There Are No Girls on the Internet - April 13, 2024


Tom Holland should speak up in Romeo + Juliet harassment; Eclipse 2024!; No politics on Instagram?; Fake podcasts exposed! – NEWS ROUNDUP

Topics
The Rot Economy ft Robert Evans - Better Offline Marylin Manson’s abuse allegations are a tech issue - STUFF MOM NEVER TOLD YOU

Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per minute

169.84

Word count

11,252

Sentence count

546

Harmful content

Misogyny

13

sentences flagged

Toxicity

20

sentences flagged

Hate speech

22

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.000 This is an iHeart Podcast.
00:00:02.580 Guaranteed human.
00:00:05.140 Get Bell Pure Fiber Internet with Crave, Netflix, and Disney Plus
00:00:08.720 from $94 a month.
00:00:10.160 Price guaranteed for two years on Internet
00:00:12.040 with a two-year term and auto-pay credit.
00:00:14.400 Visit bell.ca for details and to check availability.
00:00:17.180 Bell. Connection is everything.
00:00:19.620 Run a business and not thinking about podcasting?
00:00:21.880 Think again.
00:00:22.520 More Americans listen to podcasts
00:00:23.980 than ad-supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
00:00:26.680 And as the number one podcaster,
00:00:28.060 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:00:30.820 Learn how podcasting can help your business.
00:00:32.640 Call 844-844-IHEART.
00:00:34.940 I survived nine months in captivity,
00:00:38.460 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
00:00:43.680 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are The Survivor Files.
00:00:47.300 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
00:00:51.020 abducted, stalked, controlled, and nearly silenced.
00:00:54.640 These are stories about what it takes to make it out alive.
00:00:58.720 Listen to The Survivor Files with Elizabeth Smart on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:01:10.580 There Are No Girls on the Internet is a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
00:01:18.700 I'm Bridget Todd, and this is There Are No Girls on the Internet.
00:01:21.440 welcome to there are no girls on the internet where we explore the intersection of technology
00:01:28.400 social media the internet and identity and this is another installment of our weekly news roundup
00:01:34.400 where we're rounding up some of the stories that happened online that you might have missed
00:01:38.000 this week mike thank you for being here bridget thanks for having me always a pleasure to be here
00:01:42.760 i should say i am still in mazatlan mexico where i traveled to see the eclipse when i recorded the
00:01:51.140 news roundup with Joey the previous week, I had not yet seen the eclipse. Now I have seen the
00:01:56.880 eclipse. I feel that everything has changed. It's like, do you remember Corn Kid, where he says,
00:02:04.000 when I tried corn with butter, everything changed. When I saw the eclipse in totality,
00:02:08.340 everything changed. This is like you're putting butter on corn. Amazing. So where were you when
00:02:14.700 you saw it? I was out on the beach. You know, I had these like very complicated plans to take a
00:02:22.940 ferry to a small island and then hike up a little area. And then I was like, let's just go to the
00:02:29.460 beach. So the whole, it felt like the whole city of Mazatlan came out to the beach to see it.
00:02:34.360 I have never experienced totality. And for a really long time, everybody in my life had been
00:02:39.840 telling me like, oh, totality is amazing. Like it's going to change your life. Like blah, blah,
00:02:43.560 blah. I was like, oh, well, I've seen it from my office in eclipse classes from like downtown
00:02:48.980 Washington, DC. Is that not the same thing? And people are like, no. And I always felt a little
00:02:53.340 bit raw about it. If I'm being honest, my, I did not know this, but my father is an eclipse chaser.
00:02:59.040 And I only learned that when I tried to say that I experienced an eclipse in a partial eclipse in
00:03:05.180 DC. And he was like, no, you haven't. If you haven't been in totality, you haven't experienced
00:03:08.380 shit yeah totality really but he was right he's right i mean he didn't have to say it so rudely 0.58
00:03:14.220 but totality really is a whole different thing you know somebody described being in 99 eclipse 0.89
00:03:21.360 as like driving 99 of the way to disney world and i feel that's like a good description right like
00:03:26.900 unless you actually get all the way there uh you're not experiencing it yeah the eclipse was
00:03:34.960 beautiful. It was sublime. Can't wait for the next one. Did you see this thing where there was like
00:03:41.940 eclipse backlash? I'm not just talking about all the different wacky conspiracy theories that
00:03:47.260 people said the eclipse was going to trigger, which obviously that's bunk. I mean, reasonable
00:03:52.340 people who were like, stop being excited about the eclipse. Like, I'm not going to be pressured
00:03:57.980 into caring about this eclipse. Did you see any of that? I did. And I found it super baffling and
00:04:03.560 sort of like disappointing about society uh yeah it was like a whole category of content of people
00:04:09.760 uh expressing anti-eclipse sentiment like don't be excited about it it's not that great
00:04:16.320 uh who cares and then even after the eclipse i've seen some content that was like framed that way
00:04:23.760 with like clickbaity headlines about what was the headline that i saw this morning just this morning
00:04:30.720 uh somebody was like complaining about the eclipse because and then he got into the article and they
00:04:39.100 were like it was so beautiful that now I don't know what to do with myself uh but the the headline
00:04:43.960 was like clickbaity and anti-eclipse and so it's just I don't know it's like can't we have anything
00:04:49.780 nice where we just feel good about something well that's my thing is that post eclipse I'm actually
00:04:56.380 feeling a lot of for lack of a better phrase childlike wonder like I think like being around
00:05:04.520 all these people who just wanted to marvel at this this celestial magic thing that happened in
00:05:10.620 the sky and I don't know it's just like it felt like a whole day or people got to be excited about
00:05:15.880 something that's pure and good and just like I don't know reading about how the only reason why
00:05:21.720 we get eclipses this is because like our the sun and the moon happen to be the same size is that
00:05:28.280 right uh yeah i mean it is kind of like i i want to say magical magic isn't the word but uh yeah
00:05:39.260 like the the sizes are it seems like quite a quite a coincidence that the sizes are so aligned the
00:05:47.300 way that they are considering how far apart these objects are. Yeah and I just think that's nice
00:05:52.980 that it's this like coincidental thing that we as humans just get to experience and how lucky for us
00:05:59.180 and yeah we should have more things that are just purely about Marvel for Marvel's sake and looking
00:06:06.560 up at the sky and wonder. We don't get a lot of opportunities for for childlike wonder collectively
00:06:11.960 so I'm still feeling the warm fuzzies from it I guess but I should also say that because I'm in
00:06:16.980 Mexico still. I am still really close to a beach where there are roaming bands, which I learned
00:06:24.140 actually they're called Banda bands. And Mazatlan, Mexico is the place where that tradition of like
00:06:30.180 playing music on the beach and like wandering around. This is the hometown of that tradition.
00:06:36.380 So go Mazatlan, Mexico. But you might hear a little bit of jubilation in the background is
00:06:41.960 what i'm saying all right that's pretty cool i like the idea of roving bands of musicians
00:06:47.440 traveling up and down the beach going back to that like childlike wonder at the beauty of
00:06:52.820 nature and the universe uh i think that's sort of what that anti-eclipse article i read this morning
00:06:59.260 was uh like pushing back against or complaining about because you know they had experienced it
00:07:06.180 during this brief sublimely beautiful moment and then it passed and the author almost sounded like
00:07:14.400 mad that now they had to go back to their normal humdrum life and they struggled to remember
00:07:23.280 what it had been like during totality uh and you know i just think anger at the eclipse is one
00:07:31.880 path a person could take to like deal with those feelings another path could be to try to seek out
00:07:39.080 uh opportunities to marvel at the world uh more regularly right like
00:07:47.120 our lives don't have to be soul-crushing grinds we can look up and wonder every now and again
00:07:54.100 sounds like somebody's in the pocket of big eclipse mike yeah i'll admit it i'm i'm on the
00:07:59.400 dole for big eclipse well speaking of soul crushing not everything is childlike wonder
00:08:06.520 and this this is something that i've been experiencing a childlike sense of rage and
00:08:12.060 infuriation i guess i might say yeah i guess children really do like whatever they're feeling
00:08:17.960 they just really feel it intensely yeah so what do you feel in childlike rage about bridget so
00:08:24.460 So Francesca Amaluda Rivers is an actor who was cast as Juliet in an upcoming London West End production of Romeo and Juliet, alongside Tom Holland, who you might know from those Spider-Man movies or Dating Zendaya, alongside him as Romeo.
00:08:38.120 So the entire production is pretty racially diverse, but because Francesca is a dark-skinned Black woman, that means that her being cast as Juliet has led to this torrent of racist, sexist online abuse.
00:08:50.680 People saying she's too ugly and too black to be a beautiful Juliet figure and that her casting is, quote, woke and that she did not deserve the role.
00:09:00.260 So the Jamie Lloyd Company, which is the company behind the production, put out a statement saying, 0.94
00:09:05.360 Following the announcement of our Romeo and Juliet cast, there has been a barrage of deplorable racial abuse online directed toward a member of our company.
00:09:12.200 This must stop. We are working with a remarkable group of artists.
00:09:16.060 We insist they are free to create work without facing online harassment.
00:09:19.960 Jamie Lloyd, the director of the company, said that it would continue to support and protect everyone at our company at all costs.
00:09:26.160 Any abuse will not be tolerated and will be reported.
00:09:29.020 Bullying and harassment have no place online in our industry or in our wider communities.
00:09:33.460 I will say this statement is good.
00:09:35.760 Like something that I say again and again on this show is that when somebody is being targeted in this way, you need to show clear, unambiguous support.
00:09:44.860 You need to have a plan in place for what you will do. And you need to make sure that there is no confusion about where you stand and how you are supporting the person targeted.
00:09:53.940 The fact that the Jamie Lloyd Company didn't ignore it, spoke to spoke to what was happening right away in very clear terms.
00:10:01.200 This is how I think that organizations and industries should be reacting when somebody is somebody is targeted in this way. 0.76
00:10:08.600 Luckily, if there is one thing that black women are going to do, it is support each other.
00:10:12.800 more than 800 predominantly Black women and non-binary actors signed on to an open letter
00:10:18.000 in solidarity with Francesca. The letter was organized by Enola Holmes actor Susan Wacoma
00:10:23.480 and writer Somalia Naniye-Seaton. And the letter really has two kind of important bits.
00:10:29.180 One, just generally supporting Francesca, and two, pointing out that this kind of thing,
00:10:34.780 these kind of racist attacks and harassment, happened to Black performers all the time.
00:10:39.380 The letter reads, 0.94
00:11:09.380 of a play to ignite such twisted, ugly abuse is truly embarrassing for those so empty and barren
00:11:15.380 in their own lives that they must meddle in hateful abuse. Also, that is a read. Somebody
00:11:23.080 had time when they wrote this letter. So they really drill in on one of my sticking points,
00:11:27.720 that in a lot of cases, when this kind of thing happens, the people in charge just kind of do
00:11:31.660 nothing. They don't put out a statement. They maybe hope it'll blow over. Maybe they're privately
00:11:36.600 supporting the person targeted but like they're not communicating that to the public and that is
00:11:40.800 that doesn't work the letter reads too many times theater companies broadcasters producers and
00:11:47.020 streamers have failed to offer any help or support when their black artists face racist or
00:11:52.020 misogynistic abuse reporting is too often left on the shoulders of the abused who are then expected
00:11:57.300 to promote said show which i think is also like a really good point like it is a racism and sexism
00:12:02.880 issue, to be sure, like an identity issue, but it's also just like a workplace equity issue,
00:12:07.580 right? Like she is meant to promote this project on social media that she is a part of, which will
00:12:12.100 only lead to more of the abuse that she is already shouldering. And so it's not an equitable
00:12:16.880 situation if like, yeah, you're going to be in this play, you need to promote this play on social
00:12:21.780 media. But in order to do that, you just have to individually shoulder this kind of unacceptable
00:12:27.220 racist and sexist harassment that other people in your production are not having to deal with.
00:12:31.920 it's not equitable. Yeah. And not just shoulder that, you know, it's not just abuse, but it's
00:12:38.740 coordinated abuse, right? Like people across the internet coordinating to target one particular
00:12:46.540 performer. Uh, and like, of course that's going to be like too much for one person to take on.
00:12:53.860 Of course, people, you know, facing that sort of vast network of international bigots, uh,
00:13:00.840 need some institutional support to help hold them up. Yes, the letter really speaks to that
00:13:07.740 in a beautiful way. They write, we want to send a clear message to Francesca and all Black women
00:13:12.540 performers who face this kind of abuse. We see you. We see the art you managed to produce with
00:13:17.960 not only the pressures that your white colleagues face, but with the added traumatic hurdle of
00:13:22.480 misogynoir. We are so excited to watch you shine. So we should talk about what's going on here.
00:13:28.700 One is that I've seen a lot of people say like, oh, well, I'm not, I don't have a problem with 0.81
00:13:33.680 her that she's Black. I have a problem with her is that she's not beautiful. Juliet is meant to 1.00
00:13:38.520 be beautiful. She's meant to be beautiful enough to have, you know, Romeo go against his family
00:13:44.200 to be with her. I'm not saying it's a problem because she's a Black woman. I'm saying it's 0.98
00:13:48.260 a problem because she's not beautiful. So I think there's like a really specific racially coded 0.98
00:13:53.560 thing happening here that I can tell you quite a bit about as a black woman with dark skin,
00:13:58.800 you know, people saying that, oh, well, she's, it's that she's not attractive and Juliet should 0.51
00:14:02.840 be attractive. Saying that it's not a race issue, it's an attractiveness issue. It can be such a
00:14:08.640 deeply coded, like racially coded claim, especially when you're talking about a darker skin black 1.00
00:14:14.120 woman with like thick hair. And, you know, like, like, I just have heard that my whole life that 1.00
00:14:19.920 it's like, oh, well, it's not a race thing. It's just that you're not pretty because you're a 1.00
00:14:22.740 black woman. It's like, well, that does sound like a race thing to me. Yeah. And I mean, 1.00
00:14:26.560 there are few things more subjective than beauty. Yes. And it's like the fact that these people
00:14:33.240 could say like, oh, I'm just talking about beauty standards. The fact that they could
00:14:38.560 try to conveniently divorce all of that from race, from the fact that we live in a white
00:14:43.280 supremacist society, you know, Eurocentric beauty standards, like all of that. It's like,
00:14:48.380 I don't know. It's like playing in my face. Like, it's very clear what's going on,
00:14:51.740 But they don't want to just say what's going on. So they're like, oh, no, no, no, it's not about race. I just don't believe that anybody would ever find a black woman attractive.
00:14:57.520 Yeah, and I truly wonder how many of them are saying it's about beauty as an intentional way to hide the racism that they know that they have within them versus how many are just so un-self-critical and unreflective that they don't see what's going on in their own head. 0.99
00:15:22.120 Like, that almost is like sadder, I think, for somebody to live such an uncritical life that they would not realize that. Right. I don't know. Maybe that's a dumb point.
00:15:35.660 No, I don't think it's a dumb point. So I spent a lot of time digging into what people who are behind this harassment are saying. And I think that you're right. It's clear to me that these are not people who are thinking very deeply about the things that they're saying, the things that they are claiming to feel about this person and why they're making such a big deal of it. 0.97
00:15:57.380 I don't think that they're really analyzing that too deeply. And so I bet these people do think it's not about race and that like spending a lot of energy and time to talk about whether or not they think this Black woman, Juliet, is pretty enough for a production that they probably would never see is normal behavior.
00:16:17.260 I don't think that they're looking at their behavior in any kind of like critical lens.
00:16:20.640 Yeah. Because you bring up another good point. Why do they care? How many of these people are going to travel to London's West End to take in this Shakespeare production?
00:16:32.620 Okay, so I have been racking my brain trying to figure this out and figure out, like, what's going on with this. And I think something really particular is happening here. So anybody listening who is into theater, particularly Shakespeare, y'all know that diverse casting, and I'm talking diverse with regard to race and gender, is pretty common in Shakespeare productions.
00:16:56.300 Like, you could see every iteration of race and gender identity in Shakespeare plays if you wanted.
00:17:02.620 Like, diverse casting has been a thing for a while, for generations when it comes to Shakespeare, right?
00:17:07.660 But I think that because people are hearing that Tom Holland is in this particular production, they are thinking, like, oh, Tom Holland, he is a movie star, right?
00:17:19.180 Like, he was Spider-Man in six Marvel Cinematic Universe superhero movies.
00:17:23.520 So I think that they think this is a movie that is going to be on in the theaters, right? I think that they see Tom Holland, Romeo and Juliet, they are making a Romeo and Juliet movie. They do not realize that this is a theatrical production wherein diverse casting is like commonplace and has been for a really long time.
00:17:41.640 They think it's a film. And so they're like, oh, it's just it's just a woke Romeo and Juliet, you know, just like all the other times where these kinds of people are like, oh, superhero movies have gotten so woke.
00:17:53.020 They've ruined superhero movies with their diverse casting and their women and their people of color. Right. 0.98
00:17:58.320 So I think that's what they think is going on, because that's the only frame of reference they have. 1.00
00:18:03.920 Let's just cut the shit. These people don't know anything about theater like that is like very clear to me. 0.99
00:18:08.480 These are not people who go to the theater. These are not people who have any frame of reference for what is or is not commonplace in theater. They just don't know, right? So they're not only racist and sexist, but they're also Philistines.
00:18:19.560 Like when I was researching this, I saw this very angry post that was like performing pretty well in the Jordan Peterson subreddit. 0.92
00:18:29.360 The post reads, why do we let woke moralists steal our classic stories of the Western tradition? 0.98
00:18:35.920 We have no way to know if this black person was included for a reason besides capitulating to the wokes and virtue signaling. 0.70
00:18:43.000 which I will pause there because Romeo and Juliet is a play about two warring families who have 0.99
00:18:50.800 deep divisions. Like, you really can't think of another reason why you might cast a Black person 1.00
00:18:56.020 in a role about a production about deep divisions. You can't think of any reason why that might make 0.90
00:19:01.740 narrative sense within the play, other than just, like, virtue signaling and being woke.
00:19:07.640 Well, and the statement, like, we have no way to know if this Black person was included for a 0.93
00:19:12.300 reason besides capitulating like every casting decision needs to be like super justified like
00:19:20.220 what what do you mean you have no way to know like what business is it of yours well he closes that
00:19:27.000 comment with this is a story which has defined romantic love for generations and now will be
00:19:33.000 just another example of dun dun dun anti-white racism like what are you talking about yeah 1.00
00:19:40.160 how is an interracial couple falling in love anti-white racism no it's just it's so stupid 1.00
00:19:48.260 like trying to like logically pick apart the internet writings of an imbecile 1.00
00:19:56.000 yeah i mean i i completely agree and i don't know how these people would feel about the fact that 0.98
00:20:06.080 in Shakespeare's day, the characters that are women would probably be played by men in drag.
00:20:12.400 I'm curious how that hits them. Yeah, right. This is like, what does he say? Like the classic
00:20:19.240 story of the Western tradition. Yeah. It was like two dudes making out on stage. Is that what he
00:20:24.060 wants to see? Something tells me he wouldn't appreciate that either. So the top comment on
00:20:31.000 that Jordan Peterson Reddit thread is, wow, looks like another box office bust. Kind of a reference
00:20:38.900 to that idea of go woke, go broke, that when Hollywood makes movies that feature diverse
00:20:43.820 cast, that they're going woke and that people aren't going to support that. Now, nevermind that
00:20:48.440 this particular production of Romeo and Juliet actually sold out within hours. But again, it is
00:20:54.960 not a movie like another box office bust what are you talking about these people don't even know
00:21:00.980 what they're mad about no they're just what are they mad about right and like like clearly they're
00:21:07.120 mad about something how sad that they have to direct it at this like young woman right like
00:21:13.260 can't they find anything more productive to direct that childlike rage at
00:21:17.960 i will say this though like and i i don't want to make it sound like i'm speculating on celebrities
00:21:25.340 because that's not what i like to do but in the fact that so many other actors mostly black women
00:21:33.340 actors and non-binary act black actors are speaking up for francesca in that open letter
00:21:38.920 i'm a little bit surprised that we have not heard tom holland speaking up for for her you know they
00:21:44.960 are co-stars. He is the Romeo to her Juliet. It's entirely possible that maybe he's supporting her
00:21:51.360 privately, which would be nice. But again, I do think that loud, clear public support is the only
00:21:59.820 thing that works in situations like these, right? And I think especially for somebody like Tom
00:22:04.700 Holland, who is the face of this big Marvel Cinematic Universe Spider-Man franchise, you know,
00:22:10.720 So certainly like a battlefield for, you know, people who get angry about seeing black people or women or people of color in their movies.
00:22:21.420 I think having somebody like Tom Holland be like, no, you know, this kind of racist, sexist abuse will not be tolerated.
00:22:28.200 You're not going to do this in our name.
00:22:30.040 You're not going to like we don't want to see this as creatives and as storytellers and we don't like it.
00:22:33.840 I think that would go a long way toward creating the conditions where this kind of thing would not be commonplace.
00:22:39.420 And I guess I say that to say that I don't think it should just be on the other Black actors, like the Black actors who organized that letter to support Francesca.
00:22:48.880 I think that's great, but it shouldn't just be on them to create a working environment free from this kind of abuse.
00:22:55.180 Everybody should want a workplace where people can just do the jobs that they are hired to do without being harassed for it, right?
00:23:01.140 That benefits everybody, not just people of color, not just traditionally marginalized people.
00:23:05.600 I'm sure Tom Holland wants a kind of working environment where that kind of thing is not commonplace. Who wouldn't? And I just think it's just another unfair, unpaid burden that black women actors are being made to shoulder to get us there, right? Like this is not a system that we created. This is not a system that is benefiting us. However, it is like seems to be on us to be doing the work to fix that system and to get us to a place where this kind of abuse is not commonplace.
00:23:31.980 And yeah, I just, I would like, it's like when you are being targeted or harassed at work, that is already a, so you have to do your job, then you have to shoulder this abuse, and then you have to like be the one that's also doing all the organizing to create the conditions to not have that abuse be commonplace.
00:23:49.460 It's too much. And I just think that for somebody like Tom Holland, who certainly has a lot of privilege as a white male superhero actor, I think he could spend a little bit of that privilege getting us to a better system a little bit.
00:24:06.200 Not to mention the fact that he is in an interracial relationship. He's in a relationship with Zendaya, somebody who I really like because she is really open about the fact that, you know, as a lighter skinned black woman with like long hair, the kind of privilege that comes along with.
00:24:21.320 And so he's in a relationship with somebody who intentionally does a lot of public speaking about the very things that Francesca is dealing with.
00:24:29.240 And yeah, I just think that we, I wouldn't mind hearing from him.
00:24:36.200 Let's take a quick break.
00:25:06.200 from Spotify and Pandora.
00:25:07.860 And as the number one podcaster,
00:25:09.600 iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:25:12.040 So whatever your customers listen to,
00:25:13.620 they'll hear your message.
00:25:15.020 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message
00:25:16.920 to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:25:19.260 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:25:21.120 Think iHeart.
00:25:22.180 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:25:24.240 Call 844-844-iHeart to get started.
00:25:27.380 That's 844-844-iHeart.
00:25:29.620 If your bookshelf and your For You page
00:25:31.840 are equally important to your personality,
00:25:34.260 welcome home.
00:25:35.780 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:25:48.240 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:25:55.360 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:25:57.260 I'm obsessed.
00:25:58.000 I'm obsessed.
00:25:58.480 From best-selling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture moments, nothing is off the table.
00:26:04.900 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:26:12.800 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:26:21.960 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:26:27.460 See you between the pages.
00:26:34.860 And we're back.
00:26:37.860 So we've talked a lot about how AI is being used to exploit women's bodies to basically make men rich.
00:26:44.660 And this new 404 Media Report is exactly what I mean.
00:26:48.660 AI-generated adult content creators are stealing from actual human adult content creators.
00:26:54.720 This is all from a deeply reported 404 Media piece that we will link in the show notes.
00:26:59.320 It is a really good read.
00:27:00.360 This is one of those stories that I definitely recommend, like reading the whole thing.
00:27:03.620 The piece says, people running Instagram accounts for AI-generated influencers and nude models
00:27:08.740 are downloading popular Instagram reels of real models and sex workers, deep faking the
00:27:14.160 AI models face onto them, and then using the altered videos to promote paid subscriptions
00:27:18.780 to the AI-generated models accounts on OnlyFans or other competitor sites.
00:27:23.580 In some cases, these AI-generated models have amassed hundreds of thousands of Instagram
00:27:28.500 followers using almost exclusively stolen content.
00:27:32.340 So it is a pretty messed up situation.
00:27:34.760 And it's even more messed up when you think about the fact that human sex workers and
00:27:39.180 adult content creators are often really harshly moderated on the internet.
00:27:42.920 And so while those human content creators are sort of marginalized and pushed to the
00:27:47.920 sides on the internet, here we have these AI-generated adult content creators stealing
00:27:53.120 from those humans and showing up online. It is really uncanny. Like it will be the exact same
00:27:59.060 video, but with an AI generated fake influencers head, like swapped into that human's body. Like
00:28:05.680 I actually had to really look to see the difference between some of these real humans video and the
00:28:11.420 version that puts an AI generated content creator onto her face. This sounds like a fun house
00:28:17.560 mirror situation of what we have talked about several times with nudify apps where, you know,
00:28:22.960 In the past, people were using these apps to put celebrities and real humans' faces onto AI-generated bodies,
00:28:35.140 and now these scammers and bad actors have found a way to do the opposite thing of putting AI-generated faces on human bodies.
00:28:44.660 There's just, like, no end to the ways that people can use AI to steal from women.
00:28:52.100 it's all scams and sexual exploitation the whole way down. And I think you're exactly right. Like
00:28:58.580 we talk a ton about what deep fakes means for celebrities, but this is going to show it is not
00:29:03.980 just celebrities who are being targeted here. We're talking about ordinary women whose bodies
00:29:10.240 are being used without their consent. Like the labor and the content that these women are making 1.00
00:29:15.420 is being stolen from them to make somebody else money.
00:29:19.740 And more disturbingly, 404 Media also found that there are very detailed instructions
00:29:25.040 on how to do this on YouTube, where they recommend stealing reels on Instagram
00:29:29.200 specifically from small creators and small accounts to avoid detection.
00:29:33.780 In one of these instructional videos, they say,
00:29:36.540 it's a fact that faceless OnlyFans accounts earn three times less than ones with a face.
00:29:41.220 This opens up a lot of possibilities for people to start earning more in different ways imaginable.
00:29:46.480 And now it's up to you.
00:29:47.820 Build your own AI influencer and start monetizing your swaps.
00:29:51.800 Grow your social media accounts.
00:29:53.380 Get an account.
00:29:54.260 Start an OnlyFans and make it rain.
00:29:56.860 So we'll say something else is that this is like explicitly a money-making enterprise wherein men feel like they are like turning the tables on women who make adult content.
00:30:07.280 Like there's a real disdain that these men feel for women who sex workers or women who make adult content like that is very clear. And I think that comments make very clear that like, this is a thing where men feel like women have been exercising economic agency over their own content over their own bodies over their sexuality, and they want to like turn the tables on them.
00:30:31.400 Like in one of those YouTube instructional videos, the comments make clear that the viewers of that content think that this is like a big development for men on the Internet.
00:30:41.080 One comment says, can finally take all the simps money while being a male.
00:30:45.340 So comfy.
00:30:46.760 Another one says, this may just be the end of influencers and the constant quest for Internet fame and vanity.
00:30:53.160 Love this.
00:30:53.900 so it's like when you when you really peel that apart why are these men so mad about influencers
00:31:00.180 about women showing their bodies on the internet like and making money from that like why are they
00:31:05.760 it's like they're they clearly have a lot of disdain for the women who are doing this
00:31:09.540 and it kind of conveniently leaves out the fact that like it is men who are consuming that adult
00:31:14.320 content so it's like if anything they should be mad at themselves it's this it's this weird
00:31:18.760 combination of like
00:31:20.840 lust and disgust where it's like
00:31:22.860 I want to consume this but I also
00:31:24.940 am disgusted by this and I want to
00:31:26.820 shame her for making me want
00:31:28.940 this like it's this you know what I'm saying
00:31:30.580 I think it reveals it's very
00:31:32.600 weird tension
00:31:33.780 yeah it's like a twisted
00:31:36.920 logic unlike the previous story
00:31:38.980 where you know it was just the 1.00
00:31:40.920 nonsensical logic of an imbecile 1.00
00:31:43.200 here it's like a twisted 1.00
00:31:44.680 logic of
00:31:46.160 yeah hating women and also being like strangely jealous of them uh yeah it's it does not seem
00:31:58.320 like the the behavior or the statements of healthy well-adjusted men that's definitely
00:32:04.720 one way to put it and i do think it's like i think that what they hate is this idea that
00:32:10.380 women have been able to exercise economic agency and they feel like because the people who are
00:32:17.640 consuming this content are largely men that like men are being fleeced into giving money to like
00:32:24.840 human women who make only fans content or whatever and it's like they it's like they see that as a
00:32:29.840 kind of economic exploitation but it's like well you're the one who's spending the money it's like 1.00
00:32:34.360 it's like no one is forcing you to spend this money yeah but like don't don't hate the woman
00:32:39.600 who is making this content because of that dynamic.
00:32:44.320 Do you know what I'm saying?
00:32:45.520 Yeah.
00:32:46.280 And there's also like some moralistic positioning
00:32:51.380 of like we're finally taking this back 1.00
00:32:54.060 from the women who have been scamming us 0.95
00:32:59.300 by making us attracted to them. 1.00
00:33:02.460 And the way that we as men are taking it back
00:33:05.320 is to like steal their content
00:33:07.720 so that we become the scammers of other men.
00:33:11.220 Like, what?
00:33:11.800 Like, it doesn't make sense.
00:33:15.040 It doesn't make sense.
00:33:16.680 That's a good way to put it.
00:33:17.620 Except I guess, like, it does
00:33:20.060 because they're making money, right?
00:33:21.320 Like, that's why they're doing this,
00:33:23.380 to steal and make money.
00:33:25.300 They're scamming, yeah.
00:33:26.220 Like, it does make sense.
00:33:26.980 Scams always make sense.
00:33:28.540 Yeah.
00:33:29.880 Yeah, the layers.
00:33:31.120 That's why people do it.
00:33:32.520 Yeah.
00:33:33.260 The layers of, like, moralistic misogyny,
00:33:36.920 which is kind of a weird phrase in itself, but like, that's the part that doesn't make sense.
00:33:42.940 But the stealing and making money, that part makes a lot of sense.
00:33:46.860 Speaking of adult content online, new anti-nude technology is coming to Instagram. So we've
00:33:54.000 talked a lot on the show before about sextortion schemes that really blossom on Instagram that are
00:33:59.080 mostly targeting young boys, wherein bad actors like lure young people into sending them nudes
00:34:05.420 by pretending to be like interested in them
00:34:08.320 and like doing a long con
00:34:10.300 where they pretend that they're in
00:34:11.460 like a romantic relationship.
00:34:13.160 And then once these bad actors have those images,
00:34:16.040 they then exploit and pressure the young people
00:34:19.200 into sending them money
00:34:20.160 or they'll release them to their friends and families.
00:34:22.180 It is a real problem.
00:34:23.360 And to combat that,
00:34:24.320 Instagram announced that they are testing out
00:34:25.940 tools to detect when somebody is sending a nude image
00:34:28.860 and having that image be blurred out in your DMs
00:34:32.160 where you would have to click a button to say like,
00:34:34.620 okay, I want to see this image. This feature is going to be automatic for Instagram users who
00:34:39.540 are under 18, but everybody on Instagram is going to be prompted to turn that feature on in the
00:34:44.280 coming weeks. So according to Instagram, it will use on-device machine learning to detect nudes
00:34:49.640 and is aimed at stopping sextortion schemes that target teenagers. When you try to send a nude,
00:34:55.060 you'll get a warning that says, take care when sharing sensitive photos. The photo is blurred
00:34:59.600 out because nudity protection is on. Others can screenshot or forward your photos without you
00:35:04.800 knowing. You can unsend a photo if you change your mind, but there's a chance others have already
00:35:09.080 seen it. I don't have much to say about this. I mean, I do know that Instagram, they really have
00:35:15.140 pioneered like nipple detection software. Like they really are quite good at knowing when there
00:35:21.960 is nudity present or even like the suggestion of nudity present in images. I just, I kind of,
00:35:27.820 And one of the reasons I'm having trouble with this announcement is that it just seems to, I just wish that Instagram was offering something better than like their nudity detection software.
00:35:41.920 Like, I guess it's better than nothing, but I've seen Instagram really default to like quick fixes to signal that they're doing something, even if those quick fixes like really don't solve the problem.
00:35:51.720 And I just have been through this a lot with Instagram and I can't help but wonder if they're like, oh, yeah, we're going to get a ton of good press on this like one small feature and then we can all move on.
00:36:01.080 You know, we talked about that horrifying Wall Street Journal report about how Instagram is really enabling pedophiles by allowing pedophiles to subscribe to the Instagram accounts of children using the loophole that those accounts are like parent run accounts.
00:36:22.200 And so you are not, as an adult, allowed to use Instagram's subscribe feature where you pay money to get exclusive content.
00:36:29.140 You can't subscribe to a child as an adult, which makes perfect sense. But the loophole is that if that is a parent run account, adults can subscribe to the accounts of children. And so that whole report was kind of a bombshell about how much that is enabling pedophiles to get direct access to young people, which is disgusting.
00:36:47.040 And so I just think that Instagram here is like just counting on everybody reporting this and being like, oh, it looks like they're really taking it seriously without actually demonstrating that it's going to meaningfully address the problems.
00:37:00.220 I agree. It seems like a fine, good feature to have. It's hard to imagine that this is really going to put a meaningful curve on the sort of sextortion schemes that you talked about earlier when you set up the story, because there's a lot of other apps out there that people could easily switch over into.
00:37:26.200 And if somebody is running a long con on a teenager, you know, talking to them over days, maybe weeks, maybe months, it doesn't take a lot of imagination to think that they would just suggest let's move to a different app.
00:37:43.820 Let's go to WhatsApp. Let's use text message. Send me an email, like whatever. Pretty easy workarounds.
00:37:49.360 Uh, so I think you're right that this is more like this protects Instagram and meta more than I think it's going to protect the actual kids. Uh, but like, it's not a harmful feature. What it really reinforces though, is how sophisticated meta and other tech platforms can be when they want to, in terms of identifying harmful content.
00:38:16.160 And, you know, so there's so many other areas, like you talked about, the people subscribing to exclusive kids content via the mommy blogger account.
00:38:30.880 You know, there's racist content, really like a lot of harmful content out there.
00:38:38.680 Setting aside like harmful political content, like insurrectionist type content, QAnon stuff.
00:38:45.480 There's so much harmful content out there, and this kind of policy here, this technology to detect nudes, really reveals that all of that could be detected and dealt with if the platforms wanted to.
00:39:06.340 right? It reinforces the extent to which failing to take action on those other types of harmful
00:39:12.680 content is a choice, not some sort of technical limitation. I completely agree.
00:39:21.200 So speaking of meta and political content, we told you all a while back about meta deciding
00:39:26.460 to deprioritize content related to political and social issues on threads and Instagram.
00:39:31.080 I have just anecdotally definitely seen this happening and felt the impact on my own feed
00:39:37.340 on Instagram.
00:39:38.720 I feel like when I scroll Instagram these days, which is less and less and less, I feel
00:39:43.640 like it is 30% viral videos and stuff like that of people that I don't follow, maybe
00:39:51.180 20% people that I actually have chosen to follow, and then the rest of it is ads and
00:39:57.980 just scammy stuff.
00:39:59.320 It just doesn't feel good.
00:40:00.580 and I certainly don't feel like I'm like learning a lot from scrolling Instagram.
00:40:04.440 Well, now hundreds of political and news content creators, including activists and meme account
00:40:10.420 administrators and journalists, signed on to an open letter asking Meta to reverse his decision
00:40:15.540 to limit the reach of accounts posting political content on threads and Instagram. So Washington
00:40:20.340 Post reports that just as I suspected when this was first announced, it is impacting people who
00:40:25.160 make content related to being marginalized or like marginalized identity in some way.
00:40:29.640 The piece reads, the decision has alarmed users who post about social issues, including
00:40:34.320 LGBTQ rights, women's rights, racial inequality, and disability.
00:40:38.000 And independent journalists and content creators say they've struggled to reach their audiences
00:40:41.820 in recent weeks since the change was rolled out.
00:40:44.300 The limits, they say, have significantly impacted creators who are Black, female, disabled,
00:40:49.000 and LGBTQ.
00:40:50.040 So none of this surprises me because Facebook just has a whole track record of suppressing
00:40:55.260 content related to marginalized people through, you know, moderation and inequities and things
00:41:01.040 like that. This is stuff that we know about Facebook. How it works now is that you have
00:41:05.140 to intentionally opt in to get content about political issues. We'll put directions on how
00:41:09.400 to do that in the show notes. But the folks who signed the letter say that it should be the other
00:41:13.280 way around. We should be given the option to opt out of political content. The letter reads,
00:41:18.340 as users of Meta's platform, we did not choose to automatically opt out of receiving suggested
00:41:22.940 political content on civic activism and news updates, removing political recommendations
00:41:27.320 as a default setting, and consequently stopping people from seeing suggested political content
00:41:32.140 poses a serious threat to political engagement, education, and activism.
00:41:36.660 So I should also add that we still don't really have clarity on exactly how Facebook is determining
00:41:42.840 whose experiences are political and whose aren't. I could look at Facebook's track record and make
00:41:49.940 some guesses as to how they are doing that, but all they have really said is, like, things that
00:41:54.460 are pretty vague. They say political content under the new restrictions includes any content that
00:41:59.500 touches on politics, or in Metta's words, topics that affect a group of people and or society at
00:42:05.880 large, which, like, that is so vague that it's, like, clear to me that that's, like, purposely vague.
00:42:12.300 These topics include content about LGBTQ and women's rights, as well as posts about racial
00:42:17.460 and disability discrimination. Many creators also have reported that the filters restrict
00:42:22.240 content on seemingly unrelated topics. This really reminds me to the first story that we
00:42:29.560 talked about, about the actor who is receiving so much online hate and Tom Holland not more vocally
00:42:39.880 standing up to support her. You know, it seems like Instagram is really trying to just create a
00:42:50.080 pleasant, non-threatening, non-controversial experience. And I think it's easy to, yeah,
00:43:03.340 not want to rock the boat and when people are not part of groups that are receiving targeted hate
00:43:12.320 it can be a lot easier to just like look the other way and not want to deal with it and like
00:43:18.900 you know in this case be like oh it's it's political content we're not going to include
00:43:22.680 that on the platform uh people talking about their experiences being lgbtq uh in this
00:43:30.920 current climate of trans hate uh and how but like that's so harmful to just not to exclude that
00:43:42.080 any conversation about that uh it just feels yeah i think that that letter is exactly right that it
00:43:50.960 is not just cruel of instagram to exclude any kind of content that discusses people's experiences
00:44:00.280 facing discrimination or whatever their experiences are but it's like reckless to pretend as if
00:44:07.340 you know we can have a conversation that doesn't include those things like what a harmful reckless
00:44:14.920 conversation that would be yeah i mean i have so much to say about that one i think that facebook
00:44:20.060 is trying to tell us something that i just we know is not true right so for instance if you're
00:44:25.420 a theater buff and you're really interested in theater, is the story that we led with about
00:44:30.440 Francesca's racist, sexist harassment, is that a theater story or a political story because it
00:44:35.380 deals with race? Facebook is trying to act as if people's interests are so siloed that identity
00:44:42.020 and things like politics and social issues don't bleed into that. That's not true. Theater is a
00:44:47.780 political issue. That first story illustrates that. It's not that Francesca was making it a
00:44:52.820 political issue other people were making it a political issue and therefore that story about
00:44:57.060 theater is also a race issue is also a political issue movies entertainment sports technology
00:45:02.720 those things are identity issues they are political issues they are social issues and pretending like 0.97
00:45:08.000 that's not how we live our lives it's just it's a farce i think that anybody who is of any kind
00:45:12.760 of like marginalized identity or also not from any kind of marginalized identity is really familiar
00:45:18.880 with the ways that there are all these intersections of the way we live our lives and our identity
00:45:23.940 in all of these other things that might not look so identity-driven on its face. And so one, I think
00:45:30.500 that Instagram is like totally trying to pee on our leg and tell us it's raining, to quote my girl
00:45:35.280 Judge Judy. Two, Facebook has had a huge direct hand in polarizing our democracy, polarizing our
00:45:44.300 communities, right? They've made money off of that. I don't even think that Facebook would
00:45:48.400 disagree that they've done that. Their internal reporting makes that very clear that they have
00:45:52.180 had a huge direct hand in that and have made money from that. To now turn around and be like,
00:45:56.740 oh, well, we don't want to do any, we don't want to show people anything that's going to rile them
00:46:00.820 up. Bitch, you made a bunch of money off of riling people up. And so now to tell me that I can't post 1.00
00:46:05.740 about my experiences after you have made money and contributed to a climate where people are
00:46:10.520 polarized it just doesn't work like i'm just not i'm just not willing to accept that yeah like they
00:46:16.040 broke our democracy and then they were like oh you know what this is getting too messy
00:46:21.780 we're just gonna like leave it like no you broke it you created this huge information ecosystem
00:46:29.300 uh and like intentionally shaped it and distorted it from what it was you have a responsibility
00:46:36.740 to try to fix it and like i'm not saying that like it's meta's responsibility to fix democracy
00:46:44.900 but yeah they like you said they had a huge direct hand in creating the climate that we now
00:46:53.500 have of like polarization uh and riling people up uh and they just they just want to like walk
00:47:01.260 away and wash their hands of the whole thing. At least they're consistent. So that is exactly
00:47:08.900 what Nicole Gill, who is a co-founder at Accountable Tech, which is the organization
00:47:13.240 that organized this letter, that's exactly what Nicole Gill had to say. And I think she points
00:47:17.020 out something really important here is that they're making this decision right before a big
00:47:20.920 election year. It's not just a big election year for the United States. Multiple countries around
00:47:25.220 the world will have elections this year. Nicole Gill said in a statement, limiting the reach of
00:47:30.180 creators without notice or definition of what constitutes political content threatens their
00:47:34.580 identities and livelihoods, while leaving hundreds of millions of users without access to critical
00:47:38.980 news content during the biggest global election year in history. Today's fragmented media environment
00:47:44.600 that Meta helped create has resulted in social media platforms having outsized influence over
00:47:50.100 the way information is presented and disseminated, and this decision will have negative effects
00:47:54.540 both on and off their platforms.
00:47:57.360 And I guess like to your point,
00:47:59.180 like that's what I think,
00:48:00.240 like we shouldn't have to just rely on Mark Zuckerberg
00:48:03.740 and Adam Mosseri to determine whose experience
00:48:07.720 and whose life is politics and whose isn't.
00:48:10.600 We already know how they use that power when they have it.
00:48:13.840 They don't use it well, they don't use it equitably, right?
00:48:16.160 And so I don't think that we should just allow them
00:48:17.800 to create and maintain this system
00:48:19.560 that marginalizes people who are already marginalized
00:48:22.620 and they get to make money off of it, right?
00:48:24.440 Going back to that Francesca Romeo and Juliet story, I didn't decide that my existence as a Black woman is political. Other people did. And so telling me that I can't then talk about that and that if I do, I'm going to be deprioritized, I don't accept that. I don't think that we should be relying on these wealthy, white, straight, cis tech leaders and billionaires to define whose experiences count as politics and whose don't.
00:48:47.620 Yeah, I sometimes I like to just like close my eyes and imagine a world like an alternate parallel universe where I don't know, maybe Mark Zuckerberg got like hit on the head or maybe he took some LSD and had a revelation or something and decided to like radically change what he's doing.
00:49:09.380 And instead of, like, dumping $46 billion into the metaverse, which, like, burned that money up, what if he had taken, like, a fraction of that and put it towards, like, research and innovating in a way to, like, increase literacy and connection and compassion among their users, right?
00:49:31.320 Like, wouldn't that have been nice?
00:49:33.400 Knowing him, he'd find a way to muck that up, too.
00:49:39.380 More after a quick break.
00:50:09.380 And as the number one podcaster, iHeart's twice as large as the next two combined.
00:50:15.740 So whatever your customers listen to, they'll hear your message.
00:50:18.720 Plus, only iHeart can extend your message to audiences across broadcast radio.
00:50:22.940 Think podcasting can help your business?
00:50:24.820 Think iHeart.
00:50:25.860 Streaming, radio, and podcasting.
00:50:27.920 Call 844-844-iHeart to get started.
00:50:31.080 That's 844-844-iHeart.
00:50:33.300 If your bookshelf and your For You page are equally important to your personality, welcome home.
00:50:39.380 This is Prose Society, the weekly podcast that's part book club, part group chat for
00:50:45.000 thought daughters, pop culture obsessives, and anyone who thinks Pride and Prejudice
00:50:48.880 and Love Island deserve the same level of discourse.
00:50:51.920 I'm Eli Rallo, and every week we're connecting the dots between books, the internet, and
00:50:56.360 the conversations everyone can't stop having.
00:50:58.900 I'm going to have to look up this story.
00:51:00.940 I'm obsessed.
00:51:01.720 So obsessed.
00:51:02.520 From bestselling authors and your favorite book talk creators to the latest pop culture
00:51:06.540 moments, nothing is off the table.
00:51:08.560 It's like if you can hide some real messages inside compelling characters, then that is a Trojan horse.
00:51:16.460 Whether you're looking for literary deep dives, smart pop culture conversations, or a community of readers who love to think a little too much, you're in the right place.
00:51:25.640 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:51:31.680 See you between the pages.
00:51:38.560 So let's get right back into it.
00:51:41.740 So I do have a little bit of news kind of on that front, which is that lawmakers unveiled
00:51:46.440 a new proposal that would, for the first time, give consumers broad rights to control how
00:51:51.240 tech companies like Meta and TikTok and Google use their personal data.
00:51:55.540 I say this a lot, but surprisingly, here in the United States, we do not have any real
00:51:59.360 data privacy protections here, which, again, every time I say it blows my mind.
00:52:03.020 But if this proposal succeeds, it could establish something akin to the European Union's
00:52:08.260 landmark privacy law known as the General Data Protection Regulation or the GDPR and kind of
00:52:13.620 attempt to curb this like totally unregulated wild, wild west that we have in the United States
00:52:19.780 where all of our personal data is just for sale by the highest bidder. Whoever wants to use it
00:52:24.100 to make money, that's the situation. And so this could bring in some of that if passed.
00:52:30.100 Thank God. It's wild that it's 2024 and we're just getting around to this in this country now. It is completely banana pants that we do not have any laws protecting our data privacy.
00:52:47.440 Yeah, I mean, I was just reading about how the FCC just, I think, yesterday passed a law that internet service providers have to give the same way that when you buy a box of cereal, it has the nutritional label that tells you what's in it and all the different things that are in it.
00:53:04.620 internet service providers will now be forced by law to clearly include a breakdown of the
00:53:12.280 broadband facts that you're paying for. So like the monthly price of your internet, you know,
00:53:16.900 the additional charges, all of that. And yet they have to clearly label this both online and at
00:53:23.100 physical stores. It looks almost exactly like a nutritional label that you would find on a box
00:53:27.000 of cereal. And what I was so struck by by that story is that, first of all, the fact that we
00:53:32.280 there was nothing requiring that kind of clarity to consumers to begin with. And the fact that
00:53:37.380 internet service providers like Comcast really fought this. They were like, no, we shouldn't
00:53:41.760 have to do this. And it just really struck me of like, y'all just want to scam. Y'all just want to
00:53:47.460 take people for a ride. You just want to bait and switch. And you want the ability to do that,
00:53:51.860 to be protected and enshrined by law, your ability to scam and lie to people. And so I remember when
00:53:57.240 I moved into a new apartment, signing up for Comcast, and they were giving me like a deal on
00:54:01.360 internet and being like, okay, so is this deal going to be forever? Or is this an introductory
00:54:07.320 rate and then it's going to go up? And they were like, oh, it's the deal forever, the deal forever,
00:54:11.300 deal forever. I was like, are you sure? Are you sure? Are you sure? They were like, oh yeah,
00:54:14.100 your price will never go up. Well, that was a lie because my price did go up. And then they were
00:54:18.060 like, oh, well, it was this or that. We had to add fees. And that's like, people deserve clarity.
00:54:24.700 Like it should be a given that people are knowing what they are being asked to pay for. Like this
00:54:29.720 idea that you should just be able to obscure that and it's fine and not only is it fine but like
00:54:33.660 it is your right as a corporation i don't know i just the fact that we are finally now just getting
00:54:39.480 around to being like oh wait maybe consumers do deserve some protections maybe it shouldn't just 0.91
00:54:44.400 be like fuck you pay me and i can lie to your face like maybe that's not a helpful dynamic for 0.98
00:54:50.780 anybody i love how raw you are about this comcast bill like a decade ago that yeah you're still like 1.00
00:54:58.740 grinding this axe and we're like we finally have a bill to protect privacy like you know what the
00:55:04.460 real like thing is though mike i was in grad school i had no money when that bill increased
00:55:11.820 i mean i i asked in every which way is my bill going to get going to increase and they ensured
00:55:18.960 me no i even had my dad who was so good on the phone dealing with like sales people and like
00:55:24.640 that kind of thing. I called him while he was in the room to coach me through what to ask to make
00:55:29.440 sure because I was like, I really cannot afford if my bill goes up. And when my bill went up,
00:55:33.080 yeah, I was heated. I was mad. I'm still mad 10 years later. I'll admit it. I have an ax to pick
00:55:39.200 with Comcast. Yeah. I mean, yeah, we're going to go down this path. I remember years ago when I
00:55:45.920 lived in Madison, when I was going to grad school there, there were a couple internet service
00:55:49.320 providers in town and i think every year i would like switch from one to the other so i could
00:55:54.980 get some kind of promotional deal what a stupid way to like manage one's internet right and it
00:56:02.160 just especially given how central the internet is to so many functions of day-to-day life like 0.92
00:56:10.300 we use it to communicate we use it to work we use it for entertainment we use it to get information
00:56:15.980 about the world so that we can be civic participants. It's so absolutely critical
00:56:22.660 to everything we do. And that just makes it even more mind-blowing that we still have no
00:56:31.180 federal laws protecting our privacy when we are on the internet.
00:56:37.280 Yes, access to the internet. The UN says it's a human right, but it's like, to go through it,
00:56:41.860 I have to deal with an internet service provider that is allowed to lie to me and scam me and
00:56:45.820 disappoint me? I don't think so. So this last thing I wanted to talk about, it's not really
00:56:50.100 news, but it's something that I find deeply interesting that I just wanted to share with
00:56:54.100 all of you. So in our Andrew Huberman two-part episode, which by the way, thanks to all of y'all
00:56:58.680 for listening. We have gotten such interesting feedback from that episode. Thank you for going
00:57:02.660 down that rabbit hole with me because it was certainly a rabbit hole if I want it to go down.
00:57:06.240 So thank you for letting me do that. But I ended that episode talking about how I really feel like
00:57:12.140 podcasting is this tricky space where listeners really trust podcasters and how podcasts for
00:57:18.140 whatever reason kind of automatically convey a certain level of authority. I've talked about
00:57:23.240 it on the podcast before, but I have noticed these TikTok videos where people look like they
00:57:28.560 are recording a podcast in a podcast studio. There's a microphone in front of them. They've
00:57:33.260 got like the neon sign behind them. But I know, I can tell that that mic is not turned on. And in
00:57:39.700 some cases, it's not even plugged into anything. It's just like a prop that is in front of them,
00:57:43.520 right? I've seen that where I'm like, the way this setup doesn't make any sense.
00:57:49.840 Because when I record my podcast, it looks like you can just tell like there are wires everywhere.
00:57:55.020 Your microphone is plugged into something that is recording. It's not just sitting
00:57:58.320 wirelessly in front of you. Like, where's the audio that you're uploading going to, you know?
00:58:02.940 Well, my suspicions have been confirmed by this piece in Bloomberg,
00:58:06.660 breaking down the cottage industry of hired actors who are, you know, selling their services
00:58:13.200 on websites like Fiverr, who take money to make fake podcasts as user generated content style
00:58:19.620 advertising. They even have an upsell where they will make a fake podcast in front of one of those
00:58:25.060 glowing neon signs to make it look like a real podcast. So in the piece, they talked to this guy
00:58:30.720 named Wolf, who is like always in these TikToks that make it look like he is podcasting, wherein
00:58:35.800 And he's like talking up a product, casually mentioning its benefits and why he loves it.
00:58:40.520 Maybe you'll think this podcast feels slightly excessive in its enthusiasm for a particular
00:58:44.760 thing, but TikTok's content onslaught doesn't leave much time for questioning.
00:58:49.500 The takeaway is here's a passionate person speaking authoritatively on a podcast.
00:58:54.160 In reality, these clips are not coming from podcasts.
00:58:56.920 In fact, Wolf is being paid $195 for each of these one minute advertisements designed
00:59:03.660 to look like a podcast.
00:59:04.600 On the freelance service website Fiverr, where he sells his service to brands, Wolf claims,
00:59:10.020 I will make a UGC podcast video ad or a user-generated content ad using the client's
00:59:16.040 own script to talk about the product. The custom neon sign is an upcharge. So this is just
00:59:21.260 fascinating to me. Honestly, it actually kind of sounds like a pretty good racket. He says that
00:59:25.720 he makes almost $20,000 a month doing this. Like, France, if y'all are listening and you want this,
00:59:31.560 Not only do I have a podcast, Mike, I actually even know how to turn it on.
00:59:35.400 So if you want to give me $20K a month to do this, I will gladly do it for you.
00:59:38.740 Yeah, no doubt.
00:59:40.840 We'll even throw in a neon sign for free.
00:59:43.440 No upcharge.
00:59:44.440 Part of the basic package.
00:59:48.240 So a lot of the services they're hawking, which I guess doesn't really surprise me,
00:59:52.040 are crypto or financial services or men's health and wellness related.
00:59:57.700 Friend of the show, Ryan, at one of my favorite newsletters, Garbage Day,
01:00:01.560 He called them weird Gen Z Hustlebro influencers, which I love that name for them.
01:00:08.520 So Ryan's theory is that during COVID, the podcast mic became a symbol of authority or
01:00:14.300 a visual signal of importance, sort of like how during the era of peak TED Talk, a bunch
01:00:19.540 of guys would film themselves on stages, add some inspirational music, and then post it
01:00:23.400 to Facebook.
01:00:24.300 If there's a microphone in front of you, I assume, the logic goes, it means you're important
01:00:28.640 enough to record, which I can tell you, anybody can buy a podcast mic. Like it doesn't mean
01:00:33.140 anything. Yeah. You can get one for like 60 bucks, especially if you're not going to plug it in,
01:00:38.000 you know, you don't even need to, who cares about quality when it's not plugged in.
01:00:41.800 It sounds like there was one kind of white whale TikTok video that made Ryan like
01:00:46.720 skeptical that these people were making actual podcasts. It was this very viral TikTok of a
01:00:51.860 woman in front of a podcast mic talking about how she would like sexually please her husband.
01:00:57.180 It went super viral on Twitter.
01:00:59.320 But then Ryan was like, what the hell podcast is this even?
01:01:02.380 Like there wasn't a watermark or any kind of branding with like a show name on it or anything.
01:01:06.320 If you were publishing a podcast clip, you would probably put the name of the podcast that you wanted people to listen to on that clip.
01:01:12.640 It didn't have that.
01:01:13.820 And it turns out this woman, just as a content creator who was making this as a way to promote her OnlyFans, which I don't have any kind of problem with. 0.86
01:01:21.360 Like good for her.
01:01:22.120 But Ryan connects this to a darker trend in kind of the overlap of podcasting and marketing where they have this thing that I've definitely seen where it'll be like a real podcast where part of the way that they are marketing their podcast is making these short viral clips of them interviewing is too strong, really just like humiliating a woman on the podcast.
01:01:46.300 The podcast Whatever is really known for this, and Fresh and Fit was really known for this, where they would make these very short videos of them humiliating a woman who has gone on the podcast, and then that video would go viral.
01:02:00.400 He writes, there's an entire universe of post-Andrew Tate sexuality and relationship podcasts that put young women in front of microphones, ask them outrageous questions, and turn it into viral clips, and then let audiences tear them apart.
01:02:12.840 Some of these podcasts even have like casting calls on their websites to find new guests.
01:02:19.840 I hate this.
01:02:22.040 So maybe making fake podcasts to hawk items is one thing.
01:02:27.160 But this dynamic where microphone plus misogyny equals authority equals profit, that dynamic is a little bit more toxic.
01:02:38.660 Yeah, there's a lot going on there.
01:02:39.980 It was just kind of like a sort of weird, funny story until it took that dark turn at the end.
01:02:46.440 I think that the fact that podcasters like Fresh and Fit and Andrew Tate, that they know that this kind of thing does go viral on social media, it just really is about the fact that misogyny and misogynoir and all of that will always find a welcome home on the Internet.
01:03:03.220 Like, I think this is not a bug. It's a feature of the internet landscape that we have where a video where a man in front of a microphone is humiliating a woman that will always find an audience. And I think it is, I wanted to talk about this as sort of like a funny, weird thing, but it does, it does connect back to that very real dynamic where massage noir and massage knee will always be profitable online, which is why we need to have a better internet landscape that doesn't allow for that.
01:03:31.720 Yeah, if only Meta would start excluding that kind of content
01:03:36.060 rather than political content.
01:03:38.560 Exactly.
01:03:40.040 Well, Mike, thank you so much for being here.
01:03:42.800 Bridget, thanks for having me.
01:03:44.080 I hope you have a safe trip home from Mazatlan.
01:03:47.320 And to the rest of you, thanks for listening.
01:03:48.980 We will see you on the internet.
01:03:54.240 If you're looking for ways to support the show,
01:03:56.440 check out our merch store at tangoti.com slash store.
01:03:59.180 Got a story about an interesting thing in tech or just want to say hi?
01:04:03.720 You can reach us at hello at tangody.com.
01:04:06.080 You can also find transcripts for today's episode at tangody.com.
01:04:09.400 There Are No Girls on the Internet was created by me, Bridget Todd.
01:04:12.160 It's a production of iHeartRadio and Unbossed Creative.
01:04:14.760 Edited by Joey Pat.
01:04:16.580 Jonathan Strickland is our executive producer.
01:04:18.820 Tari Harrison is our producer and sound engineer.
01:04:21.440 Michael Amato is our contributing producer.
01:04:23.440 I'm your host, Bridget Todd.
01:04:24.920 If you want to help us grow, rate and review us on Apple Podcasts.
01:04:27.180 For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:04:57.180 with your favorite writers, book talk creators, and plenty of overthought opinions.
01:05:01.940 Yeah, I'm obsessed. I'm obsessed.
01:05:03.700 Listen to Pro Society on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:05:09.740 I survived nine months in captivity,
01:05:13.000 and I've spent my life exploring how other people survive what should have destroyed them.
01:05:18.400 I'm Elizabeth Smart, and these are the Survivor Files.
01:05:21.680 Every week, I'm with survivors who live through the unthinkable,
01:05:25.500 abducted stalked controlled and nearly silenced these are stories about what it takes to make it
01:05:32.240 out alive listen to the survivor files with elizabeth smart on the iheart radio app apple
01:05:38.360 podcasts or wherever you get your podcasts i'm hoda kotby host of the podcast joy 101 with hoda
01:05:45.140 kotby you know i'm always searching for inspiration and useful tools to maximize joy
01:05:51.120 Like when my friend Henry Winkler offered advice to aspiring actors and really anybody hoping to stand out.
01:05:58.300 You're not hired just to fill time and space.
01:06:01.100 You're hired to fill the space with you.
01:06:04.300 Listen to Joy 101 with Hoda Kotb on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
01:06:11.740 This is an iHeart Podcast.
01:06:14.180 Guaranteed human.