For The Wild - October 11, 2023


OBI KAUFMANN on the Ecotone of Art and Science ⧸351

Topics
JASON BALDES on Buffalo and Land Rematriation ⧸350 JACQUELINE SUSKIN on The Poetry of Seasons ⧸352

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 13 minutes

Words per minute

121.23

Word count

8,893

Sentence count

239

Harmful content

Hate speech

4

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 Hello, and welcome to For the Wild podcast. I'm Ayanna Young. Today we are speaking with
00:00:10.380 Obi Kaufman.
00:00:12.160 In every single cell of us, we are the land. We are the earth. We are physiologically interconnected
00:00:21.820 in a potentially infinite way.
00:00:27.520 So how could we understand that?
00:00:30.020 How could we quantify that?
00:00:32.560 How could we leave that?
00:00:34.340 Because that is wholly terrestrial in nature.
00:00:40.760 That is our interconnection
00:00:44.340 to the biosphere process of evolution
00:00:50.520 that there is no removing us from.
00:01:01.280 Obi Kaufman is an award-winning author
00:01:03.980 of many best-selling books
00:01:05.480 on California's ecology, biodiversity, and geography.
00:01:09.760 Obi's signature style is as artful as it is analytic,
00:01:13.500 combining masterful renderings of wildlife,
00:01:16.500 hand-painted maps, and data-driven storytelling
00:01:18.880 to present a hopeful and integrated vision of California's future.
00:01:23.940 An avid conservationist, Obi Kaufman regularly travels around the state,
00:01:28.640 presenting his work and vision of ecological restoration and preservation
00:01:32.660 from the Klamath-Siskew Wildlands Center to the Mojave Desert Land Trust.
00:01:38.040 Most recently, Obi was the artist-in-residence for the National Park Service
00:01:42.140 at Whiskeytown National Recreation Area.
00:01:44.740 You can catch him every month in conversation with author and tribal chairman
00:01:48.760 Greg Sarris in their podcast called Place and Purpose. A lifelong resident of California,
00:01:55.520 Obi Kaufman makes his home base in Oakland and is currently working on field atlases to come.
00:02:05.080 Well, Obi, thank you so much for joining us today. I'm really looking forward to conversing and
00:02:11.960 exploring and seeing where our conversation goes. Oh, what a privilege. What an honor.
00:02:16.980 Thank you, Ayanna. I am such a fan of the work that you all do at Fully the Wild. I am so
00:02:22.660 excited to be a guest, babe.
00:02:25.820 Well, thank you. Well, you know, the feeling is mutual. I was mentioning before we officially
00:02:32.360 started that I am a fan and have your books in my little library and have always been drawn to
00:02:39.840 the way you weave art and science together. And maybe that's a good place for us to start,
00:02:48.160 which is, yeah, just the way that you blend. And it's so beautiful. And I'd really love if
00:02:54.340 you could explain what draws you to this weaving and why you think your work resonates so deeply
00:03:00.460 with so many of us. Thank you. Thank you for a wonderfully deep question to kick things off here.
00:03:07.820 I mean, what a wonderful thing it is, really, that we can have an hour-long conversation about this topic.
00:03:14.200 What you just encapsulated right there in your query is something that we can spend days unpacking.
00:03:21.280 In fact, I do. These books keep coming out of me, Ayanna.
00:03:27.400 It's almost as if sometimes I get confused as to whether or not I'm making them or they're making me.
00:03:31.320 right there's like this creative force that's like pushing on me to get them out and realized
00:03:37.640 as if the books themselves are the length of a human thought that needs to be fully formed and
00:03:44.700 rendered and it takes about 500 pages and yet still per volume but at the end of it i'm still
00:03:50.660 like i don't know if i answered the question at all the teeter-totter the seesaw between science
00:03:57.420 and art where you have science answering questions and you have art questioning answers
00:04:04.840 and yet they often switch roles in that regard too isn't it where where the art of asking the
00:04:12.280 right questions in a scientific context is entirely necessary well the art of the well-rendered
00:04:19.620 hypothesis makes science at all possible. And this was really codified in the work of
00:04:28.500 one of the greatest 20th century naturalists, at least in my mind, Edward Wilson, E.O. Wilson,
00:04:37.620 who pioneered such ideas as theory of island biogeography, biodiversity itself. He's often
00:04:45.920 accredited with coining biophilia the idea that we are hardwired to love life his 1989 book called
00:04:57.400 consilience the unity of knowledge made a meteoric impact on my creative self from a young age where
00:05:08.440 he imagines as a naturalist he puts this in sort of ecological terms where he says there's sort of
00:05:13.440 an edge effect that occurs between different ecotones in human thought.
00:05:19.080 So let me just unpack that for a second.
00:05:20.760 The edge effect is the idea that on the landscape,
00:05:24.720 there is this space between habitat structures,
00:05:29.060 like between the forest and the meadow.
00:05:31.300 You have this abundance of resources where species,
00:05:36.300 animal species and plant species,
00:05:37.880 might find a wealth of ecological niches inside of, right?
00:05:43.840 And so you get this abundance of biodiversity
00:05:46.700 inside of this ecotone,
00:05:49.420 which is the word ecologists use
00:05:50.900 for the space between spaces, between habitat spaces.
00:05:54.640 So there's this edge effect that happens
00:05:56.580 between art and science as well,
00:05:59.440 where the two overlap.
00:06:01.360 And, you know, the product is greater
00:06:03.320 than the sum of its parts,
00:06:04.320 where you have inroads to greater understanding, to greater meaning, to greater depths of narrative.
00:06:12.780 And that's really where I hope to go to with all of this work, where we're sort of bypassing,
00:06:20.120 defusing, unplugging all of this divisive political rhetoric with all this agenda making
00:06:27.020 that so often dominates our popular discourse, especially in a democratic context, right?
00:06:34.320 I'd rather be in the camp of storytelling than argument making, right?
00:06:40.100 So that's why I eschew the idea of being like a pundit or a politician, although I'm engaged
00:06:47.100 as a citizen on whatever level, whether it be my town, my county, my state, my biosphere,
00:06:52.400 whatever it is, I really push back on a couple of core sort of constructs that include commonly
00:07:04.300 used phrases such as expert right or even something like politician right one who knows
00:07:13.540 one who has an agenda or has claimed an authority over this thing called truth especially in the
00:07:21.740 context of this moment in time this this 21st century that we are wrestling with figuring out
00:07:30.520 such words as sustainability, for example, or resiliency. What is the nature of human ecology
00:07:40.480 and the more than human world? I'm not exactly sure. All I've got is this trajectory, this
00:07:46.380 orientation based on this consilience of the physical sciences and the aesthetic world of
00:07:54.960 art making so i think that's my little intro to how those two worlds might work
00:08:03.460 what do you think of that goodness well there's so much to think about there and i am really
00:08:13.640 considering how we as a society seem to have forgotten about the artistry that is so much
00:08:22.700 of science. You had kind of mentioned that in the art of the inquiry. And so I'm wondering how
00:08:29.220 can we bring back the focus to this idea and bring humanity into, I want to say into data-driven
00:08:39.040 pursuits, but that doesn't sound very artistic. And so, yeah, so much of science has become
00:08:47.300 godlike in today's progressive communities then i kind of also wonder about this trifecta of art
00:08:55.080 god and data-driven pursuits i guess and where do we blend those all together in a way that feels
00:09:03.800 balanced and more true where one isn't overtaking the other yes yeah i don't even know if that's
00:09:12.840 the actual question, though, either, because there's so much that we can pull from here.
00:09:17.820 So much of our culture is built on this trifecta. So gosh, yeah, please, just if any of that's
00:09:25.120 poking at you, I'd love to hear what you think.
00:09:28.700 Right, right, right. How do we know if we're asking the right questions?
00:09:32.840 Especially when we use vocabulary words such as God. I quickly go to a space where we need to
00:09:40.200 sort of define the traditions of our cultural context, right? Because it's a place that
00:09:45.280 is largely unfamiliar to me. I didn't grow up with any religious tradition. I don't know. Did you?
00:09:52.320 No, I was raised quite secularly. So no, but I long to connect with something beyond intellect
00:10:06.440 and science for that matter and feel a type of I don't know if it's emptiness but it's definitely
00:10:15.300 this feeling that there has to be something more that we really don't understand the whole story
00:10:22.060 even with the best of research there's more to it and we may never understand that in a
00:10:31.300 data or intellectual driven way and can that be okay and maybe that's where the art comes in it's
00:10:40.160 like the art picks up where the science leaves off or maybe it's vice versa that's right that's right
00:10:47.920 there is this materialist view of the world which is certainly an ontology right ontology
00:10:58.860 Ontology is the study of why matter exists, right?
00:11:02.700 There's this ontology that suggests that you can live your whole life thinking that the physical substance of our reality is the whole of it.
00:11:16.740 In fact, the scientific method, which, as you said, is so often a substitute for godlike technology, because it is sort of a skeleton key into a particular scale of truth perception and experimental predictability that has worked very well thus far, you know, to do what we wanted it to do.
00:11:39.060 But our minds evolved on the African savanna, medium-shaped creatures moving at medium speeds through phenomenological reality.
00:11:53.260 And that has worked very well in a Newtonian sense, but over the past 120 years, since the sort of psychological revolution represented by this Einsteinian concept of reality, where energy and mass are equivocal at great speeds,
00:12:20.020 we're finding now and i'm i am the son of a astrophysicist my father dr william kaufman
00:12:31.860 the third was the uh was the director of the grift observatory for a time and he wrote many
00:12:38.160 college textbooks on astronomy and whatnot his books were called the universe or discovering
00:12:45.760 the universe was another one or cosmic frontiers of general relativity was another one you know so
00:12:51.360 so for i grew up under my in my father's shadow uh and dr kaufman's son was going to be a
00:12:59.380 mathematician so i have something in me that is programmed i have a lot of software in in in my
00:13:08.340 in my heart, soul, and mind that is oriented towards mathematical models and system thinking
00:13:15.380 on that level. And I still find it fascinating. And I find the new physics, right? Here we are
00:13:23.260 80 years after the Manhattan Project, you know, since Oppenheimer. Anyway, here we are 80 years
00:13:30.940 past that. When we're thinking of post-Einsteinian reality, when we're thinking about freeing
00:13:38.340 we're thinking about certain concepts of our universe,
00:13:43.980 including the Big Bang, including dark matter,
00:13:46.600 that are really open to new mathematical models, perhaps.
00:13:50.860 Like these singularities that have just never worked out mathematically.
00:13:55.220 And answering those questions might get us to become truly an intergalactic species.
00:14:05.020 Maybe.
00:14:05.520 In fact, this is a roundabout way to getting to a couple of things that I'd love to sort of work out with you here in real time, is the idea, one, that perhaps that's not a good destiny for our species to leave Earth.
00:14:23.680 Or even more so, I don't believe that we can because of what you said before, intimated at the godlike aspect to what I ascribe that to be, which is the infinity of life forms that we bodily represent physiologically.
00:14:46.380 I mean, as we are sitting here right now, you and I are both breathing in and out hundreds of thousands of fungal spores that have co-evolved with us for hundreds of millions of years into our earliest vertebral forms.
00:15:07.380 Even before that, into the very mitochondrial DNA that had a foreign place in our human bodies, in every single cell of us, we are the land, we are the earth, we are physiologically interconnected in a potentially infinite way.
00:15:34.620 So how could we understand that? How could we quantify that? How could we leave that? Because that is wholly terrestrial in nature. That is our interconnection to the biosphere process of evolution that there is no removing us from.
00:16:02.060 and i don't think that's a gloomy thought at all i think that that is a holy w-h-o-l-l-y
00:16:12.040 that is a holy integrating impulse that fuels my creative vocation right it fuels the thing that
00:16:23.500 i'm going after this and the thing that i'm going after isn't a thing at all of course it's a process
00:16:28.700 it is a trail it is not the destination at the end of the trail and uh and i think that
00:16:36.060 by that practice i'm coming almost asymptotically you know it's like they'll never quite get there
00:16:43.980 but it'll get there infinitely close and close to what i'm not exactly sure something like
00:16:49.460 infinity something like god something like connection something like fearlessness in the
00:16:57.440 face of death i you know i think about that a lot in terms of climate change and my own sense of
00:17:02.640 activism and community so like you know all of this sort of transcendent yet imminent experience
00:17:08.380 that you know is so well expressed by just the flow of watercolor on paper right and which brings
00:17:16.320 me to like the zen of the painting experience which is why gosh ayana i guess why i do what i do
00:17:24.760 well yeah there's so much there there there is and i don't mean to go completely big or
00:17:34.120 completely deep but i absolutely do because no i love it i you know i yeah no i'm i'm totally
00:17:39.460 into it why not okay good good why you know yeah i think that one of the great challenges of our
00:17:48.580 time of course is climate change or as i sort of less euphemistically call it in my books
00:17:56.160 climate breakdown by way of anthropogenic global warming the apt description of what
00:18:02.740 is happening in real time across now there's this existential dread this doomful heuristic
00:18:12.120 that manifests itself in the real sort of deleterious,
00:18:16.920 our mental health suffers from this daily charge.
00:18:21.620 What is presented to us is the withering of the biosphere
00:18:24.600 because of the choices that we are making,
00:18:29.580 which is an okay way of going about it,
00:18:33.460 but there are other ways of looking at it
00:18:37.120 In order such that we might confront it more holistically from a healthier perspective, as opposed to one that is ungrounded, uncentered, panicked, and, you know, potentially undemocratic because of it as well.
00:19:01.660 you know i'm one who really believes in the democratic process uh i mean the subject of
00:19:06.820 my work is california which is which is a political entity which is a democratic entity
00:19:12.180 doesn't exist except for in political political semiotic conversation we have this symbol of this
00:19:21.160 thing called california you know and i use that as a metaphor for greater processes across the land
00:19:27.080 and inside of me and it's a capable enough metaphor to do that to hold all of it to hold
00:19:36.720 all of my views on how the world society and ecology is glued together you know by way of
00:19:48.500 investigation of this these very complex systems within systems
00:19:51.800 Awaken by a wild flame
00:20:14.280 And nurtured by the alder
00:20:18.360 And hazel lace of sunlight haze
00:20:23.120 And threads of cold spring water
00:20:27.180 The season scribed in spiral
00:20:39.540 A feather bed below
00:20:43.200 And upward toward the turning sky
00:20:48.840 The heavy smell of snow
00:20:52.640 Gosh, you know, you're up there in Alaska today in Glacier Bay.
00:21:03.900 I wonder how you are dealing with climate anxiety up there.
00:21:10.200 I mean, I imagine you live in a very rural community out far from, you know, the dense urban populations that I deal with every day, living in downtown Oakland, California.
00:21:22.560 Oh, yeah. I think we can't escape the climate anxieties and the climate realities of this moment, no matter where we are. And it impacts us all psychologically, if not, you know, of course, materially.
00:21:40.380 And I'm thinking about humans being nature and we're not separate, which of course is something that is, I think most of us know in a rational type of way.
00:21:55.800 But what does that really mean or look like today with these ideas of the Anthropocene where it seems like we have become so separate from nature, which is why we're even dealing with the issues of climate change.
00:22:10.380 change because we have tried to separate ourselves and think of ourselves as humans as more mighty or
00:22:18.020 intelligent than the rest of nature and you know we could totally go down that rabbit hole of how
00:22:22.960 and why we separated even though we never can be separate anyways we completely rely on this earth
00:22:29.260 right and i really appreciate how much you engage the idea that our human concept of nature is
00:22:39.180 constructed and often serves a very specific societal purpose but at the same time you also
00:22:45.340 recognize just how important conservation and protecting these so-called you know natural
00:22:50.960 spaces can be so it'd be interesting to dive into this tension a bit more deeply
00:22:57.700 yeah i'd love to hear what you think now uh i love the point you just made there and if i
00:23:06.420 understand it i think that there's great truth there that's presented in paradoxes i love the
00:23:12.920 idea of paradox the paradox you know i guess i mean for this conversation we can call paradox
00:23:18.880 like any sort of absurd preposition that yields surprising or counterintuitive truths because of
00:23:28.580 Right. So one of the paradoxes might be that there's this game of alienation that civilization has played with itself in different forms, in different degrees, on different spectrums since, you know, for 100,000 years since the cognitive revolution.
00:23:55.020 Right. When we when we invented the the notion of fiction, when we invented the notion of art, something seems to have switched on in us in a way that we don't really see represented elsewhere in the fossil record.
00:24:14.780 anywhere and now we're chasing this self that is manifest psychologically see my mom was a
00:24:25.480 psychologist so now you're getting my full family story here i got got my astrophysicist father and
00:24:31.540 then i got my clinical psychologist mother and so somehow the you know nature nurture argument
00:24:38.980 inside of my own body and self is resolved or entangled therein and i am uh fascinated by
00:24:48.140 the the psychological development of the anthropological human what that thing then that
00:24:56.640 is as you said nature nature we can call we can call nature maybe this is really pushing the
00:25:03.740 limits of what i believe is the english language right uh nature nature with a capital n
00:25:10.700 might be what exists inside of you and that you can never separate yourself from right but then
00:25:17.820 there's the nature with the little n which is the course of american policy right nature with the
00:25:24.560 little n is the thing to be saved i guess and it's also the thing to be sort of fetishized
00:25:30.840 economically it's like well we if we just set aside enough of it it's going to be um okay
00:25:39.640 yeah which suggests whole realms of intellectual anemia right like it's just like
00:25:49.060 the connective tissue that is represented in landscapes across different ecologies
00:25:59.000 has a direct through line to the well-being of human communities everywhere at every stage of
00:26:06.160 our history across the planet and tracing that through the deep time and space of california
00:26:14.420 i have sort of parsed into these different books that i write and explore through this
00:26:20.820 consilient theory into this aesthetic space across this you know complex horizon of different
00:26:27.260 dancing variables inside of this matrix that is that is land area that is that is human policy
00:26:34.020 that is stories being told that is bottlenecks being experienced inside of climatic temporality
00:26:43.240 um i find interestingly and this is another paradox i just unpacked that very complex
00:26:52.700 sentiment that I just expressed, to unpack and return it to this very simple space.
00:26:58.260 Every single one of my books is built on very simple questions that I'm just trying to get
00:27:04.520 some good answers. Okay. So my first book in 2017 was the California Field Atlas.
00:27:13.940 And that book changed my life. And that was based on a very simple question too. Like what elements
00:27:20.240 of california and that's the whole natural world right because i use california as a microcosm
00:27:27.100 for greater macrocosm of the natural world or the more than human world what are those aspects that
00:27:34.200 have always been at least you know in the past six million years or so since the middle miocene
00:27:39.840 the sort of tectonic configuration of the california space began to resemble its current
00:27:46.360 self you know you can sort of say that's california what aspects of california have
00:27:51.400 always been what aspects continue to be despite the very successfully imposed urban veneer over
00:28:00.560 the past 170 years or so since the gold rush of 1850 and what aspects of california will always
00:28:09.740 be right so there's this temporal aspect across the spatial aspect which is where the secret of
00:28:18.020 the genre that is the field atlas came from right like field atlases don't exist i invented it
00:28:22.840 to tell this very specific story uh not about where things are or how to get places or
00:28:30.400 you know but to democratize the whole space if you will not just the the marquee things of like
00:28:37.100 yosemite or the giant coastal redwoods in it but like the whole of california these watersheds
00:28:42.960 across the western slope of the sierra nevada say north america's longest contiguous mountain range
00:28:48.220 i need to say it's also its highest these watersheds across the west slope of the sierra
00:28:52.660 nevada you know back then they emptied into what geologists call the san pablo sea right which is
00:29:00.380 an ocean that doesn't exist anymore and now you go through all my books and you find no roads
00:29:07.300 right because i'm much more interested in drawing that blue line of say like the yuba river for
00:29:12.620 example not surrounded by these little red lines that will return to the dust from which they are
00:29:18.400 made in the next few hundred years right but that blue line of the yuba river will look like that
00:29:24.540 for millions of years to come and that sort of exploration of deep time especially in the
00:29:30.540 context of now especially in the context of today's bottleneck you know climatic bottleneck
00:29:35.920 societal bottleneck whatever it is is a great wellspring of this thing called hope this actionable
00:29:44.840 beautiful amorphous thing called hope and and so that was my first book right so
00:29:51.820 So there's temporal aspect, and then I sort of organized it in, like, you know, these grand living systems of earth, air, fire, and water.
00:30:00.100 How do these big adaptive cycles inform this world-class portfolio of biodiversity that California still enjoys?
00:30:12.360 Because although every single one of our landscape types here in California are either threatened, endangered, or critically endangered, we have a very low extinction rate across the state.
00:30:29.600 Still, in 2023, we have a less than 1% extinction rate.
00:30:36.860 Now, it's a little bit higher with some classifications.
00:30:39.900 We've lost 5% to 10% of our freshwater fish species, for example, across the state.
00:30:46.160 We've lost some beautiful creatures, including that magnificent creature that we put on our state flag, the California grizzly.
00:30:55.700 In 2023, we are commemorating the 100th year since the last California grizzly was killed in Sequoia National Forest, 1923.
00:31:12.200 So what I've done in my next books, okay, so I did the state of water, and that was, to go back to these simple questions, okay, so these simple questions, California state of water, state of water, understanding California's most precious resource.
00:31:24.880 That book is very simply about water storage, water conveyance, and then water usage in the state.
00:31:34.280 And so that book, a thin little book that sort of breaks the format of my larger books, was really just sort of a large math problem that was peppered with my poetic and artistic voice ruminating on California's hydrological future, we can say.
00:31:53.040 in terms of surface water and surface water ecology.
00:31:56.300 So it's a very, it's a very narrow focus.
00:32:00.120 And then I opened it up again.
00:32:01.800 And this is, and Ayanna, this is the big thrust that I'm celebrating here with you today,
00:32:06.540 that I've written the third book now in what has become the California Lands Trilogy.
00:32:14.280 This is a series of California field atlases that began four years ago
00:32:19.140 with the publishing of The Forests of California.
00:32:22.260 and then it moves through to the coasts of California and now this year my new book is
00:32:28.000 called the deserts of California and that book is arriving in bookstores fall 2023 it is here now
00:32:39.020 and it is my baby and I am don't tell the other books but I think it might be my favorite
00:32:46.500 so I was telling you before that all my books have like very simple questions behind them
00:32:50.780 The Forests of California, the first book in this series, really asks simple questions like, what rivers flow through what national forests in California?
00:33:03.060 It's such a simple question, but it's a very difficult answer to get, especially on a popular level.
00:33:11.120 I mean, you can go to, you know, the USFS, United States Forest Service site, or USGS, or Department of Energy, and you can kind of find maps of rivers as they go through the political borders that are the Forest Service's designation of the 17 national forests in California.
00:33:28.340 But it's very difficult information to find, and it's not really for you.
00:33:32.520 It's usually for a researcher or a forester.
00:33:35.300 They're not really on roadmaps.
00:33:36.840 so i wanted to make very information very easily accessible on that level and then and then that
00:33:44.160 opened up the whole can of worms as to how the forests themselves are different in character
00:33:51.740 with respect to specifically arboreal i call ecology right what is a tree at all is another
00:33:59.340 of questions sort of like what is nature but you know inside of a forest ecosystem especially today
00:34:07.300 and when we're asking questions like what is a wildfire or what is a healthy forest and you know
00:34:14.580 i found some i found some shocking discoveries there too for example uh here we are the 21st
00:34:22.180 century in california and there are more trees in california now than there have ever been in
00:34:27.380 its entire geologic history there's more trees now in california than there has ever been and so
00:34:34.240 you hear or you see bumper stickers everywhere plant more trees plant more trees and i question
00:34:39.120 that reasoning in regards to our goals and the biogeographic reality on the landscape for example
00:34:53.840 if if we're really going for carbon sequestration we need healthy forests we don't need more trees
00:35:01.540 our forests are in fact after 100 years of fire suppression policy say from the united states
00:35:07.840 forest service we have we have trees that are potentially overpopulated infirmed stressed
00:35:16.180 beetle ridden we have which and all of those things might be very well inside of larger
00:35:23.740 very natural regimes too there's nothing new about the situation that we are in right now as far as
00:35:33.900 as far as for example drought is concerned for for example as far as fire is concerned
00:35:42.220 what we what is novel now is the is the uptick in in global temperature the simple question that
00:35:51.460 i asked for my next book the second volume was the coasts of california and that was simply
00:35:56.420 to ask what would a biogeographic survey of the view shed of california shoreline
00:36:04.760 actually look like from the very north of the state, Crescent City, say Del Norte County,
00:36:13.820 all the way down to San Diego, south of the state. And it's funny, I called the book The
00:36:22.040 Coasts of California. And the idea of pluralizing the coasts was so novel that when I bought
00:36:29.400 the website the url or whatever for the coasts of california.com i paid like 25 cents for it like
00:36:37.460 i guess it's because nobody had thought to like think of the coast of california as more than
00:36:44.800 one thing when ecologically very much is as you know being from mendocino it's like or having
00:36:50.560 lived in mendocino are you from mendocino or did you just live there i was born and raised in
00:36:57.040 southern california but lived in mendocino so i'm yeah familiar with the coastline oh okay okay so
00:37:04.360 you know you know how how ecologically different those two characters are oh very different quite
00:37:10.320 so how could you not pluralize them if you're really looking yes yes my the third in the series
00:37:17.580 now the deserts of california this new book beyond the sierra crest beyond this temperate
00:37:26.440 space where you and i know so well across these these arid landscapes the modern california
00:37:35.160 deserts themselves a very recent geologic phenomenon very recent just about the same
00:37:41.920 age as the Holocene, really, in this interglacial period that we're experiencing still over the
00:37:48.340 past 12,000 years. I find that, you know, in the deserts of California, which includes like,
00:37:55.680 for example, 72 different maps of all of the federal wilderness areas, hand-painted maps of
00:38:02.220 how the greater systems of biogeography and hydrology work within these wilderness areas.
00:38:11.440 i've got 72 maps but what those maps do and i and i lament at some point early on in the book that i
00:38:19.560 could have like made many of these maps with a pair of scissors instead of a paintbrush you know
00:38:25.380 which is which is ideologically politically what these land designations actually do and how they
00:38:34.940 are drawn with a broad pair of scissors that cuts the landscape up and so and so the simple question
00:38:43.600 that i asked in the deserts book which turns out is not so simple there's two parts of it really
00:38:50.600 the first part would be something like is there a bottom threshold of anthropogenic disturbance
00:39:00.960 that we can impose on the ecology by which it does not recognize itself and collapses
00:39:15.120 into something completely other than what it was? Or has that already happened?
00:39:24.000 Does the Mojave Desert, for example, one of the four deserts that I explore in this new book,
00:39:29.780 the deserts of california is the mojave desert something completely different now than what it
00:39:36.880 was before say colonization so the second part of that question would be what is the role that
00:39:43.880 fetishizing nature as nature can be put away into this wilderness area this is where
00:39:49.740 nature exists is that at all an apt way of going about the thing called conservation and if
00:40:03.300 and if not are we going to let great be the enemy of good it's not the greatest thing but it's what
00:40:14.080 we've got you know so so i wrestle with this a lot and i think that's probably where i am at this point
00:40:44.080 We'll be right back.
00:41:14.080 i'm in a lot of discussions these days with sacramento
00:41:26.460 specifically one guy his name is wade crowfoot and he's the our state secretary of natural
00:41:34.760 resources and uh let me see just if i could plug my own podcast which is place and purpose.live
00:41:42.420 in which once a month, me and the chairman of the Federated Indians of the Great and Rancheria in Santa Rosa,
00:41:51.320 Greg Sarris, who's also an author and a professor of literature at Stanford and at UCLA,
00:41:59.960 and he's the tribal chairman, he and I sit down once a month and discuss issues of seasonality
00:42:06.280 and traditional ecological knowledge and whatnot,
00:42:10.800 Wade, the Secretary Crowfoot,
00:42:13.680 joined us for a conversation this month
00:42:17.500 wherein we talked a lot about the 30 by 30 program.
00:42:21.520 Are you familiar with the 30 by 30 program?
00:42:24.580 I am, yeah.
00:42:25.460 But maybe some of our listeners aren't.
00:42:28.220 Right, right, right.
00:42:29.120 So it's moved to a national scale,
00:42:31.340 but it really had its seeds here in California
00:42:34.180 with the present Newsom administration, Gavin Newsom is our governor, the Newsom administration
00:42:39.180 who put forth the goal that by the year 2030, we will understate protection towards guidelines
00:42:48.760 that are intended to protect biodiversity in all of its different forms.
00:42:56.160 So under the auspice of this protection, we will have designated this land equating to 30% of it, right?
00:43:06.300 So 30% of the total land area of California, and California is very easy to figure out.
00:43:10.340 So you've got about 100 million.
00:43:12.360 It's about 101 point something million acres in California, 160,000 square miles.
00:43:19.400 California is not small.
00:43:22.080 It's not Alaska, but it's not small.
00:43:23.900 uh so so we got about 30 million acres right now we've got about 24 and a half million acres that
00:43:30.880 qualify so so in the next six years we've got about six million acres to go to protect
00:43:37.480 california's land and its waters waters the protected marine environments at about 16 right
00:43:45.140 so we've got a lot more work to do with protecting our our offshore ecologies but the deserts the
00:43:52.420 deserts are doing so much work because of these 72 wilderness areas that have got mapped out in
00:43:59.380 the book, or largely because of them. But we also got some national parks and some state parks down
00:44:04.000 there. The desert itself is doing so much heavy lifting for this goal of 30 by 30. And I've got
00:44:13.100 a lot of criticisms
00:44:14.680 about 30 by
00:44:16.940 30 and
00:44:18.900 and yet and yet
00:44:22.680 and yet I have
00:44:25.220 little
00:44:27.000 choice but to love this
00:44:29.080 program this 30
00:44:30.960 by 30 vision there's no
00:44:32.900 choice I
00:44:34.940 get scared for example
00:44:36.220 what happens if we make
00:44:39.060 that goal are people
00:44:40.940 going to
00:44:43.100 acquiesce somehow into a state of complicity where where it will have seemed as if we we did
00:44:52.220 it we saved nature now we have a license to trash the other 70 or what yeah what if we stop wouldn't
00:45:00.600 it make so much more sense to to carry on from 30 by 30 to do 50 by 50 which is the half earth
00:45:07.680 idea, which is really probably what it's going to take to give these species enough
00:45:15.500 buffer zone in order to retain these vectors of resiliency often embedded into the very
00:45:29.300 nature of biodiversity itself uh you know in order to to keep that complement that steward
00:45:37.700 that miracle if you will of the fact that you know we have an extinction rate of one percent
00:45:42.220 so it's tough because what we've got here now hey you're driven across the mojave desert or
00:45:49.740 have you done it lately probably about two years ago two years ago okay perhaps perhaps if uh
00:45:57.140 But, you know, if you're driving from like San Bernardino to Vegas, you will have passed the Ivanpah solar farm to the north, just just really close to the Nevada border.
00:46:09.880 Massive solar array.
00:46:11.260 OK, so those are those are springing up all across the desert, these incredibly expensive and by expensive, I'm not talking about economics, I'm talking about ecological expense.
00:46:27.140 These are incredibly ecologically expensive contraptions, contrivances, machines.
00:46:36.580 We've got across wind farms, solar farms, and geothermal farms across California's deserts.
00:46:43.460 We've got about, on any good given day, we've got about seven megawatts of energy that we can draw from the grid.
00:46:52.120 And this is necessary in order for our greater goal, which is drawdown, carbon drawdown.
00:47:01.900 We need to get away from fossil fuels.
00:47:03.920 And this is what we've got right now.
00:47:06.640 But by 2045, 2045 is when California plans on becoming a net carbon sink.
00:47:16.760 No longer a carbon source.
00:47:18.940 a net carbon sink
00:47:21.680 by 2045
00:47:23.240 means that
00:47:25.640 we will need at least
00:47:27.480 20 megawatts
00:47:29.920 of wind,
00:47:31.620 solar, and geothermal.
00:47:33.140 Right now we're at 7.
00:47:34.840 So we're going to need to
00:47:37.100 raise, R-A-Z-E,
00:47:39.780 we're going to need to raise
00:47:41.260 about a quarter
00:47:43.640 million more acres
00:47:45.160 across the desert in order
00:47:47.560 to do that and build these solar monstrosities to find this cheap solar energy that that we need to
00:48:00.260 to power our electric lives and hey i get it i remember that my books here my books here are
00:48:08.580 saying we're acting under an assumption that there is some sort of essential bottom level right you
00:48:14.880 hear that a lot in conversation circles like what is essential habitat and i'm here to
00:48:23.840 really consider that that question might be a paradox that that question might be
00:48:35.860 inappropriate and that question might even perhaps cynically be rooted in economics and not
00:48:44.580 in ecological science but how much can we get away with seems to be the subtext of the question
00:48:52.600 what is the you know what is the bottom limit to what we can exploit and yet still not be committing
00:49:03.560 ecocide say and i don't know if that's a good question and so we press forward
00:49:14.480 hoping that
00:49:17.760 this dangerous gamble of not letting
00:49:21.820 good be the enemy of great in this
00:49:25.940 democratic context of negotiation, compromise
00:49:29.800 and disappointment, ultimately
00:49:32.700 that the biodiversity holds on and the Mojave
00:49:38.000 remembers itself, for example
00:49:40.360 that
00:49:42.200 we don't lose
00:49:46.020 the existential entity
00:49:47.840 that is
00:49:48.760 this precious
00:49:52.160 jewel of biodiversity
00:49:53.820 of evolutionary
00:49:55.340 of
00:49:57.360 ancient evolutionary
00:50:00.080 processes that is our great
00:50:02.020 gift, honor, and sacred duty
00:50:03.980 to witness, to protect
00:50:06.020 and to
00:50:06.760 engage with on a reciprocal
00:50:09.920 level such that the investment is not wasted in how we take care of it it will take care of us
00:50:23.000 in taking in furthermore you can push that further in taking care of it we are taking care of us
00:50:29.380 in all human communities across the history of time there is a direct through line between
00:50:38.100 the fitness and robustness of biodiversity and the fitness and robustness of the human
00:50:47.620 community that it's adjacent to that that goes something like this it's like the math of like
00:50:53.420 like biodiversity means healthy ecosystems healthy ecosystems means predictable deliverable
00:51:00.480 ecological services within naturalized regimes that are then tappable, perhaps even exploitable
00:51:09.440 by the human communities that necessarily need them for the supply chains all the way
00:51:15.800 down to the bottom.
00:51:17.820 And that very straightforward line of logic is something that seems so lost to the materialist
00:51:27.340 21st century consumer capitalist industry that can't begin addressing the word sustainability.
00:51:38.600 Oh, that felt good to say, Ayanna.
00:51:41.640 Yeah. Yeah. Gosh. Well, sustainability is a tricky one. And also I feel like rewilding
00:51:50.860 is getting a bit tricky. And you had a talk called Thinking Like a Watershed in the Age
00:51:56.620 of resiliency. And you say, quote, I speak of rewilding as an evolutionary concept rooted in
00:52:02.020 deep time, offering what can be a kind of genetic code, an informational cipher, even a heading for
00:52:09.280 our efforts based in determining insight as to the character of California's truer self,
00:52:15.060 the one beyond the so successfully imposed concrete veneer of the 20th and 21st century,
00:52:20.220 end quote and yeah i really enjoy the way you speak about the idea of rewilding and the important
00:52:27.100 distinction between the idea of rewilding that comes from a misplaced idea that we can control
00:52:32.600 nature and an idea of rewilding as this deeply rooted evolutionary concept that you refer to
00:52:39.700 so yeah i'd love to hear how you're thinking about rewilding now and the role you see it
00:52:46.240 playing in california's future yeah yeah yeah there's so much there's so much in a prefix right
00:52:52.160 re r e you know every every from from return to reservation to rewilding to reciprocal to um
00:53:04.880 you know restoration to
00:53:08.840 reverse there is a looking backward in order to look ahead
00:53:15.980 circular aspect to that uh to that horizon and
00:53:24.300 you know on my podcast sitting across from greg saris uh he uh he often talks about
00:53:35.580 And the Southern Pomo Kishayo Dreamer, one of the great basket leavers of North Bay.
00:53:45.800 North Bay Arts in the late 19th or late 20th centuries just made the most beautiful baskets.
00:53:54.780 And if you know about the tradition of California basket making among indigenous peoples,
00:54:01.100 It's wrapped up in this whole narrative of how humanity works in the world.
00:54:09.160 And his teacher, this Kishaya woman, her name was Mabel McKay.
00:54:16.220 Mabel McKay says, you think, you know, she's such a plain speaker.
00:54:21.460 Greg does her very well.
00:54:23.320 You know, she's such a plain speaker.
00:54:24.980 She says, you think your ideas are so new?
00:54:27.760 Nothing is new.
00:54:29.480 Discovery doesn't exist.
00:54:31.100 it's just all remembering
00:54:32.760 and
00:54:34.940 there's that re again
00:54:36.800 there's that prefix
00:54:38.660 remembering
00:54:40.120 there is so
00:54:46.820 much wisdom in that
00:54:49.240 and so much license
00:54:50.600 license to
00:54:53.020 not
00:54:57.060 have to rely on the
00:54:59.220 novel
00:54:59.700 innovation. The novel innovation is a great help. But remembering, restoring, rewilding
00:55:10.380 is about engaging very old systems. We don't have to figure it out. It does it by itself.
00:55:21.580 you give it half a chance and it'll figure it out there are major biotic pieces of the puzzle
00:55:31.900 that are missing for example the beaver or the salmon which historically have historically
00:55:42.380 when i say historically i mean at the end of the last century like like the the time that has passed
00:55:51.860 is nothing i mean a century is a very long time for a human but for a place it's a blink it's a
00:56:00.760 it's not even a blink it's a it's it's there's no quantifiable measure that is that is
00:56:09.200 recognizable in human space
00:56:12.260 for how insignificant
00:56:14.000 it is in time over the way
00:56:16.100 that ecosystems
00:56:17.820 evolve to become
00:56:20.300 their resilient selves
00:56:21.920 that
00:56:23.960 paradox though is
00:56:26.080 rivaled by
00:56:27.680 the extraordinary
00:56:29.900 rate
00:56:31.500 by which
00:56:33.120 this
00:56:34.040 species of ours
00:56:37.120 in its current configuration, this worldly zeitgeist
00:56:42.320 that is this capitalistic fire cult, if you will,
00:56:48.940 fire everywhere, when you fire everywhere.
00:56:51.900 I mean, speaking metaphorically,
00:56:57.640 but making a larger point that we are the atmosphere,
00:57:03.620 Yeah, we are in the hydrosphere.
00:57:06.800 We are agents of some sort of programming that may or may not be attended to.
00:57:18.100 What is the limits of our agency?
00:57:19.840 This gets me critical of the nature of activism in general, although I appreciate local community.
00:57:29.300 California where I exist is
00:57:31.180 responsible for about 1%
00:57:33.140 of the total carbon
00:57:35.260 emissions across the biosphere every year
00:57:37.220 so we're working on that
00:57:39.440 we're working on
00:57:40.680 1% we can do that
00:57:43.100 here of course
00:57:44.900 under the neoliberal
00:57:47.320 globalist regime
00:57:48.420 we are
00:57:50.460 integrated into in the 21st century
00:57:55.480 what
00:57:57.380 can be done
00:57:58.480 on a global level
00:58:00.640 remains up in the air
00:58:02.600 how do we steer the ship
00:58:04.600 of 8 billion people I'm not exactly sure
00:58:06.360 but what I can
00:58:07.700 attest to is
00:58:10.260 the nature of
00:58:12.860 community
00:58:14.960 to engage one's
00:58:16.680 landscape and
00:58:17.600 that is where I hope that
00:58:20.400 my books as far as
00:58:22.680 ecological literacy
00:58:24.200 find their best
00:58:26.560 quality
00:58:27.740 And what I mean by that is that I want to, for as much as possible, remain non-prescriptive in my political agenda because I'm fascinated by complex systems.
00:58:46.000 Whatever system you're talking about, if it's complex, it experiences something called emergent phenomena.
00:58:54.220 Emergent phenomena are these unexpected, entirely unpredictable occurrences where good things happen or catastrophic things happen.
00:59:09.820 Or catastrophically good things happen. 1.00
00:59:11.900 And if we can just sort of like stand on the teeter-totter enough that we weight it towards catastrophic success as opposed to catastrophic failure, might we engage these endemic, indigenous systems? 0.99
00:59:34.900 systems. Might we remember these systems, as Mabel McKay might say, in order such that we leave 0.99
00:59:43.100 the natural world of California and indeed the biosphere at the end of the 21st century,
00:59:51.660 regardless of the injuries of climate change, in better shape than we left it at the end of
00:59:58.020 the 20th century i think it's entirely within our scope of work let's say
01:00:06.680 so that's probably where i'm going to sort of generally address that question if i did at all
01:00:16.260 i mean these questions are not capable of being directly answered
01:00:24.520 so i think what you did respond with was interesting and i was following you and
01:00:32.520 thinking you know it's hard not to think about old growth forest which is something that i
01:00:38.620 have been deeply devoted to for years and i really appreciate how much you engage with
01:00:46.160 old growth forest of california which have totally swept me away and i just don't feel
01:00:52.540 like this conversation would be complete if we didn't give some time to those just incredible
01:00:58.500 spirits and places and in your talk thinking like a watershed in the age of resiliency you say quote
01:01:06.960 although no human has yet witnessed the return of old growth conditions we can imagine what such a
01:01:13.500 community might look like end quote and so there's a number of questions like one i'm imagining or
01:01:20.440 I'm wondering how the power of imagination plays into your work and into your general philosophy of conservation.
01:01:27.720 And then, you know, specifically with old growth, it does challenge us to expand our frameworks of time, if that's even something our minds can, you know, or are truly even capable of, which I question, you know, you had mentioned deep time.
01:01:42.780 and so yeah just thinking about the beauty in opening ourselves up to input from other forms
01:01:51.260 of intelligence you refer to that in the mind of the redwood forest and so yeah can we even
01:01:58.500 comprehend deep time enough to imagine an old growth forest returning but there again is the
01:02:07.840 re word. And I'm thinking about that from a few comments ago. And so, yeah, it's hard for me to
01:02:15.280 really even directly ask you a question about this because I'm being challenged with my thoughts on
01:02:21.120 old growth forests, but I know that they call so loudly and they feel so powerful yet so fragile
01:02:29.920 at the same time. And so, yeah. So just from one old growth lover to another, wondering what
01:02:37.720 your thoughts are uh um this this is all very new science i can hear mabel mckay the kashaya
01:02:45.880 dreamer laughing at me when i say this but old growth for successive fire ecology science is a
01:02:53.300 new thing in fact across the university system just in the past 20 or 30 years fire ecology
01:02:58.640 has become its own thing apart from forestry apart from silviculture we understand now that
01:03:03.980 fire is a great creative force in fact the snag forest which is the which is the early forest
01:03:14.100 post fire post severe fire is more biodiverse holds more species of songbirds say
01:03:24.080 more species of songbird rely on the snag forest than they do on the old growth forest
01:03:30.100 right so so a lot of our notions on how valuable one type is to the other
01:03:37.700 are beginning to reveal new stories uh and we've got some big conservation challenges
01:03:47.220 90 of our endangered species don't exist in protected areas so we've got we've got like
01:03:55.580 core challenges and yet yet it's an remembering eye on it if i could sort of close with this
01:04:00.940 dreamy story that really is as compelling as it gets you asked me about imagining and where does
01:04:08.760 imagination place in my artwork and i i feel like i i like have this like this place of reverie in
01:04:16.820 my mind this daydream that's like 200 years ago or maybe it's 200 years from now but like i'm
01:04:24.600 Walking up the Sacramento River, which is the largest river in California that runs through the Sacramento Valley there, is fed by the northernmost rivers from the west slope of the Sierra Nevada.
01:04:40.720 spring it's may and you can you look across the flooded waters right because one of the things
01:04:51.120 that happens in the yearly pulse of water in california is that when the snow pack melts it
01:04:57.460 floods the valley to an enormous degree before the system thousands of levees and impoundments
01:05:04.700 and dams across the northern sacramento river valley were installed over the past 100 years
01:05:11.660 the river could swell to be 15 miles wide and i can imagine walking beside the river
01:05:18.640 looking out over the river to the east and you can see the whole surface of the water
01:05:22.940 glinting nickels with the return of hundreds of thousands of mature people-sized chinooks
01:05:34.700 salmon these were these were four or five foot long imaginous fish returning from their marine
01:05:44.420 adult lives to to find their headwaters and and along the shore are are these fat bears
01:05:56.980 fat bears and when i say a fat bear i mean weigh in at like 1800 pounds you know but the brown
01:06:03.960 bears of california fat off this routinely got upwards of over 2 000 pounds huge bears
01:06:11.080 and the the indigenous people of the north bay remind us that that it wasn't until the coming
01:06:20.820 of the gun that bears were dangerous to humans because of the abundance because of the
01:06:27.320 fecundity of not only the land but the stories that we told about the land for thousands and
01:06:33.120 thousands of years in pre-contact California that bears and humans lived peace and so you can
01:06:42.800 imagine the the whole landscape dotted with these fat bears across this flooded river valley
01:06:48.180 and in every step every step is full of thousands of different flower blooms and little flower
01:06:55.980 blooms you know in California we get so many tiny tiny little flowers flowers that are much smaller
01:07:02.040 than a pencil eraser and then we have hundreds and hundreds of native bees uh thousands of
01:07:08.580 native bee species across across north america and california but close to 2000
01:07:14.360 and and it almost seems as if there's a different pollinator for every flower species
01:07:20.600 the whole ground is alive in this hum of you know angiosperm magic and angiosperm is a flowering
01:07:28.740 plant right so silly so it's a wash with color and then i'm walking up past these terraced this
01:07:36.000 terraced landscape which is the the beaver dams okay so so before the fur rush which predated the
01:07:43.020 gold rush by about 20 or 30 years there was approximately 15 to 20 million beaver in the
01:07:49.320 california floristic province they estimated that there was one or two beaver per kilometer of
01:07:55.200 watercourse across the state and when you have beavers doing their thing slowing the water down
01:08:02.200 sinking the water spreading it across the landscape you get entire ecologies by the way of their
01:08:08.220 ecological engineering we get entire ecologies resistant to mega droughts that lasted
01:08:14.900 hundreds of years we know of several of them in the past uh 2000 years 100 year droughts
01:08:23.280 In which it seems like California Floristook Province retained its entire complement of biodiversity solely because of the largest of all North American rodents.
01:08:31.580 If you wonder if that is the beaver.
01:08:33.820 So I'm walking up the staircase of beaver dams, beaver lodges, to find ultimately the course where this shimik salmon ended up going. 0.90
01:08:44.340 Their headwaters, where in their anajimous life cycle, they're honored to lay their mortal bodies down.
01:08:52.140 and what we're talking about is hundreds of thousands of metric tons of
01:08:58.240 calcium phosphorus nitrogen the best plant fertilizer ever and then you know under the
01:09:08.680 winter snows then washed down in the floods or carried off by you know the thousands of raptors
01:09:16.340 that feed on their bones and drop them throughout the forest.
01:09:20.400 Feeding the forest, what starvation the trees, the forest itself must be experiencing now
01:09:29.320 without that clockwork return of this incredible song, song of the salmon, if you will.
01:09:40.500 And so it's this dream, this dream of fecundity, this dream of abundance
01:09:45.780 that is just right
01:09:47.980 here. It's all
01:09:49.640 written still on the landscape.
01:09:51.500 We
01:09:52.000 can, should, do
01:09:55.320 realize it. You can hear the
01:09:57.520 salmon. We're doing things like taking out
01:09:59.580 the four Klamath dams now
01:10:01.040 and sort of like the
01:10:03.480 last best
01:10:04.460 restoration. It's
01:10:07.340 the best chance that California salmon have
01:10:09.380 for continued
01:10:11.360 survival into the last half
01:10:13.540 of the 21st century. And they're
01:10:15.240 waiting for those dams to come they're waiting today we can hear them singing that song that
01:10:22.620 song is there to help them sing that song to witness to say i hear you i hear you is the thing
01:10:33.180 that that gets me out of bed in the morning it gets me to work on this stuff so i'm gonna leave
01:10:41.060 it at that, Anna. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for letting me express that
01:10:46.060 dream, that vision. That's the circuit. Yeah, absolutely. I'm so grateful you shared it.
01:10:51.140 Thank you. Yeah. Thank you. Well, it's hard to stop this conversation because there's so much
01:10:56.580 more to unpack. Oh, there really is. I'm grateful for this time. Well, you know, I really appreciate
01:11:06.640 you giving me the space to wander through my thoughts here in real time you know i'm not
01:11:12.340 i'm not a good soundbite guy you know i really i really want to uh express my most authentic
01:11:21.000 self with you and i feel like you really and as is your gift and i've seen this you elicit this
01:11:28.420 response from a number of authors thinkers on this podcast and and as i say to be counted
01:11:34.480 amongst your community is just such a thrill and so the thanks is all me to you oh yeah this has
01:11:41.380 been really wonderful ob and i'm grateful that you're in our community and yeah until the next
01:11:48.900 time we continue this wandering thank you my friend thank you ob
01:12:04.480 Thank you for listening to this episode of For the Wild.
01:12:15.160 The music you heard today is by Mema Tone, Magnetic Vines, and Daniela Lanaya.
01:12:21.540 For the Wild is created by Ayanna Young, Erica Ekrem, Julia Jackson,
01:12:30.780 Jackson Krupp, Evan Tenenbaum, and Jose Alejandro Rivera.
01:12:51.540 Thank you.