Vulgar History - June 04, 2025


Giving Credit To History's Disregarded Women

Topics
Canadian History: Thanadelthur, the Peacemaker Trans History: The Lieutenant Nun

Episode Stats


Harmful content

Misogyny

43

sentences flagged

Toxicity

29

sentences flagged

Hate speech

29

sentences flagged


Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
Topics generated with Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct.
00:00:00.800 Insurance operations today are fragmented and policyholders expect more.
00:00:06.000 That's why leading insurers run on Adyen. From premium collection to claims payout,
00:00:11.040 Adyen supports the entire insurance value chain, giving insurers full control over how money moves.
00:00:16.960 A single platform to reduce fragmentation, complexity, and risk. Drive revenue,
00:00:22.320 control claims cost, and power your next move with Adyen. Learn more at adyen.com.
00:00:30.000 Sorry, investing, trading, that isn't a personality.
00:00:34.520 You don't need the voice.
00:00:35.980 You don't need the jargon.
00:00:37.520 You don't need the podcast.
00:00:39.080 You already know how to trade.
00:00:41.140 You've done it your whole life.
00:00:43.040 And TD Easy Trade taps into that instinct
00:00:45.160 so you can build something real.
00:00:47.420 No minimums, no monthly fees, 24-hour support.
00:00:50.740 No investor personality required.
00:00:53.820 Because you are made to trade.
00:00:56.240 And TD Easy Trade is made to help.
00:00:58.700 Download it now.
00:01:00.000 hello and welcome to vulgar history of feminist women's history comedy podcast my name is ann
00:01:15.480 foster and today i'm so delighted to bring you an interview with author allison tyra who you may
00:01:21.480 know from her podcast infinite women or also from her website infinite women which is an ever
00:01:27.500 expanding encyclopedia of women so we talk about this in the episode as well we talk about her book
00:01:34.280 mostly but also her project infinite women which is a website that's bringing together
00:01:38.640 biographical information about thousands of of women from history and it's an ongoing project
00:01:44.800 and she's still going on it it's got over 6 000 different entries and you can look up on the
00:01:49.740 website for a specific person to read about them or you can look up a specific type of person
00:01:55.300 if you just log on any day it shows like here's what happened in history on this day and it's
00:01:59.160 women from all of history like all the way back to the oldest of old like ancient cultures up to
00:02:03.580 people who are doing stuff these days and so she wrote a book which is called uncredited women's
00:02:09.940 overlooked misattributed and stolen work this book is available now as a book also as an audiobook
00:02:16.600 i know this because she in one of her earlier conversations she was saying that she was hard
00:02:21.880 at work recording the audio book. It's like 18 hours long. So she was giving me some advice for
00:02:26.600 if I end up recording my audio book, how, how long you can go before your voice completely breaks
00:02:32.140 off. Anyway, I want to just let everybody know that the women's history podcasting community
00:02:38.860 is so supportive and so kind. And when I started doing this podcast in 2019, part of the reason
00:02:46.600 why, why it kind of took off and became successful is because of the support of people like Alison
00:02:51.620 Tyra, Katie from the Queen's Podcast. It's just such a nice, positive community. There's no
00:02:57.900 competition. It's just people, women helping each other out because in the podcast space, 1.00
00:03:03.500 there's a lot of bros and we are happy to see each other succeed. And I'm so happy that Alison
00:03:08.320 has this book out and I was so happy to talk to her. So please enjoy this conversation between
00:03:12.260 myself, and Alison Tyra, author of Uncredited. So I'm joined by Alison Tyra from the Infinite
00:03:24.260 Women podcast and the new book. Wait, I don't even have the book in front of me. Tell everybody
00:03:29.780 the name of your book, please, Alison. But I don't have it in front of me either.
00:03:35.460 It's called Uncredited, Women's Overlooked, Misattributed, and Stolen Work.
00:03:40.000 I love that you know that right off like the title, subtitle. Yes, I pulled it up.
00:03:46.860 That's relieving for me because I too have a book coming out and I'm always like,
00:03:50.420 will I remember the title? Will I remember the subtitle? Well, it's the subtitle.
00:03:54.060 The subtitle, exactly. And I assume that you've gone through different titles and subtitles. So
00:03:57.260 like which one stuck? Well, originally it was going to be to her credit. But then a few months
00:04:03.220 after I signed the contract, which keep in mind was two years ago, right? Because that's how long
00:04:06.940 it took to get it out on the shelves. Another book came out with the same title and a similar
00:04:12.960 theme. So it wasn't an in-depth analysis. It was, I think maybe two dozen stories like you would
00:04:19.860 find in my book, except my book has over 600 stories. Um, so it was, it was still very different
00:04:25.720 in format, but, um, because it was on the same general topic, um, and it would have come out
00:04:32.760 within, you know, recent times, uh, when this book came out, they wanted us to change the title.
00:04:38.680 So I think my editor was more cranky about it than I was. I was like, look, I'm just glad that
00:04:42.420 it's not. Um, so my first offer from a publisher, uh, that I'd sent it to was a military history,
00:04:50.420 one that also does a bit of women's history. And so their managing editor, I assume is a middle
00:04:55.960 aged to older white man whose main interest is military history. And he really wanted to change
00:05:01.580 a title from, like I said, at the time it was to her credit, he wanted to change it to women's
00:05:06.400 hidden achievements. And literally every woman I said that title to got the same, like, look on
00:05:13.940 their face. And I was like, would you pick up that book? And they said, no, no, no. That sounds
00:05:18.700 like a text, like a, you know what? That would have been a good textbook to encounter in 1991.
00:05:23.920 But like, I feel like if I was researching for my podcast and I'd be like, oh, there's something
00:05:29.180 about this person and women's hidden achievements of a textbook from 1989. And then I'd be like,
00:05:34.140 oh, that was okay. I got some facts, but like, whatever. But yeah, I think I've learned it's
00:05:38.800 important to have a title that is distinct. You don't want people to confuse it with another
00:05:43.780 book, especially if it's the same topic. But I want to like, take a step back just for people
00:05:48.180 who may not be familiar with the infinite women project. So can you explain, cause the book kind
00:05:53.500 of grew out of that. So can you explain like your website and everything you're doing?
00:05:56.680 sure so you mentioned the podcast which uh you are actually on if anybody wants to keep an eye
00:06:03.640 out for the princess charlotte episode it's an hour and 42 minutes long and that's shorter than
00:06:10.260 what we recorded very much so yes so in addition to the weekly podcast which i've been doing since
00:06:16.460 2023 so um you know there's well over a hundred episodes and i've already got them scheduled
00:06:22.840 into like february so please do go check them out i will talk about anything except cisgender dudes
00:06:28.840 pretty much is my only caveat um so i talked to a lot of really interesting people about
00:06:33.680 whatever they're obsessed with case in point anne and princess charlotte but the original project
00:06:43.460 and the main function of it i would say is the biographical database so um at the time that
00:06:48.860 recording, it's at just over 6,700 biographies and I'm always adding to it. And it is not limited
00:06:58.340 by geography, by time period, by field. So as far as I know, it's the only resource out there
00:07:04.960 of this size that has such a broad range of women. Cause usually you see like Irish women or, 1.00
00:07:13.600 you know women in science or whatever this is the only one I found that is more comprehensive
00:07:20.020 and the thing is despite that huge range of women I kept seeing the same stories over and over and
00:07:27.580 over again and so one that I like to mention is being kept out of med school isn't just something
00:07:33.940 that was happening in the 1870s to the Edinburgh 7 it's also happening as recently as 2018 because
00:07:43.140 a lot of the examples in this book are, you know, even into the 2020s. But in 2018, it came out that
00:07:49.760 at least 10 medical schools in Japan were deliberately downgrading female applicants'
00:07:57.320 test scores to justify rejecting them. And at the time, less than 22% of doctors in Japan were women.
00:08:07.880 and so that's the thing that you'll you'll read about you know artists and business women and
00:08:15.000 inventors and activists and athletes and see how these patterns are playing out not just in a given
00:08:23.400 situation because i think that's what happens when we tell these stories in isolation which is very
00:08:28.080 important like i cannot tell you how much i appreciate the scholars um well like you who
00:08:34.000 will go incredibly in-depth on like a particular woman's stories and you know who may be digging
00:08:40.280 through all of those dusty boxes full of old documents that haven't gotten digitized yet
00:08:45.740 and because my work would not be possible without that in-depth work but when we tell those stories
00:08:54.660 in isolation I think it's much easier for people to think oh well that sucks for them
00:09:01.840 that happened one time to this one person and that was too bad but like exactly like when you're
00:09:07.340 looking that closely at one tree you don't get what i'm bringing is like drone footage of the
00:09:13.380 whole forest and i have your website up and i was just it's so well designed listeners you should
00:09:20.280 go so it's infinite-women.com and so you've got like this day in history like things are happening
00:09:25.180 today that you've got sort of like pick a random woman button to just like here's somebody's
00:09:29.500 interesting story but you can also browse you can also just type the name of someone you're looking
00:09:33.200 for like it's such a good resource and how how do you get the biographies of all the people
00:09:40.020 and then how do you so I guess you're just putting them in there my question is how do you get the
00:09:45.540 biographies then once you have them you're codifying like this is the date so you know
00:09:48.960 that can link to that stuff and things like that so the widget that is the you know chain women's
00:09:55.660 history, you just plug all those in as separate entries. And so I actually have a separate
00:10:00.580 document that I keep track of because I love a spreadsheet. And it's literally just anytime I
00:10:08.400 come across a date, I pop it in there. And then when I have the time, which is never,
00:10:15.840 but I think I had at least four or five events for every day. And then I was like, okay,
00:10:20.080 that's good for now. Maybe I'll come back and do more later. But there's also a function
00:10:25.580 that I want to add called world of women. So it's not live yet, but I have another spreadsheet with
00:10:31.520 all of these places that women lived or, you know, did work or are buried that, you know, 0.99
00:10:39.320 I want to, maybe it's just going to be like a giant Google map essentially. Um, but yeah, 0.91
00:10:45.140 I just think that there's something about those little connections to history, whether it's you
00:10:51.160 were standing someplace that this person was doing something or just something about the dates like
00:10:57.820 knowing that today something happened I think that helps people connect to history I don't know if
00:11:03.960 all historians have the same experience I do but my birthday April 5th keeps coming up in so many
00:11:10.160 stories I read I was just like oh this was the day that this person got one on the train to here
00:11:13.660 this is the day that this person was arrested I'm just like April 5th it's like a cosmic magical
00:11:17.340 date. But I feel like if that's your birthday, if whatever anyone's birthday is, I think if you read
00:11:21.500 as much as I do, you'd keep coming up any date. But I'm just like April 5th, April 5th. So I feel
00:11:26.400 like, yeah, I like tracking the significance of dates and all the different things that might
00:11:31.200 have happened. Well, I can send you a list later of all the things that happened on April 5th
00:11:35.980 in women's history. Probably not all of them, but a lot of them. I was low-key hoping you would
00:11:41.740 offer that. And if you have something missing, I can fill you in. Um, but so the, like the,
00:11:49.640 the entries, so you're pulling these from like library of Congress records or where are you
00:11:53.480 getting them? Yes. So, um, some things are available for different reasons. So the library
00:12:00.720 of Congress and the national park service had a bunch. I don't know because, um, the Trump
00:12:06.380 administration has had so many diversity things taken down um but thank god for the way back
00:12:13.320 machine which is an incredible archive if anyone's not familiar you can plug in a link
00:12:17.580 and it'll show you what has been there in the past to basically take snapshots
00:12:21.680 um and i've had to use that because some of these pages have been taken down but with the u.s
00:12:28.280 government there is a law that says any work product essentially of a federal government
00:12:32.780 employee is automatically public domain. So anything that like a national park service
00:12:38.320 staff member writes for the national park service website, that's public domain. Um, and you know,
00:12:45.060 unless I've seriously misunderstood copyright law, I can share anything from, you know,
00:12:50.260 the library of Congress, the national park service, the national archives. Um, so that's great.
00:12:56.220 There's also some sites like the conversation, which is another great resource. Um, it's
00:13:01.400 essentially like mainstream journalism, but it's written by academics, but it's written for a
00:13:06.860 mainstream audience. So they'll take a current events issue and give you all of this context
00:13:12.740 that they know because they have a PhD in the topic. Um, and so I absolutely love that. And they
00:13:19.100 make their stuff freely republishable under creative commons licenses. And so a lot of them
00:13:25.080 are like, as long as you're not doing this for a commercial purpose, then you can share it.
00:13:29.900 Um, others I have explicitly asked for permission. So like the, um, national women's history museum
00:13:35.580 is fabulous. I love their bios and, you know, they gave me permission several years ago
00:13:41.380 to share theirs. So there, there are a couple, like if it's not attributed, then I wrote it,
00:13:46.460 but almost all of them, like the vast majority are from other sources because I don't want to
00:13:52.780 reinvent the wheel. I would rather spend the same amount of time importing 20 bios that someone
00:13:59.240 else has written than writing like one or two myself i was just gonna say because you've got
00:14:03.220 what did you say like 6700 yeah i'm recording this so when it comes out it's definitely going
00:14:08.580 to be more right right so you're you're finding like as you described like you're finding these
00:14:13.180 sources putting them all in one place so that people like me who are researching somebody for
00:14:19.220 their podcast like i can just kind of like well and this is something you talk about in your book
00:14:23.460 which is the wikipedia problem um we have a chapter called wikipedia's gender bias
00:14:29.640 and i having handled this so many times just when i come across the name of a woman or
00:14:36.700 somebody suggests it like my first go-to is often wikipedia just to be like is there a story here
00:14:42.020 like is there what's you know i'm always excited when there's a heading that's just like scandal
00:14:47.140 and murder trial i'm like oh this is going to be a good story because i see that subheading
00:14:51.000 but or like mysterious disappearance i'm like okay that's good but so many people are
00:14:55.880 just the smallest little thumbnail um paragraphs i mean your your resource is such a good i'm
00:15:01.980 gonna pivot i'm gonna pivot this is where i'm gonna look first now so thank you well and it's
00:15:06.460 also i think very helpful that if i come across other links so if i have a smithsonian magazine
00:15:12.340 article that i find about that person like i do always try to link to wikipedia pages and i think
00:15:17.280 it's very telling, um, how many pages I have that there is not a Wikipedia link for, because I will
00:15:23.200 always have checked if there are any other resources I can tell you about. But, um, you know,
00:15:28.700 the conversation, like I mentioned, if, even if the bio isn't from there, I might have a link
00:15:32.260 to an article that someone's written. So I do try to share other resources for more information
00:15:38.400 if I have them. Yeah. What I find helpful, I mean, you have this on your site as you're
00:15:43.980 describing but also sometimes the wikipedia has got like the shortest possible thing but at the
00:15:47.980 bottom it's like here's the resources and it's like great let me try to find the resource does
00:15:51.740 the university library have that like is it on internet archive like can i find this obscure
00:15:56.760 french language document from 1952 or not but just um and it's interesting because i do find
00:16:05.240 there's i work at the public library but i also am a big library user and there's a
00:16:10.100 old-ish yet still useful multi-volume resource that i use it's called the it's like the
00:16:17.600 either the dictionary or the encyclopedia of women in world history and so my go-to is often
00:16:23.480 because these are really good essays in there they're written by scholars on a specific thing
00:16:26.880 and they have like a point of view and they give their references at the bottom but when i'm like
00:16:30.220 okay is if there's an essay there that's always my first stop but then i'm like oh they're not in
00:16:34.880 there okay so it's like are they with a video huh they're not i'm like oh but it's a cool story i
00:16:39.160 need to find it. So just having them all in one place, like what you're doing is so useful for
00:16:44.740 people and everybody should know about it. So that's why I wanted to make sure that everybody
00:16:48.080 understands that before we even talk about your book. But you were saying how looking at all these
00:16:53.900 stories as you're putting together this website, but also for your podcast, you're noticing these
00:16:57.960 themes. And so could you describe how the book actually describe how you decided to arrange the
00:17:03.920 book by the themes that it's arranged by? Sure. So my first step was I started just making notes.
00:17:11.940 So every time I would kind of come across one of these stories, make a note, make a note,
00:17:15.540 make a note. And when you have like 600 notes, you should probably write a book.
00:17:18.940 But yeah, so I first was actually looking at a much broader topic, just generally about like
00:17:23.640 women's work. I hadn't really focused in on what I was going to do yet. And that huge topic was
00:17:30.700 just going to be way too much for one book. And so I was like, okay, what can I pull out of that?
00:17:37.220 And so rather than looking at things that were like interfering with women doing the work,
00:17:41.500 I was like, okay, let's focus on women have done the work, but for whatever reason,
00:17:47.680 they're not getting the credit they deserve. And so broadly speaking, there are several categories.
00:17:55.720 So we start with documentation and gatekeeping. And I describe documentation as like a multi-tiered
00:18:01.880 sieve where each level we are losing women's stories until all you're left with is that
00:18:08.120 little trickle. And so the holes, if you will, are often around privilege, right? So who is 0.90
00:18:15.900 literate? Who considers themselves worth talking about? Who does someone else consider worth
00:18:20.940 talking about? Whether that's a journalist or maybe somebody who would be mentioned in other
00:18:25.080 people's letters? And then who has the time and energy and money to buy the supplies, right?
00:18:31.900 Who has the privilege to document their life? And then even if that documentation existed at some
00:18:39.280 point, what is considered worth saving and who makes those decisions, right? Is it a relative
00:18:45.120 who decides to just check your stuff in the trash? There's so many examples of diaries where somebody
00:18:52.200 dies and then their family just burns the diaries. I'm so mad every time I come across her. I'm just
00:18:55.960 like, oh, I would have loved to read the diaries. But yeah, I think people are just like, this isn't
00:19:00.000 worthwhile. Well, the diary of Anne Lister is actually a great example. So she died in, I want
00:19:08.540 to say around 1840. But around 50 years later, her, I'm going to say a great nephew, that's probably
00:19:15.360 an imprecise description of their relationship, but let's call him a great nephew. He and his
00:19:20.840 buddy around 1890 discover these diaries that have been hidden in the walls of the family home
00:19:27.760 and it's in code but there's um like a key and they're able to decode it and they read all of
00:19:33.400 this stuff about how she's running around seducing all of her neighbor's wives and stuff and the
00:19:40.180 buddy according to his own account is like yeah i told him to burn them but he didn't and i believe 0.57
00:19:46.640 there's a theory that the great nephew himself was also a queer man and so that may have had 0.55
00:19:51.600 something to do with it but so they hide it back in the wall and then another 50 years goes by so
00:19:57.240 it's now like 1932 i want to say and um the great nephew has died the year before presumably other
00:20:04.180 relatives have come into the house they re-rediscover it and the buddy is still kicking
00:20:09.660 around he's like oh i know the code and and this is also when he's like i mean i told him to burn
00:20:14.640 know i told them they'd be awful for the family reputation i don't know so it hasn't been destroyed
00:20:19.660 and it does end up in an archive but nobody's writing about it right nobody wants to tie 0.92
00:20:25.020 their reputation as an academic to this 1800s lesbian lesbian sex diary in code yes
00:20:33.660 and so it's not until again another 50 years goes by so it's 1988 i want to say that an academic 0.60
00:20:41.940 actually publishes like actually makes public hey this this diary is queer as hell and it's from
00:20:51.520 you know almost 150 years ago well probably more than 150 years ago because they spanned 0.76
00:20:57.220 like so much of her life but and then it wasn't um until i want to say 2017 that we got the book
00:21:03.980 gentleman jack and then 2019 that we got the series so if you look at each of those steps
00:21:09.640 that's a pretty good encapsulation of she was incredibly privileged right uh like the fact
00:21:15.420 that she felt safe enough even in code to have all this written out that is a sign of that she
00:21:23.220 was incredible like she was wealthy she was well connected she had the privilege to do this in the
00:21:29.040 first place and then a relative chose not to destroy it and then it did make it into an archive
00:21:36.200 It's relatively safe there, but it's not being, nobody's talking about it. It's not being
00:21:41.220 indexed, looked at by academics. Obviously, this is well before digitization. And then,
00:21:47.900 okay, finally, the academics talk about it. And then eventually, eventually it comes to public
00:21:52.760 attention. I do want to just mention, we're talking about your book, but my book available
00:21:57.200 now for pre-order at rebeloftheregency.com does use Anne Lister as a source. I do quote from her
00:22:03.240 diaries because she did write twice about Caroline of Brunswick. And thank you to all those
00:22:08.460 generations of people that made me able to have two quotes in my book from her.
00:22:15.240 And so after documentation and gatekeepers, because gatekeepers are the ones making these
00:22:20.040 decisions at every step, right? Then you have credit outright being stolen and contributions
00:22:27.000 being ignored so these are two i wanted to take those apart because um credit being outright stolen
00:22:34.660 is really overt but there's also a lot of like more subtle but still incredibly harmful things
00:22:39.680 so treating a woman as though she's just the assistant to particularly her husband so they
00:22:46.740 actually did this to marie curie and so people might say like oh why is like the only woman 0.70
00:22:52.680 scientists that a lot of people can probably name at least westerners um why would she be in your 0.90
00:22:58.100 book um you know she's the first woman to win a nobel because she almost wasn't the 1903 nobel
00:23:03.180 committee was only going to recognize pierre her husband and another prominent male uh scientist
00:23:11.440 uh heard about this and he goes to pierre and he warns him and pierre and a third prominent male
00:23:18.560 scientist, they go to the Nobel committee and they fight for her. They say like, no, you have
00:23:22.980 to give this to her as well. She is at least as deserving as Pierre. And so the Nobel committee
00:23:29.660 gives in, but it took three prominent men fighting for her, like caring enough to go to bat for her.
00:23:38.440 And so I love that example because it's, it is one of several male ally stories in the book.
00:23:44.660 because I did want to shout out the good men. I told my husband, I want to write a book about
00:23:50.640 the good men. And he said, so a pamphlet. I would agree. Yeah. Yeah. But they are definitely
00:23:58.760 the minority, but I do want to give credit where credit is due. And also point out that,
00:24:07.440 you know, a lot of times there is only so much women have the power to do. It's one reason that 1.00
00:24:14.420 I get really annoyed at books that basically tell you how you're letting yourself down and how you could, you know, succeed in the workplace if only you do these things.
00:24:24.760 And it really puts the responsibility. 0.97
00:24:26.760 Like, it's framed as empowerment, but when it comes down to it, there's only so much power that women have in a lot of these situations.
00:24:34.700 And so, like, if Marie had gone by herself and, you know, tried to fight for herself, I highly doubt she would have been successful through no fault of her own.
00:24:44.420 The simple fact is that male allyship is incredibly important in a lot of these stories.
00:24:50.540 Like even if it's not the key, you know, pivot point that we wouldn't have this story if it wasn't for these men, it's still important.
00:24:59.740 And I think that I need to understand that as well.
00:25:02.920 I think what's also really what I keep coming across in my research, but also this is in
00:25:08.940 your book too, is the concept of, and this is where I think like a book like this is
00:25:13.020 so valuable, is that women often won't think that something is even an option for them
00:25:19.720 because you don't know that a woman did this before.
00:25:21.720 And the reason you don't know a woman did this before is because of what you were saying.
00:25:24.120 It's like there wasn't a record kept of it or nobody explained that like, oh, actually
00:25:27.580 she did all the work, but the man's name was published in it.
00:25:30.720 So I think it's just so important to where we do know about women who did stuff to kind of elevate those and raise those so people can see like, oh, I'm not the first one to do this.
00:25:39.020 Like, there's somebody who could be my role model.
00:25:40.860 Like, there's somebody who did this 100 years ago or five years ago or something.
00:25:45.340 And I think that sort of record is so valuable.
00:25:49.240 When we say representation matters, it's not just, you know, a catchphrase like you can't be what you can't see.
00:25:54.960 And it's important to understand that women have been written out of these things.
00:26:00.120 like women in hollywood women in computer science they were there from the very beginning like 1.00
00:26:05.680 computer science the first programmer before computers even existed was ada loveless the 0.99
00:26:11.180 people who made the first computer work the eniac programmers were women you know women literally
00:26:17.980 founded this discipline and the fact that we now see a minority of women in this field is man-made
00:26:29.360 quite literally yeah and that's interesting too that like computers is such a good
00:26:35.120 example of this it's just kind of like it was considered well i'm just thinking about like
00:26:39.640 the movie hidden figures like a computer was a person um and it was sort of considered it wasn't
00:26:45.440 necessarily a gendered thing until it became a gendered thing like where i work at the public 0.94
00:26:50.340 library here in saskatoon i've heard tell there was a woman who retired shortly after i started 1.00
00:26:55.260 working, but one of her first jobs was working in the computer room, like where it was a room 0.62
00:27:00.140 full of these machines. And she was, who was hired to do it because it was like, yeah,
00:27:03.420 let's get this young woman to do it because it was sort of equated to being equivalent to other 1.00
00:27:07.880 female coded jobs, like secretarial work or something. And now the IT department is entirely 0.99
00:27:14.480 men because that's who tends to enter and be successful at that career.
00:27:20.400 Well, and there's also a really interesting pattern that I've noticed. I don't think I
00:27:24.360 mention in the book but one of the things that you find is that women often get put into tedious
00:27:33.420 roles and so things like the the harvard college observatory astronomers who were women i mean
00:27:42.580 there were men doing other jobs but the women actually analyzing the photographs a lot of
00:27:50.460 times it's because this is boring it is minutiae it is detail oriented and there's this argument 0.98
00:27:58.180 that like oh women are just better at tedious work which is incredibly insulting but also 0.99
00:28:06.500 anyone who does science knows that a lot of times the tedious work is where the discoveries happen 1.00
00:28:13.620 so someone like Henrietta Swan-Levitt who's in the book they are making those discoveries
00:28:19.380 because they're doing the tedious work like you could you can make the same argument about
00:28:23.740 this book in fact because i i love my website i'm very proud of it but it is very tedious it
00:28:30.940 is very repetitive adding all of these biographies to this site it's very time consuming and um
00:28:38.620 it's also why i saw these patterns it's why i have this book written is because wait here it's
00:28:47.420 it's why I wrote this book. It, because I was able to see those patterns from doing the tedious
00:28:53.060 parts. And so it's actually really funny that this sexism is what is leading to these discoveries.
00:29:01.800 You also talk in your book about something that has come up a few times, actually pretty recently
00:29:05.940 on my podcast. And it makes me so angry, which is when somebody's grave has their husband's name,
00:29:12.860 mrs husband's name mrs nameless yeah yeah yeah it's it just makes me when someone is remembered
00:29:20.840 as not who they were but it's like here lies mrs husband's name mother of son's name and it's just
00:29:28.620 like oh so that's like that's the whole identity of this person yeah and i'm guessing not even
00:29:34.300 mother of daughter's names no no i'm sure not yeah my favorite example of mrs nameless is there
00:29:41.180 was a woman who collected, I want to say botanical samples. So these were kept in the Smithsonian
00:29:47.380 archives. And when they were entered, they were listed as Mrs. Husband's name. And at some point
00:29:56.160 when they were upgrading their digital system, any honorifics, so Mr. and Mrs. were removed.
00:30:03.200 And so suddenly Mrs. Husband's name became just husband's name. And so all of these samples
00:30:07.640 were now credited to him except he'd been dead for years it's it it's a thing that it just feels
00:30:18.340 like the final when i what you know when i finished because my podcast i always do like
00:30:22.300 life to death of a person and when there's like a what i consider like a good memorial or even
00:30:28.540 just like a gravestone i'm just like yes amazing love it but so often it's just like oh hate it
00:30:34.400 Either there's no grave or it's just like Mrs. Husband name.
00:30:37.200 And I'm just like, no, that's not, it makes me mad.
00:30:41.580 But you also talk in your book about male pseudonyms.
00:30:44.920 Can you talk about that?
00:30:47.340 Sure.
00:30:47.760 So one of the interesting things is I do connect that again to how things are still happening
00:30:53.920 this, like in recent years.
00:30:57.500 And so there are stories about, obviously like the standard ones.
00:31:02.980 So like Andre Norton was actually Mary Alice Norton and to get published in a sci-fi space,
00:31:09.180 she's going by a male pseudonym, but that also reinforces the reason that she needed the pseudonym,
00:31:15.420 right? Like she is reinforcing that perception of sci-fi is a male space. And I don't mean to
00:31:20.840 criticize her for that because so often it's just, we're doing what we need to do to get our work
00:31:26.760 out there um but you can see how like it's self-perpetuating patterns and more recently
00:31:33.200 there was you know a story where an author was talking about she sent out her query to however
00:31:40.100 many agents let's say 20 agents right um under her name and then she got basically no response
00:31:47.100 so she sent it out um to the same number of agents under a male name and i think she phrases it as
00:31:54.260 like, he was 60% more competent at writing the same book as I was, you know, just changing the
00:32:02.780 name. Or there was a, I want to say she was a PhD student at Vanderbilt who was significantly
00:32:12.320 more successful. So she did one round of grant applications under her name and again, got
00:32:18.240 basically no support and then she convinced the university in their system to change it to
00:32:24.480 just her initials and she was much more successful but then the system like reset itself or something
00:32:32.100 and suddenly without her knowledge it was her full name again and again miraculously she was
00:32:38.400 unsuccessful again and so she phrases it as like you know this limit this experiment has a limited
00:32:43.500 sample size, but it's not one that I care to repeat. Well, and then now we're seeing stuff
00:32:49.820 like with AI and hiring practices and stuff like the systems look at, well, here's historically
00:32:56.720 who are the successful candidates and it's duplicating that. And again, it's looking at
00:32:59.720 things like, well, not just gendered names, but also is it like, is it a name that reflects that
00:33:05.980 they're maybe from a different background that they're probably not a white person.
00:33:08.760 and then so it's like the way that people's like sometimes they are aware of this bias they have
00:33:16.300 and sometimes you're not aware of the bias that you have and then the these systems are just kind
00:33:21.100 of adopting that being like well this is what people do so we'll do this too and so like that's
00:33:24.700 a problem that i see really not much different now than it has been in terms of just female names and
00:33:32.220 how pseudonyms are more effective like even in workplaces where there's things like people are
00:33:38.040 answering an email and it just depends like which name do you sign off with can affect how the
00:33:43.500 person who's responding to the email even if you have a group organizational email like whatever
00:33:48.080 name you say and then if it's a name where it's kind of like is this a man or a woman's name like
00:33:52.000 erin then it's interesting to see how how people respond am i interesting i mean like depressing
00:33:58.720 and just like kill me yeah and i did write this two years ago so um ai was not even as much of
00:34:07.800 an issue then as it is now, but the issues are still happening, right? It's still the same
00:34:14.620 issues. And so fundamentally, I would say it comes down to trash in trash out is a term you'll hear
00:34:21.860 in data science. And it's basically, if you're not using a, an accurate or a good, whatever that
00:34:29.560 means data set, then your data, your results are going to be messed up. And in AI, that means that
00:34:36.180 because it's learning on existing data so a company like amazon it can upload you know all
00:34:43.180 of these resumes of people who did get hired but if the people who got hired were what i call
00:34:49.780 chomps so cisgender heterosexual abled white men that is what the system is learning amazon wants
00:34:57.460 because if we're being honest it is right like if you were being honest about your biases that's who
00:35:02.160 you've been hiring. Um, and it replicates those biases, but it gives people this veneer of lack
00:35:11.400 of accountability, right? Cause they can blame the AI. There's not a human person actively making
00:35:16.920 that decision. And so you hear stories about, you know, it downgraded resumes that mentioned the
00:35:23.420 woman so like you know women's rowing team right or um women only universities because it'll look
00:35:33.440 at its data set and say oh we don't hire people from that from that college it's just yeah the
00:35:39.600 and this is where i cut like your book goes through all different time periods you're talking
00:35:43.720 about more recent people you're talking about like people from ancient times and that's where
00:35:47.220 you were saying like you're you've got this overhead view you're just like oh this is the
00:35:50.040 same theme like this happened in 1820 and this happened to someone very similarly in 1640 and
00:35:56.300 also in 1992 like you're you're really so arranging it by themes rather than by chronological order
00:36:03.800 this is where i would say this is a book i think you say this in your introduction
00:36:08.380 probably most people are not going to sit down and read it front to back that's like too much
00:36:14.260 facts i think it's like a nice i think it would be a good book to have like on your bed stand
00:36:18.600 just oh let's just read like a bit and think about it like that i wouldn't read it before bed you
00:36:24.600 will not sleep well you'll be mad you're right put it in your bathroom um although you might 0.99
00:36:30.540 end up lingering in your bathroom i don't know maybe you want to well it is gonna shit you so 0.98
00:36:35.180 that works but i do think it's a book like there's so much information in each chapter that in order 0.77
00:36:42.300 to really absorb it all you need to kind of like put it down come back to it but then you say in
00:36:47.680 introduction I think that your your dream is that somebody will read this and be interested and then
00:36:52.500 like pursue to read more about one of these people which I think that's what it's really good for as
00:36:56.280 well like it's sort of introducing so many people in context that if someone has it finds a special
00:37:01.260 interest in one of these people you know put the book down put in your bookmark and then just go
00:37:06.160 find a biography of that person yeah I think I phrase it as like feel free to stop reading this
00:37:12.160 but please come back yeah
00:37:17.680 So when you were first putting this book together, whichever title it was under at that time, how, like, there's so many people in this book. How did you decide how many people it was going to be?
00:37:30.660 I just kept adding until my editor made me stop. So that was, I think, maybe eight months before publication. She said, okay, it's a static medium. You need to stop.
00:37:44.540 It's not a website, Allison.
00:37:46.160 um but since then i have kept taking notes so i've got like 10 pages just since then
00:37:54.320 i mean what less than a year later i've got 10 pages or so of notes that i could add so maybe
00:38:02.020 they'll let me do like a 10th anniversary expanded edition or something it'll be bonus chapters yes
00:38:06.600 yes well but it'll still all be the same themes like that's the thing with women's history
00:38:12.640 and in fact the the name of the project infinite women comes from the fact that i kept seeing
00:38:19.660 listicles where it's you know uh five women artists you've never heard of or it might be 0.96
00:38:25.560 a book that has you know like that one that i mentioned that's called to her credit they stole 0.99
00:38:29.620 my title how dare they um but you know that has i think two dozen and those are great as a starting 1.00
00:38:35.840 point but i think it does sort of reinforce this idea of you know you'll see the only woman in the 0.96
00:38:41.840 room stories. And I think that framing it as here's a handful, maybe it's a big handful,
00:38:50.480 but it's still just a handful creates this idea that that's all there is.
00:38:55.200 Yeah. There only ever was five women artists and here they are. I find that when I'm very 1.00
00:39:00.960 fortunate now that just from listener suggestions and other things, like I have a really long list
00:39:05.060 of people to profile on my podcast eventually. But sometimes when I was like, oh, I just wonder
00:39:09.460 are some ideas and you look up like women from history and it's like the same people every time
00:39:13.620 and it's and it's always like Joan of Arc, Queen Victoria, like Cleopatra. I'm like yeah I'm aware
00:39:19.420 thank you the internet like this is it's just regurgitating the same names and I would feel
00:39:25.420 like it's probably the same thing for here's these five women artists like all the articles would be
00:39:29.080 like it's the same five like because when you don't dig deeper those are the names that just
00:39:33.520 keep coming up so it just keeps perpetuating itself. Well it's also how we tell those stories
00:39:38.700 So you mentioned, you know, Cleopatra and this image of her as like a seductress rather than,
00:39:44.740 you know, a brilliant ruler who, you know, was incredibly well-educated, spoke all these
00:39:49.900 languages. And instead we just tell her story as a seductress because that's the version of events
00:39:57.880 that the Romans were telling and that's whose documentation survived. And there's so many
00:40:05.540 stories like that like I know when I was a kid I had one of those books about like women who ruled
00:40:10.500 that's made for you know like 10 year olds and it was a good book like I liked it and as an adult 0.98
00:40:18.460 I'm like wait Indira Gandhi was a Nepo baby and a dictator right they're not telling you the full
00:40:25.180 story because they want to focus on like oh here's you know the first woman to be prime minister of 1.00
00:40:30.940 India, and they want you to be inspired by that, but not telling you the full story. And that
00:40:36.220 really limits, like I have an episode where we talked about the diary of Anne Frank, which is
00:40:41.000 also in the book about the censorship that's happened and each layer of censorship that's
00:40:47.320 removed, the more complete picture we get of a real teenage girl, as opposed to this idealized
00:40:55.200 version that her presumably grieving father wanted put out into the world like he didn't want 0.99
00:41:02.580 the world to know that she talked about like sex and masturbation and touching breasts and she 0.99
00:41:09.420 talked about prostitution like not from personal experience but just you know this was a thing that 0.98
00:41:13.880 she was aware of he didn't want them to know that like she fought with her mom and you know
00:41:18.520 like she's a teenage girl of course she fought with her mom but the person I was talking to who
00:41:24.060 was dutch was saying that you know reading the sanitized version as a teenage girl herself like
00:41:31.280 you don't really connect with it because it doesn't it's not authentic not just it doesn't
00:41:35.720 feel authentic it isn't well that's an interesting thing too about like getting back to ann lister
00:41:41.700 and stuff like these are people who are writing a diary for themselves so eventually to publish it
00:41:47.520 it's like yeah like this was never meant for public consumption so i can understand it's like
00:41:52.900 well, let's just kind of like finagle this a bit. But then as historians, you want to read
00:41:56.940 the original diary. Like you want to get those like weird tangents and, and things like that.
00:42:02.900 Yeah. On, on our conversation on Infinite Women about Princess Charlotte,
00:42:06.880 you were telling me how amazing it is that we have all of these letters that she wrote to her bestie
00:42:11.940 that the bestie was supposed to destroy and didn't. And thank God she didn't. But we talked
00:42:18.140 about how you really get such a sense of her personality because it was something that was
00:42:22.160 meant to be private. Yeah. It's interesting. Um, how, so, you know, this gets back to what you're
00:42:30.100 saying before about your book. It's just kind of like whose diaries are deemed as important enough
00:42:34.140 to, to put in an archive or to, or to digitize or things like that. And then just in terms of
00:42:39.780 the only thing that I'm capable of talking about, Carolina Brunswick, she, when she knew she was
00:42:45.020 dying, the doctors were like, well, you're dying. So if you want to destroy your papers, you should
00:42:48.660 do that now and then she did and i'm just like i would murder 25 people to be able to read caroline
00:42:55.780 of brunswick's papers but 25 people or just 25 random strangers no i think 25 is a number i just 0.92
00:43:03.040 want i didn't want to say like i would kill i would kill 25 specific people but um whose names
00:43:09.860 i don't know specific people if we could get away with it but that's absolutely absolutely so that's
00:43:14.920 not really a sacrifice for me. But anyway, what I mean to say is just like, it devastates me the
00:43:18.800 same way that Mary Shelley lost her papers in a hotel in France or whatever. It's just like,
00:43:24.280 I would love to read these actual diaries. So it's just like the ones that we still have,
00:43:28.120 I'm grateful for. And I just mourn the ones that were destroyed or edited by family members and
00:43:35.600 you could never read what they secretly said. Yeah. And it's also the biases that the editors
00:43:40.460 have. So if I'm recalling correctly, Emily Dickinson's work, like her trunk full of poetry
00:43:47.600 that was not published during her lifetime was left in the control of, I believe there was a
00:43:52.860 fight between her brother's wife, who she also had a sapphic relationship with, and then her
00:44:00.120 brother's mistress. So they're fighting over the papers, the mistress wins. And the edits she makes
00:44:07.060 are just I would say atrocious I'm not a poetry aficionado but one of the things that she did
00:44:13.740 was make it a lot less queer because Emily was writing essentially love poetry to her sister-in-law 0.78
00:44:21.260 but we also get the work of Sappho when you see the translations and the spins that they put on
00:44:30.460 these things like deliberately changing the genders and stuff it's just so blatant but then 0.87
00:44:37.700 there's also there's so many stories when it comes to censorship but it's not just queer women right 0.52
00:44:45.160 it's my biggest bugbear on this front is actually sojourner truth and what we call the ain't i a
00:44:52.320 woman speech because truth was from new york she was born enslaved in new york there is no
00:44:59.840 indication that she spoke with this like southern slave patois right her first language was dutch
00:45:05.480 and so we have two versions and again this is how important documentation is we are so lucky
00:45:11.320 that we have the original version which i believe was published in a newspaper like the same week
00:45:17.380 she gave the speech and oh sorry for anyone who's not familiar sojourner truth was an abolitionist
00:45:23.640 and a women's rights activist. And the premise of this speech was essentially
00:45:28.700 talking about how, like you say that women are so delicate and need to be taken care of,
00:45:34.740 you know, am I not a woman? That's essentially the gist of the speech. So we have the version
00:45:41.100 that my understanding is she was friends with the editor of this newspaper. So she presumably
00:45:46.380 signed off on it. It was published the same week that she gave the speech.
00:45:50.220 then there's the Francis Dana Barker Gage version and you know any white woman with that many names
00:45:57.920 is not going to be an ally yeah I feel confident in saying that
00:46:03.700 12 years after the fact Francis Dana Barker Gage publishes her I want to say translation
00:46:12.400 and she's changed both the content of the speech like putting words in her mouth saying things
00:46:18.940 that like are not in the original version but also putting this like i said southern slave patois 0.53
00:46:25.440 and that's where we get the phrase ain't i a woman she almost certainly never said that phrase
00:46:30.820 and yet the francis dana barker gage version is the that she created for her own reasons i'm not 1.00
00:46:40.960 saying she was malicious um like she was probably doing this because to her white lady ears that is
00:46:47.800 what a formerly enslaved person sounds like and maybe she thought that this version would be more
00:46:53.540 accessible to white people who were on the fence I don't know what was in her head bless her heart
00:47:00.840 but because we have both sets you can see the changes that you make you can compare them
00:47:10.180 side by side, online, there's a website, Google it. But if we didn't have that original version,
00:47:19.180 we might have just accepted that this is actually what Sojourner Truth said, and it's so blatantly
00:47:25.040 not. And now for a quick advertising break. Leading insurers know that fragmented operations
00:47:32.120 don't cut it anymore. Policyholders expect more, and modern insurers meet those expectations with
00:47:38.120 Adyen. From effortless premium collections to instant claims payouts, Adyen's single platform
00:47:43.700 automates the entire policy lifecycle. One platform to manage how money moves, control
00:47:48.940 claims fraud, and automate operations. Adyen, fintech built for your next move.
00:47:56.060 The war is over and both sides lost. Kingdoms were reduced to cinders and armies scattered
00:48:03.860 like bones in the dust.
00:48:05.900 Now the survivors claw to what's left of a broken world,
00:48:10.100 praying the darkness chooses someone else tonight.
00:48:13.360 But in the shadow dark, the darkness always wins.
00:48:17.620 This is old school adventuring at its most cruel.
00:48:21.140 Your torch ticks down in real time.
00:48:23.440 And when that flame dies,
00:48:24.940 something else rises to finish the job.
00:48:27.060 This is a brutal rules light nightmare
00:48:29.240 with a story that emerges organically
00:48:31.940 based on the decisions that the characters make.
00:48:34.620 This is what it felt like to play RPGs in the 80s,
00:48:37.060 and man, it is so good to be back.
00:48:39.360 Join the Glass Cannon podcast as we plunge into the shadow dark
00:48:42.340 every Thursday night at 8 p.m. Eastern
00:48:44.380 on youtube.com slash the glass cannon
00:48:46.680 with the podcast version dropping the next day.
00:48:50.060 See what everybody's talking about and join us in the dark.
00:48:59.140 Ever look at someone at the top and wonder,
00:49:01.080 Do they even remember where they started?
00:49:04.040 What did it take to get there?
00:49:05.820 I do on every episode.
00:49:08.260 I'm Evelyn, and on my podcast, Reppin', the people the world thinks it knows, gets to
00:49:14.100 say who they actually are, the grit, the doubt, the moments nobody sees, and everything they
00:49:20.920 learned getting there, it's yours for the taking.
00:49:24.900 Reppin', find us wherever you listen.
00:49:27.460 Go get it now.
00:49:29.700 Goodbye, Kyle.
00:49:31.080 Did the sound of those words call to you like Pavlov's dog?
00:49:34.320 Then you might enjoy our podcast, Turtle Time.
00:49:37.020 Every week, you can join me, Riley Hamilton, and my co-host, Amy Scarlotta, as we cover
00:49:41.980 the most pressing Bravo news and dig into the new episodes to answer important questions
00:49:46.680 like, who the hell is Adrienne Maloof in this world?
00:49:49.820 Listen to Turtle Time on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
00:49:55.000 New episodes every Wednesday and Friday.
00:49:59.000 And we're back.
00:50:00.120 and that sort of thing it's so like again it comes up the themes that are in your book I was
00:50:05.520 just like it's just like things that I've sort of half aware noticing just in the various stories
00:50:12.060 that I'm reading and so much of it um just to go back to the what we know about Cleopatra is
00:50:19.220 because that's what the Romans wrote about it like every time I kind of come across a story
00:50:23.780 that I feel like I know and then it turns out like it's either the Romans and everyone just
00:50:27.980 kind of believed that for like up until now or sometimes it's the victorians and how they
00:50:34.480 presented something and it's like oh i'll just tell everybody this tidbit which is that when
00:50:39.920 queen victoria became queen england was not super into monarchy at the time because it'd been a
00:50:46.620 series of messy kings in carolina brunswick had been around and so victoria was like i want to
00:50:52.420 just like make everything be like everyone should respect the monarchy i'm going to be such a like
00:50:57.020 trad wife queen but people were like do we want to have like a woman queen like this is kind of
00:51:02.460 like a woman in charge and she's like well there was one woman in charge who did pretty well and
00:51:05.860 that was elizabeth the first so she brought in this era of like memorializing the tutors and
00:51:10.840 making them such a big deal which they weren't until that point and you see that still today
00:51:16.860 like six the musical or whatever or like it was just as we're recording this it was the anniversary
00:51:21.960 of anne boleyn's execution and i saw a picture of how many people brought bouquets to her like
00:51:25.860 The Tudors are so well-known above and beyond almost anything else from English history.
00:51:32.300 And it's because I'm, and I was like, well, I guess they just always were more popular.
00:51:35.920 It's like, no, it's because Victoria was like, here's a successful queen.
00:51:39.780 Wasn't she great?
00:51:41.320 She was so great.
00:51:42.420 And I will also be great.
00:51:43.740 And that's kind of where that came from.
00:51:45.600 And the other time period where I see a lot of the things that a lot of people,
00:51:50.820 common perceptions of historical figures come from is America in the 1950s.
00:51:55.860 like glamorizing specific things from the past and pretending like America in the 1950s was a
00:52:01.180 specific time. It was like post-World War II, like the economy is doing pretty good,
00:52:07.040 like suburbs are being invented. And this is a time where it's like, they wanted to connect
00:52:12.460 themselves back to the Victorian age and be like traditional family structure. Like that's, it's
00:52:16.240 like, but the Victorians weren't even like that. So it's just like people from time periods,
00:52:20.960 reimagining other time periods. And now we're in 2025 and people believe that misinterpretation.
00:52:27.340 And so when I peel back those layers to be like, oh, like it was just explained to me,
00:52:31.980 listeners will hear this in a bit. I have an episode coming out. I think it's coming out.
00:52:36.760 No, it's for sure coming out after this, where we're talking a bit about like the American
00:52:40.200 Revolution era and the founding fathers. And I learned in that episode that the whole premise
00:52:46.340 of like the founding fathers of America are like, you know, George Washington, et cetera.
00:52:49.960 they're these infallible perfect saintly like brought directly from god everything they said
00:52:57.180 was like so incredible like ww founding fathers do and it's like that was kind of popularized in
00:53:03.300 the 1950s also it's not like that was not the perception of the founding fathers from 1776
00:53:08.660 through till now it's like no in the 50s because there was this like american nationalist movement
00:53:13.620 and like that all connects so i'm like man and people now are like let's make it like it was
00:53:17.980 in the past, it's like, that's literally one decade. Like you just want to bring back this
00:53:21.900 one decade where there's some really good propaganda and the baby boomers all went to school. 0.89
00:53:26.880 And that's where so much of this stuff was perpetuated. And then people get,
00:53:30.600 so this is my bugaboo, I guess. And then people get mad where you're like, why are you making
00:53:34.500 history woke? Or like, why are you saying that the founding fathers were like perfect people?
00:53:38.800 It's like, because people never thought that until this one 10 year period, like we're actually
00:53:43.240 correcting the record. We're not changing it. And I feel like that's what your book is doing too.
00:53:47.980 like you're going back and correcting what people might have thought about these women or about
00:53:53.060 these situations rather than, I don't know if that helps people not get their backup about it as much
00:53:58.360 where it's like, no, I'm not changing. Like we're restoring what actually was true in the first
00:54:02.800 place. So one of the projects that I want to do is about how discomfort is basically the root of
00:54:10.880 most of our problems as human and our refusal to deal with things that make us uncomfortable and
00:54:18.580 our refusal to examine our own discomfort but i think how that applies here is people want to
00:54:24.880 believe they know history they want to believe that their knowledge is reliable and a lot of
00:54:34.320 times you know they may have founded part of their identity on this so the fact that
00:54:38.600 you know if you're a white guy and pretty much all the history you've been taught is
00:54:43.340 white guys did everything and sometimes women or people of color were there
00:54:48.880 then that really strongly reinforces your sense of like white male entitlement and so anyone who
00:54:57.260 comes along and challenges that not just in the sense of if this thing that you believe is true
00:55:04.740 is wrong then what else do you think you know may be wrong that's a very uncomfortable feeling 0.97
00:55:12.140 if you were in the chom the chominent party that is very uncomfortable and we don't like having
00:55:22.700 our beliefs challenged and obviously like that applies to religion and everything but i think 0.94
00:55:28.360 also applies to our worldview more broadly and our understanding of history, particularly some
00:55:35.500 that we were told as children, right? So you've carried this with you. Like I said, maybe it
00:55:39.980 helped shape your identity and your perception of yourself and the world around you. That's part of
00:55:45.940 your worldview. And some people react very negatively when you tell them something that
00:55:52.840 changes that and if you are a woman or a person of color seeing that representation is very
00:55:59.640 empowering but there is a a certain type of charm who feels disempowered it's the if you think there
00:56:07.940 should only be men in the room even one woman seems like too many there's a study that I cite
00:56:14.100 in the book from Dale Spender here in Australia and it's in the section about you talk too much 0.98
00:56:19.960 and she did an analysis of university classroom conversations where she would record the
00:56:28.220 conversation and then basically ask everyone who do you think talked more the boys or the girls
00:56:34.200 and the men felt that the women were speaking an equal amount of time at I believe it was 15
00:56:44.640 percent. So a 15 to 85 percent ratio was what they perceived as balanced. They perceived the
00:56:52.500 women as dominating the conversation at 30 to 70. So the women were still speaking less than 0.99
00:56:59.460 a third of the time. But again, if your perception of, you know, balanced is basically no women or
00:57:08.720 very little women, which sounds like I'm talking about people of short stature, but
00:57:13.700 um, or very few women, then equality feels like an attack. It feels like you were being disempowered.
00:57:24.400 Well, and that's what you see too, like these lately with things like the main characters in
00:57:28.900 a Star Wars or a Marvel film or something where they're just like, where's all the men? It's like,
00:57:32.300 okay, if you look at the, like, if you look at the cast announcement that they just came out of
00:57:36.340 like, whatever, this new like Avengers, 1000 people are in it movie, that thing they did
00:57:40.740 with the chairs. I forget what the proportions are, but it's like, okay, they announced there's
00:57:45.360 like this new Avengers movie coming and there was a five hour live stream. And every like 20 minutes
00:57:50.100 slowly over this five hours, they would pan over and show one more director's chair with the name
00:57:54.100 of an actor on it. And people were apparently just watching this for all five hours. And slowly
00:57:59.240 they were revealing who the cast is going to be of this new Avengers movie. And it's something like
00:58:03.140 35 or 40 people. And I'm going to extrapolate, I'm going to make up a number, but I'm not going
00:58:08.940 to be very far off it's something like six women are in this movie and the rest are men and but 0.89
00:58:15.680 that is a sort of number that to some people would and the women who ran it are i think mostly white
00:58:20.240 but it's that sort of number where people like how dare you have one movie with a woman main
00:58:24.780 character it's like if you look at a list of every movie that came out of hollywood in the last
00:58:28.880 month it's like yes there was one movie with a woman main character and there's also 750 movies
00:58:35.020 with a male main character it's like when you start yeah i'm just gonna say um the gina davis
00:58:41.880 institute is absolutely phenomenal i cite them multiple times but they actually do studies about
00:58:49.160 you know the top grossing films of a given year and sort of diversity breakdowns um they'll give
00:58:55.840 you breakdowns of how much women talk in like children's movies and so you can see stories 0.82
00:59:03.560 where like particularly egregious are ones like you know the little mermaid or sleeping beauty
00:59:09.220 where the main character is like asleep or mute for basically the whole film but even modern day
00:59:17.180 films you can see these breakdowns that actually give you those numbers for how few women and
00:59:24.380 people of color and other diverse metrics how little diversity we have in films and there was
00:59:31.800 one where, um, I think I mentioned the fit, you know, the 15% is seen as equal in the classroom
00:59:38.960 discussion conversation. There was a study that they put out where they found that only I think
00:59:45.660 17% of people in crowd scenes, um, including workplace crowds, only 17% were women. And
00:59:55.420 there's a quote from gina davis about basically are we training people because obviously movies
01:00:02.740 and film movies and television shape how we perceive the world are we training people
01:00:10.380 to think that 17 percent women is the norm i was i just want to clarify some fact checking for
01:00:19.320 myself the new upcoming film and avengers doomsday in that five-hour live stream so they announced
01:00:24.420 26 actors, five of whom are women, three of whom are white.
01:00:29.020 So, but that also reminds me of, and I think this is, it's, it's interesting how the themes
01:00:34.120 of this podcast that have emerged, like last week's episode, this week's episode, next
01:00:37.560 week's episode, we're talking about some similar themes, but I'll say it again in case someone
01:00:40.980 didn't hear last week, which is again, going back to my thing about the 1950s is a lot,
01:00:45.940 or let's just say like Hollywood films of the 1940s, 50s, 60s, there was a lot of historical
01:00:52.040 movies made especially about the american west or like there's the you know cleopatra movie with
01:00:57.760 elizabeth taylor there's a lot of historic or movies about like victorian england and those
01:01:02.740 movies have almost exclusively only white actors in them and then a lot of people watch those and
01:01:09.640 that shaped their perception of what the wild west was like or what victorian london was like or what
01:01:13.780 ancient egypt was like so then when a new project comes in and they have like one black actor it's 0.74
01:01:19.900 like oh my god they're going woke like why are they changing this you're ruining history it's 0.87
01:01:22.960 like no like the movies had white people in them because they're produced in hollywood during a
01:01:26.640 time not that it's that much better now but of like extreme like racism in terms of like who
01:01:33.660 could be in what movies it's like yeah these movies about the american west invented basically
01:01:39.780 this the mythology of the west where it's just like all these white people if indigenous people
01:01:44.520 show up at all. It's as the villains or the victims. If there's black people, it's mostly 0.56
01:01:49.940 they're in an enslaved type role. So when you try and correct that record, then people get mad,
01:01:55.080 like you were saying, like you're challenging the worldview, but it's like, no, but your worldview
01:01:58.720 is based on movies made in America in the 1950s, a very famously racist time. So it's like,
01:02:07.160 you're not looking at pictures from back then. You're looking at a movie from a hundred years
01:02:11.520 removed from those events. And it's, yeah, people just get so, they're the charm type people get
01:02:18.040 really mad about this. I just have one other example I want to tell you, because I don't
01:02:20.900 know if you've come across it, but I did a two part episode about Sally Hemings and Thomas
01:02:27.200 Jefferson. And one of the, one of the resources I was looking at mentioned when the revelations
01:02:34.720 came out about what Sally Hemings' relationship to Thomas Jefferson was, which is that she was
01:02:39.180 the mother of several of his children she was his longtime partner not really but like it's always
01:02:46.720 it's always tricky because like all of the terms we would ascribe to that don't really apply
01:02:51.220 to a situation where she had no yeah sorry i'm gonna cough again but yeah no every time i see
01:02:58.040 them i see her referred to as like his mistress or something and it's like she was quite literally 0.87
01:03:04.160 his sex slave i mean she was an enslaved person that he owned and that he raped i mean i i'm sorry 0.84
01:03:12.200 but there is no scenario that i could there is no argument i can see for saying that she had the 0.82
01:03:18.080 ability to consent there is no argument to say that this was not a coercive relationship yeah
01:03:24.040 and she and then they unearthed this like room attached to his room and it's like this is where
01:03:27.740 she slept it's like the smallest closet with room for like half a bed but so when these first like
01:03:33.760 there had been rumors about this and that Thomas Jefferson had these mixed race descendants through 0.99
01:03:39.200 Sally Hemings. And there was, that was kind of always a rumor. And then when it was basically
01:03:45.260 codified by like doing some DNA tests on some people, looking at some letters, like actually
01:03:49.240 believing these descendants, there was a lot of people who were so mad about it. And this one
01:03:53.840 woman, I just remember the quote from her where she was like, it's not just that people feel close
01:03:58.800 or connected to the history.
01:04:01.520 Like people have like parasocial relationships
01:04:03.520 to historical figures.
01:04:04.660 And she had grown up reading Thomas Jefferson's letters
01:04:07.880 and she felt so personally connected to him.
01:04:10.560 Like he was very inspiring to her in various ways.
01:04:12.920 And she's like, this can't be true
01:04:14.840 because the man I know from these letters
01:04:17.000 would never have done this.
01:04:18.600 And so she refused to believe
01:04:20.660 that he had been involved with Sally Hemings
01:04:22.900 because she's just like the man,
01:04:24.180 she felt like she knew him so well.
01:04:27.340 and it's just kind of well here's the facts here's the dna test here's the family stories
01:04:31.960 here's here's monticello changing their like adding these new exhibits like making it be like
01:04:37.920 hey here's what happened and she's just like no because the man i know would never do that
01:04:41.820 like people feel these ownership over these stories like people have the yeah just the
01:04:48.180 parasocial relationship to how a person presented themselves and if you can find inspiration in some
01:04:53.780 of what Thomas Jefferson did, I guess. I don't know. I don't care. But like, he probably did
01:04:58.920 something interesting. He kept these lists. I don't know. People like, you can find inspiration
01:05:03.900 in his life, but also see him as a person, a deeply flawed, shitty person. But you could still 0.99
01:05:09.360 be like, well, you know what? He wrote good sentences. I admire him as a writer. I don't
01:05:15.160 know but i think that's the problem is we don't allow for nuance and context and interesting i
01:05:24.840 had another conversation where we're talking about uh might have been in the context of comedy but if
01:05:30.080 you are anything other than a charm the further you get from charmness the less context you are
01:05:37.400 allowed to have the less nuance you are allowed to have because your diversity is taking up space
01:05:43.940 So when you watch a stand-up comedian, a lot of times they will address whatever it is about them that deviates them from charm-ness.
01:05:54.740 And part of that is lived experience.
01:05:56.420 And, you know, I love hearing about different experiences and stuff.
01:05:59.940 But I was actually talking with Katie G. Salisbury, who wrote a book called Not Your China Doll.
01:06:08.060 The anime Wong book.
01:06:09.000 Yes, yes.
01:06:09.620 Yes, yes.
01:06:10.000 Exactly.
01:06:10.920 She was on my podcast.
01:06:12.000 Love that book.
01:06:12.520 Love her.
01:06:13.940 And one of the things that we were talking about, it made me think when you were talking about racist Hollywood, and you didn't even mention all the yellow face and the black face, and how the Hays Code wouldn't allow interracial marriage.
01:06:28.620 I did say, I carefully worded it, I was like, it was mostly white actors, which is not to say it was all white characters. 0.79
01:06:35.640 here's the thing we could talk for 25 more hours as I murder a person each hour but people need to
01:06:44.980 people need to read the book a bit far from uncredited we have we have but it's all good
01:06:52.760 um and this is the thing like you have your book is available as a book you also have an
01:06:57.600 audiobook that you read yourself what is it 18 hours long 18 and a half 18 and a half hours long
01:07:03.420 and your poor voice congratulations on accomplishing that i wanted to ask you one
01:07:07.980 more question about your book which is it ends with a playlist tell me about how you chose those
01:07:14.200 songs it's just songs that i like that make me feel it that they give me the girl power 0.96
01:07:23.600 vibes and you know they sort of we're not going to take this shit anymore
01:07:27.800 yeah i i hope that um it helps other people get through what is admittedly 0.98
01:07:33.820 often not a fun book the the midwesterner in me anytime someone says oh i just got your book
01:07:41.000 wants to reply with oh i hope you enjoy it but the person who wrote the book in me is like oh
01:07:47.920 no no no no that's not the vibe yeah it's more often like oh i hope it makes you mad my favorite
01:07:53.460 review so far is my mom who is a 68 year old white midwestern lady and she said you know
01:08:01.600 this really pissed me off and that that is not her but um the other way to look at it um is that
01:08:13.940 it is honestly the most empowering thing i think i've ever experienced to really appreciate because
01:08:22.580 I think we do all internalize that message of like, oh, if women are as good as men,
01:08:26.880 how come I haven't heard of more women? Like the implication being, well, obviously they're not 0.84
01:08:30.820 because I haven't heard of them. And I do think that we internalize that because that's what
01:08:36.660 we're shown constantly is this absence and really seeing. So like I mentioned that drone footage of
01:08:44.920 the forest, right? Not just one or two women's stories, but here's over 600 stories. Here's how
01:08:50.300 What didn't happen today, so don't let anybody tell you this is all in the past, is actually really empowering to see how hard the patriarchy and the people who uphold it, they have to work to keep us out because they know if we get in, we will outperform them.
01:09:10.260 if we get into the schools if we get the job if we get the promotion that we've earned
01:09:15.300 we will often outperform the men and they can't have that and so they try to convince us 0.99
01:09:24.340 because if you can convince a woman that she's not capable she'll do the job for you right she 0.97
01:09:32.180 will do the work of keeping herself down. And that is what our whole society tells us over and over
01:09:40.880 and over again, implicitly or explicitly. And I really hope that people who read my book, both
01:09:48.660 men, women, non-binary, other, whatever your gender, I hope that people who read my book
01:09:57.340 will realize how much they have been lied to about women's potential and women's abilities
01:10:04.560 and that hopefully that will help unravel some of their biases because there are stories in the book
01:10:10.900 about not just the male allies but male bosses in contemporary settings who wants things like
01:10:18.160 heap eating where a woman says something and it's ignored and then a guy basically says the exact
01:10:23.860 same thing. And it's like, Oh, you're brilliant. Once you point this out to, to a male boss,
01:10:31.020 some of them are massages, obviously like they, you know, they'll just keep, they won't believe
01:10:35.540 you or they'll just keep letting it happen. But there are multiple stories in the book about
01:10:39.900 once things like, you know, men interrupting women all the time, once that their eyes are
01:10:45.900 open to that because they are blinded by their privilege, right? If it doesn't affect them,
01:10:50.780 they're probably not going to notice it i was actually just in the san francisco airport and
01:10:55.860 they've got um an aviation museum there and there was a display with i think it was virgin america
01:11:01.840 paraphernalia and one of them was a flight attendant i believe uniform like the actual
01:11:08.900 uniform from like 2012 and it included knee-high stiletto boots and i mentioned this to like a male
01:11:16.680 employee there he had not noticed like it had not occurred to him that not only is this for people
01:11:24.360 who are on their feet for hours at a time it's also probably a safety code violation if we're
01:11:30.540 being honest but it genuinely just hadn't occurred to him until i pointed out that forcing a flight 0.99
01:11:36.980 attendant to wear stiletto boots in 20 freaking 12 was stupid on many levels well and especially 0.98
01:11:46.120 the like just my recent understanding of flight attendants as first responders after there was 0.99
01:11:52.380 that thing where the airplane landed upside down and then i just threw that i learned 0.97
01:11:56.000 their first is your safety yeah so like why the fuck are we putting them in these shoes 0.93
01:12:01.420 when it's like well she would have saved your life or she would have helped the people 0.94
01:12:05.640 evacuate the airplane but unfortunately she tripped and fell because she's wearing these 0.96
01:12:08.820 fucking stiletto boots yeah and so i i do genuinely hope that you know people who don't 0.94
01:12:14.800 identify as women will also read this book. And if they have experienced male privilege, 0.97
01:12:20.880 that hopefully it will change their biases and hopefully it will open their eyes
01:12:25.260 so that they can be better allies. Because I do love the good men. I'm married to one. My
01:12:31.640 dedication in the book is for Jared. He knows what he did. And it's an in-joke with me and
01:12:40.640 my husband, Jared, because what he did was, you know, support me and listen to me rant about this
01:12:46.060 and feed me and read the book multiple times. So I do want to shout out the men who help women
01:12:56.520 get the credit they deserve, but also do the work in the first place, because
01:13:01.020 the last section of the book is about the cost of disregarding women.
01:13:04.480 and one of the people i talk about is um an fda employee uh francis oldham kelsey who
01:13:14.120 while european countries were okaying a drug called thalidomide for use in morning sickness
01:13:20.600 so for pregnant women all these countries were approving it and she said hang on there was this
01:13:26.820 one study that found that like birth defects may be connected to this and i want more research done
01:13:31.640 and she talks about how her bosses backed her up and not too long after she was credited with
01:13:40.880 preventing tens of thousands of birth defects in children because yeah it turned out that she was
01:13:48.980 exactly right to be concerned about that and all of these kids in countries where it had been
01:13:54.480 approved were being born with these birth defects. And so you can see how having supportive bosses
01:14:01.960 trust her saved a lot of kids from being born with those conditions. And there are lots of stories
01:14:12.180 where the men didn't listen to the women. The men in power chose to disregard women and people died
01:14:19.120 or, you know, say investment companies lost a bunch of money because they didn't trust a woman 0.96
01:14:24.580 entrepreneur. And it really drives home that it's not just about the women themselves. And it's not 0.80
01:14:33.180 just about the girls who are not seeing themselves represented. People die when you don't listen to
01:14:39.300 women. Thank you so much for talking with me about your book and also about your website.
01:14:47.300 I wanted to, well, first of all, everybody like go get the book, like order this book from your
01:14:52.040 local bookstore or all the places you can get it. Force your library to order a copy of it.
01:14:56.780 The ebook and the audio book are also available. And also I just wanted to let everybody know,
01:15:01.300 like your website is so great. Infinite-women.com. So you can go in there, look up your faves.
01:15:07.520 6,700 people there and growing. But if there's someone who's not there,
01:15:11.300 you have a form right at the bottom of the website where you can suggest somebody.
01:15:14.140 I will say the total list, because I love a spreadsheet, as previously mentioned,
01:15:20.060 the total list is something like 225,000 people. So I am working on it, but I'm always happy to
01:15:29.960 add to that list because I have issues with boundaries, apparently, when it comes to
01:15:36.340 these projects. I was complaining to my husband and he's like, you literally called it infinite
01:15:41.420 women we have a very uh you did this to yourself policy in in our house like when he's you know
01:15:52.400 really sore because he just did an ultra marathon like you did this to yourself
01:15:57.180 nobody made you no exterior force yeah you chose this path you knew what was going to happen and
01:16:05.340 now you are paying the consequences sometimes I tell him like look I am just trying to check
01:16:10.460 yourself before you wreck yourself. And I am failing. I wanted to mention too, just I'm looking
01:16:16.720 at the cover of your book. So I don't know how much input you had on the cover design, but I
01:16:21.460 love it. It's called uncredited women's overlooked, misattributed and stolen work. And then it says
01:16:25.740 Alison Tyra in the hugest font where you're just like, I will be credited as the author of this
01:16:31.720 book. And I respect that. Thank you. I did not have any input on the, well, I'm sure I could
01:16:38.320 have if i'd asked but um no the cover illustration is by a designer named nat mac who is brilliant
01:16:44.440 and is currently at work um on the cover design for the view from the hill which is my next book
01:16:52.900 comes out in 2026 it'll be on pre-sale um i would guess november i should probably know that
01:17:00.840 but um yeah it celebrates women uh who made their mark after 40. I love that I love that as a concept
01:17:08.560 and I love knowing I'm gonna invite you back on to talk about that because that's what shouldn't 1.00
01:17:13.140 like we'll talk about that later I'm sure but just like because for a lot of women it's like 1.00
01:17:18.980 marriage and raising children you're not able to pursue these passions and your goals until 1.00
01:17:24.520 you're after 40 because a lot of women are raising children up to that point. That's one of the 1.00
01:17:30.500 reasons. Another factor I found was, um, some women are just working away for decades and they 1.00
01:17:37.000 just don't get recognized. They don't get credited and acknowledged and widely known until they're 0.87
01:17:43.240 older. So, you know, you might have someone like Tina Turner who did have a career as a singer,
01:17:50.140 but she was very much under the control of her husband, Ike. And it was very much Ike and Tina.
01:17:55.240 and it wasn't until um later in her life that she got away from him and she came into her own
01:18:02.660 or it might be a women artists or scientists where the rest of the world just hasn't caught 0.98
01:18:10.020 up with them yet so uh you know a scientist like patricia bath i believe had to wait for 1.00
01:18:17.320 laser technology to catch up with her ideas for what she wanted to do with laser eye surgery
01:18:21.800 and it wasn't until later in her life that that happened so i will happily come back and talk with
01:18:28.100 you for however long you want about that but it was interesting getting into like the different
01:18:34.040 reasons but that one's less analytical it's more a collection of stories but there is a bit of that
01:18:38.980 okay let's look at this whole you know youth obsession and this idea that you have to you 0.82
01:18:44.580 have to know what you want to do with your life at 18 is just dumb and also i think we put too
01:18:51.480 much pressure on young people going back to that whole question of how much control are you actually 0.56
01:18:57.320 in right like what I was saying about telling women here's what you can do to get ahead in
01:19:01.780 the workplace and sort of indicating that if you don't it's your fault but I think that we put too
01:19:07.680 much pressure on young people who feel like they have to have everything in their life sorted by
01:19:14.160 age 25 like okay I have to be married by this date I have to have kids by this date you know I have to
01:19:20.280 have bought a house by this date. And a lot of times it's just not realistic. And it's not
01:19:26.620 necessarily what's going to make you happy in the long run. I just want to say, and do you know
01:19:30.520 where those timelines and numbers come from, is America in the 1950s. Everything comes back
01:19:37.340 to America in the 1950s. It traces back the one decade where that was possible for anybody. 0.97
01:19:42.980 Like, is this going to become a conspiracy podcast where you've got the board with all
01:19:47.720 the string and like it's just the 1950s at the center and then it's all the string well and then
01:19:53.840 i think the ultimate end of that would be like me time traveling back and then like sort of like in
01:19:59.220 back to the future with the room with the string because it also takes place in the 1950s i think
01:20:03.160 that's where this is all headed but i'll let you know please stay away from your parents if you do
01:20:06.960 time travel yes that's what we learned from that trilogy absolutely thank you so much for talking
01:20:13.840 with me this is it's always a pleasure everybody should listen to first of all just listen to
01:20:18.540 infinite women the podcast subscribe like set up your automatic downloads whatever and then keep
01:20:22.980 your ears peeled because on august 4th you can hear the episode the extremely long episode that
01:20:28.280 you've edited down where i am on infinite women talking about my fave should have been queen
01:20:34.080 princess charlotte well and if you just can't wait i do already have an episode about the
01:20:39.880 Hanoverians and their rise to power. So if you want to hear about all the messy drama that came
01:20:45.440 before Princess Charlotte, brace yourself. Um, there's also a Royals playlist. So if you go on
01:20:51.880 my website under the podcast item in the menu, there's playlists and you can see all the Royal
01:20:58.880 episodes. And I also have transcripts for every episode. So feel free to check that out. If you're
01:21:05.520 more of a reader than a listener. This is fantastic. I just clicked on it and I'm like,
01:21:11.320 oh, you know what? I've done some website work. I should do this. These playlists are great.
01:21:15.620 I just feel like you're going to start doing like you should start doing like react videos. Like
01:21:20.400 you're just listening to the podcast, like hang on. BRB, I'm just going to recode my website.
01:21:27.760 Thank you so much for talking to me, Alison. And I hope that you continue having fantastic
01:21:32.700 interactions with people about this book, because I do think it's going to make people mad in a good
01:21:37.000 way. That's the plan. And so far it seems to be working. So again, Alison's book is Uncredited,
01:21:47.900 Women's Overlooked, Misattributed, and Stolen Work. And you can get more information about that 0.88
01:21:52.540 from her website, which is infinite-women.com, which is also the website where you can get all
01:21:57.100 the information about women from history, as well as playlists of her past podcast episodes. If you
01:22:02.680 have a certain type of person you'd like to hear about. And I might add that to my website too,
01:22:07.120 because I love the idea of podcast playlists. Anyway, speaking of books, I have a book that
01:22:12.060 is available now for pre-order. It's called Rebel of the Regency, The Scandalous Saga of
01:22:16.020 Carolina Brunswick, Uncrowned Queen of Britain, or maybe it's Britain's Uncrowned Queen.
01:22:22.080 We go back and forth. It's, you know, until the book is printed, it could still change.
01:22:26.960 But just look up Rebel of the Regency by Anne Foster. You can order that at your local bookstore.
01:22:31.940 if you've never pre-ordered you can just go to your local bookstore's website and look at my
01:22:36.580 book rebel of the regency by ann foster and click on like order and then the website will do it for
01:22:41.260 you you can just go in in person and be like i demand that you order this book it comes out next
01:22:45.120 february so there's plenty of time for you to do that you can also order it from any of the
01:22:49.780 major online book websites you can have more information about ordering my book at rebel
01:22:55.500 of the regency.com and there's also a link there for if you do pre-order the book you can share
01:23:01.580 a picture of the receipt with me. And then you can get some delightful treats. Like you can get
01:23:07.260 a paper doll of Carolina Brunswick designed by Siobhan Gallagher. You can get a free membership
01:23:11.920 to my Substack or a free membership to my Patreon. Anyway, rebeloftheregency.com.
01:23:17.520 Get used to me talking about it because I'm going to be promoting that every week
01:23:21.300 until next February. And what else is there to say? So yeah, I mean, if you want to keep up with
01:23:29.680 more information from me and what I'm up to, you can subscribe to my newsletter, which is like
01:23:34.440 every month I send out just kind of the highlights of what's up. Like I talk about the most recent
01:23:39.660 podcast episodes I've done. I'll give you the latest book news, information about events.
01:23:44.360 Like for instance, I'm going to be having an in-person Vulgar History meetup in July in
01:23:49.640 Toronto, Ontario, Canada. If you're going to be around that area and you want to know the
01:23:55.200 information you can rsvp at vulgarhistory.com slash meet up and otherwise i mean i i did these
01:24:04.860 new end credits that say a lot of the stuff that i used to usually say so i'm like i feel like
01:24:08.660 there's more to say but i think it's all going to be covered in the credits so until next time 0.93
01:24:12.400 keep your pants on and your tits out vulgar history is researched scripted and hosted by 0.98
01:24:18.360 ann foster that's me editor is christina lumagi theme music is by the severin duo 0.99
01:24:24.840 Transcripts of this podcast are available at vulgarhistory.com by Aveline Malek.
01:24:29.280 You can get early ad-free episodes of Vulgar History by becoming a paid member of our Patreon
01:24:33.880 for as low as $1 a month at patreon.com slash annfosterwriter.
01:24:38.940 Vulgar History merchandise is available at vulgarhistory.com slash store for Americans
01:24:43.420 and for everyone else at vulgarhistory.redbubble.com.
01:24:47.540 Follow us on social media at vulgarhistorypod
01:24:50.180 and get in touch with me via email at vulgarhistorypod at gmail.com.
01:24:56.900 Leading insurers know that fragmented operations don't cut it anymore.
01:25:01.440 Policyholders expect more, and modern insurers meet those expectations with Adyen.
01:25:06.460 From effortless premium collections to instant claims payouts,
01:25:10.080 Adyen's single platform automates the entire policy lifecycle.
01:25:13.880 One platform to manage how money moves, control claims fraud, and automate operations.
01:25:18.500 Adyen, fintech built for your next move.
01:25:48.500 on their skinny jeans in 2026.
01:25:54.920 Dentine, too bold.