00:00:49.980If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:00:55.400Pro Society is a weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:01:04.060Each week, we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and pop culture with your favorite writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions.
00:02:00.460yesterday the ceos of facebook google and twitter went before congress to testify about the role
00:02:10.100that their platforms played in spreading the misinformation that led to the insurrection
00:02:14.100in january facebook ceo mark zuckerberg proposed some limited reforms to section 230 legislation
00:02:20.380that says that tech platforms can't be held liable for what people post on those platforms
00:02:25.200First, platforms should have to issue transparency reports that state the prevalence of content across all different categories of harmful content,
00:02:34.460everything from child exploitation to terrorism to incitement of violence to intellectual property violations to pornography, whatever the different harms are.
00:02:44.080On this week's episode, we heard from Evan Greer, digital rights activist, about why she works with the organization Fight for the Future to preserve Section 230.
00:02:53.580Now, in the episode, Evan said that rushed changes to Section 230 could do more harm than good.
00:02:59.380This is not about defending the companies.
00:03:02.140I don't particularly care very much about, you know, the company's profits or, you know, how much money they have to spend on lawsuits.
00:03:11.460What I care about is the impact that that then has on marginalized people's speech and particularly social movements.
00:03:19.660And for me, Section 230 is such a crucial law for protecting speech, like, for example, a video of police violence, which in a world without Section 230 would almost certainly invite lawsuits from law enforcement who would claim that it's defamatory or that it's incitement, right?
00:03:38.240Like the Me Too movement, where people are able to speak out about abusive behavior and platforms are willing to host that speech because they know that they're not going to get sued for giving people a platform to speak and speak their truth.
00:03:56.200And so I always think about the impact on those movements.
00:03:58.560Fight for the Future sees Section 230 as one of the most important laws protecting free speech and human rights in the digital age.
00:04:06.920And that doesn't mean that we don't think it can ever be changed, right?
00:04:12.960But we are very concerned that, you know, rushed or uncareful changes to Section 230 will do far more harm than good.
00:04:22.820So you might have already gleaned there's a lot of debate about Section 230.
00:04:26.740Some people say it shields big tech companies from accountability, while others say it's the backbone of what makes the Internet the Internet.
00:04:33.880Last season, we heard from Kerry Goldberg,
00:04:36.420an attorney who fights things like revenge porn,0.98
00:04:38.620stalking, and harassment on social media.
00:04:41.040In a groundbreaking case about a horrific harassment campaign
00:18:16.020Carrie has a real connection to her clients.1.00
00:18:18.320She rages about the injustices they face on Twitter.
00:18:21.340She uses her own experiences to help them combat stigma and shame and let them know they're not alone.
00:18:26.560I feel very invested in in making the process of the litigation or getting justice tolerable because it can take years and you need you need them to be able to to feel like it's worth it.
00:18:43.680and it's um it's stressful at times and it can be very um invasive you know like when you're
00:18:53.460having to relive when you're only 16 17 you're having to relive this awful thing that happened
00:18:58.800to you when you're 13 you need you need to like feel like it's it's for something really important
00:19:04.380and um and also just getting back to what you were talking about bridget about how um you know
00:19:13.760when we're young we can actually be complicit in some of the violation it makes me think about um
00:19:24.440how much more traumatizing it is to be a victim when you're when you're young and we we're not
00:19:32.000only have have our violators not developed the skill of empathy but the victims haven't figured
00:19:39.040out how to cope and it can feel like your whole world is crushing around you if if you are not
00:19:47.260only sexually violated but then all the students in your class you know think you're a joke and
00:19:52.740are spreading it and you know you're afraid your parents are going to punish you and you're afraid0.86
00:19:57.360your school's gonna punish you and and like kids already don't have control over their lives and
00:20:05.100and then to to be kind of socially ostracized or or put in this category of other and have
00:20:11.200your friendships kind of crumble like that is that can create such desperation um and every
00:20:19.460single one of our young clients has been suicidal during during those moments it's just like they
00:20:26.140don't have the coping skills. I didn't when I was that age. When Carrie was younger, she was
00:20:32.060victimized by abusive exes. One had intimate images of her and vowed to use them to ruin her
00:20:37.720life. This was before revenge porn was even really a thing. People didn't know how to talk about it1.00
00:20:43.340or deal with it when it happened. And lawyers didn't really know how to handle what she was0.91
00:20:47.640going through. In your book, you talk about how you became the lawyer that you wish you had had
00:20:53.440in your thirties. Can you tell me a bit about that? Yeah. Um, well, I had some, uh,
00:21:00.960violence, you know, I, I was a victim of, of some dating violence and incident of sexual violence,
00:21:10.760uh, before I started my law firm. And, um, when I was trying to escape my ex-boyfriend's
00:21:20.440stalking and, and he was, um, just besieging me with, with text messages and threats and,
00:21:29.700and false police reports. And it was never ending. Um, I had trouble finding a lawyer.
00:21:37.100Um, you know, I, I worked with somebody on the domestic violence piece. I worked with somebody
00:21:44.360on the bogus criminal complaints piece, but for everyone that I talked to, this was a real
00:21:51.640abnormal case for them. And you don't want to be the outlier when it comes to getting legal help
00:22:03.800and having a lawyer be kind of learning as they go. And it was unpredictable for them what would
00:22:12.580happen or, or the profile of my offender was, was something really new to them. And, um, when I
00:22:20.440finally got my orders of protection and he pled guilty, which was six months after the breakup,
00:22:27.640um, I quit everything and started my law firm a few months later when I was, you know,
00:22:37.040in retrospect, I was still in the midst of a lot of trauma, but I started this law firm basically
00:22:45.660to become the kind of lawyer that I'd needed because I'd gotten this kind of involuntary
00:22:51.020education into the world of, you know, being stalked and having no control over what's
00:23:01.420happening in the internet. And I learned that in New York, we didn't have a law criminalizing,
00:23:08.040um, you know, somebody sending around your naked pictures. And so the internet component of,
00:23:16.360of the attack on me was, was the most scary thing that, um, the scariest part about it,
00:23:23.940because even after I got my order of protection, I knew that legally he could still be sending
00:23:30.340around my images he you know as far as I know he didn't but but there was always this like
00:23:37.980thing this that he had threatened to and and uh he had sent me emails saying that he with the
00:23:47.160pictures saying that he'd blind copied um you know people that I was uh like other lawyers and
00:23:53.660judges and stuff um but it was like this constant anxiety that like I wasn't I wasn't
00:23:59.920protected even after all the legal issues had seemingly wrapped up.
00:24:06.600Carrie became one of the most prominent lawyers specializing in revenge porn1.00
00:24:10.100and offers victims legal support and a pathway to justice, whatever that looks like for them.
00:24:16.280Our expertise is dealing with people who've been stalked and harassed
00:24:20.860and victims of sexual assault and sexual trauma and getting justice for them.
00:24:26.560Sometimes it's just about getting an order of protection or helping advocate in the criminal justice system or just sending a cease and desist and getting the offender to go away forever.
00:24:36.400Other times it's we have to give the victim doesn't want to take any legal action, but just wants those images to to be removed from the Internet.
00:24:45.960And then we also do sometimes have really big cases against the city of New York when there's a retaliation against a student or a big case against Grindr because we felt they were facilitating our client being stalked.
00:25:06.100But basically the idea is that every client that comes to us has either been attacked or is under attack.
00:25:17.040And we've seen all these behavioral profiles over and over again.
00:25:20.800And the more you do something, the more expert you get.
00:25:23.660And so we can predict, you know, well, by sending a cease and desist letter to this kind of behavioral profile who is mentally ill and unrelenting and obsessed, we can know that's just going to escalate things.
00:25:39.880Um, whereas, oh, this other person, he, he's threatening revenge porn, but he's actually got a really stable job and, um, lives with, with, and has a kid and he's actually going to feel, um, scared of a threat because it could take things away from, from him.
00:27:00.340streaming radio and podcasting let us show you at iheartadvertising.com that's iheartadvertising.com
00:27:07.820if your bookshelf and your for you page are equally important to your personality
00:27:11.600welcome home this is prose society the weekly podcast that's part book club part group chat
00:27:19.140for thought daughters pop culture obsessives and anyone who thinks pride and prejudice and
00:27:23.380love island deserve the same level of discourse i'm eli rallo and every week we're connecting
00:27:28.360the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:27:33.360I'm going to have to look up this story. I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
00:27:36.940From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments,
00:27:41.820nothing is off the table. It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling
00:27:47.920characters, then that is a Trojan horse. Whether you're looking for literary deep dives,
00:27:52.660smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much,
00:27:57.960you're in the right place listen to pro society on the iheart radio app apple podcasts or wherever
00:28:04.420you get your podcasts see you between the pages when i was 14 years old i was kidnapped and held
00:28:11.820captive for nine months i survived and i've spent my life exploring how other people survive what
00:28:18.300should have destroyed them i'm elizabeth smart and these are the survivor files i just remember
00:28:24.640this low taunting voice next to my ear saying shut up don't say anything every week i'm with
00:28:33.480survivors who live through the unthinkable i knew if he woke up without a doubt he was going to hurt
00:28:40.780i started feeling that there was someone at the end of my bed and i just started screaming they
00:28:48.740are abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced. But these aren't stories about what's
00:28:54.500taken from them. They're stories about what it takes to make it out alive. Listen to the
00:29:00.340Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
00:29:06.400get your podcasts. Let's get right back to it. Carrie's case against the dating app Grindr was
00:29:15.920one of the biggest fights of her career. In it, she sets her sight on legislation called Section0.97
00:29:21.080230, which basically says that tech platforms can't be sued for what people say on those
00:29:26.280platforms. Now, free speech advocates like the Electronic Frontier Foundation say Section 230
00:29:31.980is what makes the internet the internet. But Carrie says that's exactly the problem.
00:29:37.080Forgive me if I like bungle this from my kind of like layperson's research. I understand that
00:29:42.020it really comes down to section 230, which I know that is something that you really, really have an
00:29:47.420issue with. You know, this is the section that allows tech companies to not be held liable for
00:29:52.940things that are said on their platform, the way that their platforms are used. Free speech advocates
00:29:58.660say that that section is like what makes the internet what it is. But you say that's exactly
00:30:03.760the problem, right? That we should be thinking about the internet in a different way. We should
00:30:07.700be building a different internet I guess how do we reconcile those two those two arguments I guess
00:30:13.920you know is there some way to preserve free speech online while also not letting tech companies just
00:30:22.180like avoid accountability for the way that their platforms are are misused oh my gosh I have so
00:30:28.760much to say to this Bridget you you framed it like better better than I could our client Matthew
00:30:36.120Herrick was a waiter slash actor slash former reality star who lived in Manhattan in Harlem
00:30:43.040and he had just ended a relationship with a really controlling and abusive man and
00:30:49.520among the ways that that man stalked Matthew was he started creating fake profiles on Grindr
00:30:58.440the gay dating app and then luring people to Matthew's job and to his home using Grindr's
00:31:05.000geolocating technology and dming with with the unknowing people and over the course of several
00:31:13.400months over 1300 individuals came in person to matthew's apartment and to his job thinking that
00:31:23.720they were there to have sex with him so imagine just like in the course of this interview if your
00:31:31.160buzzer rang three times with you know like so it was sometimes as many as 23 people a day Bridget
00:31:36.900and um and you know each time he he didn't know who it was going to be he didn't know if that
00:31:45.480person was going to be dangerous sometimes um Matthew's ex would would torment and taunt the
00:31:51.900visitors and say homophobic or racist things or say that Matthew had free drugs and so sometimes
00:31:57.520the visitors would, um, come really angry or tweaked out. Um, but always they were there
00:32:05.240thinking that Matthew had, had, um, rape fantasies and, and stuff. So, I mean, it was scary. Like it
00:32:12.200was, it was a crime that was happening to Matthew day in and day out every single day. And Matthew
00:32:19.480had gone to the police 10 times. He'd gotten an order of protection that the offender was violating
00:32:26.520over and over again. And nothing, nothing mattered. Matthew flagged the accounts
00:32:32.980with Grindr about 50 times by the time we came along. And then I was, um,
00:32:41.380I had just worked with a bunch of big tech companies at the time. This is like, um,
00:32:48.160the fall or the, the end of 2016. And I'd worked with a bunch of tech companies on their revenge
00:32:54.400porn policies. And so I was super like, I'll just call up Grindr's general counsel and get them to
00:33:00.200remove this user. And they ignored me too. And so I was like raging with him. And we ended up
00:33:09.420getting a restraining order against Grindr saying that they had to remove this user, which, you know,
00:33:16.540it's not super common to get a restraining order against a tech company, but we got it.
00:33:21.960And Grindr even ignored that. The visitors kept coming. And as we plotted our lawsuit against Grindr, we had to worry about the Communications Decency Act, Section 230, which was this law, as you mentioned, that went into effect back in 1995.
00:33:51.960when the internet looked nothing like it does now. And the law was actually, you know, it's just a
00:33:59.00026-word law that was part of a bigger law that basically banned pornography on the internet.
00:34:07.280But the other part of that law got deemed unconstitutional, in case you're wondering
00:34:12.780why we have porn on the internet. It's not constitutional to outlaw it, but this little
00:34:20.440section survived. And it originally was supposed to just make it so that, you know, if a bulletin
00:34:27.520board, which was basically the way that, you know, people talk to one another online, if
00:34:33.520somebody posted something defamatory on the bulletin board, there wouldn't be a lawsuit
00:34:40.240against the bulletin board, but the defamation would be user to user. And, you know, it kind of
00:34:45.980makes sense because then, um, the, the platforms are not tasked with this burden of, of having to,
00:34:54.160um, moderate all, all the speech and all the posts and stuff like that. But the issue is that, um,
00:35:01.500over the last, you know, 25 years, um, that law has been interpreted by our courts in this really
00:35:12.760expansive way. And so anytime, you know, Twitter or Facebook or anybody gets sued for something
00:35:19.260that's happening to a user, they say, we're not liable because of Section 230. You know,
00:35:27.180like, you can't hold us accountable for anything that one user does to another. And courts have,
00:35:32.880you know, said, you're right, because all the other cases before you didn't.
00:35:38.120It's important to emphasize that Kerry isn't just talking about what someone says on a platform.
00:35:42.760If a platform allows an abusive user to impersonate you and set you up for a dangerous encounter in real life, it's a pretty big flaw.
00:35:51.600The issue is that the internet and apps and, you know, are so much different now than they were.
00:35:58.840We're not just talking about defamation.
00:36:00.640We're talking about, you know, geolocating technology and, you know, social media companies, which have so much functionality.
00:36:08.220And we're talking about, you know, dating apps, you know, apps that are playing a role in matching users.
00:36:15.500And so, but we had to make it when we were filing this lawsuit so that we were not suing Grindr for anything that Matt's ex was doing to Matt.
00:36:23.980Because we knew it would get kicked out of court for violating Section 230.
00:36:27.860And so when Grindr's lawyers finally came to court and told us that they didn't have the technology to ban an abusive user, we were like, what?0.82
00:36:42.140You have the world's biggest dating app and it's so foreseeable, biggest dating app for gay people.
00:36:50.840It's so foreseeable that sometimes it's going to be abused by stalkers, by predators.
00:36:55.200and you've not designed into it like a way to stop abusive users well then you've you've
00:37:03.100released a dangerous product into the stream of commerce and just like our product liability laws
00:37:09.600for cars you know that have airbags that don't go off or or broken brakes or something like
00:37:16.600grinder had created a dangerous product we say you shouldn't have been on the market in the first
00:37:21.820place. And the fact that you are, well, that's how we're going to sue you. Grindr still said,
00:37:28.520at the end of the day, you're still holding us liable for stuff this user's done to Matthew.
00:37:34.100It's not us. And the judge agreed with Grindr and we appealed and kept losing at every stage
00:37:43.780and ultimately petitioned to the Supreme Court and lost. And which happened, you know, this was
00:37:51.300from the beginning, a real, um, it was a very experimental lawsuit. Like at the time that we
00:37:59.180filed it, it was novel for us to even be for anybody to even be referring to, um, apps as
00:38:06.740products. Everyone was saying their services, their services, but, but now this idea has caught
00:38:11.740on. And, um, and it's kind of changed the way that, um, that we think about apps and internet
00:38:20.760products. And the fact that we did have such, you know, that Matthew experienced such a horrific
00:38:28.260thing and he couldn't get justice. That's actually helped us
00:38:35.380fight for legislation. And, and so, as you mentioned, you've got all these people on the
00:38:44.440other side that, and I don't actually think it's all these people. I think they're just very vocal
00:38:49.700and they're getting paid a lot of lobbying money from, from big tech.
00:38:55.520Is the internet we have now working for everyone? Is it the version of the internet we want?
00:39:00.320Is it one worth preserving as is? Carrie doesn't really think so.
00:39:03.960But they're saying that basically the Internet as we know it wouldn't exist without Section 230.
00:39:12.700And we're going to lose, you know, all the this wonderful free exchange of ideas if we if we lose Section 230.
00:39:21.820And I call total BS on that because, number one, you're assuming that the Internet as we know it is a great place and that as we know it, like should be, you know, like preserved.
00:39:31.460Just, you know, it's kind of like any constitutional argument or make America great again. You're assuming that it is, that things are great. And, you know, you're assuming that, you know, that everyone has the same level of free speech.
00:39:48.960But I mean, speech on the Internet really belongs to those who are the loudest and and, you know, for basically for companies, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft and Apple.
00:40:06.340I mean, they they control the Internet. We've got all our our issues with with antitrust and and then you've and also the quantity.
00:40:16.200So the most hostile people on the Internet are the ones who have the greatest protections.
00:40:24.040But but also when we're talking about lawsuits and the right to sue, it's such a fundamental right.
00:40:31.560Carrie says that as long as tech companies have the kind of legal protection afforded to them by Section 230, it creates a situation where there's not a lot of avenues to hold them accountable.
00:40:40.840you know like the thing is like as you see with our our cases against the new york city department
00:40:46.720that like for the cost of an index number which is a couple hundred bucks which you can get waived
00:40:53.920i had a client who you know whose mom was a part-time home health aide and didn't speak
00:40:59.440english you know and they had they had no money to speak of i had her suing the city of new york
00:41:07.460which is worth multi-billion, you know, multi-billion dollar dollars.
00:41:11.640And that's the great equalizer in our country is that anybody can sue, you know, if there's been a harm.
00:41:22.080And it's also how we keep our big organizations, our companies, from being total assholes.0.98
00:41:28.980Because the threat of being sued is, you know, it's a bottom line issue.0.99
00:41:36.260It costs money. And, and it's why, you know, like so many safety measures, whether we're talking about pharmaceuticals or cars, it's because of litigation that happened, or it's because of the fear of litigation. And also it's because most companies want people to be safe. They want their customers and clients to not have a bad experience. You don't see that with big tech, though.
00:41:59.940you know like the the wall off you know like if you had a crisis on Facebook if let's say you're
00:42:11.780a parent and your kid was manipulated into giving nudes to a pedophile and then he was sharing them
00:42:21.780online you're a parent your first instinct was who you know is who do I talk to who do I talk to
00:42:28.300What's the phone number? Who's live to help me with this crisis?
00:42:33.560And it's just like a one way street here where we're giving these companies all this information about us and and and stuff.
00:42:43.520And we can't. I mean, they are like it's like Oz, like they're behind this magic curtain and don't have to interact with us users.
00:42:54.200So as you were talking, it occurred to me that when you first started your law firm, the idea of revenge porn didn't even really exist.
00:43:00.740And it was through advocating for legal protections and working with victims that you helped usher in both a legal change and a cultural reimagining of what revenge porn actually is.
00:43:10.500And in listening to you talk about tech companies just now, it seems like you're poised to do that same kind of thing again when it comes to reimagining what role tech companies should play in creating an Internet that's safer for everyone.
00:43:21.660Like a hard reset of how these companies operate.
00:43:24.200Yeah. I mean, it's, it's true, Bridget. There's so much, there's so much work that can be done. And like, it's, it's a really critical time because you have all this concentrated power and wealth in such a few, you know, just a few companies.
00:43:40.480And that the inequality in our in our society is just getting greater, you know, because of these companies, because and also the power and the omniscience is also, you know, another thing that's just creating so much more inequality and in our country.
00:44:03.320And the thing is, I do have so many cases where it's, you can't ignore that the facts are horrific. You know, an 11 year old who was sextorted and made to create all these videos and they were sent around on Instagram or my, my client who's, who was, whose murder was basically live streamed.
00:44:27.680or another client who was raped and murdered on a first date through match.com by a known sex
00:44:35.520offender. Like there's going to come become a point where the more cases like that. Okay.
00:44:42.160Even if these cases can't be brought in court or get kicked out, like you can't deny that there is
00:44:48.160extreme negligence by these companies. Like, and we're just, I'm going to just keep producing them
00:44:54.580until we get new law. And it's just like any other case where if you don't feel like you can
00:45:02.040become a victim, then you're not going to care. But the whole purpose of my book and everything
00:45:08.360is to pound into the consciousness that we're all a moment away from becoming victims.
00:45:17.880Like, all it takes is one person to decide they want to destroy you.
00:45:23.060One bad interaction at the supermarket with somebody who finds out your name,
00:45:27.180they then have the right to, you know, go to pedophile websites
00:45:31.580and tell the world that you're a pedophile, and good luck getting that down.
00:45:35.900You know, like, anybody can become a victim,0.82
00:45:42.120but it shouldn't take that in order for us to have empathy toward victims