If Books Could Kill - March 06, 2025


Of Boys And Men

Topics
You Are A Badass Steve Harvey's "Act Like A Lady, Think Like A Man"

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 22 minutes

Words per minute

195.78

Word count

16,118

Sentence count

965

Harmful content

Misogyny

56

sentences flagged

Toxicity

147

sentences flagged

Hate speech

92

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 do it peter zing us zing give give us a zing about the men and the boys am i doing a boys
00:00:04.400 to men pun or just saying dudes rock and being done with it just keep saying that at like 15
00:00:10.360 minute intervals throughout the episode that's all i need from you as i recite tedious statistics
00:00:14.380 yeah i can't wait to say dudes rock 25 times while you read to me about like literacy rates
00:00:20.540 they're dropping out they're angry they're sad i'm ready to get yelled at by everyone it's just
00:00:29.620 like two guys talking about gender issues maybe that's the thing is no i think this is the first
00:00:33.760 episode we've ever done where we're actually qualified to talk about the topic we're like
00:00:38.020 a gay man and a straight man oh that's a good point that's why i didn't do any work for this
00:00:42.400 episode i'm a man so true read about men all right okay uh peter michael what do you know
00:00:47.940 about Of Boys and Men.
00:00:49.860 Finally, a book on my expertise, dudes.
00:01:07.240 So the book is called Of Boys and Men,
00:01:10.220 Why the Modern Male is Struggling,
00:01:12.220 Why It Matters,
00:01:13.040 and What to Do About It by Richard Reeves.
00:01:14.980 I hope the reasons why we're doing this episode are clear.
00:01:18.680 I feel like there's been a lot of discourse about the crisis of boys, what is happening
00:01:23.040 with the boys and the men, especially since the election. 0.98
00:01:26.080 And there's so much bad faith garbage going around.
00:01:29.320 Like, I also read Josh Hawley's book about this, which is basically the same book, but 0.60
00:01:33.700 like totally bad faith with no real solutions.
00:01:37.080 And I have been trying for the last couple of months to sort of separate the good faith
00:01:41.140 crisis of boys stuff from the bad faith stuff.
00:01:44.980 So we are going to attempt to do a good faith episode about a good faith book and talk about
00:01:50.060 the boys.
00:01:50.760 Well, this is a book about men and boys, so we will not be apologizing.
00:01:56.080 Yep.
00:01:56.420 You got a problem with us?
00:01:57.560 Blame God for putting us in charge.
00:02:00.060 Okay.
00:02:00.280 So I want to just dive into the book.
00:02:01.680 I think this is a good encapsulation of a lot of the good faith points that he's getting
00:02:06.400 at, but then I think a couple of the blind spots as well.
00:02:09.540 So I am going to send you the first couple of paragraphs.
00:02:13.980 I have been worrying about boys and men for 25 years.
00:02:17.880 That comes with the territory when you raise three boys, all now grown men.
00:02:21.760 My anxiety has spilled over into my day job.
00:02:23.920 I work as a scholar at the Brookings Institution, focusing mostly on equality of opportunity or the lack thereof.
00:02:30.820 Until now, I have paid most attention to the divisions of social class and race.
00:02:35.320 But I am increasingly worried about gender gaps, and perhaps not in the way you might expect.
00:02:39.880 It has become clear to me that there are growing numbers of boys and men who are struggling in
00:02:43.300 school, at work, and in the family. I used to fret about three boys and young men. Now I'm
00:02:48.080 worried about millions. And then he has a little bit of extra meta stuff about the book. Even so,
00:02:54.800 I have been reluctant to write this book. I've lost count of the number of people who advised
00:02:58.300 against it. In the current political climate, highlighting the problems of boys and men is
00:03:02.680 seen as a perilous undertaking. One friend, a newspaper columnist, said, I never go near
00:03:07.880 these issues if I can avoid it. There's nothing but pain there. Some argue that it is a distraction
00:03:12.140 from the challenges still faced by girls and women. I think this is a false choice. We can
00:03:17.180 hold two thoughts in our head at once. We can be passionate about women's rights and compassionate
00:03:21.220 toward vulnerable boys and men. Sure. Yeah, I think his kind of conclusion here is correct,
00:03:26.400 right? There's nothing precludes you from caring about gender equality in a way that protects
00:03:30.080 girls and protects boys. Like that is kind of fine. I also think one of the threads of like
00:03:35.940 irritation that I had throughout this book is that he's constantly talking about like you're
00:03:39.800 not even supposed to say it. There's a weird like almost like Schrodinger's crisis of men going on
00:03:45.880 where in society people are talking about this constantly. There have been numerous best-selling
00:03:51.040 books, cover stories of magazines, but every single person who discusses it says we're not
00:03:57.260 discussing it. A couple paragraphs later he lists a bunch of best-selling books like The End of Men,
00:04:03.220 There's one called Man Out.
00:04:04.740 There's one called Manning Up.
00:04:06.100 There's one called Man Interrupted.
00:04:07.680 John Gray, the Men Are From Mars guy, wrote The Boy Crisis.
00:04:11.060 And then Richard Reeves does not mention this, but apparently Maureen Dowd wrote a book called
00:04:15.720 Are Men Necessary?
00:04:17.020 The subtitle is just yes, and we should respect them.
00:04:19.920 Maureen Dowd.
00:04:21.900 So we are also going to go through roughly the same structure of the three ways in which
00:04:27.280 boys are falling behind.
00:04:28.540 So we've got education, work, and family.
00:04:30.860 I just want a note to our listeners, everyone who's like, we want good faith dissections
00:04:36.500 of books that are actually a little bit better, have a really strong point.
00:04:41.680 Prepare to be bored, okay? 1.00
00:04:44.000 I can't wait till this book gets stupid. 0.99
00:04:46.020 One of the most common comments we get is like, why don't you do a good book? 0.99
00:04:50.620 And like, you're going to see how bad this is.
00:04:52.060 You won't admit this.
00:04:53.120 I'll admit this. 1.00
00:04:53.780 It's a shit talking podcast. 1.00
00:04:55.440 You're like, oh, I'm doing journalism. 1.00
00:04:56.960 I have 200 pages of notes.
00:04:58.620 My notes are longer than the book. 0.96
00:05:00.860 I'm just like Googling dumbest books 2025. 0.98
00:05:05.280 I do think the world owes me a dumb one after this. 0.98
00:05:08.380 So the first thing we're going to talk about is the gender education gap. 0.97
00:05:12.000 This is like a very long and detailed part of the book.
00:05:15.640 And I'm not going to read long excerpts because it's basically just like a litany of statistics.
00:05:19.040 But I will read a couple of the statistics.
00:05:21.920 So actually, let me send these to you.
00:05:25.020 Girls are 14 percentage points more likely than boys to be school ready at age five.
00:05:29.640 A six percentage point gender gap in reading proficiency in fourth grade
00:05:33.960 widens to an 11 percentage point gap by the end of eighth grade.
00:05:37.800 In math, a six point gap favoring boys in fourth grade
00:05:40.880 has shrunk to a one point gap by eighth grade.
00:05:43.460 So basically girls are ready for school earlier than boys
00:05:46.080 and this little tiny gap just gets bigger the longer they're in school.
00:05:50.300 And due to some sort of structural problem, 1.00
00:05:53.360 girls are closing our natural God-given math advantage. 0.99
00:05:56.960 Math is one of the only areas where like it's either equal or boys are doing better. 1.00
00:06:02.880 But like in every other subject, like girls are like very decisively ahead. 0.92
00:06:06.900 Oh, you mean we're only better at the fundamental laws of the universe?
00:06:11.840 Let's go, boys.
00:06:13.840 Keep it.
00:06:14.660 Stay in that frame, Peter.
00:06:15.680 Keep that voice.
00:06:16.640 Keep that voice on the rest of the time.
00:06:18.120 The whole time, no matter what it is, I'm just cheering on the boys.
00:06:21.040 Let's go.
00:06:21.520 You know, as you follow this into college, we all kind of know this statistic that like colleges are now roughly 60 percent female.
00:06:28.720 Yeah.
00:06:28.900 He also mentions that basically boys have benefited from a massive nationwide affirmative action policy for decades.
00:06:38.680 So I'm going to send you these paragraphs. 0.57
00:06:40.360 Almost every college in the U.S. has mostly female students.
00:06:43.200 Last bastions of male dominance to fall were the Ivy League colleges, but everyone has now swung majority female.
00:06:49.460 The steady feminization of college campuses may not – is that really the terminology we're using? 0.94
00:06:55.000 You're supposed to say pussification. 0.97
00:06:56.320 It's pussification. 0.99
00:06:57.480 The vaginification. 0.99
00:07:00.160 The increasing vaginality. 0.73
00:07:03.080 Vaginality. 0.91
00:07:03.720 There's the word. 0.99
00:07:05.200 The steady feminization of college campuses may not trouble too many people.
00:07:09.100 But there is at least one group whose members really worry about it, admissions officers.
00:07:13.580 Once you become decidedly female in enrollment, writes Jennifer Delahunty, Kenyan College's former dean of admissions,
00:07:18.960 fewer males, and as it turns out, fewer females, find your campus attractive.
00:07:23.940 In a provocative New York Times opinion piece, plaintively headlined,
00:07:27.560 to all the girls I've rejected, she said publicly what everyone knows privately,
00:07:32.000 standards for admission to today's most selective colleges are stiffer for women than men.
00:07:36.900 This is like a huge self-own on the part of boys.
00:07:39.960 Like we need affirmative action to be going to college.
00:07:43.000 And we're still only like 40% of enrollment. 0.90
00:07:45.040 It almost justifies the fact that we had to keep them back, that they're doing so well at school now.
00:07:50.280 I know.
00:07:50.600 Because, like, as soon as we let them go to school, they're better than us.
00:07:52.980 Yeah, I know.
00:07:54.080 Dominating. 1.00
00:07:54.560 And now they call us stupid and they have to write books about how we're stupid. 1.00
00:07:57.160 There is actually, like, an anti-sexism case for why women are attending college and doing so much better at school is literally that the returns to education are better for women. 1.00
00:08:05.880 They had to go to college to get into the middle class, whereas men assumed, eh, I don't really have to go to college and I'll be okay.
00:08:11.520 Oh, interesting, yeah.
00:08:12.360 I mean, how can you prove these things, right?
00:08:13.520 But there's like some economic work saying like that actually explains the entire gap. 0.96
00:08:17.280 It's like women were behind, so they had to get educated. 0.97
00:08:19.640 That was the only reliable way to get money. 1.00
00:08:21.220 Dudes rock. 1.00
00:08:21.780 Dudes rock.
00:08:23.880 So again, this is an extremely well-established trend that girls are doing better than boys
00:08:28.120 in school.
00:08:28.620 Obviously, the causes of this are like very difficult to suss out.
00:08:32.420 I've noticed that most conversations about this focus on like the US context that like,
00:08:36.520 oh, it's the feminist movement or whatever, like changing understandings of gender.
00:08:39.420 But like this is a really remarkably global trend.
00:08:43.520 So it's like a global feminist conspiracy. 1.00
00:08:46.360 Yes, exactly. 1.00
00:08:46.980 That's what we need to go bigger. 1.00
00:08:48.080 Illuminati feminism. 1.00
00:08:49.440 Yeah.
00:08:49.680 So I read this super interesting Norwegian government report because the Scandinavian
00:08:54.080 countries were some of the first to show this trend.
00:08:56.060 As early as 1956, girls were doing better than boys in Scandinavia.
00:09:01.300 And among OECD countries, basically wealthy countries, it flipped from boys to girls in
00:09:06.700 achievement in 1966.
00:09:08.620 Imagine while Mad Men was happening, women in Norway were doing better than men. 0.99
00:09:12.900 That's fucking wild. 0.99
00:09:13.680 That's crazy. 0.99
00:09:14.240 What Reeves says is that the only thing that explains it is basically the timing of brain development between boys and girls.
00:09:22.940 So girls go through puberty about 18 months earlier than boys do.
00:09:26.900 And that has all kinds of processes in the brain that are extremely important for schooling.
00:09:31.860 So here is what Reeves says about it.
00:09:35.300 Adolescence is a period when we find it harder to restrain ourselves.
00:09:38.540 But the gap is much wider for boys than for girls because they have both more acceleration and less breaking power.
00:09:44.920 The parts of the brain associated with impulse control, planning, future orientation, sometimes labeled the CEO of the brain, are mostly in the prefrontal cortex, which matures about two years later in boys than in girls.
00:09:57.860 The cerebellum, for example, reaches full size at the age of 11 for girls, but not until age 15 for boys.
00:10:04.780 So basically, like, all of the things that allow you to decide, like, should I stay up late playing video games or should I do my homework and go to bed early?
00:10:13.260 All of those mechanisms are appearing much earlier for girls than for boys.
00:10:18.180 I mean, to state the obvious, this clocks.
00:10:21.400 I know, right?
00:10:22.200 I was doing myself, too.
00:10:23.460 If there's any, like, definitive quality of the teenage boy, it's lack of impulse control.
00:10:29.720 So do you know what his solution is?
00:10:31.120 this is like the main kind of headline to come out of this and something he's talked about a lot
00:10:34.480 publicly and like in interviews and stuff. Do you know what his solution is to the gender achievement
00:10:37.580 gap? My guess would be that each person transitions to the other gender right before puberty. 0.94
00:10:45.600 Damn it. You got there before me. My joke was going to be that like the only thing we can do 1.00
00:10:50.420 about this gap is puberty blockers for all American girls. We're now doing it for around 1.00
00:10:55.860 5,000 kids, we need to get that up to 25 to 30 million. There's no reason to enter puberty before
00:11:01.600 the brain is fully developed at the age of 25. You rent a car, then you get armpit hair. When I
00:11:07.960 write an article for The Atlantic, that's like, they won't let you say it. This is what it's about.
00:11:11.800 So his actual solution to this is basically red shirting. Hell yeah. So because boys are like a
00:11:17.760 little bit delayed in development, if you just hold every single boy back for a year, that will
00:11:22.720 essentially equalize like the maturity levels of girls and boys and then they'll start on an equal
00:11:27.380 footing this idea has actually been around since like the 1970s and so this is already roughly i've
00:11:34.120 seen different statistics but it's somewhere between five and ten percent of kids are held
00:11:37.860 back for a year yeah that means that there's a decent amount of literature comparing kids who
00:11:42.380 are held back for a year versus kids who are not held back for a year and like the data is very
00:11:46.140 clear that like kids are held back for a year do really well that makes sense because if you put me
00:11:50.820 back in fourth grade right now, I would dominate every aspect from reading to math to sports.
00:11:57.160 So the first time I read this chapter, this idea honestly sort of sounded fine to me.
00:12:03.180 Reeves has established enough credibility that I really trusted him at this point that, you know,
00:12:08.420 as I was reading through this chapter, I was like double checking statistics
00:12:11.260 and like everything checks out. But then once I got to the later sections of the book,
00:12:18.080 I was like, OK, I think I need to circle back to the data underneath this red shirting idea.
00:12:25.100 So the first problem with this idea is child care.
00:12:30.620 Right.
00:12:31.140 So he's like, don't worry, don't worry, don't worry.
00:12:32.720 We're also going to have universal pre-K.
00:12:34.940 I do sort of I understand you just you need a place for the boys to just mill about for another year.
00:12:41.420 Yeah.
00:12:41.920 See, this is as soon as something requires a massive social program, you know, it's a no go in America.
00:12:46.800 So I think the thing of adding like, oh, footnote, asterisk, we're just going to add universal pre-K to this does to me point to like one of the flaws in the book that begins to show up here is that I think one of the things that is appealing to him about this is because it seems like, oh, we're just making the structural change.
00:13:01.340 It's not ideological, right?
00:13:02.660 We're not like having different curricula in the classroom.
00:13:05.240 We're not hiring a bunch of teachers.
00:13:06.820 Right. 1.00
00:13:07.020 But the right is going to see this and be like, oh, you think boys are dumb and weak. 1.00
00:13:12.540 Exactly. 0.99
00:13:13.400 Every guy is just graduating high school at the age of 20.
00:13:16.060 You think the right's going to be OK with that?
00:13:18.180 This is also something that that he sort of he kind of waves away.
00:13:22.660 But if you look at the data on kids who are held back now, holding back kids that, you
00:13:28.740 know, fail, you know, fourth grade or something.
00:13:30.960 And so they just repeat the grade is actually like catastrophically bad for them because
00:13:35.340 it's really stigmatizing.
00:13:36.640 Right.
00:13:37.000 It's like you get held back. 1.00
00:13:38.140 The whole fucking school knows why you were held back. 0.99
00:13:40.060 All of your friends are no longer in your class anymore. 0.99
00:13:43.040 Presumably a lot of the social stigma goes away in his situation, right?
00:13:47.000 This is his argument. 1.00
00:13:47.820 Yeah, that if it's all boys, then it's not like, well, Jeff is dumb. 0.98
00:13:52.060 It's like, well, every boy in the class is one year older. 0.88
00:13:54.400 Girls are in first grade and they're just passing, they pass a room in the hallway and they're like, what's in there? 0.74
00:14:01.000 That's the boys your age milling.
00:14:04.620 It just sort of feels like, oh man, this group of people is like so broken, every single one of them.
00:14:12.160 Yeah.
00:14:12.520 has to, has to get this remedial thing. I mean, there's no way to prove it, Rex. It's never been
00:14:16.840 tried. But to me, I don't actually think the stigma would go away. I think it's like,
00:14:20.780 it would be humiliating for boys just like as a class, even if you're a gifted, even if you're
00:14:24.860 a smart kid, boy, you're then going to school a year later. Cause like, oh, you can't handle it.
00:14:29.500 Like your sister is more mature than you. Right. Or like you have to test up or something. Cause
00:14:33.360 you know, you know that some parents would want their kids to have access to first grade or 0.98
00:14:38.560 whatever when the girls do so you'd probably implement a testing system or something like
00:14:44.000 that you can see it being tricky very immediately and i think the what you what this requires is 0.90
00:14:50.880 like a nationwide consensus that boys are biologically dumber at this age and there is
00:15:00.760 no way that you're going to get people to believe that that is true it's also not true i mean i also
00:15:05.060 looked into the biological evidence on this. It's like the whole biological theory is that like
00:15:09.440 boys are worse at controlling their impulses and boy brains and girl brains are different. And
00:15:13.720 the actual evidence that there's a sort of biological basis for this kind of behavior
00:15:19.440 is pretty thin. I mean, brain evidence is like pretty hard to link to behavior because we're
00:15:24.320 just talking about regions of the brain, right? It's like, well, boys, boy brains have this part
00:15:28.040 that's bigger and girl brains are like a little bit denser. But to then say like, that's why girls 0.93
00:15:32.660 do homework it's like well maybe it could be also that they're socialized to do homework i mean we 0.83
00:15:36.860 don't even fucking under we think we barely understand what consciousness comes from right
00:15:40.960 so the idea that we understand exactly where impulse control comes from right is a little 0.98
00:15:47.440 misguided also even this thing of like boys have worse impulse control than girls even that is just
00:15:53.600 like a thing that people say it's kind of an urban legend girls have different impulses than boys
00:15:58.100 yeah and what happens during adolescence is it's true that you have a huge increase in your
00:16:02.560 it's called sensation seeking. Like you want things that give you pleasure. But at the same
00:16:06.180 time, you're also getting much more ability to control your impulses. Okay. So earlier when I
00:16:10.720 said everyone sees the gap between boys and girls, you just let me ramble like an asshole. 0.99
00:16:15.380 I let you do it because I was going to... Interesting. 0.99
00:16:19.260 This is what I do on this show. I'm like, yes, yes, Peter. Wait six minutes.
00:16:23.340 There are things that feel related to impulse control that you see like teenage girls get into
00:16:26.620 that you just tend not to see teenage boys get into. And I always wonder how socialized that is
00:16:31.720 versus, you know, some developmental brain shit or whatever, boys would never do the 0.99
00:16:37.340 slender man killings. 0.99
00:16:38.600 It's not a morality thing.
00:16:40.540 It's that the lore is too deep.
00:16:42.860 I mean, one thing that really stuck out to me and I really remember from this period
00:16:46.000 of my life, too, is that when you go through puberty, yes, you have more impulses.
00:16:50.580 Yes, you have more ability to control your impulses.
00:16:52.300 But at the same time, you also start to care what other people think about you.
00:16:55.420 This sort of hormonal blast that you get is part of what makes you aware of like, am I
00:17:00.280 popular?
00:17:00.860 Do other people like me?
00:17:02.040 How am I fitting in?
00:17:02.800 Like, this is really when, like, teen hierarchies start to form.
00:17:06.200 And so the fact that people's behavior changes around, like, 12, 13 could be the biology of the brain.
00:17:12.060 Like, their myelin sheaths are getting thicker.
00:17:14.040 But it could also just be, like, well, they care about what other people think.
00:17:16.840 Like, it's just so hard to untangle this stuff.
00:17:19.780 Why are we such worse drivers?
00:17:21.180 That's actually such a fascinating example to me because part of that is probably, like, boys are more risk-seeking. 0.98
00:17:26.180 Like, you can easily say that's, like, a biological thing or, like, there's some evolutionary crank shit that I'm, like, 0.89
00:17:30.580 totally skipping so i'm like boys boys had to be risk-taking to fight mammoths or whatever fine 1.00
00:17:35.080 right also like boys are also socialized in a way to be like you're a fucking pussy if you drive 1.00
00:17:40.220 slow so like are boys driving fast because of brains or because of social we just don't know 1.00
00:17:45.540 the only the only way to know would be to find one of those boys who was raised by wolves and
00:17:53.540 give him a car and see how fast he goes this society-wide thing that he's proposing that has
00:17:58.200 never been done by the way there's never been a randomized control trial of this he's proposing
00:18:01.460 this for the entire country at once basically relies on a little bit at least unestablished
00:18:06.580 biological theory and then also the evidence for red shirting itself is pretty thin mostly because
00:18:12.480 it is true at the most basic level that like boys who are held back a year do a lot better
00:18:16.100 however most parents who hold back their kids are like really wealthy parents who read like cute
00:18:22.960 books about like cute little one weird trick ideas to help their kids do better in school
00:18:27.700 So the idea of redshirting was popularized in Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers.
00:18:31.720 This is why three weeks ago you texted me being like, did we talk about redshirting
00:18:34.880 when we discussed outliers?
00:18:36.740 And I was like, Mike, that was two and a half years ago.
00:18:39.160 I had to check the transcript.
00:18:40.580 I was like, did we talk about it? 0.99
00:18:42.080 I don't want to talk shit on anybody who does this with their boys. 0.96
00:18:43.960 I think there's all kinds of reasons why you would or would not do this. 0.98
00:18:46.100 I'm not judging anybody.
00:18:47.060 But like as a policy for every single boy in the country, there's not that much evidence.
00:18:52.840 And to the extent that we can say anything, there's a couple of like natural experiments
00:18:56.420 where because this has become such a craze,
00:18:59.540 some states have changed their criteria for like birthdays
00:19:02.760 and they'll move the cutoff up.
00:19:04.720 So all of a sudden you have boys who like would have been in first grade.
00:19:07.220 They're now going a year later.
00:19:08.760 And so we do have some data on that.
00:19:10.220 But it appears that at first you do see huge gains.
00:19:13.540 Like if you're a year older than the other kindergartners,
00:19:15.820 you're 20% older than the other kids.
00:19:18.340 And then it decreases.
00:19:19.900 Yeah.
00:19:20.080 By the time you're like a freshman in high school,
00:19:21.720 you're like 3% older than the other kids.
00:19:23.960 Right.
00:19:24.140 There's also the last thing I want to mention is that
00:19:25.520 If you look at the studies, even the ones that Richard Reeves cites in his book, race and socioeconomic class have a way bigger effect than, like, your birth month.
00:19:33.720 Right.
00:19:33.920 It's perfect Malcolm Gladwell bait, right?
00:19:35.860 It's like, did you know that, like, boys born in October do better than boys born in December?
00:19:39.780 Yeah, yeah.
00:19:40.340 But, like, we're talking about tiny little things.
00:19:42.740 And then if the main determinants of, like, outcomes and stuff is mostly, like, how rich are your parents and, like, how good is the school that you go to?
00:19:49.720 Right.
00:19:50.020 It just isn't the case that, like, we can one weird trick our way to, like, the gender achievement gap going away.
00:19:54.580 You can't talk about nationwide, massive societal change kind of solutions when we haven't even quite pinpointed the problem, right?
00:20:07.780 Like we have ideas.
00:20:09.220 Right.
00:20:09.420 I don't think from what I've heard that we know enough to be like, pass a law, boys have to start school later.
00:20:16.000 Before we move on to the work stuff, I just want to talk really briefly about like the actual causes of the gender achievement gap, or at least the extent to which we know what they are.
00:20:23.440 the researchers seem to have settled on this thing like kind of conscientiousness or they call them
00:20:29.560 non-cognitive skills that boys and girls are roughly the same amount of intelligence like
00:20:34.020 boys are not dumber than girls but girls are much higher in conscientiousness and other sort of like
00:20:39.600 i can get things done like putting off gratification kinds of skills to me it's like this stuff is 0.94
00:20:44.200 really interesting but also it doesn't really solve the problem right it's like why are boys
00:20:48.520 falling behind ah they're less conscientious well why are they less conscientious then we're just
00:20:51.960 back to like is it biology or is it socialization again because we're punishing boys who lash out
00:20:57.180 in class they get yelled at and then they don't do as well in school and i speak from personal
00:21:04.320 experience uh i got yelled at all the time and look where you are now and now i'm a podcaster
00:21:10.140 you should do scared straight presentations in middle school and now i'm a podcaster as a young
00:21:15.900 as a young boy back when i was on my adhd meds i was a gifted student uh it was when i went off 1.00
00:21:23.020 the meds that they were like oh you're actually stupid you're actually dumb as hell it was the 0.99
00:21:27.600 adderall the whole time that was just chemicals so there is actually some evidence that boys are 0.99
00:21:33.720 discriminated against in school so boys tend to do better on things like standardized tests
00:21:40.360 where there's no teacher discretion where it's just like you fill in the bubbles and everybody's
00:21:44.440 graded on the same criteria. When they aren't there to judge us. Well, honestly, like as soon
00:21:49.080 as there's teacher discretion, it's like an essay or whatever, like teachers know the kids. Teachers
00:21:52.580 are overwhelmingly female, especially in earlier grades, especially in elementary school. And so
00:21:57.620 it's fairly plausible that teachers might just be giving less grace to boys, especially considering
00:22:03.380 that boys are much more likely to act out. They might then get into the cycle of punishment where
00:22:07.780 they act out. And then teachers are like, oh, he's one of the boys that acts out. I'm not going to
00:22:10.540 give him a good grade. That's at least plausible. Although there's been tons of work
00:22:14.400 on this because it's a really big deal, right? If boys are facing discrimination in schools,
00:22:17.440 like systematically, it's like that is something that we should be concerned about. And so as
00:22:22.600 people have looked into this more, it appears that this effect only shows up or primarily shows up
00:22:27.660 for poor boys. Because if you're a rich boy acting out and you get in trouble, then your
00:22:32.860 obnoxious ass parents go yell at the teacher and they don't have time for that. There's this theory 0.99
00:22:37.680 that basically social deprivation seems to harm boys more than girls. Boys raised by single 0.91
00:22:44.160 mothers have worse outcomes in life, whereas girls raised by single mothers basically do the same
00:22:48.820 as people not raised by single mothers. Well, then it sounds to me like that's also
00:22:53.380 discrimination, but this time from the mothers. There's no one in this world more discriminated
00:23:00.240 against than the little misbehaving boy. That's my personal belief. We are getting representation.
00:23:06.080 you are qualified to talk about this as a young troublemaker yeah when i was a kid as a young
00:23:11.680 troublemaker with a wasted life with the outcome that you have ended up where you are new jersey
00:23:17.640 podcaster if you would if you i should have never told you i moved to new jersey
00:23:23.340 if i if you would ask nine-year-old me who's got it the hardest i would have been like probably
00:23:29.280 little boys who make trouble uh probably little boys to who have who like to have a little bit
00:23:33.120 of fun sometimes. So the other thing, the other thing I wanted to say about like the gender
00:23:36.440 achievement gap is that like, it is wild how consistent it is, but it's also really interesting
00:23:41.180 how much it varies. So if you look at race, Asian kids, girls are 3% more likely to graduate from
00:23:48.620 high school than boys. If you look at black kids, boys are 19% less likely to graduate from high
00:23:53.720 school. Wow. The gender gap is like everywhere, but it, it varies a ton across like income levels 0.97
00:23:59.420 across countries. Like in some countries it's really big and some countries it's really small. 0.63
00:24:03.120 Which also indicates to me anyway that it's like fairly malleable.
00:24:06.900 Right.
00:24:07.080 So I'm going to send you one of many charts that I'm going to send you this episode.
00:24:12.140 I love sending you charts.
00:24:13.420 Okay.
00:24:13.840 So what are you seeing?
00:24:14.460 Tell me what you see.
00:24:15.040 This is a chart from Brookings, a state-by-state breakdown of whether girls are more likely to graduate high school on time.
00:24:25.920 Yeah. 0.97
00:24:26.160 Girls are more likely to graduate high school on time in every single state. 1.00
00:24:31.760 Yes.
00:24:32.000 However, the gap between girls and boys is about as or even less significant than the gap between certain states.
00:24:43.880 If you look at Virginia, the best performing state, boys are like 91% graduating high school on time, girls 95.
00:24:53.320 If you look at Arizona, it's like 73 and 80, something like that.
00:24:57.900 Yeah. So you're seeing the same gap between boys and girls. However, also seems obvious that like
00:25:07.000 state by state policy is playing a big role here. This is precisely what I wanted to get at is that
00:25:10.880 like you do see a gap between girls and boys. It's always the same trend. But in the smallest state,
00:25:17.280 it's 2%. So in Vermont, girls are 2% more likely to graduate from high school. And in the worst
00:25:22.900 performing state, it's 9%. So girls are 9% more likely to graduate in New Mexico. And you can
00:25:27.740 also see in the trend line, you can see that as the states do better in general on kids graduating
00:25:32.900 from high school on time, the gender gap tends to be smaller. They're graduating more kids and
00:25:38.060 they're graduating more boys relative to girls. I don't mean to open a can of worms here, but this
00:25:41.800 reminds me a lot of like race and IQ stuff where people will be like, here's this racial gap in IQ.
00:25:48.140 And even if you imagine that IQ is like this very important metric, the gap that you're looking at
00:25:55.160 is often less than the generational gap.
00:25:58.200 Right.
00:25:58.480 When you're talking about a gap between two groups,
00:26:02.280 just because it's real doesn't always mean
00:26:05.100 that it's the most important thing happening.
00:26:07.020 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:26:07.380 Because you've got a 20% difference in graduation rates
00:26:09.920 between Arizona and Virginia.
00:26:12.120 Enormous gaps.
00:26:12.920 Right, 75% of kids are graduating versus 95% of kids.
00:26:15.440 That's huge, right?
00:26:16.740 And then you've got this gender gap,
00:26:18.100 which is roughly, usually it's like four or 5%,
00:26:20.300 but at biggest, it's 9%.
00:26:22.260 If we can address something,
00:26:23.540 it's probably just the overall graduation rates. Like, it's really bad that there's this huge
00:26:28.180 disparity. What's happening in the American Southwest? Arizona and New Mexico are the
00:26:32.840 worst two states. It's the strip malls and the scorpions. This is my airport bestseller. 0.92
00:26:38.100 So the thing is, I want to say, yes, the gender achievement gap obviously matters.
00:26:42.640 I think it's probably something to do with poverty and deprivation. And there's other
00:26:46.860 things that we can do. There's deliberate strategies that states and countries have
00:26:51.020 done to like identify the boys that are at the highest risk for dropping out and do like targeted
00:26:55.920 interventions on those boys. Right. The biggest problem with like my explanation that it's like
00:27:01.080 something to do with deprivation is basically the Scandinavian countries. Yeah. Norway and Finland
00:27:05.820 have extremely high rates of income equality and also have huge gender gaps and have tried to close
00:27:13.740 the gender gaps for literally decades and have failed. I don't want to replace Richard Reeves
00:27:18.400 is like one weird trick with like another weird trick of mine like let's make class sizes smaller
00:27:22.420 or something yeah it's like countries that have been working on this for decades have not done it
00:27:26.080 and it does not appear that there's like any obvious fix can i can i articulate what i believe
00:27:30.940 is like a slightly good faithified version of the right-wing theory of why this is happening
00:27:37.400 do it that there are sort of cultural elements within school administration that are biased
00:27:44.020 against young boys, that teaching and school administration full of anti-boy libs.
00:27:51.540 I read some like fairly credible academic work that was like kind of trying to posit
00:27:56.300 this in like a polite way, like the curriculum have changed. 0.54
00:27:59.260 One of them was like, we should make sure that boys are reading literature with male
00:28:02.840 protagonists.
00:28:03.880 Name one book that had a male protagonist that you read when you were in school.
00:28:08.720 There's also my favorite biological crank theory was there's this weird theory that
00:28:13.420 boys they hear different frequencies than girls and so they can't hear their female teachers 1.00
00:28:18.780 scientifically we're just tuning these bitches out it's so dumb i actually literally can't hear 1.00
00:28:25.140 women that's dude women women be talking the paper academic paper i know god damn dude that 1.00
00:28:33.040 rules i i the audacity the audacity to be like i can't even hear him i can't even hear him okay
00:28:39.480 But to take vaguely seriously this, like, bad faith case, boys have been told that, like, masculinity is toxic and they're, you know, maybe they're afraid of raising their hands or maybe it's just, like, giving them really low self-esteem.
00:28:49.500 The problem with it, of course, I mean, first of all is the international comparisons because they have completely different sort of feminist movements in other countries.
00:28:55.300 But also among the states, we just saw, like, Arkansas has one of the largest gender gaps. 0.97
00:29:00.860 Right.
00:29:01.160 And so we don't see a clear correlation between, like, curricula and outcomes between girls and boys.
00:29:07.320 It's not based on the content.
00:29:08.420 Yeah, that does seem pretty devastating to the cultural argument, right? 1.00
00:29:11.760 So that was gender achievement. 1.00
00:29:13.520 We've solved nothing. 0.92
00:29:14.740 We've learned nothing.
00:29:15.720 This is a problem with no solutions.
00:29:17.280 We just found out that boys can't hear girls.
00:29:20.080 That's the only thing you're going to remember. 1.00
00:29:22.020 There's going to be one in-joke running out of this episode, and it's, I can't hear women. 1.00
00:29:26.020 Women speak at a frequency I can't hear. 0.99
00:29:28.200 My academic paper. 0.98
00:29:30.020 OK, so now we are going to talk about how the boys are struggling in the workplace.
00:29:36.260 I will say this.
00:29:37.180 I we're going to we're we've cracked a bunch of jokes and we'll continue to crack a bunch of jokes.
00:29:41.860 But there's a real issue being being identified here.
00:29:45.700 Right.
00:29:46.000 The clear gaps at the education level.
00:29:50.040 And I imagine we're about to hear about more in the workplace that due to the feminization, the vaginality, increased vaginality of HR.
00:29:58.740 Since the 1980s, women have earned around 33 percent more.
00:30:03.580 Men have earned 10 percent less.
00:30:05.620 In real terms.
00:30:06.480 Yeah.
00:30:06.720 If you look at like men with no high school diploma, they are earning 23% less than they did in 1979.
00:30:14.080 Women are earning more, 4% more.
00:30:16.740 If you only have a high school diploma, you didn't go to college.
00:30:19.340 Men are earning 18% less.
00:30:21.080 Women are earning 6% more.
00:30:22.760 Among Americans with bachelor's degrees, men earn about 20% more than they did in 1980.
00:30:27.420 Women earn about 40% more than they did in 1980.
00:30:29.920 A lot of this seems like it might be a little less gendered and more about like the post-union order shaking out.
00:30:35.500 And Reeves talks about men were concentrated in industries that were vulnerable to automation
00:30:41.060 and outsourcing. All of this like sort of blue collar work has faded as this kind of like pink
00:30:47.300 collar work or these like knowledge jobs have increased. So, you know, you think about like
00:30:51.340 nurse practitioners or various middle managers, a lot of these are kind of like knowledge work
00:30:56.460 and require a lot of like what he calls is like emotional intelligence rather than kind of like
00:31:00.800 technical intelligence. I was waiting for us to talk about emotional intelligence.
00:31:04.000 He says, you know, STEM fields, women are gaining ground in that area.
00:31:08.360 But the biggest growth in the economy over the last 40 years has been in what he calls 0.99
00:31:11.680 a heel profession.
00:31:13.280 So healthcare, education, administration, and literacy. 0.66
00:31:16.720 His solution is basically just like a huge, he actually says this at one point, like affirmative
00:31:21.520 action to get men into these like heel positions, like getting them into these like more kind
00:31:26.800 of feminine coded stuff like nursing and teaching. 1.00
00:31:30.180 Maybe we can do an affirmative action trade. 0.80
00:31:32.300 He does say that we should have a two-to-one hiring preference for men in these heel positions.
00:31:39.300 And he's like –
00:31:39.720 Hell, yeah.
00:31:39.920 Just straight up illegal discrimination.
00:31:41.860 And he says – he's like, before you say it's illegal, before you say it's illegal, that's what's been happening in STEM if you actually look at the numbers.
00:31:47.120 Yeah, but not as an actual – not as an actual overt express policy.
00:31:52.060 That doesn't make his thing – his idea legal.
00:31:54.180 He also – he says there should be like male-targeted scholarships and fellowships to get men into these fields.
00:31:59.420 That's about to get going.
00:32:00.340 Yeah.
00:32:00.480 It's guys only for scholarships from here on out.
00:32:03.940 So anyway, this is his plan, like a big affirmative action thing.
00:32:06.440 He also has this kind of like somewhat strange section about how ultimately we're not going
00:32:12.520 to get to gender parity because like people just have different preferences.
00:32:15.940 Hell yeah.
00:32:16.240 So here is him talking about the advances that have been made and potentially the limits
00:32:21.240 of those advances.
00:32:23.020 There has been a strong movement to get more girls and women into STEM careers in science,
00:32:27.400 technology, engineering, and mathematics.
00:32:29.380 It has been pretty successful, too.
00:32:31.120 Women now account for 27% of workers in these occupations, a big jump from the 8% share
00:32:35.680 in 1970, though still, of course, a long way from parity.
00:32:39.820 That is a big increase, but that's also a 50-year span, right?
00:32:42.700 Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:32:43.600 And also still a 3-to-1 ratio between men and women in STEM.
00:32:46.920 It's still a really big disparity.
00:32:48.960 Should we expect to get to 50-50 gender parity in all these jobs?
00:32:52.720 Probably not.
00:32:53.520 On average, remember, men are more attracted to things, women to people. 0.95
00:32:58.360 Even under conditions of perfect gender equality, more men than women will likely choose these
00:33:03.380 career paths, not because of sexism or socialization, but because of real differences in preferences.
00:33:09.740 Okay.
00:33:10.020 How is he separating out socialization from those preferences?
00:33:12.420 Yeah, this is one of the only places where he was laundering this weird right-wing argument.
00:33:18.520 Well, I don't know if we could really do much more because like they just have different
00:33:21.860 preferences. And honestly, if tech was like 55% men, I feel like honestly, I'd be like, yeah, 0.87
00:33:28.880 whatever. Even if it gets to like 60, 40, I feel like a lot of the broader social concern starts
00:33:34.180 to fall off. But like you look at the influence of tech right now on broader society and it's hard
00:33:44.440 not to feel like perhaps the male dominated element of that culture is causing some slightly
00:33:50.460 bigger problems than it might appear to at a glance, right?
00:33:53.580 Yeah.
00:33:53.740 The persistent testicality of existing fields can also be a problem.
00:33:57.880 And also, I mean, this is kind of what we're getting to now because the obvious counter
00:34:01.580 argument to what he's saying is like, well, why should we do all this effort to put men
00:34:06.900 into the workforce when men earn more than women? 0.95
00:34:09.460 Right.
00:34:09.660 He has a whole section where he acknowledges that among full-time workers, women earn 82
00:34:14.400 cents to the dollar.
00:34:16.060 Among all workers, if you include part-time workers, it's 67 cents to the dollar, which
00:34:19.960 is a huge gap yeah so his argument about this is that first of all we need to acknowledge the fact
00:34:25.300 that the gender wage gap has gotten much better over time which i don't find difficult to
00:34:29.060 acknowledge at all and i i don't see like feminists arguing about this or like i don't
00:34:32.980 know what feminists are saying because i literally can't hear them but even their writing even when 1.00
00:34:39.220 they write articles it just shows up as like hieroglyphics for me i don't know maybe that's
00:34:42.440 that's my cochlear that's the shape of my ears doesn't know i'm sorry it's uh it's the west 0.98
00:34:46.820 world doesn't look like anything to me it's when they're looking at their fucking schematics so 0.96
00:34:50.860 his other thing is that like it can be deceptive to say women are 82 cents for every dollar that 0.98
00:34:56.840 a man makes because there's a huge amount of overlap so 40 percent of women earn more than
00:35:01.380 men's median earnings okay well then who cares exactly we're done here what's the percentage of
00:35:07.280 boys who are back in town today as opposed to in the 1980s sorry that i couldn't uh i've been
00:35:15.500 waiting on a boys are back in town. I was thinking of how long have you been holding that? I want to
00:35:20.860 see a chart that's like girls on the X axis, boys on the Y, and then it's want to have fun versus
00:35:27.420 back in town. So the thing is, I'm going to go through this stuff relatively quickly because
00:35:33.880 you're familiar with all this stuff. Yeah, yeah. He says the one word explanation for the pay gap
00:35:38.420 is children. Okay. So if you look at the gender wage gap early in your career, there's almost no
00:35:43.900 difference. But then over time, throughout their sort of 20s and 30s, women leave the workforce 1.00
00:35:47.960 to have kids. Right. This is something that was brought up in Lean In, if you recall. 1.00
00:35:53.340 That, yeah, women will leave the workforce even for a short period, which negatively impacts 1.00
00:35:58.660 their income. And what Sheryl Sandberg said was, if you can afford it, just pay for the child care, 1.00
00:36:05.800 even if it is like extremely expensive and basically washes out your earnings,
00:36:09.540 because your future earnings will return on that investment. Although she didn't say,
00:36:13.900 If you could afford it, I had that qualifier because she's an elitist lunatic. 0.98
00:36:18.740 Also, it does. 0.62
00:36:19.660 I mean, as a factual matter, that does roughly appear to be true, right?
00:36:22.960 If you stay in the workforce, your wages are going to be way better later.
00:36:25.840 Yeah.
00:36:26.020 He, you know, he notes that like for every kid you have, your wages fall further behind.
00:36:30.660 There's these studies of lesbian couples in Scandinavia where, you know, both women, right?
00:36:34.620 So they're both experiencing gender discrimination at roughly the same level as we would assume.
00:36:38.420 Careful what you say.
00:36:39.120 This is most of our listeners.
00:36:40.200 the study was called lickety split the lesbian experience in Sweden but he says like the the
00:36:47.960 lesbian partner who leaves the workforce to have a baby will have a huge hit to her earnings
00:36:51.700 whereas the lesbian partner who stays in the workforce does not have a hit to her earnings
00:36:55.060 which indicates that we're not talking about gender discrimination we're talking about like
00:36:58.440 leaving work and coming back is very bad for your earnings right so not not gender discrimination
00:37:02.940 at the workplace level we're talking about like ultimately social expectations of women 0.65
00:37:09.920 Exactly. And also he also notes that even within the same employer, you find wage, you know, the thing you always hear about like women making less money than men for the same job. This does show up in the data, but he finds a large scale study of like a transportation authority where they looked at all the wage data and it appears that men are working more hours in the same job. Like men are available for overtime more. Men are available for, you know, Sunday shifts, which end up producing more pay in a way that women are not. And you can also trace that back to childcare if you want to.
00:37:37.180 Yeah. As far as I was able to tell, this stuff is all kind of like as a descriptive matter,
00:37:40.740 roughly true. The gender wage gap appears to be driven mostly by women choosing different 0.97
00:37:46.360 occupations than men. The thing of like women earning less for the same job does happen.
00:37:51.200 But as far as like the broad societal phenomenon, it's mostly women clustered in jobs that pay less. 0.98
00:37:56.460 This is why the gender wage gap debate gets so hot, because the real question ideologically
00:38:03.100 is do you think that needs to be remedied or not exactly right and to me it does but to him he
00:38:09.120 doesn't really say it but to him he thinks we should shift the focus to men i don't know it's
00:38:13.360 very weird to me how like in his mind some biological differences in outcome need to be
00:38:20.140 remedied like exactly if you imagine that at the elementary school level that boys are they got a
00:38:26.420 case of the bad brain your solution to that if you're him is all join hands across america and
00:38:32.100 hold them back a year so they can do better. But then you see women choosing child care over work 0.66
00:38:40.060 and that results in lower income. He's like, so we can ignore it. I don't get it. 0.92
00:38:45.640 This whole question of like women are choosing to be in lower paying occupations also feels like a
00:38:50.660 weird, like to me, it's not necessarily refutation of discrimination.
00:38:55.720 Well, the fact that someone is in a job does not mean that they chose the job per se.
00:38:59.320 Yes. And a lot of his argument rests on this idea that men and women kind of inherently have these different preferences, right? As he said earlier, men like things and women like people. And so it turns out the thing oriented, the men oriented industries just happen to pay more. But the fact that women dominated fields pay less is partly the result of sexism.
00:39:18.320 There's this really interesting article called The Cost of Caring from the 1990s where they look throughout the economy and like every job associated with caring for another human being pays way less than a comparable job with the same level of education.
00:39:31.660 There's also some interesting work about sectors as they become more female dominated, the wages go down.
00:39:37.680 So the wages for housekeepers have gone down by 21% in the last 50 years.
00:39:41.660 Due to the slow decline of the butler.
00:39:43.240 You've got like computer programming, which used to be seen as like a fairly menial task that was mostly done by women.
00:39:48.560 That has then, of course, become this like massive powerhouse and pays really well as it has become more male dominated.
00:39:54.100 I think there probably are many women and men for that matter, but maybe more women who see two paths, one lower paying, but more fulfilling to them for whatever reason.
00:40:04.180 But that's different than people whose choices are narrowed to lower paying paths and have to go down one of them or feel some kind of social or cultural pressure to go down one of those paths.
00:40:16.720 And it's not super easy to tease out the causes there.
00:40:20.520 If 50% of the population is having to choose between having kids and having a stable career, that's also a problem.
00:40:26.940 You can chalk it up to whatever you want to.
00:40:28.700 Right, right. 0.99
00:40:29.100 But like it feels bad and wrong that only women have to make that choice. 1.00
00:40:33.160 That's the obvious problem. Again, just because women are foregoing income to take care of their child does not mean that that is a choice that they want to have to make. 0.86
00:40:45.620 I also think it's a little telling that most of his statistical case for, like, why we should shift the focus from women to men relies on relative statistics, right?
00:40:55.620 He's talking about, like, since 1980, men are doing worse, women are doing better.
00:40:59.260 But men and women were in very different economic positions 50 years ago.
00:41:03.920 And as soon as we get to absolute statistics, he's like, oh, yeah, well, you know, men do earn more money than women.
00:41:10.780 Women are more likely to live in poverty than men.
00:41:12.980 And if you look at most industries, the overwhelming majority of like top managers and CEOs are still men.
00:41:21.540 Yeah.
00:41:21.720 There is still sexism in the world.
00:41:23.820 Let's not get into politics, you know?
00:41:27.900 Because like if you – I mean even Reeves admits that like if you look at high-level lawyers, like high-level lawyers in firms, it's still only roughly 20%.
00:41:38.940 If you look at Fortune 500 CEOs, it's around 10%.
00:41:42.820 venture capital going to women is about 3%. College professors, it's now 48% of college
00:41:48.440 professors are women. But among tenured faculty, it's only 35% of women. We also know that women 0.99
00:41:54.640 were historically marginalized for most of American history. Like women could not vote 1.00
00:41:58.620 until 1920. Women could not attend college up until the 1960s. Anytime someone is like looking 0.99
00:42:04.720 around a society and saying like, yeah, this historically marginalized group, the reason 1.00
00:42:09.920 they make less money is because of their choices i always think like we actually need really good
00:42:16.760 evidence of that it's so annoying to have these conversations because for some reason the
00:42:22.280 conversation often revolves around like is there sexism yeah yeah when the actual question is like
00:42:28.040 how exactly is sexism manifesting right but instead of having like a normal conversation
00:42:35.840 about how they manifest, where they manifest, what might be done to address it, if anything,
00:42:43.180 everything just gets turned into an argument about like whether this is real and whether
00:42:47.580 we should care.
00:42:48.540 I also think a lot of men would like to stay home.
00:42:51.040 I wouldn't know anything about it.
00:42:53.440 So it's been five years since the last time I was in the office.
00:42:56.460 Yeah.
00:42:56.720 Five days a week.
00:42:57.480 Dude, I could not do it anymore.
00:42:58.680 If I got a real job, no.
00:43:00.120 I will die on the streets before I go back.
00:43:03.060 And you can talk all you want about how it was Peter's choice to die on the streets.
00:43:07.420 So we've talked about how men are falling behind in education, how men are falling behind in the workforce.
00:43:14.640 His third category of the way that men are downtrodden is basically like a cluster of things that I'm calling the masculine mystique.
00:43:23.840 We are no longer needed to do man stuff.
00:43:26.960 Yes.
00:43:27.220 We're sad because our purpose in the world is no longer there and we're adrift.
00:43:31.540 And we have to we have to elect Donald Trump.
00:43:35.240 Joe Rogan, help us.
00:43:37.240 Part of this manifests in men being three times more likely to have deaths of despair.
00:43:42.760 This is the idea that men, especially kind of working class white men, mostly in rural areas, are dying of things like poisonings, which was like alcohol overdoses or fentanyl overdoses.
00:43:54.380 Yeah.
00:43:54.780 Sadness adjacent deaths. 0.79
00:43:56.160 White males are about 70 percent of the suicides. 0.66
00:43:58.960 This is actually like a uniquely American thing that in basically every developed country, the ratio of male to female suicides is around one in two men are twice as likely to kill themselves as women.
00:44:10.820 However, in America, it's one to six.
00:44:13.700 If men in America are basically a lot more prone to suicide, for example, than men in other countries, then we need to look at variables that exist in America, right?
00:44:26.700 I think the place to start, and I'll let you take the lead, is American women. 0.78
00:44:32.080 What do you think they're doing?
00:44:33.400 This is kind of one of the problems always of talking about suicide rates is that partly you can chalk it up to like sort of male malaise fine.
00:44:39.900 But there's also like logistical issues of just like access to guns.
00:44:42.980 That's what I was actually thinking might explain that.
00:44:44.880 It's just the fact that if you have a brief suicidal thought, the suicide machines are all around us in America.
00:44:51.160 One way in which Reeves is totally correct is that I do think like these problems, like these specifically male aspects of things like opioid overdoses and suicides are genuinely under research.
00:45:03.460 So the one study I found was basically like, we think we're the first people to do this.
00:45:08.120 Women are just as likely to get opioid prescriptions as men, but they're like two thirds less likely to die of overdoses.
00:45:14.640 And we don't really know why.
00:45:16.140 We need qualitative research.
00:45:17.380 We need quantitative research.
00:45:18.500 Yeah, I believe it was Drill who on Twitter said that everyone wants to talk about mansplaining, but no one wants to talk about man's pain.
00:45:30.180 That's true.
00:45:31.040 So true.
00:45:31.840 There's only one study of male suicides in America.
00:45:34.880 They took a data set of around 70,000 suicides and they looked at all of like the contributing factors.
00:45:40.400 Men are more likely to be using drugs and alcohol and drugs and alcohol for everybody are oftentimes precursors to suicides.
00:45:47.460 men are more likely to have as a precursor a breakup or a fight with a romantic partner if
00:45:53.920 they're younger it's typically a fight with a family member that triggers it typically their
00:45:57.920 parents they're much less likely to seek or get medical help they're about half as likely to have
00:46:03.660 a diagnosed mental health condition than women are who kill themselves around 40 percent of them
00:46:08.560 were drunk or high at the time that's a lot i really think reeves is on to something and i think
00:46:12.760 he's correct that like this needs much more attention, but the act of helping men with this 0.89
00:46:18.620 would require doing a bunch of like woke bullshit about the nature of masculinity, right? If you 0.75
00:46:24.920 look at the pattern of male suicides, men are being discouraged from reaching out at every
00:46:30.100 link in the chain. We're not identifying mental health problems early, right? We then have the
00:46:35.060 normalization of using drugs and alcohol to cope with emotional problems, which is a huge part of
00:46:40.320 American masculinity, right? We then have these precipitating incidents where men do not have
00:46:45.840 people that they can reach out to. They also have fucking guns in the house. And so at every stage 0.99
00:46:53.060 of this problem, the norms of masculinity are playing a huge role. Breaking that cycle requires
00:47:00.580 like updating norms of masculinity that like, it's okay to reach out. It's okay to ask your
00:47:04.660 friend for help. It's okay to like form intimate friendships with other men. One of the things I
00:47:08.940 read said that like friendships between men changed pretty significantly during the gay rights
00:47:13.460 movement because men were like oh i don't want my buddy to think i'm gay yeah and like if i if i
00:47:18.300 express any affection or anything or talk about like hey it's really nice being like a close
00:47:21.800 friend with you he's gonna be like what are you a homo i had a nice weekend with my uh best friend 0.96
00:47:27.200 a couple weeks ago and i had to text him no homo afterwards it's relentless but you you have to 0.97
00:47:32.840 constantly guard the boundaries of your heterosexuality so at this point we're like 0.90
00:47:37.500 two-thirds of the way into the book. And so far, I genuinely thought this was going to be the first
00:47:42.840 book that I was going to recommend on the show. There really are areas where men are falling
00:47:47.360 behind. I don't agree with everything. We've kind of been quibbling as we've gone along here.
00:47:51.240 But in general, this is a responsible presentation of a genuinely really interesting and important
00:47:56.720 issue. The part where the book just completely goes off the rails is the minute he gets into
00:48:03.520 political analysis. So chapter eight is called progressive blindness. The political left is in
00:48:10.440 denial. Hell yeah. And we start with an anecdote from his son's school, which I'm going to send to
00:48:17.580 you. Litter boxes. If that's level 10, this is like level seven. Here's what happened. A boy at
00:48:23.940 the school created a list of his female classmates ranked in terms of their attractiveness and
00:48:28.380 shared it with a number of his friends, some of whom added their own opinions. Months later,
00:48:32.400 one of the girls saw the list on another boy's laptop. A number of girls complained to the school
00:48:36.580 administration. The boy who created the list was reprimanded and given detention. A protest ensued.
00:48:42.160 It was the last straw for us girls of this boys will be boys culture, one of the young women
00:48:46.660 involved told the Washington Post. Part of a statement read out at a protest outside the
00:48:50.500 principal's office was the following demand. We should be able to learn in an environment without
00:48:54.880 the constant presence of objectification and misogyny. Large meetings were held in the school
00:48:59.340 to discuss culture. The boy who created the list apologized personally to the girls in question
00:49:03.600 and to the Washington Post. All right. And then we, so that's the story. Those are the set of
00:49:07.440 facts. We then have his conclusion. He posts pictures of all the girls. That's the real
00:49:13.780 crisis of boys. Boys have no idea what's hot anymore. This is the last third of the book.
00:49:24.640 Okay. So here's his interpretation. What was instructive about the incident was the way it
00:49:28.700 was immediately framed, especially in media coverage, as an example of toxic masculinity.
00:49:33.700 If that really is the case, the term has acquired such a broad definition that it can be applied
00:49:37.900 to almost any antisocial behavior on the part of boys or men. It is one thing to point out that
00:49:42.780 there are aspects of masculinity that in an immature or extreme expression can be deeply
00:49:47.080 harmful, quite another to suggest that a naturally occurring trait in boys and men is intrinsically
00:49:51.940 bad. Indiscriminately slapping the label of toxic masculinity onto this kind of behavior is a
00:49:57.300 mistake rather than drawing boys into a dialogue about what lessons can be learned it is much more
00:50:02.320 likely to send them to the online manosphere where they will be reassured that they did nothing wrong
00:50:06.820 and that liberals are out to get them okay i guess the the good faith sort of read on this is like
00:50:12.640 you want to use language that does not ostracize and potentially radicalize young boys that's his
00:50:21.860 case yeah there's probably something to that like i don't think that that's totally wrong
00:50:25.640 in a vacuum however there's also a sort of natural output of this that's like hey you really need to 0.95
00:50:32.480 like tiptoe around this shit so that we don't yeah upset these kids and radicalize them and 0.95
00:50:37.940 that will reach a point where it's like well are you allowed to punish this yeah like socially 0.99
00:50:43.340 uh in school whatever it seems to me like what happened here was that his kid goes to a very
00:50:51.600 rich school, the kind of school where when something like this happens, which probably
00:50:56.480 happens at almost every high school in the country to some degree, it gets widespread
00:51:01.540 press coverage.
00:51:03.040 Yeah. 1.00
00:51:03.480 And maybe the girls at the school, this is an opportunity maybe to organize. 0.98
00:51:09.260 Yeah.
00:51:09.560 So they do a protest and then all of a sudden the Daily Mail is like, I don't know about
00:51:13.480 this.
00:51:14.080 That's absolutely what happened.
00:51:14.900 This is also in the wake of Me Too.
00:51:16.280 That's right.
00:51:16.780 2018. 1.00
00:51:17.180 It was 40 girls at this high school showed up outside of one of the administrator's offices
00:51:20.860 when they found out that A, the boy had made the list, B, it had been sent around a bunch of their
00:51:25.300 friends. Like what really hurt the girls was that a lot of their male friends had like weighed in
00:51:29.680 on this list. And they're like, what the fuck? I thought we were friends. And you're like, oh, 1.00
00:51:32.840 she's a seven or whatever. And then the administrators, when they found out that
00:51:36.960 the boy had done this, they gave him like one day of detention and like weren't going to put it on
00:51:41.220 his record. And the girls were pissed off about this. And so 40 of them showed up at the
00:51:45.000 administrator's office and was like, we want to talk about the culture at this school. And they
00:51:49.040 had like a round table thing which was supposed to be 45 minutes but ended up going on for four 0.99
00:51:53.180 hours where like girls told stories of like the fucked up shit that had happened to them at the 0.99
00:51:57.700 school and the boy was there part of it was like the punishment for the boy was like he had to 0.99
00:52:01.680 listen to the way that part of the punishment for the boys listening to the girls was like okay so
00:52:06.920 you had to sit there and then according to this washington post article the boy gave like a very 0.98
00:52:10.500 heartfelt apology he's like okay you're right this was a really fucked up and stupid thing to do i 0.87
00:52:14.520 shouldn't have done it i also like the fact that the post did not name the boy yeah this was a 0.96
00:52:19.260 dumb thing that a 16 year old boy did but like it doesn't need to ruin his life it's like yeah this 0.78
00:52:23.260 boy did this dumb thing the girls were mad everyone talked about it what else do you want 1.00
00:52:27.560 here yeah if what you're saying is a 16 year old boy doing this shit shouldn't get widespread press 0.99
00:52:33.360 coverage i agree i don't understand the complaint that like you can't call this toxic masculinity 0.96
00:52:40.100 this is what like jokerfied me is that like he's like oh you can't just put that label on anything
00:52:45.240 but like this feels like an a very clear-cut example of toxic masculinity to me yeah like 0.97
00:52:49.700 boys behind the girl's back being like oh she's more like a four and not telling the fucking 0.97
00:52:54.220 girls for months and that fucking right dude how many how many people say that like the left 0.99
00:53:00.160 does language policing right and then like we have been introduced to like a relatively useful term 0.97
00:53:08.620 Maybe it's not always used correctly, but can be used to describe incidents like this, toxic masculinity.
00:53:14.580 You use the term and they're like, oh.
00:53:16.340 It's like they'll call anything toxic masculinity these days.
00:53:18.920 Even a boy writing down the looks of his female classmates and sharing it with all the other boys.
00:53:25.360 So from this anecdote, the whole point of this anecdote, of course, is that it's emblematic of, he says, four major failings of the political left on issues related to boys and men.
00:53:34.620 The first issue is a tendency to pathologize naturally occurring aspects of masculine identity, usually under the banner of toxic masculinity.
00:53:44.380 So this is what he says about that.
00:53:47.640 Lacking any coherent or consistent definition, the phrase now refers to any male behavior that the user disapproves of from the tragic to the trivial.
00:53:54.500 It has been blamed, among other things, for mass shootings, gang violence, rape, online trolling, climate change, the financial crisis, Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and an unwillingness to wear a mask during the COVID-19 pandemic.
00:54:07.360 Lumping together terrorists and delinquents, it ultimately poisons the very idea of masculinity itself.
00:54:13.100 I mean, look, at the end of the day, Brexit was toxic masculinity.
00:54:16.660 Now, that's the one I disagree with the most, the idea that the British are doing anything out of an excess of masculinity.
00:54:22.840 I just want to point out the dynamic here. This is an entire chapter dedicated to the problems of progressives, right? The ways that progressives are not helping boys. The first category is a complaint about people using a term. Yeah. This is the life cycle of every trendy term. People also overuse like sweet summer child.
00:54:42.320 Well, yeah, yeah, yeah. That said, I don't think it's crazy to think that like the left in like online social spaces can use language that like ostracizes certain groups. Right. That's why I don't joke about white people. I specifically carve out ethnic groups within white people. Italians, Irish. Right. It's important to be specific so that people know that you're not talking about everyone.
00:55:10.820 I think also like 80 percent of fucking discourse now is like leftists should talk different online. 0.88
00:55:17.140 Yeah. We need to acknowledge the fact that there's a vast right wing apparatus explicitly designed to find the dumbest leftists saying the dumbest shit and bring it to the nation's attention. 1.00
00:55:27.120 The Daily Mail did not cover this thing at the Washington, D.C. high school to like bring attention to like the plight of women in high schools. 0.99
00:55:35.260 That's that's the other side of what I was just saying. So, like, I think it's true that certain language that is employed by the left can be ostracizing. The problem with trying to address that internally is that there is this right wing media apparatus that will elevate that language no matter how often you use it.
00:55:56.920 Exactly. Yeah. And so it's sort of unclear how much we can do to address the problem. Right. Internally on the left.
00:56:03.720 Your political strategy cannot be that like tens of millions of people need to show perfect
00:56:08.440 discipline in the vocabulary that they use.
00:56:10.440 That's not a real strategy.
00:56:12.080 Dude, your median Republicans are like retweeting gas chamber memes right now. 1.00
00:56:17.020 Yeah, no shit. 1.00
00:56:17.440 Yeah. 1.00
00:56:17.740 Where's the fucking Atlantic article? 0.99
00:56:19.500 So that was the first problem with progressives on the issue of boys and men. 0.99
00:56:24.380 The second flaw in progressives is male problems are seen as the result of individual failings
00:56:29.980 of one kind or another rather than of structural challenges.
00:56:32.780 So I'm going to send you this.
00:56:35.380 Usually, progressives are reluctant to ascribe too much responsibility to individuals for their problems.
00:56:39.640 If someone is obese or commits a crime or is out of employment, the progressive default is to look first to structural external causes.
00:56:46.980 This is a valuable instinct.
00:56:48.640 But there is one group that progressives do seem willing to blame for their plight.
00:56:52.840 Men.
00:56:53.580 And then he gives us some examples.
00:56:55.820 Carol Harrington believes that the term toxic masculinity plays an important role here since
00:57:00.320 it naturally focuses attention on the character flaws of individual men rather than structural
00:57:05.040 problems. If men are depressed, it is because they won't express their feelings. If they get sick,
00:57:10.260 it is because they won't go to the doctor. If they fail at school, it is because they lack
00:57:14.600 commitment. If they die early, it is because they drink and smoke too much and eat the wrong things.
00:57:18.000 For those on the political left, then victim blaming is permitted when it comes to men.
00:57:22.340 So we're back to toxic masculinity again.
00:57:24.920 I think you can flip this and also say that the right suddenly sees structural problems when it comes to their in groups.
00:57:32.320 Yeah, they will say men are experiencing this and this and this.
00:57:35.940 There must be something wrong with broader society.
00:57:38.400 Right. Whereas when it's black people, women. 1.00
00:57:41.440 Right. They're like, that's natural hierarchy at work, baby. 1.00
00:57:44.640 Yeah. I have seen I have seen some of this.
00:57:46.900 There are jokes like men will do X before going to therapy.
00:57:49.480 Right. Like I've made those jokes.
00:57:51.560 Sure, you know, those jokes are predicated on an individual explanation rather than a structural one.
00:57:56.380 I think that's right.
00:57:57.340 I would excise the term toxic masculinity from this discussion because I think that toxic masculinity in and of itself does imply something structural.
00:58:07.020 This is to me what is so interesting is that even in his own examples, he's citing what I think are structural factors.
00:58:13.440 So if men are depressed, it's because they won't express their feelings.
00:58:17.020 That to me is structural.
00:58:18.220 It's like, well, it's not your fault you haven't been diagnosed with something.
00:58:20.740 it's not your fault you're not taking antidepressants. You've grown up in a culture
00:58:23.580 that tells you you're not supposed to express your pain. Like that's taking away the blame
00:58:27.300 from the individual. That's the thing is I think you can say a lot of this stuff and still embrace
00:58:31.300 the structural explanation. Maybe it's more accurate to say that a lot of people occasionally
00:58:35.620 speak flippantly about structural problems. In a way that they wouldn't with other groups. I think
00:58:40.980 that's true. I'm not going to pretend that this is a problem that is limited to the left. In broader
00:58:45.420 society this is true of almost every group right we live in a very individualistic society most
00:58:51.760 people ascribe other people's problems to those people so his third reason why progressives are 0.97
00:58:57.600 fucking up this issue is an unwillingness to acknowledge any biological basis for sex 0.67
00:59:02.660 differences i was so excited for this to get transphobic this is why it's so important to me 0.94
00:59:07.040 to stress that like richard reeves is a good faith dude not transphobic because when when i
00:59:11.820 saw this like little chapter heading i was like oh god here it comes jesus christ but he goes out
00:59:16.580 of his way to defend trans people nice he's like the political right is like saying that trans people 0.79
00:59:21.100 threaten like sports and bathrooms and stuff it is garbage they are doing this to reify traditional 0.97
00:59:25.440 sex roles they do not mean it trans people do not pose any threat to masculinity my my apologies to 0.98
00:59:30.640 richard reeves you've done nothing wrong yes other than the shoe the attempted shoe bombing so here
00:59:35.400 is his case that the left denies biology. One of the rallying cries of the modern political left
00:59:42.640 is that science is real. While conservatives succumb to myth and misinformation, progressives
00:59:47.200 carry the enlightenment torch of reason. At least that is how they see things. The truth is that
00:59:52.180 there are science deniers on both sides. Many conservatives deny the environmental science of
00:59:56.900 climate change, but many progressives deny the neuroscience of sex differences. For many
01:00:01.040 progressives, it is now axiomatic that sex differences in any outcomes or behaviors are
01:00:05.740 wholly the result of socialization. When it comes to masculinity, the main message from the political
01:00:10.960 left is that men are acculturated in certain ways of behaving, generally bad ways of course in this
01:00:16.580 version, which can therefore be socialized out of them. But this is simply false. Men do not have a
01:00:21.980 higher sex drive just because society valorizes male sexuality, even if it does. They have more
01:00:26.840 testosterone likewise aggression remember boys under the age of two are five times more likely
01:00:32.280 to be aggressive than girls this is surely not because one-year-olds have picked up gender cues
01:00:36.480 from around them does the political left deny this this thing i was waiting this whole section
01:00:41.360 for him to give an example right the whole thing is kind of bizarre like i i was very careful when
01:00:46.180 we were talking about like boy brains and girl brains earlier not to deny biology right that
01:00:51.220 like it's a basic fact that girls go through puberty roughly 18 months before boys do that's 0.99
01:00:55.320 biology. It's not threatening to my worldview to admit that. In my experience, what people are
01:01:00.100 objecting to is biological explanations for behavior, right? Boys drive faster because of
01:01:05.380 their brains. That I think is much more difficult to prove. But that's the thing is like when you're
01:01:11.180 talking about the left denying that, are you just talking about a few dipshits online? Because that's 0.99
01:01:17.700 where it starts to feel like you really are, right? I'm really not sure that I've seen intelligent
01:01:22.020 people on the left just say everything's socialization. I don't think that's a common
01:01:25.860 belief. The fourth and final progressive mistake on this issue is the conviction that gender 0.76
01:01:31.720 inequality can only run one way. That is to the disadvantage of women. So here is his more
01:01:39.140 concrete example. In 2021, President Biden created a White House Gender Policy Council,
01:01:45.620 a successor to the previous Council on Women and Girls, which had been abolished by Donald Trump.
01:01:50.700 But while the name changed, the mission did not.
01:01:53.380 The formal charge of the new council is, quote,
01:01:55.440 to guide and coordinate government policy that impacts women and girls.
01:01:59.300 In October 2021, the council published a national strategy on gender equity and equality,
01:02:04.500 the first in U.S. history.
01:02:06.480 The strategy is entirely asymmetric.
01:02:09.180 No gender inequalities related to boys or men are addressed.
01:02:12.100 The fact that women now outnumber men in college is noted,
01:02:15.340 but only in order to highlight the fact that women hold more student debt than men.
01:02:18.560 And then he lists a bunch of other examples of, they mentioned like women need access to health insurance, but men are more likely to be uninsured than women.
01:02:26.000 But he throws in there that the mandate of this agency is to guide and coordinate government policy that impacts women and girls.
01:02:34.700 Right.
01:02:35.240 It's a government report about women and girls.
01:02:37.240 It's going to focus on women and girls.
01:02:39.380 Like a black empowerment council is not going to mention the problems faced by white people.
01:02:43.680 That's just not in the mandate of the group.
01:02:45.820 When I was in college, I dated like a classic women's studies feminist type of girl.
01:02:52.600 And the way that she like brought me into that was to be like, here's how this stuff
01:02:56.800 affects men.
01:02:57.760 That was like very formative for me.
01:02:59.820 Just like having someone articulate that to me and having it click in my brain.
01:03:03.820 The idea that like we should be reading this much into one policy council from the Biden
01:03:10.900 administration, just completely isolated from any broader context.
01:03:14.620 I don't know about that.
01:03:15.680 It's genuinely fascinating to me that he's so diligent and so interested in this issue
01:03:20.400 until he gets to political analysis. 0.55
01:03:22.480 He's Gen X, right?
01:03:23.740 I guess, yeah.
01:03:24.800 There was light in the paint at the end of the day.
01:03:26.840 You can get close to being a fully formed, well-rounded, intelligent human being as Gen 0.51
01:03:32.100 X, but you can never get all the way there. 0.87
01:03:33.660 We then get to chapter nine, Seeing Red, The Political Right Wants to Turn Back the Clock. 0.97
01:03:39.960 So now we're going to talk about what conservatives are fucking up. 0.97
01:03:42.740 Okay. 0.97
01:03:42.860 He says, conservatives have paid more attention than progressives to the growing problems
01:03:46.900 faced by boys and men, but their agenda turns out to be equally unhelpful.
01:03:51.680 We have not talked about the democratic agenda on this at all.
01:03:54.840 We've only talked about the way that people talk online, but okay, fine.
01:03:57.800 The number one problem is many conservatives fuel male grievance for political gain.
01:04:03.820 And so he talks about how the gender gap in voting is the largest it's ever been.
01:04:08.340 In 2016, Trump won men with a 24-point lead.
01:04:14.660 Among white men, he won them 62 to 32.
01:04:19.000 That's because there's never been a presidential candidate with that much raw masculinity.
01:04:25.600 When I see an 80-year-old man draped in silk with a rub-on tan over half of his face, I think about returning to nature.
01:04:36.120 So here is his case for this.
01:04:38.340 Some conservatives go as far as to claim that there is a war on men or a war on boys.
01:04:44.000 This language validates and fuels a sense of victimhood.
01:04:48.240 In the U.S., a third of men of all political persuasions believe that they are discriminated
01:04:52.660 against, and among Republicans, the number is rising.
01:04:55.460 This is false.
01:04:56.560 While the problems of boys and men are real, they are the result of structural changes
01:05:00.780 in the economy and broader culture and the failings of our education system, rather than
01:05:05.080 of any deliberate discrimination.
01:05:06.680 But on the political right, as on the left, attitudes on gender issues float free of the facts.
01:05:12.300 Throw a little dig on the left. 0.98
01:05:13.360 Yeah, right.
01:05:14.200 You can't say anything bad about the right without an equivalent jab.
01:05:19.080 Bad on the left.
01:05:19.840 There's something that I'm going to try to articulate here.
01:05:21.660 But when the rhetoric of the right does not align with reality, these folks, by which I mean like centrist types, will say, you know, this isn't true, but this fuels the right, right?
01:05:36.680 When they're talking about right-wing misinformation, they almost talk about it like it's a political
01:05:41.060 strength.
01:05:41.660 Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
01:05:42.220 And when they're talking about left-wing misinformation, they talk about it like it's
01:05:45.340 a political weakness.
01:05:46.340 It's never like this fuels the left.
01:05:48.040 This gives the left energy, even though that's probably just as true. 0.98
01:05:50.840 The thing that really stuck out to me was in the US, a third of men of all political
01:05:55.900 persuasions believe that they are discriminated against.
01:05:58.480 And among Republicans, that number is rising.
01:06:01.040 Why wouldn't you say what the number is?
01:06:02.900 I do believe that's true.
01:06:03.840 just anecdotally, when I was an employment lawyer, when I first started, you would almost
01:06:10.460 never see cases brought by men and white people saying that they were discriminated against.
01:06:16.820 When I was wrapping up my career, I say wrapping up like I was doing it on purpose.
01:06:21.680 When I was about to get fired.
01:06:23.420 When it was being wrapped up for me.
01:06:25.300 I was seeing this relatively often, a couple times in my own practice, and then my friends
01:06:31.280 were reporting it to me. And then I've spoken to employment lawyers I know recently and they're
01:06:35.720 like, it's all over the place now. The right wing grievance machine has sort of like hit the legal
01:06:41.300 system. It all starts with Barry Weiss's article about the rapping librarian. I mean, the thing
01:06:46.920 that is really weird about this construction is that the percentage of men who think that they
01:06:51.100 are discriminated against is rising among both Republicans and Democrats. So to say it's rising
01:06:55.780 among Republicans is like a little wormy because it's happening. But also Republican men are twice
01:07:00.680 as likely to think that men are discriminated against as Democrats. It's around 40% of Republicans
01:07:05.120 and around 20% of Democrats. And it's very slightly rising between 2012 and 2016, which is the poll
01:07:10.460 that he's citing. It's really fucking weird to not mention the basic political dynamic of this,
01:07:17.360 which is that it's overwhelmingly concentrated on the right. In the previous chapter, he's like, 0.95
01:07:21.880 this is the problem with progressives. They say this online. And here he's like, well,
01:07:26.080 political leaders are lying. They're saying that you're under attack if you're a man.
01:07:29.860 And men are voting for Donald Trump and right wing, basically authoritarian parties in record
01:07:34.460 numbers.
01:07:35.020 Right.
01:07:35.660 These are not equivalent problems, right?
01:07:37.800 Unlike the progressives and conservatives. 0.97
01:07:39.980 It's like, oh, yeah, by the way, they're fucking lying to men and it's working. 0.97
01:07:44.320 I'm happy to criticize the rhetoric that emanates from the left. 0.97
01:07:47.560 But when you start to talk about like, well, what what are the politics that we should
01:07:52.420 be doing?
01:07:53.400 You need to address the fact that the right wing is the one that is completely detached
01:07:58.880 from reality.
01:07:59.480 Yeah, exactly.
01:08:00.660 You can't do this sort of like, here's what the left gets wrong.
01:08:03.700 Here's what the right gets wrong.
01:08:05.020 When what the left gets wrong is like the use of rhetoric on the internet that you don't
01:08:10.920 necessarily agree with.
01:08:12.620 And then what the right gets wrong is that like almost all of them believe that men are
01:08:17.300 discriminated against incorrectly.
01:08:19.440 And they're like banning abortion.
01:08:21.280 Right.
01:08:21.620 Like this is actually affecting women. 1.00
01:08:22.860 Right. 1.00
01:08:23.000 Like it manifests in policy much more directly.
01:08:26.540 Yeah. 1.00
01:08:26.660 I don't like seeing certain phrases on the internet and also like thousands of women 0.91
01:08:29.760 are dying of sepsis.
01:08:31.060 Right.
01:08:31.320 So that was the first problem with conservatives.
01:08:35.040 The second is conservatives overweight the importance of biological sex differences for
01:08:40.620 gender roles.
01:08:42.080 He now takes a weird left turn, which I was not expecting. 0.78
01:08:45.660 So here are the first couple paragraphs of this.
01:08:48.580 I know.
01:08:49.780 Respected among scholars for his work on personality traits, Jordan Peterson came to fame for
01:08:54.800 refusing to use the preferred pronouns of a transgender student in protest of new Canadian
01:08:59.300 laws on trans rights. His 2018 book, 12 Rules for Life, sold more than 5 million copies.
01:09:05.240 For anyone serious about understanding what is happening with young men,
01:09:08.220 Peterson's appeal is an important data point. By Peterson's own reckoning,
01:09:12.560 they account for 80% of his audience. Peterson's own reckoning sounds a little low.
01:09:17.640 Men flock to him because unlike so many, he does not mock or patronize them.
01:09:21.680 he makes them feel heard. Peterson stumbled across a gigantic reservoir of unmet human need.
01:09:27.420 His genuine compassion for the plight of young men marks him out from the people of the left
01:09:31.680 who want to excoriate them and the people on the right who want to exploit them. He's a genuine
01:09:36.100 intellectual wrestling with real and important issues. Dude. Richard. No. He's writing this in
01:09:41.540 like 2022, man. What the fuck? Jordan Peterson is just like a blithering weirdo who tweets like 1.00
01:09:46.480 300 times a day about like people are too fat in magazines now like the dude is a right-wing 0.99
01:09:53.700 psychopath bro there this is such an example of like the weird moral affirmative action that men
01:09:59.640 get so reeves says men flock to him because unlike so many he does not mock or patronize them he
01:10:05.760 makes them feel heard yeah but he does mock or patronize women exactly it's not that he's like 0.99
01:10:11.500 showing empathy for them finally empathy for men he says misogynistic shit he says that women wear 1.00
01:10:16.160 lipstick because they're like horny sluts i don't want to start talking about go down an 1.00
01:10:19.280 evolutionary psychology rabbit hole here but i like i love that in evolutionary psychology 0.99
01:10:22.980 you get to make up a potential explanation of some behavior and then some bizarre political
01:10:30.700 outcome flows from it where you're like women are putting on lipstick to simulate the flushing of
01:10:38.160 the lips during intercourse and therefore sexual harassment in the workplace i don't know but also
01:10:45.540 like the fact that you can you can just rise to prominence on a lie right he said that you're
01:10:49.880 going to go to jail for misgendering trans people which is a straightforward lie yeah he then spends 0.99
01:10:54.140 his entire career as a public intellectual also fucking lying like most of what he says is just 0.99
01:10:59.220 him saying stuff and he still even now gets this bizarre laundering where we're like oh he was 0.98
01:11:05.500 hearing some real concerns i think a lot of men are like right leaning and they want their existing
01:11:11.200 ideology to be sold back to them as intellectual, which is all Jordan Peterson was doing. 0.96
01:11:15.840 The fact that you can't decipher what the fuck he's saying is why he was popular, right? 0.95
01:11:19.720 You're like, oh, a smart person is saying this and I feel good, right? 1.00
01:11:22.560 What if women are all sluts? 1.00
01:11:24.060 What if I'm being held down? 1.00
01:11:25.260 All he's doing is the same victim ideology that fucking Rush Limbaugh was doing. 1.00
01:11:29.100 It's the same shit. 1.00
01:11:29.880 Not being able to clock Jordan Peterson as right wing is, it just reflects a massive 1.00
01:11:35.060 deficiency in your ability to analyze politics.
01:11:37.920 I don't know what you would need to think that he's right-wing if you don't know it now.
01:11:42.480 He also has this weird tick where he just admits all of the problems with Peterson.
01:11:47.260 So the rest of the section, right?
01:11:48.360 He's talking about how conservatives overweight the importance of biological sex differences, right?
01:11:52.200 And he's like, well, Jordan Peterson is an important figure and we should listen to him and he's making men feel heard.
01:11:56.640 Also, he is lying about the lobsters.
01:11:59.480 So he has this thing, lobsters exist in hierarchies.
01:12:01.820 And so hierarchies are natural. 0.91
01:12:03.120 I mean, this is garbage even if it was true, but it's also wrong about lobsters. 0.97
01:12:07.000 He says, 0.96
01:12:07.660 The science here is not very good.
01:12:09.380 Lobsters don't actually have brains, it turns out.
01:12:11.700 For what it's worth, I think his use of lobsters is better seen as simply part of his storytelling style.
01:12:16.740 I see Peterson as the latest incarnation of the mythopoetical strand of the men's movement,
01:12:21.540 which uses allegory to evoke an older, deeper form of masculinity.
01:12:25.360 Dudes rock.
01:12:25.740 Recall that last chapter was almost exclusively dedicated to, like, random people,
01:12:31.900 including teenage girls, calling things toxic masculinity.
01:12:35.960 That's singled out for scorn by Reeves.
01:12:38.760 And here we have one of the nation's most important public intellectuals for years,
01:12:44.020 millions of books sold.
01:12:45.340 This guy is just constantly lying and lying to men in order to sell them on a right-wing
01:12:51.740 ideology that's making them worse, that is making them believe a bunch of things that
01:12:55.600 are not true and are not helping them. 0.60
01:12:57.960 Here, Reeves is like, oh, isn't he really just a bard? 0.97
01:13:01.500 An older, deeper form of masculinity where you cry all the time on camera and dress like the fucking Riddler. 0.94
01:13:11.480 So the third problem with conservatives is he says conservatives see the solution to men's problems as lying in the past rather than the future. 0.98
01:13:20.340 And so here's this.
01:13:22.340 In a fascinating study conducted before the 2016 election, Dan Casino, a professor at Fairleigh Dickinson University, added an unusual question to a survey of voting intentions.
01:13:31.500 Do you earn more, less, or about the same as your spouse?
01:13:35.580 Half the respondents got the question early in the survey, before being asked about voting,
01:13:40.100 and the other half got it after declaring their voting intention.
01:13:43.220 The results were striking.
01:13:44.620 Men asked the question about spousal earnings early in the survey were much more likely
01:13:48.560 to say they would vote for Donald Trump than Hillary Clinton.
01:13:51.360 This was a small poll of around 700 registered voters, but Casino's experiment hints at the
01:13:56.220 potential for politicians to activate and exploit male anxiety about loss of status.
01:14:01.100 So I'm very skeptical of this whole like these priming studies.
01:14:04.820 I don't know.
01:14:05.520 A lot of these have totally failed to replicate.
01:14:07.600 So I went back to this study that Reeves is citing.
01:14:09.900 Like most of the statistics he cites in this book, like this is correct.
01:14:12.940 It's actually – it's a 24-point shift in voting preference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump depending on whether you prime people with this like does your spouse make more than you.
01:14:22.360 And what's wild is he also tested it with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump because maybe it just pushes people more toward Republicans, right?
01:14:29.040 It's not about gender.
01:14:29.840 No, there was no effect when you did it with Bernie Sanders.
01:14:33.000 It was only when you did it with Hillary Clinton.
01:14:35.360 Wow.
01:14:35.660 Again, what frustrates me about this book is that Reeves is looking at a real mechanism here, right?
01:14:40.480 That it's very easy to prime men to see basically any societal phenomenon as a threat to their masculinity.
01:14:48.280 This is basically the story of the Republican Party over the last 40 years.
01:14:52.280 Right.
01:14:52.500 Like I was so struck reading Josh Hawley's book.
01:14:54.600 the whole thing is basically an exercise in just like telling men that everything they see around
01:15:01.340 them, every form of social advancement is a threat to their masculinity. So I want to do a bonus
01:15:06.620 episode actually like specifically on this book because it's kind of a rich text. And also I did
01:15:11.060 a bunch of reading on like the history of the men's rights movement, which is super fascinating.
01:15:14.780 And I want to talk about it. So here's what Josh Hawley says.
01:15:18.540 Leftists have advocated expanded welfare payments and disability insurance.
01:15:22.880 Scare quotes.
01:15:23.360 To the point one need not actually be disabled to claim government support.
01:15:27.980 More recently, they have championed universal basic income.
01:15:31.340 This latter idea would have the federal government guarantee every adult in America an income stream generous enough to live on, whether he works or not.
01:15:39.020 One liberal candidate for president recently ran an entire campaign on it.
01:15:42.660 Died to a liberal, Andrew Yang. Everyone's favorite leftist.
01:15:45.540 The message is that work is optional, replaceable, and that a check is just as good as a job.
01:15:50.260 and what that means in practice is a check is just as good as a man because if government can
01:15:55.800 supply everything a father or husband once did by working what's the point of manhood this is 0.99
01:16:01.400 what my college girlfriend was talking about when she said that this shit constricts men too 0.99
01:16:05.400 it's wild dude you are your job dude and also he's he's literally saying that like other people 0.99
01:16:10.900 getting disability insurance or like you getting unemployment benefits when you're fired makes you
01:16:15.320 less of a man right why this is completely made up these these guys are like sort of mentally
01:16:21.180 trying to harken back to like hunter-gatherer societies like we were out hunting and providing
01:16:25.780 right but like those societies were super communal right you obviously relied on like the broader 0.95
01:16:31.720 group to provide you and your family with shit all of this uh like modern masculinity stuff is
01:16:38.140 basically like invented tradition it's just like yeah hard not to see that it just happens to align 0.99
01:16:43.960 with uh like republican policy in the post-nixon era they're just like food stamps are gay for this
01:16:52.300 i also read stift which was susan faluti's follow-up book after backlash both of which
01:16:57.000 i really recommend she frames all of this as like a betrayal by women what she says is that it's
01:17:04.300 basically like it's oligarchs who did this to you it's like rich people it's like the elon musks of 0.98
01:17:09.060 the world who completely fucked you over and told you whispered in your ear the whole time that the 0.98
01:17:14.940 person you should be mad at is like the immigrant that stole your job or the woman who's your boss 0.99
01:17:20.780 elon musk talking to you about masculinity think about that you ever seen him do the x jump my god
01:17:26.060 i think this is the thing to keep in mind is that like they want us to be fighting they want this 0.64
01:17:30.920 dumb like war of the genders to be going on like are women better men better so that they can take 0.98
01:17:37.000 your job and fucking send it to china like that's that's been the dynamic for the last 40 years we 1.00
01:17:41.640 should be focusing our anger at the chinese i just think it's so frustrating that it's like 0.99
01:17:48.220 we get such clear-eyed diagnoses of the problems in like our sort of intellectual life as americans 1.00
01:17:54.840 but the minute it comes to solving them everyone pretends to be half as smart as they actually are
01:18:00.160 like well there's problems on both sides what's interesting is that he's getting very bogged down
01:18:05.560 by the aesthetics. And he seems to understand that the right wing is pitching to men,
01:18:10.500 but offering them nothing, right? So credit where it's due. But he's unwilling to sort of say the 0.73
01:18:16.400 opposite, which is, okay, the left is not pitching to men, or at least not doing it very effectively.
01:18:23.220 But that is where the better solutions to these problems lie.
01:18:27.500 I don't want to blame individuals. I want to look for structural solutions. The thing is,
01:18:32.220 I don't really blame Richard Reeves for this. I think there is a sickness among quote-unquote
01:18:36.700 serious punditry where you cannot be taken seriously as an intellectual unless you do
01:18:41.700 this pantomime of both sides have problems. If Richard Reeves wrote a book where he was like,
01:18:47.220 the right offers no solutions for men and it's actively making all of the problems worse,
01:18:51.860 and the left could be doing more, has some problems, but fundamentally is on the side
01:18:55.720 of downtrodden men, everyone would write off the book as like, oh, it's too partisan.
01:18:58.880 Yeah. And it's so bizarre, especially on this issue in particular, where conservative everyone just admits openly they're like, oh, yeah, conservatives are like actively trying to bring back this like fake 1950s family. They're not doing anything for boys. Like you think fucking Josh Hawley is going to restore your factory job? They're not doing anything. The reason why work is so much more precarious is mostly because of fucking Republicans. This is like the basic political dynamics are so clear on this. Everyone just admits to it. Like throughout this book, he's like, oh, well, yes, yes. Conservatives are trying to bring back like the fake traditional family.
01:19:27.920 But both sides have problems.
01:19:30.480 This is the problem with the social media era where everything gets analyzed through what the like bulk of rhetoric online looks like.
01:19:37.400 Yeah.
01:19:37.880 What happens when one side is in power versus another?
01:19:40.720 Yeah.
01:19:40.980 Right.
01:19:41.160 What do they do? 0.96
01:19:41.880 Who's funding mental health that men can access? 0.83
01:19:45.080 Right.
01:19:45.300 Yeah.
01:19:45.500 Who wants to fund schools and give them the resources to help boys?
01:19:52.180 Right. 0.99
01:19:52.300 I understand that he wants to do this sort of like no one's talking about this maneuver because that allows everyone who's reading it to feel OK, as opposed to a book that's like, by the way, generic Democrats are just like 10 times as good on this shit as Republicans. 0.98
01:20:11.100 Now you lose Republicans, right? 0.95
01:20:12.860 Or you lose, you know, moderate fence sitters who like to believe that they are like above politics.
01:20:18.980 We're just going to end with the final two paragraphs of the book.
01:20:21.480 Will the boys ever be back in town? 0.88
01:20:25.920 Will women ever speak at a frequency that men can hear? 0.99
01:20:28.580 Right now, there is a distinct lack of responsible leadership on this front.
01:20:32.400 Politics has become like trench warfare, both sides fearing even the slightest loss on any ground.
01:20:37.540 While moms and dads worry about their kids, our leaders are trapped in their partisan positions.
01:20:41.880 Our political leaders have political views that are different.
01:20:44.520 Progressives see any move to provide more help to boys and men as a distraction from the fight for girls and women.
01:20:49.620 conservatives see any move to provide more help to girls and women as motivated by a desire to
01:20:54.280 put men down. My hope is that away from the heat and noise of tribal politics, away from politics,
01:21:00.220 we can do political things away from politics. When I see the term tribal or tribalism in the
01:21:05.400 context of politics now, it is like a beacon. This is an Atlantic reader. My hope is that away from
01:21:13.100 the heat and noise of tribal politics, we can come to a shared recognition that many of our
01:21:17.060 boys and men are in real trouble, not of their own making, and need help. One side is trying to
01:21:22.060 increase their wages and the other side is saying that it's gay to get unemployment insurance. 0.99
01:21:26.640 Definitely a shame that we got here from the first chunk of this book, which was pretty
01:21:30.000 interesting. It almost makes it even more depressing because when you're like,
01:21:34.680 there are real discrepancies between boys and girls in elementary schools and the outputs of
01:21:40.480 that might be really bad and dangerous and we should be thinking about addressing them. Well,
01:21:44.840 they might be dismantling the department of education so how does that go right again he
01:21:51.780 wrote this uh probably wrote this about three years ago and the winds have changed but as we
01:21:59.280 deal with fascism ascending the people who are like the problem is tribalism i know become more
01:22:07.280 and more delusional yeah um and so i my tolerance for the uh like partisanship is the issue crowd
01:22:13.980 is waning yeah yeah imagine how much barry weiss would be pissing me off now if i could hear her
01:22:18.800 when she spoke 0.57