are renters, end quote. 1.00
00:28:20.200 so yeah it is i'd love to hear you expand on that and how does the scale and form of the
00:28:26.420 internet and e-commerce reflect and refract various entanglements of property and power
00:28:33.020 yeah i thought that paper from dan green that he'd been working on for a really long time was
00:28:38.340 super informative about what the actual physical structure of the internet is right
00:28:45.120 because you think about who owns the internet you think it must be like you know
00:28:49.880 the government or one of the big tech companies but it's not really either of those it's these
00:28:55.960 trusts right it's these financialized instruments that own buildings where cables go and the
00:29:01.780 interlinks between the cables um that connect to each other and then the big tech companies
00:29:07.420 like everybody else uh rents some of that for them and you might read about uh facebook or
00:29:15.380 some of the other big tech companies building their own data centers, but those are a minority
00:29:20.460 of the data centers they're using. Even for a big firm like Google, they like the flexibility of
00:29:25.980 being able to rent space as they need it, as opposed to building the centers themselves.
00:29:31.420 And that definitely reflects the industry and its character. Yeah, it's really fascinating to learn
00:29:37.780 more about this like the underbelly or the details that so many of us have no idea
00:29:45.380 how all of this really works and I guess part of me wonders what does this do for the user
00:29:52.920 to understand the way the internet actually works and the infrastructure of course there's the
00:30:01.100 actual infrastructure of the internet and the resource extraction used to power the internet
00:30:06.540 and servers and all that. There's that infrastructure. And of course, then there's
00:30:10.380 the foundation of ownership and capitalism. But let's just say for me or anybody else who's just
00:30:19.680 a user, what does it do for us to understand these things? Would it help us not use it,
00:30:26.800 use it more, use it differently? I'm kind of just in this moment of, I mean, I'm fascinated by this,
00:30:33.360 But I'm like, but why? Or what is it doing for me to understand more?
00:30:38.300 Yeah, well, as an individual consumer, right, it could either inform your choices or not, depending on how you want to consume, right?
00:30:46.540 You could be like, oh, I need to set up a VPN. I need to pay for a VPN to use when I'm surfing the web on my devices, which is a thing I advise that people should do.
00:30:57.340 People should get a virtual private network they're using to browse the web. That's a smart thing to do.
00:31:03.360 But that's not, I guess, the most important thing about insights about how an impersonal system in which you're part of can work. It sort of goes back to the first quote you read, because it's about how you can interact with it to change it with other people.
00:31:20.140 And so knowing how it works is what allows you, or hopefully is a precondition for, let's say, organizing a response that might be efficacious, right? It might matter. And that's what we're here to do.
00:31:37.080 So an example in the book is when anti-war militants have an understanding of what the early computers and the computer data systems in their universities are being used for, which is war work in Vietnam.
00:31:55.880 And they sort of understood how they worked and they use that information to target and attack those computer systems to try and aid the North Vietnamese war effort. And that required some intelligence about, you know, how these, how the system works and where you can be effective in, you know, putting your spoke, putting your stick in the spokes of the wheel.
00:32:19.680 Yeah, I'm trying to figure out what my stick is. Because I do see the harm that the internet
00:32:33.300 causes us. I don't think that it's all just a great encyclopedia. I mean, this is a funny
00:32:45.780 example but i'm trying to build a greenhouse right now and i'm trying to google or search
00:32:51.560 and i do use google but i also go and other things
00:32:56.580 and so i'm trying to search like homemade greenhouses or hand-built greenhouses recycled
00:33:04.620 greenhouses and it's truly the same sponsored ads over like for pages and pages and pages and i'm
00:33:13.380 like, wait, why am I still being shown this one pre-built greenhouse to buy? I don't want to buy
00:33:19.860 this. I'm literally asking how to build a recycled greenhouse. Not very good targeting after all.
00:33:27.120 No, no, no. So of course there's that, which is a very light level of just like, okay, this isn't
00:33:31.860 actually giving me what I want. And it's just trying to sell me things. I'm not even trying
00:33:36.660 to buy things. I'm actually trying to inform myself on how to have hard skills. So that felt
00:33:42.460 like a big downer but it's not even that that i'm concerned with of course for me on an ecological
00:33:49.140 level even the terminology like the cloud there's no cloud the cloud is on the ground in factories
00:33:56.900 being fed by massive power structures like even you know cryptocurrency which again seems like
00:34:06.440 this thing in the sky is coal plants in montana that were shut down to power towns are being
00:34:14.400 reopened just for bitcoin so i think cloud it's the matrix yeah it's a very heavy matrix too it
00:34:24.320 weighs very heavy ecologically to have this thing called the internet that a lot of us here in the
00:34:31.920 states have access to 24-7 to get subpar information that takes a ton of our energy
00:34:38.480 away from actually where we live, connecting with people in front of us. And of course,
00:34:43.960 I say all this having a podcast talking to you on Zoom from my laptop. So there's no,
00:34:49.020 I'm absolutely complicit in the matrix. And I know that every single day when I wake up with
00:34:56.420 my alarm clock on my iPhone that is on airplane mode, but nonetheless is on by my bed. And so I
00:35:03.620 just, yeah, I'm really, I really question this, this matrix that I think at one point I thought
00:35:15.100 was benefiting us. And I know of course the tech industry definitely likes to say that it is like,
00:35:22.880 i know google has a project called the next billion users and they believe that getting
00:35:27.580 the next billion people on the internet is evolution and it's good for people and it's
00:35:34.780 helpful and i wonder what are we lacking as humanity that the internet is helpful
00:35:43.640 like what is it helping us with well it's making it's helping some people make a lot of money was
00:35:50.200 part of it um i don't think it's i don't think it's like a natural product of humanity right
00:35:58.000 like there's so many different ways we could connect to each other and share data over networks
00:36:06.080 um or like you know passing printing books around and passing them around as a way to share data
00:36:11.880 over networks right like libraries are networks so i don't think there's anything particularly
00:36:16.700 unique about the internet like capital t capital i that is this connection of computers and i don't
00:36:25.040 think it's going to last forever i sure hope not so i think there's a danger in like you said about
00:36:30.160 the cloud naturalizing it uh as some hyper object right maybe it's timothy morton's term um
00:36:38.860 that is just part of the world now and will be forever as opposed to a particular conjunction of
00:36:48.100 objects at a particular time people in relation to each other that is not that old and will not
00:36:54.620 last forever explain why you think it won't last forever what that means well nothing lasts forever
00:37:02.740 This is a particular connection of a set of cables. Those cables will break one time or another, one way or the other. And hopefully in a non-catastrophic future, which is what I hope for, we'll find different ways, I think, to network with each other across spaces.
00:37:27.660 I think the internet is based on a particular moment in time.
00:37:34.440 Obviously, ARPANET is originally a backbone for U.S. nuclear response and goes from there.
00:37:45.160 So I think we probably have a different...
00:37:47.200 And people have talked about different kinds of internet and wanting a new kind of internet
00:37:51.060 and a mesh net and lots of different...
00:37:54.320 We're still using very centralized technologies that capital built in the 20th century, right?
00:38:00.100 It's still like phone lines, more or less.
00:38:03.920 So, yeah, it's important to historicize the internet, I think, both as a proper noun and as a connection of all internet-enabled computers.
00:38:15.320 Okay, well, I'm going to move away from talking about the internet because it's a real wormhole.
00:38:19.440 And I want to talk to you about the culture of work or cultures of work and work outside
00:38:26.200 of capitalism.
00:38:26.760 And I'd love to think for a moment on the difference between work and exploitation.
00:38:33.000 And it seems that in order to work, one must also serve grandiose capitalist ideas and
00:38:40.100 put oneself on the line for someone else's profit.
00:38:43.160 But I want to pay mind to the thought that work itself is not a bad thing.
00:38:47.860 So how am I changing the structure of the work reform the ways we understand collectivism
00:38:54.460 and community?
00:38:56.340 I mean, it's important not to get too individual or personal about it, right?
00:39:00.380 It's not like no one's work can be fulfilling or even that no one's work evades exploitation,
00:39:08.120 which some people find ways to do.
00:39:11.620 You can still find artisanal producers even under capitalism, right?
00:39:16.360 And I think there's a reason people like that kind of branding is because they aspire to that kind of unalienated activity.
00:39:25.000 Myself, as the writer of books, right, that's a job or role kind of work that precedes capitalism.
00:39:33.200 And it's work that I feel really privileged and excited to have.
00:39:36.780 So it's not that like every single person's job is awful and overcoming capitalism means finding a job for yourself that isn't awful.
00:39:47.280 If that were the case, it would be a little bit easier. But it's about the structure of the system itself forces the body of working people into a position where they have no choice but to sell their work and their time for less than it's worth.
00:40:06.820 work and labor. Labor in an abstract sense acquires this capitalist character as capitalism
00:40:16.220 becomes the dominant system for the mode of production and reproduction in society.
00:40:23.940 Yeah. I'm also thinking about how so-called innovation has often rested on increasing
00:40:32.460 productivity without simultaneously lessening the amount of time people are expected to work.
00:40:38.660 And if we go beyond the capitalist assumption that productivity and rapid growth should take
00:40:43.620 precedence, what options are there for alternative innovations and other ways of growth?
00:40:50.360 They're pretty limited, right? I mean, that's the problem of a capitalist system is that if they
00:40:56.400 let you do it otherwise, then we probably would. At the same time, I do think we have a certain
00:41:03.700 amount. There's a difference between that and saying like, oh, you can't do anything, right?
00:41:07.740 We have a certain range of activities we can take part in if we're trying to organize alternative
00:41:16.180 metabolisms between ourselves and the world, right? But that's a collective process. It's not
00:41:20.360 just about, oh, I bought the right book or even I bought the right coffee beans or I bought the
00:41:25.900 right, organic fruit. It's about organizing the kind of spaces with other people that provide for
00:41:33.180 the possibility of resistance against the dominant system, which I think has to come in a pretty
00:41:38.880 direct and conflictual way, ultimately. I guess I'm thinking back to Palo Alto and
00:41:47.740 thinking about the importance of history as we consider our future directions. And
00:41:54.880 then I, that kind of brings me to resolution and land back that you speak to. And I guess,
00:42:05.900 um, you know, one, one quote from Palo Alto is I'm committed to this planet,
00:42:13.080 which means I have to hold on to the possibility of an alternative to capitalist exhaustion.
00:42:18.860 What then would that look like? Palo Alto and California's many Stanford children have been
00:42:24.440 our focus thus far, Herbert Hoover and Bill Shockley and those who followed. I doubt that
00:42:31.120 these same people will have profitable answers for every problem they cause because we know
00:42:36.540 enough of their history to know they can't fix themselves. What else is Palo Alto to do with
00:42:42.800 itself. How about giving it back? What would that look like to give it back? Or what does that mean
00:42:50.180 to you? Well, it's pretty simple in this case. And that's why I think one of the reasons I can
00:42:56.200 suggest it as a very pragmatic operation, right, is that you have this nonprofit that because
00:43:02.480 unlike the covenants that indigenous people have had with their land, the covenant that the
00:43:08.140 Stanford's had with their land, which said that it cannot be sold, was maintained, right? And so
00:43:13.960 they've held on to thousands of acres, 8,000 acres in the Bay Area, which is pretty amazing territory
00:43:20.900 to hold on to throughout this period of capitalist exploitation. At the same time, the Muwekma or 0.99
00:43:27.620 Ohlone are a constituted tribe. They're politically organized. They have, you know, corporate existence
00:43:32.920 or whatever. Even though they're not recognized by the federal government, they're recognized by
00:43:37.600 stanford as having an ancestral claim to the territory stanford has ceded land before two
00:43:44.620 governmental agencies particularly the veterans agency to build the va hospital on the land
00:43:52.200 stanford has recognized the muekma when they've returned remains choosing to disregard the federal
00:44:00.200 government's refusal to recognize the tribe in order to recognize them and to return the remains
00:44:05.120 that are from the land that affirms their ancestral connection to it.
00:44:12.460 So in terms of how can we do land back,
00:44:15.960 land back seems like an insurmountably complicated thing to figure out.
00:44:21.500 Here is a very, very straightforward way in my thinking
00:44:25.520 that some land could be returned.
00:44:27.560 And I think that's the most historically progressive thing
00:44:31.460 the Stanford project could do at this moment in history,
00:44:34.680 rather than, say, endow an expensive new climate studies school, right?
00:44:40.240 Give some of the land back, and they know they should.
00:45:04.680 We remain till the dawning of day
00:45:10.120 She said you will never be my burly man
00:45:23.700 Instead a ballerina dance 0.89
00:45:27.760 Throughout the kitchen 1.00
00:45:30.100 Lacking pants
00:45:32.100 And still I will forever love this man
00:45:38.500 All I can
00:45:48.440 Oh, first who I am
00:45:51.840 Yeah, it seems like there's a way to do it
00:45:56.460 even with the way you've just explained the structures.
00:46:00.240 have i would imagine that somebody is working on this campaign or this is being at least talked
00:46:07.980 about publicly maybe even stanford returning the land i mean there's some if you go to the
00:46:15.080 if you go to the land acknowledgement page of stanford university where they do their
00:46:23.160 land acknowledgement they have a like link to the concept of land back uh but no they're not
00:46:28.960 to my the last time I checked which was pretty recently no they're not engaged in any talks to
00:46:35.780 return land to the Mwakma well I would imagine some folks listening to you know what you just
00:46:44.360 shared with us will get pretty inspired and uh yeah that's that's really interesting news that
00:46:51.860 seems very doable to be able to get the land back I know sometimes with land back the legal
00:46:58.300 ownership structures themselves make it really difficult with so many hoops and barriers but
00:47:04.460 with the way you described it that doesn't seem to be an issue and yeah gosh well I guess thinking
00:47:12.740 back to Palo Alto in general I'm I'm wondering how does Palo Alto's specific position show the
00:47:26.740 continued importance of place in a supposedly decentralized and globalized world?
00:47:34.240 Well, I really think it's this relation between the part and the whole, right? That the whole is
00:47:39.840 always made up of its parts and its structure is implicit in them. And so if you drilled on,
00:47:45.060 it's not just Palo Alto. Obviously, I think that Palo Alto in particular, and I try to make the
00:47:51.620 case that Palo Alto in particular has a lot that you can focus on and plays, I think, a particular
00:47:57.300 role in this history because of its place as this last link in the chain of global capitalism
00:48:04.400 that California gets incorporated into the system last. But I think you can also draw really
00:48:10.760 important lessons from any place, basically, that you look close enough. So not just, you know,
00:48:16.260 san francisco or los angeles but also walter johnson's got a great book about st louis
00:48:22.420 that covers the same time period that i think is really useful my friend david banks has a book
00:48:27.740 about upstate new york that's coming out soon about how upstate new york has changed uh there's a
00:48:34.020 even a recent study book about uh uber in washington dc that's coming out soon
00:48:39.980 It's sort of a focused case study on how disruption happened in the taxi industry in D.C.
00:48:47.940 So you can find a lot about a whole by looking at any individual park.
00:48:53.520 You just got to look close enough, I think.
00:48:56.940 Yeah.
00:48:58.440 And in Palo Alto, you write, quote, America's post-war suburban culture wasn't white, patriarchal, and conservative by coincidence.
00:49:09.240 It was careful design, end quote. And I guess I'm wondering, how does alteration to the environment, to specific neighborhoods, et cetera, reflect particular ideologies?
00:49:22.940 Well, you see that in Palo Alto, absolutely, that zoning and zoning control has been heavily politicized recently, but so much of it comes out of Palo Alto.
00:49:36.620 So Palo Alto is really an inspiration for zoning, prohibitive zoning around the country.
00:49:43.160 And Herbert Hoover, who is Stanford's first son, really, he's the one that pulls together
00:49:48.820 the real estate industry folks who come up with sort of the first zoning, the model zoning
00:49:54.320 law, and come up with the legal rationale for zoning, which is police power, which I
00:49:59.860 think is pretty interesting.
00:50:00.640 but Palo Alto itself is very strange in the way that it's laid out in that it feels like the
00:50:07.180 industry is constantly hiding like they have these huge setbacks and these low-slung offices that are
00:50:13.160 kind of like behind bushes and it's like you would be putting something sinister in a place where
00:50:18.900 people are living and that's sort of what they did right that they had to hide something sinister
00:50:23.800 in a place where they also wanted to live that's interesting and I guess I'm thinking about
00:50:31.940 the yeah I'm trying to think how to say this but like how does historical distance reinforce ideas
00:50:40.180 of disposability culture there's a quote I could read from Palo Alto that kind of
00:50:45.660 made me think of that but um I could read it or if you're if that kind of tapped into something
00:50:50.840 for you. No, no, go for it. I'd love to hear. Yeah. Well, so you write, quote,
00:50:55.620 the Palo Alto system isn't old from a world historical perspective, only 150 years or so
00:51:01.820 as of this writing, but it's not nearly as new as Palo Altans believe that forgetfulness is
00:51:10.100 an advantageous adaption. The past is a distraction when you're creating the future
00:51:15.140 to the new round of capital drenched rocket boys, the earth is but a launchpad for interstellar
00:51:21.440 capitalism, end quote. Ignorance and forgetfulness about the specificity of a place has really been
00:51:29.860 the mode of accumulation in Palo Alto in the system that I talk about. And that contrasts
00:51:38.740 so heavily with the indigenous people who lived in the same space for so long, which is that their
00:51:44.380 societies were based on a real density of knowledge about the place where they actually
00:51:49.400 live, right? It's like ignorance was the last thing that their society could afford, whereas
00:51:55.880 in this capitalist society, ignorance is what leads to disruption, right? Ignorance, not
00:52:02.120 remembering what a bus is so you can invent a bus for the first time is what makes millionaires
00:52:07.800 and billionaires. And so we have this society of ignorance, of forgetting, of not knowing where
00:52:14.760 you live. That's really been, I think, globalized, right? They've pushed that on the world very
00:52:21.240 intentionally. Yeah. When we focus so much on the ideals and myths of capital, we often forget that
00:52:30.720 we are living on a finite earth and that all of the things we have, all of our websites are
00:52:37.140 inventions and war machines have to come from something somewhere. And your book does such
00:52:44.500 a good job of pointing out these complicated material ties. And as we start to come to a
00:52:51.120 close, I would love to hear about the ways we can continue to uncover these connections and make
00:52:56.300 meaningful change to the material structures of the world. That's the struggle, right? Constantly.
00:53:03.240 And so I think for me, drawing out this history that I'm in some ways a part of, I guess we're all in some ways a part of, if it's a global history, part of the goal is to orient in terms of what's possible and what's impossible for the future and how can we think about it.
00:53:21.660 And I pose this sort of challenge, this land back as a challenge to the system at the end, where this seems like the smallest reasonable step we could take, the system could take towards addressing the actual scale of the problem.
00:53:38.860 But if that's met with, you know, people think that's ridiculous, right? People still treat that as an unreasonable demand and like it's not even within the realm of political possibility.
00:53:51.620 And if that's true for the system as it exists, right, if that's impossible, if a restoration of the land to forces and modes of reproduction and social metabolism that could responsibly care for it and restore it to a way where it could care for life, then we're not dealing with the situation of like negotiation or convincing, right?
00:54:18.020 then we're not when and that's important for understanding what our options are going forward
00:54:23.000 yeah well malcolm thank you so much for taking us into the matrix and beyond it's been a really
00:54:33.560 expansive conversation and i appreciate all your research and thought process behind
00:54:38.880 these very large and looming topics thank you so much for having me and i can't wait to listen
00:54:48.020 thank you for listening to for the wild podcast the music you heard today was by harry foster
00:54:56.020 harrison bosch and ian george for the wild is created by ayana young erica ekram
00:55:03.340 francesca glassbell and julia jackson